scholarly journals Mathematical Modelling of p53 Signalling during DNA Damage Response: A Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10590
Author(s):  
Ján Eliaš ◽  
Cicely K. Macnamara

No gene has garnered more interest than p53 since its discovery over 40 years ago. In the last two decades, thanks to seminal work from Uri Alon and Ghalit Lahav, p53 has defined a truly synergistic topic in the field of mathematical biology, with a rich body of research connecting mathematic endeavour with experimental design and data. In this review we survey and distill the extensive literature of mathematical models of p53. Specifically, we focus on models which seek to reproduce the oscillatory dynamics of p53 in response to DNA damage. We review the standard modelling approaches used in the field categorising them into three types: time delay models, spatial models and coupled negative-positive feedback models, providing sample model equations and simulation results which show clear oscillatory dynamics. We discuss the interplay between mathematics and biology and show how one informs the other; the deep connections between the two disciplines has helped to develop our understanding of this complex gene and paint a picture of its dynamical response. Although yet more is to be elucidated, we offer the current state-of-the-art understanding of p53 response to DNA damage.

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda S. Coutts ◽  
Nicholas La Thangue

Defects in the DNA damage response pathways can lead to tumour development. The tumour suppressor p53 is a key player in the DNA damage response, and the precise regulation of p53 is critical for the suppression of tumorigenesis. DNA damage induces the activity of p53, via damage sensors such as ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ataxia telangiectasia-related), which leads to the transcriptional regulation of a variety of genes involved in cell cycle control and apoptosis. p53 is therefore tightly controlled, and its activity is regulated at a multiplicity of levels. An increasing array of cofactors are now known to influence p53 activity. Here we will discuss several of the cofactors that impact on p53 activity, specifically those involved in the function of the two novel p53 cofactors JMY (junction-mediating and regulatory protein) and Strap (serine/threonine-kinase-receptor-associated protein).


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahrum Min ◽  
Seock-Ah Im

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 is an essential molecule in DNA damage response by sensing DNA damage and docking DNA repair proteins on the damaged DNA site through a type of posttranslational modification, poly (ADP-Ribosyl)ation (PARylation). PARP inhibitors, which inhibit PARylation through competitively binding to NAD+ binding site of PARP1 and PARP2, have improved clinical benefits for BRCA mutated tumors, leading to their accelerated clinical application. However, the antitumor activities of PARP inhibitors in clinical development are different, due to PARP trapping activity beyond blocking PARylation reactions. In this review, we comprehensively address the current state of knowledge regarding the mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitors. We will also discuss the different effects of PARP inhibitors in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents regarding the mechanism of regulating PARylation.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2118-P
Author(s):  
CHAY TENG YEO ◽  
BRYNDON OLESON ◽  
JOHN A. CORBETT ◽  
JAMIE K. SCHNUCK

10.2741/2862 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 2504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna, I. Kruman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document