scholarly journals Malaysian Health Literacy: Scorecard Performance from a National Survey

Author(s):  
Norrafizah Jaafar ◽  
Komathi Perialathan ◽  
Manimaran Krishnan ◽  
Nurashma Juatan ◽  
Masitah Ahmad ◽  
...  

Health literacy is an indicator of a society’s ability to make better health judgements for themselves and the people around them. This study investigated the prevalence of health literacy among Malaysian adults and provided an overall picture of the society’s current health literacy status, which has not been previously assessed. The study also highlighted socio-demographic markers of communities with limited health literacy that may warrant future intervention. A population-based self-administered survey using the Health Literacy Survey Malaysian Questionnaire18 (HLS-M-Q18) instrument was conducted as part of the National Health Morbidity Survey 2019 in Malaysia. The nationwide survey utilized a two-staged stratified random sampling method. A sample of 9478 individuals aged 18 and above, drawn from the living quarter list, participated in the study. The health literacy score was divided into three levels; limited, sufficient, and excellent. Findings showed a majority of the Malaysian population had a sufficient health literacy level in all three domains—healthcare, diseases prevention and health promotion (49.1%, 44.2%, and 47.5%, respectively)—albeit leaning towards the lower end of the category with an average score of 35.5. The limited health literacy groups were prevalent among respondents with older age (68%), lower education level (64.8%), and lower household income (49.5%). The overall health literacy status for Malaysia was categorized at a lower sufficiency level. Future health literacy improvements should focus on communities with a limited health literacy level to improve the overall score.

Author(s):  
Norrafizah Jaafar ◽  
Komathi Perialathan ◽  
Manimaran Krishnan ◽  
Nurashma Juatan ◽  
Masitah Ahmad ◽  
...  

Health literacy is an indicator of a society’s ability to make better health judgement for themselves and the people around them. This study investigates the prevalence of health literacy among Malaysian adults and provides an overall picture of the current health literacy state of the society. The study also highlights socio-demographics markers of communities with limited health literacy which may warrant future intervention. A population based self-administered survey using the Health Literacy Survey Malaysian Questionnaire18 (HLS-M-Q18) instrument was conducted as part of the National Health Morbidity Survey 2019 in Malaysia. The nationwide survey utilized two-staged stratified random sampling method. A sample of 9478 individuals aged 18 and above participated in the study. The health literacy score was divided into three levels; limited, sufficient and excellent. Findings showed that majority Malaysian population has sufficient health literacy level, albeit leaning towards the lower end of the category with an average score of 35.5. The limited health literacy groups are associated with respondents with older age, lower education level and lower household income. Overall health literacy state for Malaysia is categorized at a lower sufficient level. Health literacy improvements should focus on communities with limited health literacy level.


Author(s):  
Perihan Şenel Tekin

Background:  Health literacy has a measure of capacity to access, understand, assess, and apply health information in individuals’ decision-making processes to maintain and improve life-quality quality of life. Research is a descriptive study aiming to determine the health literacy level of medical secretary’ students who are health professionals and the influencing factors of health literacy in the future.  Method: The research was conducted between April 30 and June 1, 2018, and the study group consisted of 55 medical secretary students who study in Ankara University Vocational School of Health in Turkey. The participants were given the questionnaire which was composed of 3 sections (socio-demographic information, health status, and the Health Literacy Survey-European Union/HLS-EU scale) and 70 questions used for data collection purposes. Results: The average age of the group was 21.4±4.1. The average score of participants’ general health literacy index was calculated as 33.9±7.42 (n=55). Approximately 70% of participants (n=55) were found to have adequate health literacy. Conclusions: It is very important that the medical secretaries working as secretarial and patient orientation personnel in the health sector are health literate in terms of their own health and health service quality. Health literacy can't be considered independent of the general literacy level. Hence, in the lifelong learning process, individuals need to be supported in school and work life.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2110-2110
Author(s):  
Nidhi Bhatt ◽  
Cecelia Calhoun ◽  
Jason R. Hodges ◽  
Chinonyelum Nwosu ◽  
Guolian Kang ◽  
...  

Introduction In the United States 36% of adults have limited health literacy, which is associated with poor health outcomes (Kutner et al. National Assessment of Adult Literacy.2006). Health literacy is defined as "the capacity to obtain, process and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions" (Nielsen-Bohlman et al. National Academies Press.2004). Health literacy is understudied in sickle cell disease (SCD), a genetic disease affecting a minority population in the United States. SCD Preventive treatment requires patient engagement, therefore health literacy is an important determinant of health outcomes in SCD. Previous studies reported Health literacy in adolescents with SCD is suboptimal (Perry et al. J Pediatr Nur.2017), but few studies have investigated factors influencing health literacy in this population. Health literacy can be impacted by many factors such as cognition, socioeconomic status, education level and gender. This study evaluated health literacy level and factors that influenced Health literacy in adolescents and adults with SCD. In addition, we assessed the relationship of health literacy level and Hydroxyurea therapy use, one of only two FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies for SCD. Methods This was a cross- sectional study of adolescents and adults with SCD performed at St. Jude Children's Research hospital and St. Louis Children's hospital. Adolescents and adults ages 15 to 45 years completed a health literacy assessment using the newest vital sign (NVS). NVS is a validated tool with 6 questions that tests reading, mathematics and comprehension based on a nutrition label (Weiss et al. Ann Fam Med.2005). Score of 0-1 suggests high likelihood of limited health literacy, 2-3 indicates possibility of limited health literacy and 4-6 almost always suggests adequate health literacy. Self-reported demographic information was collected such as educational level, household income, age, sex, race. Additionally, SCD genotypes and hydroxyurea utilization were confirmed through chart review. Results A random sample of 125 adolescents and adults with SCD was evaluated (Table 1): 34 (28.1%) had Hb SC or Hb Sβ+-thalassemia, 87(71.9%) had Hgb SS or Hgb Sβ0-thalassemia, and 4 participants had unknown or other genotypes. Limited health literacy was prevalent, only 40 (32%) of subjects had adequate literacy, median NVS score was 2 for all participants. Participants with Hgb SS/Hgb Sβ0-thalassemia were more likely to be on hydroxyurea (p<0.001, Chi-square test). NVS scores in subjects with less severe genotype were not significantly different compared to more severe genotypes (p=0.2, Man-Whitney-Wilcoxon test/MWW). There was no difference in health literacy scores between those on hydroxyurea and not on hydroxyurea (p=0.24, MWW test), however despite low health literacy being prevalent, 85 (68%) subjects with Hb SS or HbSβ0-thalassemia were on hydroxyurea. Income level was significantly different between patient on hydroxyurea not on hydroxyurea (p= 0.034, Fisher's exact test). In addition, patient whose income was $35000 or more were found to have a higher NVS score (p=0.012, Kruskal-Wallis test) (figure 1). Subjects with high NVS scores were significantly older (p=0.026, Analysis of variance test), over all education was significantly associated with health literacy (p=0.003, Fisher's exact). Conclusion This study shows a low prevalence of adequate health literacy amongst adolescents and adults with SCD. Our data corroborate previous literature which has reported limited health literacy in this population as well adds granularity to the factors that may influence this suboptimal outcome. There was a statistically significant association between health literacy, income level and education level in adolescents and young adults with SCD. Further, health literacy was not significantly associated with sickle cell genotype or hydroxyurea use. This study highlights the social determinants of health and specific need to address health literacy in SCD patients. To optimize the care of adolescents and young adults with SCD, targeted multimodal interventions that are tailored to low health literacy levels should be employed to reduce morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population. Disclosures Kang: MBIO: Other: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital has an existing exclusive license and ongoing partnership with Mustang Bio for the further clinical development and commercialization of this XSCID gene therapy. King:Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bioline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Cell Works: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Research Funding; RiverVest: Consultancy; Tioma Therapeutics (formerly Vasculox, Inc.):: Consultancy; WUGEN: Equity Ownership. Zhao:MBIO: Other: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital has an existing exclusive license and ongoing partnership with Mustang Bio for the further clinical development and commercialization of this XSCID gene therapy. Hankins:NHLBI: Research Funding; National Committee for Quality Assurance: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; NHLBI: Honoraria; ASPHO: Honoraria; LYNKS Foundation: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick BEGIN ◽  
Annabel BOYER ◽  
Julie DUPONT ◽  
Mathieu ROUSSEAU-GAGNON ◽  
Nicolas FERNANDEZ ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Health literacy refers to the ability of individuals to gain access to, use, and understand health information and services in order to maintain a good health. It is especially important in nephrology due to the complexity of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The present study sought to define health literacy levels in patients followed in predialysis clinic, in-center dialysis (ICHD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD).Methods: This transversal monocentric observational study analysed 363 patients between October 2016 and April 2017. The Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS) and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) were used to measure health literacy. Multivariate linear regressions were used to compare the mean scores on the BHLS and HLQ, across the four groups.Results: Patients on PD had a significantly higher BHLS’score than patients on ICHD (p=0.04). HLQ’s scores differed across the groups: patients on HHD (p=0.01) and PD (p=0.002) were more likely to feel understood by their healthcare providers. Compared to ICHD, patients on HHD were more likely to have sufficient information to manage their health (p=0.02), and patients in the predialysis clinic were more likely to report high abilities for health information appraisal (p<0.001).Conclusion: In a monocentric study, there is a significant proportion of CKD patients, especially in predialysis clinic and in-centre hemodialysis, with limited health literacy. Patients on home dialysis (HHD and PD) had a higher level of health literacy compared to the other groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annabel Boyer ◽  
Yannick Begin ◽  
Julie Dupont ◽  
Mathieu Rousseau-Gagnon ◽  
Nicolas Fernandez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Health literacy refers to the ability of individuals to gain access to, use, and understand health information and services in order to maintain a good health. It is especially important in nephrology due to the complexity of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The present study sought to define health literacy levels in patients followed in predialysis clinic, in-center dialysis (ICHD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD). Methods This transversal monocentric observational study analysed 363 patients between October 2016 and April 2017. The Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS) and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) were used to measure health literacy. Multivariate linear regressions were used to compare the mean scores on the BHLS and HLQ, across the four groups. Results Patients on PD had a significantly higher BHLS’score than patients on ICHD (p = 0.04). HLQ’s scores differed across the groups: patients on HHD (p = 0.01) and PD (p = 0.002) were more likely to feel understood by their healthcare providers. Compared to ICHD, patients on HHD were more likely to have sufficient information to manage their health (p = 0.02), and patients in the predialysis clinic were more likely to report high abilities for health information appraisal (p < 0.001). Conclusion In a monocentric study, there is a significant proportion of CKD patients, especially in predialysis clinic and in-centre hemodialysis, with limited health literacy. Patients on home dialysis (HHD and PD) had a higher level of health literacy compared to the other groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desalew Tilahun ◽  
Abebe Abera ◽  
Gugsa Nemera

Abstract Background Health literacy plays a prominent role in empowering individuals for prevention as well as management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, there is paucity of information on the health literacy of patients with non-communicable diseases in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess communicative health literacy and associated factors in patients with NCDs on follow-up at Jimma Medical Center (JMC), Ethiopia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from 4 May 2020 to 4 July 2020 with 408 randomly selected adult patients, attending outpatient department of JMC in Ethiopia. The final sample size was obtained by using single population proportion formula. All patients with NCDs who were on follow-up at chronic illness clinic, JMC, were used as a source population. All eligible patients with NCDs who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this study. A simple random sampling technique was used to recruit study participants. Data were collected through structured interviewer administered questionnaires on the six of nine health literacy domains using Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) containing 30 items, socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics, disease-related factors, and health information sources. Multivariable logistic regression was executed to determine the associations. Result Descriptive analysis shows more than half of the respondents in four of the six health literacy domains had high communicative health literacy level (CHLL). The proportion of people with high CHLL across each of the domains was as follows: health care provider support (56.1%), social support for health (53.7%), active engagement with a healthcare provider (56.1%), and navigating healthcare system (53.4%). We found educational status was significantly associated with five of six health literacy domains whereas number of sources was associated with four of six health literacy domains. Conclusion The overall findings of the current study indicate that health literacy levels vary according to socio-demographic and disease characteristics of patients. Thus, healthcare professionals should assess patients’ health literacy level and tailor information and support to the health literacy skills and personal context of their patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Régis Vaillancourt ◽  
Yen Truong ◽  
Shazya Karmali ◽  
Amanda Kraft ◽  
Selina Manji ◽  
...  

Background: Medications that taste unpleasant can be a struggle to administer to children, most often resulting in low adherence rates. Pictograms can be useful tools to improve adherence by conveying information to patients in a way that they will understand. Methods: One-on-one structured interviews were conducted with parents/guardians and with children between the ages of 9 and 17 years at a pediatric hospital. The questionnaire evaluated the comprehension of 12 pictogram sets that described how to mask the taste of medications for children. Pictograms understood by >85% of participants were considered validated. Short-term recall was assessed by asking participants to recall the meaning of each pictogram set. Results: There were 51 participants in the study—26 (51%) were children aged 9 to 17 years and 25 (49%) were parents or guardians. Most children (54%) had health literacy levels of grade 10 or higher. Most parents and guardians (92%) had at least a high school health literacy level. Six of the 12 pictogram sets (50%) were validated. Eleven of 12 pictogram sets (92%) had a median translucency score greater than 5. All 12 pictogram sets (100%) were correctly identified at short-term recall and were therefore validated. Conclusion: The addition of validated illustrations to pharmaceutical labels can be useful to instruct on how to mask the taste of medication in certain populations. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical impact of providing illustrated information to populations with low health literacy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorraine S. Wallace ◽  
David C. Cassada ◽  
Edwin S. Rogers ◽  
Michael B. Freeman ◽  
Oscar H. Grandas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document