scholarly journals Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme Treated with Short-Course Radiation Alone Compared to Short-Course Radiation and Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide Based on Performance Status and Extent of Resection

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2399-2408
Author(s):  
Taskia Mir ◽  
Gregory Pond ◽  
Jeffrey N. Greenspoon

(1) Background: Studies in elderly patients over the age of 65 with glioblastoma have shown survival benefits of short-course radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, making it the standard of care adopted at Juravinski Cancer Center. Our study retrospectively examines patients with GBM aged ≥ 70 at the JCC treated with short-course radiation alone compared to those treated with short-course radiation and concurrent and adjuvant TMZ, to determine if there is a difference in outcomes based on performance status. (2) Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at JCC using patients diagnosed with GBM in 2014–2017 (treated with the old protocol of short-course RT alone) versus those diagnosed in 2017–2019 (treated with the new protocol of short-course radiation and TMZ). Patient demographics, treatments, outcomes, and baseline KPS were analyzed. (3) Results: No clear benefit and more neurologic decline post treatment were seen in patients with borderline performance status and subtotal resection who underwent concurrent treatment with temozolomide and radiation. The addition of temozolomide was most helpful in patients with good performance status and a gross total resection. Variable outcomes were seen in patients with mixed traits. (4) Conclusions: This study suggests that performance status and extent of resection are significant determinants of patient response to treatment. In the case of elderly patients with borderline performance status and GTR or those with good performance status and STR, also described as “mixed traits”, it may be beneficial to pursue single modality treatment, ideally based on MGMT promoter methylation status as opposed to bimodality treatment in order to maintain the best QOL.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik P. Sulman ◽  
Nofisat Ismaila ◽  
Terri S. Armstrong ◽  
Christina Tsien ◽  
Tracy T. Batchelor ◽  
...  

Purpose The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) produced an evidence-based guideline on radiation therapy for glioblastoma. Because of its relevance to the ASCO membership, ASCO reviewed the guideline and applied a set of procedures and policies used to critically examine guidelines developed by other organizations. Methods The ASTRO guideline on radiation therapy for glioblastoma was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO endorsement panel updated the literature search and reviewed the content and recommendations. Results The ASCO endorsement panel determined that the recommendations from the ASTRO guideline, published in 2016, are clear, thorough, and based on current scientific evidence. ASCO endorsed the ASTRO guideline on radiation therapy for glioblastoma and added qualifying statements. Recommendations Partial-brain fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care after biopsy or resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in patients up to 70 years of age. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for elderly patients with fair to good performance status is appropriate. The addition of concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide to hypofractionated radiotherapy seems to be safe and efficacious without impairing quality of life for elderly patients with good performance status. Reasonable options for patients with poor performance status include hypofractionated radiotherapy alone, temozolomide alone, or best supportive care. Focal reirradiation represents an option for select patients with recurrent glioblastoma, although this is not supported by prospective randomized evidence. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/glioblastoma-radiotherapy-endorsement and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi118-vi118
Author(s):  
Diana Shi ◽  
Mary Jane Lim-Fat ◽  
Amin Nassar ◽  
Jared Woods ◽  
Gilbert Youssef ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND We evaluated sex-based differences in clinical outcomes and tumor genomics in patients with newly-diagnosed GBM. METHODS We reviewed 665 IDH-wild type GBM patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥60 treated at our institution from 2010-2019 including; 585 patients with targeted exome sequencing of 447 cancer associated genes (OncoPanel). Deleterious mutations were defined as homozygous deletions or loss of function mutations of known tumor suppressors (as reported in TCGA, ≥ 3 times in the COSMIC database, or predicted as “damaging” in SIFT and/or “probably damaging” in Polyphen 2) or known oncogenic mutations in proto-oncogenes (reported in TCGA or ≥ 3 times in COSMIC). RESULTS There were 384 (57.7%) males and 281 (42.3%) females. Median OS was 22.5 months for females and 19.3 months for males (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 1.03-1.48, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis adjusted for age, KPS ≥90, extent of resection, and MGMT methylation status, female sex (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI [0.64-0.95], p = 0.015) was associated with improved OS. Superior OS in females was observed in MGMT-unmethylated patients (HR 0.69, 95% CI [0.54-0.90], p = 0.005) but not MGMT-methylated patients. Thirteen genes were deleteriously altered in ≥5% of our cohort: CDK4 (12.1% male vs. 7.8% female), CDKN2A (46.5% vs. 45.7%), CDKN2B (41.8% vs. 43.3%), EGFR (34.7% vs. 40.0%, MTAP (18.2% vs. 18.8%), NF1 (11.5% vs. 9.4%), PTEN (28.2% vs. 29.8%), TP53 (28.2% vs. 30.2%), RB1 (5.6% vs. 6.5%), MDM4 (6.2% vs. 5.7%), ATM (5.9% vs. 3.7%), MDM2 (7.4% vs. 4.1%), PIK3R1 (6.2% vs. 4.1%). There were no differences in frequency of mutations in these individual genes between males and females (χ 2 [1, N=585] = 0.05-2.86, p = 0.09-0.86). CONCLUSIONS Female sex is associated with improved survival. We did not identify sex-based differences in deleterious genomic alterations amongst commonly altered genes in GBM.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Ohno ◽  
Yasuji Miyakita ◽  
Masamichi Takahashi ◽  
Hiroshi Igaki ◽  
Yuko Matsushita ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), who were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy comprising 45 Gy in 15 fractions combined with temozolomide (TMZ) or TMZ and bevacizumab (TMZ/Bev). Materials and methods Between October 2007 and August 2018, 30 patients with GBM aged ≥75 years were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 45 Gy in 15 fractions. Twenty patients received TMZ and 10 received TMZ/Bev as upfront chemotherapy. O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was analyzed by pyrosequencing. The cutoff value of the mean level of methylation at the 16 CpG sites was 16%. Results Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.9 months and 9.9 months, respectively. The 1-year OS and PFS rates were 64.7 and 34.7%, respectively. Median OS and PFS did not differ significantly between patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation (N = 11) and those with hypomethylation (N = 16) (17.4 vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.32; and 13.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.11, respectively). The median OS and PFS were not significantly different between TMZ (N = 20) and TMZ/Bev (N = 10) chemotherapy (median OS: TMZ 12.9 months vs. TMZ/Bev 14.6 months, p = 0.93, median PFS: TMZ 8.5 months vs TMZ/Bev 10.0 months, p = 0.64, respectively). The median time until Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score decreasing below 60 points was 7.9 months. The best radiological responses included 11 patients with a partial response (36.7%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included leukopenia in 15 patients (50%), anorexia in 4 (13.3%), and hyponatremia during concomitant chemotherapy in 3 (10%). Conclusion Our hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen combined with TMZ or TMZ/Bev showed benefits in terms of OS, PFS, and KPS maintenance with acceptable toxicities in elderly patients with GBM aged ≥75 years.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol J. Ghia ◽  
Eric L. Chang ◽  
Pamela K. Allen ◽  
Anita Mahajan ◽  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Meningeal hemangiopericytoma (M-HPC) is a rare entity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize our institutional experience in treating M-HPC. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with M-HPC evaluated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1979 and 2009. RESULTS: We identified 63 patients diagnosed between 1979 and 2009 with M-HPC treated with surgery alone or with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). The majority were male (59%) and with a median age of 40.9 years (range, 0-71). Gross total resection (GTR) predominated (n = 31, 49%) followed by subtotal resection (n = 23, 37%) and unknown status (n = 9, 14.3%). PORT was delivered to 39 of the 63 patients (62%). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival were 90%, 68%, and 28%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year local control (LC) were 70%, 37%, and 20%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year metastasis-free survival were 85%, 39%, and 7%. PORT resulted in improved LC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, P = .008). Radiotherapy (RT) dose ≥60 Gy correlated with improved LC relative to <60 Gy (HR 0.12, P = .045). GTR correlated with improved LC (HR 0.40, P = .03). On multivariate analysis, PORT (HR 0.33, P = .003), GTR (HR = 0.33, P = .008), and RT dose ≥60 Gy (HR 0.33, P = .003) correlated with improved LC. Among those with GTR, PORT resulted in improved LC (HR 0.18, P = .027). Extent of resection and PORT did not correlate with improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: In M-HPC, both PORT and GTR independently correlate with improved LC. PORT improves LC following GTR. We recommend RT dose ≥60 Gy to optimize LC.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12529-12529
Author(s):  
H. Elshenshawy ◽  
A. Abd El-Razek ◽  
H. Bader

12529 Background: To evaluate efficacy of short- course radiotherapy(RT) in elderly (>60years) patients with glioblastoma multiforme(GBM), and compare this biological similar short -course radiotherapy with a standard radiotherapy Methods: Forty-four elderly patients with GBM were randomly assigned after surgery to receive either a short-course of radiotherapy (45 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks ) or standard radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6weeks) to a target volume described as tumor visible on CT scan and a 2- cm margin . The primary end point was overall survival. Results: The overall response rate and median duration of response were 60%and 8.5 months in short- course RT versus 65% and 8 months in standard RT . Improvement in pretreatment performance status and increase in post- treatment corticosteroid dosage were observed in 50% and 25% in short- course RT versus 40% and 50% in standard RT (P=0.09, P=0.031) respectively. Median survival time was 5.9 months in short-course RT versus 5.6 months in standard RT . Six months, 1-year survival and progression-free survival rates were 40%, 15% and 30% ,10% in short- course RT versus 45%, 10% and 35% , 5% in standard RT , respectively. In both treatment groups, females did significantly better than males, patients with KPS 60–70 did significantly better than those with KPS 50 , patients having tumors 4–5 cm did significantly better than those with tumors 6–8 cm as well as did those with more radical surgery when compared to those with biopsy only. On multivariate analysis , only tumor size and extent of surgery were found to independently influence survival. Acute toxicity was generally assessed as mild in the two treatment groups. While RT -induced brain necrosis appeared only in one patient received short- course RT, but this patient died from tumor recurrence. Conclusions: Hypofractionated RT is feasible and safe treatment for elderly patients with GBM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4663-TPS4663
Author(s):  
Benjamin Adam Weinberg ◽  
Hongkun Wang ◽  
Aiwu Ruth He ◽  
Nicole Villa ◽  
Keith Robert Unger

TPS4663 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. The current standard of care for patients with resectable disease is surgical resection followed by 6 months of adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (FFX, leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin). As survival outcomes and distant recurrence improve with the use of FFX, locoregional recurrence remains a cause of morbidity and mortality. We seek to integrate adjuvant short-course proton radiation therapy (PRT) to the surgical bed in between cycles of FFX. While there is limited literature on the combination of short course PRT and FFX, there are analogous experiences using 5 fraction SBRT or IMRT following FFX in routine clinical practice. The ongoing Alliance 021501 trial of preoperative chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy plus radiation (IMRT using 5 Gy X 5 or SBRT 6.6 X 5) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer mandates that radiation starts 5 days or more following the last dose of FFX. Additionally, at the Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, we routinely combine 5 fraction SBRT after a 10-14 day interval from FFX. Methods: This is a phase I, single-arm, open-label study. Eligible pts are ≥ 18 years old, have histologically confirmed, resected PAC of the pancreatic head (R0 or R1) on adjuvant FFX, an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and adequate normal bone marrow and hepato-renal function. Exclusion criteria are prior radiation to the upper abdomen (neoadjuvant chemotherapy is allowed). This study will use a 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the safety and feasibility of combining 5 fractions of adjuvant PRT with FFX using different intervals between cycle 6 of FFX and PRT: dose level 1 uses a 12 day interval, and dose level 2 uses a 5 day interval. The primary endpoint is to determine the RP2D between the 2 proposed schedules. Using a 3+3 dose-escalation schema, 2-12 patients will be required to determine the RP2D. Enrollment began in Q4 2019. Clinical trial information: NCT03885284 .


Author(s):  
Giuseppe Minniti ◽  
Gaetano Lanzetta ◽  
Claudia Scaringi ◽  
Paola Caporello ◽  
Maurizio Salvati ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document