scholarly journals The Effectiveness of the Good Affordable Food Intervention for Adults with Low Socioeconomic Status and Small Incomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathelijne M.H.H. Bessems ◽  
Evelyne Linssen ◽  
Marion Lomme ◽  
Patricia Van Assema
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Nutrition Education ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Portion Size ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Post Test

Good Affordable Food (GAF) is a small-group nutrition education intervention for adults with low socioeconomic status and small incomes. It aims to empower participants to save money on groceries and consume healthier diets. This paper reports the short-term and longer-term effects on behavioural determinants and self-reported behavioural changes. A quasi-experimental control group design was applied with a baseline measurement, a post-test immediately after the intervention, and a follow-up measurement after six months. The study included 237 participants (intervention group: n = 131; control group: n = 106) at baseline, 197 at post-test, and 152 at follow-up. Data were collected by telephone, mostly using closed interview questions. Positive short-term and longer-term effects were found for attitude towards the costs of healthy foods, food label use, and the use of liquid butter or oil to prepare hot meals. Short-term intervention effects related to knowledge towards saving money on groceries, self-efficacy towards healthy eating, portion size awareness, and mindful eating. GAF was effective in changing some determinants and behaviours related to cost and food consumption, however, mostly in the short term. Thereby, it is an example of combining pricing and health information in nutrition education that developers of effective nutrition education for low-income groups can build on.

Associations of rural residence and low socioeconomic status on the risk of new onset cardiovascular disease (CVD) in cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
Atul Batra ◽  
Shiying Kong ◽  
Rodrigo Rigo ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Educational Attainment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Rural Residence ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Low Education

90 Background: Cancer patients are predisposed to CVD due to cancer treatments and shared risk factors (smoking/physical inactivity). We aimed to assess if rural residence and low socioeconomic status (SES) modify the risk of developing CVD. Methods: Patients diagnosed with non-metastatic solid organ cancers without baseline CVD in a large Canadian province from 2004 to 2017 were identified using the population-based registry. Postal codes were linked with Census data to determine rural residence as well as neighborhood-level income and educational attainment. Low income was defined as <46000 CAD/annum; low education was defined as a neighborhood in which <80% attended high school. Myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrythmias and cerebrovascular accident constituted as CVD.We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the associations of rural residence and low SES with the development of CVD, adjusting for measured confounding variables. Results: We identified 81,275 patients diagnosed with cancer without pre-existing CVD. The median age was 62 years and 54.2% were women. The most prevalent cancer types included breast (28.6%), prostate (23.1%), and colorectal (14.9%). At a median follow-up of 68 months, 29.4% were diagnosed with new CVD. The median time from cancer diagnosis to CVD was 29 months. Rural patients (32.3 vs 28.4%,P < .001) and those with low income (30.4% vs 25.9%,P < .001) or low educational attainment (30.7% vs 27.6%,P < .001) experienced higher rates of CVD. After adjusting for baseline factors and treatment, rural residence (odds ratio[OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval[CI], 1.04-1.11;P < .001), low income (OR,1.17;95%CI,1.12-1.21;P < .001) and low education (OR,1.08;95%CI,1.04-1.11;P < .001) continued to associate with higher odds of CVD. Further, patients with colorectal cancer were more likely to develop CVD compared with other tumors (OR,1.12;95% CI,1.04-1.16;P = .001). A multivariate Cox regression model showed that patients with low SES were more likely to die, but patients residing rurally were not. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of cancer survivors develop CVD on follow-up. Despite universal healthcare, marginalized populations experience different CVD risk profiles that should be considered when operationalizing lifestyle modification strategies and cardiac surveillance programs. [Table: see text]

Associations of Socioeconomic Status and Rurality With New-Onset Cardiovascular Disease in Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.01053
Author(s):  
Atul Batra ◽  
Shiying Kong ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Rural Residence ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
New Onset

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer are predisposed to develop new-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to assess if rural residence and low socioeconomic status modify such a risk. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with solid organ cancers without any baseline CVD and on a follow-up of at least 1 year in a large Canadian province from 2004 to 2017 were identified using the population-based registry. We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the associations of rural residence and low socioeconomic status with the development of CVD. RESULTS: We identified 81,418 patients eligible for the analysis. The median age was 62 years, and 54.3% were women. At a median follow-up of 68 months, 29.4% were diagnosed with new CVD. The median time from cancer diagnosis to CVD diagnosis was 29 months. Rural patients (32.3% v 28.5%; P < .001) and those with low income (30.4% v 25.9%; P < .001) or low educational attainment (30.7% v 27.6%; P < .001) experienced higher rates of CVD. After adjusting for baseline factors and treatment, rural residence (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.11; P < .001), low income (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.21; P < .001), and low education (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.11; P < .001) continued to be associated with higher odds of CVD. A multivariate Cox regression model showed that patients with low socioeconomic status were more likely to die, but patients residing rurally were not. CONCLUSION: Despite universal health care, marginalized populations experience different CVD risk profiles that should be considered when operationalizing lifestyle modification strategies and cardiac surveillance programs for the growing number of cancer survivors.

Audio Stories as Incidental Language Teachers

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute Ritterfeld ◽  
Timo Lüke
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Language Teachers ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Migrant Families ◽  
Populations At Risk ◽  
Grammatical Skills ◽  
Entertainment Value

Abstract. Audio stories offer a unique blend of narrative entertainment with language learning opportunities as a user’s enjoyment is dependent on their processing of the linguistic content. A total of 138 third- and fourth-graders from low socioeconomic status and migrant families recruited from a metropolitan area in Germany participated in a randomized pre–post follow-up intervention study with a control group. Children listened to a tailored crime story of approximately 90 min over a period of 3 days within the classroom setting. Entertainment value for the age group was established in a pilot study. Outcome variables included semantic and grammatical skills in German and were administered before (pretest), shortly after intervention (posttest), and 2 weeks later (follow-up). We used nonverbal intelligence, reading, comprehension skills, age and sex as control variables. Results indicate a strong positive effect of media reception on language skills. The effectiveness of the intervention is discussed with reference to different linguistic domains, entertainment value, and compensatory effects in populations at risk of language learning deficits.

Predictors of Unmet Dental Health Needs in US Adults in 2018: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 238008442110356
Author(s):  
D.J. Gaskin ◽  
H. Zare ◽  
R. McCleary ◽  
O. Kanwar ◽  
A.L. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
The United States ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Dental Visit ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Past ◽  
Dental Needs

Objective: To identify predictors of unmet dental needs for adults 18 y of age or older in the United States. Method: Using the Aday and Andersen framework and data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), we ran logistic regression to estimate predictors for adults of not having a dental visit within 5 y and having lost any teeth using a national sample of 155,060 survey respondents. Results: Results showed that predisposing factors (age, race/ethnicity, gender, and educational attainment) and enabling factors (income and health insurance status) are important predictors for losing teeth due to decay or gum disease. Men, the elderly, and less educated and low-income residents were less likely to have seen a dentist within the past 5 y and more likely to have lost their permanent teeth. Compared to non-Hispanic White adults, Hispanics adults were more likely to have had a dental visit within the past 5 y. Unmet dental needs varied across states. People living in states with extensive Medicaid dental care benefit coverage were less likely to lose their teeth and more likely to have had a dental visit within the past 5 y. Conclusion: Efforts to improve oral health should address unmet dental needs of men and adults with low socioeconomic status. Studying the variation between state oral health care programs could further our understanding of how public policy can improve population oral health. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Men, non-Hispanic Blacks, mixed and other race minorities, and low socioeconomic status adults are most at risk of unmet dental needs. States can address these needs by expanding Medicaid coverage for adults.

Poor person and areal socioeconomic status is associated with increased diabetic retinopathy and visual impairment incidence and progression

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316430
Author(s):  
Jin Rong Low ◽  
Alfred Tau Liang Gan ◽  
Eva K Fenwick ◽  
Preeti Gupta ◽  
Tien Y Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Visual Impairment ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Housing Type ◽  
Incidence Risk

BackgroundTo investigate the longitudinal associations between person-level and area-level socioeconomic status (PLSES and ALSES, respectively) with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and visual impairment (VI) in Asians with diabetes mellitus (DM).MethodsIn this population-based cohort study, we included 468 (39.4%) Malays and 721 (60.6%) Indians with DM, with a mean age (SD) of 58.9 (9.1) years; 50.6% were female and the mean follow-up duration was 6.2 (0.9) years. Individual PLSES parameters (education, monthly income and housing type) were quantified using questionnaires. ALSES was assessed using the Socioeconomic Disadvantage Index derived from Singapore’s 2010 areal census (higher scores indicate greater disadvantage). Incident DR and VI were defined as absent at baseline but present at follow-up, while DR and VI progression were defined as a ≥1 step increase in severity category at follow-up. Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the associations of PLSES and ALSES with incidence and progression of DR and VI, adjusting for relevant confounders.ResultsIn multivariable models, per SD increase in ALSES score was associated with greater DR incidence (risk ratio (95% CI) 1.27 (1.13 to 1.44)), DR progression (1.10 (1.00 to 1.20)) and VI incidence (1.10 (1.04 to 1.16)), while lower PLSES variables were associated with increased DR (low income: 1.68 (1.21 to 2.34)) and VI (low income: 1.44 (1.13 to 1.83); ≤4 room housing: 2.00 (1.57 to 2.54)) incidence.ConclusionsWe found that both PLSES and ALSES variables were independently associated with DR incidence, progression and associated vision loss in Asians. Novel intervention strategies targeted at low socioeconomic status communities to decrease rates of DR and VI are warranted.

scholarly journals Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Return to Work after Acute Ankle Fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0020
Author(s):  
Alessandra L. Falk ◽  
Regina Hanstein ◽  
Chaiyaporn Kulsakdinun
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Zip Code

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Socioeconomic status has been recognized throughout the medical literature, both within orthopedics and beyond, as a factor that influences outcomes after surgery, and can result in substandard care. Within the foot and ankle subspecialty, there is limited data regarding socioeconomic status and post-operative outcomes, with the current literature focusing on outcomes for diabetic feet. However, ankle fractures are among the most common fractures encountered by orthopedic surgeons. While a few studies have explored the impact of ankle fractures on employment and disability status, the effect of socioeconomic status on return to work post operatively has not yet been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of low socioeconomic status on return to work. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 592 medical charts of patients with CPT code 27766, 27792, 27814, 27822, 27823, 27827, 27829, 27826, 27828 from 2015-2018. Included were patients >18 yrs of age who sustained an acute ankle fracture, were employed prior to the injury, and with information on return to work after ankle surgery, zip code, race, ethnicity and insurance status. Excluded were patients who were not employed prior to their injury. Socioeconomic status was either defined by insurance status - Medicaid/Medicare, commercial, or workman’s compensation -, or by assessing socioeconomic status (SES) using medial household per capita income by zip code as generated and reported by the US National Census Bureau’s 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. The national dataset was divided into quartiles with the lowest quartile defined as low SES. Patients who had income that fell within this income category were classified as low SES. Results: 174 patients were included with an average follow-up of 10.2months. 22/174 (12.6%) patients didn’t return to work post-operatively. Univariate analysis identified non-sedentary work to decrease the likelihood of return to work (HR:0.637; p=0.03). Patients with a low SES were more prevalent in the no return group compared to the return to work group (86% vs 60%; p=0.028). 95% of patients with low SES were a minority compared to 56% with average/high SES (p<0.005). Patients with low SES had a higher BMI (p=0.026), a longer hospitalization (p=0.04) and more wound complications (p=0.032). Insurance type didn’t affect return to work (p=0.158). Patients with workman’s compensation had a longer follow-up time and a longer time to return to work compared to other insurances (p<0.005 for each comparison). Conclusion: Low socioeconomic status based on income, not insurance type, affected return to work after an ankle fracture ORIF. Patients with workman’s compensation took a longer time to return to work compared to other insurance types. These findings warrants the need to consider socioeconomic status when allocating resources to treat these patients.

Follow-Up of Premature Infants Of Low Socioeconomic Status

1989 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 246 ◽  
Author(s):  
LINA ZAHR ◽  
STEVEN PARKER ◽  
JEAN COLE ◽  
CINDY ENGLIER
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Premature Infants ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic

Effects of Locomotor Skill Program on Minority Preschoolers’ Physical Activity Levels

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofiya Alhassan ◽  
Ogechi Nwaokelemeh ◽  
Manneh Ghazarian ◽  
Jasmin Roberts ◽  
Albert Mendoza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Sedentary Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Preschool Classrooms ◽  
Percent Time ◽  
Physical Activity Levels

This pilot study examined the effects of a teacher-taught, locomotor skill (LMS)- based physical activity (PA) program on the LMS and PA levels of minority preschooler-aged children. Eight low-socioeconomic status preschool classrooms were randomized into LMS-PA (LMS-oriented lesson plans) or control group (supervised free playtime). Interventions were delivered for 30 min/day, five days/week for six months. Changes in PA (accelerometer) and LMS variables were assessed with MANCOVA. LMS-PA group exhibited a significant reduction in during-preschool (F (1,16) = 6.34, p = .02, d = 0.02) and total daily (F (1,16) = 9.78, p = .01, d = 0.30) percent time spent in sedentary activity. LMS-PA group also exhibited significant improvement in leaping skills, F (1, 51) = 7.18, p = .01, d = 0.80). No other, significant changes were observed. The implementation of a teacher-taught, LMS-based PA program could potentially improve LMS and reduce sedentary time of minority preschoolers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document