scholarly journals Forecasting Real GDP Growth for Africa

Econometrics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Philip Hans Franses ◽  
Max Welz

We propose a simple and reproducible methodology to create a single equation forecasting model (SEFM) for low-frequency macroeconomic variables. Our methodology is illustrated by forecasting annual real GDP growth rates for 52 African countries, where the data are obtained from the World Bank and start in 1960. The models include lagged growth rates of other countries, as well as a cointegration relationship to capture potential common stochastic trends. With a few selection steps, our methodology quickly arrives at a reasonably small forecasting model per country. Compared with benchmark models, the single equation forecasting models seem to perform quite well.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihajlo Jakovljevic ◽  
Yuriy Timofeyev ◽  
Chhabi Lal Ranabhat ◽  
Paula Odete Fernandes ◽  
João Paulo Teixeira ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Philip Hans Franses

AbstractMany macroeconomic forecasts are the outcome of a judgmental adjustment to a forecast from an econometric model. The size, direction, and motivation of the adjustment are often unknown as usually only the final forecast is available. This is problematic in case an analyst wishes to learn from forecast errors, which could lead to improving the model, the judgment or both. This paper therefore proposes a formal method to include judgment, which makes the combined forecast reproducible. As an illustration, a forecast from a benchmark simple time series model is only modified when the value of a factor, estimated from a multitude of variables, exceeds a user-specified threshold. Simulations and empirical results for forecasting annual real GDP growth in 52 African countries provide an illustration.


Author(s):  
Mihajlo Jakovljevic ◽  
Yuriy Timofeyev ◽  
Chhabi Ranabhat ◽  
Paula Odete Fernandes ◽  
João Teixeira ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Accelerated globalization has substantially contributed to the rise of emerging markets worldwide. The G7 and Emerging Markets Seven (EM7) behaved in significantly different macroeconomic ways before, during, and after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Average real GDP growth rates remained substantially higher among the EM7, while unemployment rates changed their patterns after the crisis. Worldwide economic growth began to accelerate again, starting from year 2017. However, approximately one half of this growth is attributable to the EM7, while only a quarter to the G7 nations. This paper aims to analyse the association between the health spending and real GDP growth in the G7 and the EM7 countries.Results: In terms of GDP growth, the EM7 exhibited higher degree of resilience during the 2008 Global Crisis, compared to the G7. Unemployment in the G7 nations was rising significantly, compared to pre-recession levels, but, in the EM7, it remained traditionally high. In the G7, the austerity (measured as a percentage of GPD and in PPP basis) significantly decreased the public health expenditure, even so in than in the EM7. Out-of-pocket health expenditure grew at far more concerning pace in the EM7 compared to the G7 during the Crisis, exposing vulnerability of citizens and households living close to poverty line. Regression analysis demonstrated that, in the G7, real GDP growth had positive impact on out-of-pocket expenditure measured as a percentage of current health expenditure expressed as a percentage of GDP (CHE). In the EM7, it affected negatively CHE, CHE per capita in PPP in constant 2011 international USD, and out-of-pocket expenditure per capita in PPP international USD. Conclusion: The EM7 countries showed stronger endurance withstanding the consequences of the global economic crisis as compared to the G7 economies. Evidence of that were most visible in real growth rates and unemployment rates, before, during, and after the crisis. It influenced health spending patterns in both groups, although they tended to diverge instead of converging in several important areas.


Author(s):  
Richard E. Mshomba

Since independence, African states have been striving for economic development, but relatively few countries have achieved their goal. Between 1970 and 2016, real GDP per capita in sub-Saharan Africa grew by an annual average of just 0.48%. However, there was a wide range of economic performance across different countries, as well as clear variation in growth rates over time. Countries such as the Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, and Madagascar had, on average, a negative growth rate in terms of real GDP per capita. Meanwhile, countries such as Botswana, Lesotho, Mauritius, Seychelles, and Swaziland had positive average annual growth rates of at least 3%. The differences in economic growth rates reflect the diversity of economic structures, governance, and political stability across African states. Although deeper economic integration among African countries may work to reduce the large disparities in economic development, any projections must nonetheless recognize that countries will differ in their economic trajectories. Variation over time is also important. The dominant patterns of economic development in sub-Saharan Africa in the 1980s and 1990s on the one hand, and the 1970s and past the 1990s on the other, were quite different, reflecting a long business cycle. If we look solely at economic growth statistics, the 1980s and 1990s can be described as lost decades. On average, real GDP per capita on the continent declined annually by 1.54% and 0.62% in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively. By contrast, between 2000 and 2016, real GDP per capita increased by an annual average of 2.13%. One important debate has focused on whether these shifts are primarily the result of domestic or international factors. Structural adjustment programs (SAPs) imposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank have been blamed for the decline in the economic fortunes of African countries in the 1980s. At the same time, they are praised for pulling many countries out of unsustainable macroeconomic policies. Moreover, a balanced overview of Africa’s development trajectory must conclude that even without major policy shifts such as those brought forth by the SAPs, many countries would still have remained highly dependent on one or just a few commodities, and would therefore have continued to experience wild swings in their business cycles in the absence of international intervention. The lack of economic diversification of many economies on the continent means that the future is hard to predict. However, the prerequisites for a prosperous Africa are not a mystery—they include good governance, economic diversity, and genuine economic integration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document