scholarly journals Bonding Performance of a Hydrophilic Amide Monomer Containing Adhesive to Occlusal and Cervical Dentin

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4727
Author(s):  
Eri Seitoku ◽  
Shuhei Hoshika ◽  
Takatsumi Ikeda ◽  
Shigeaki Abe ◽  
Toru Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Performance ◽  
One Step ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The One

This study aimed to evaluate the bonding performance of a new one-step self-etching adhesive system containing a novel hydrophilic amide monomer. Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CUB) and Clearfil Megabond 2 (CMB) were used as the one-step and two-step adhesive systems, respectively. Flat dentin surfaces of human premolars were exposed using #600 SiC (silicon carbide) and bonded with the respective adhesives of each system. The teeth were sectioned to obtain beams (1 mm × 1 mm) after 24 h of water storage. The mean bond strength and standard deviations (MPa) on an occlusal surface were as follows: CUB: 45.9 ± 19.7 and CMB: 67.9 ± 25.3. The values for cervical ones were CUB: 56.0 ± 20.3 and CMB: 67.6 ± 16.0, respectively. In both conditions, the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) value was lower than that of CMB. As seen during the microscopic observation, no adhesive failure was observed after μTBS testing because CUB formed a firm and tight adhesive interface.

scholarly journals Effect of Different Bonding Strategies on Adhesion to Deep and Superficial Permanent Dentin

2010 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 110-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Eduardo Fernandes Pegado ◽  
Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral ◽  
Flávia Martão Flório ◽  
Roberta Tarkany Basting
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
One Step ◽  
The One

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of different bonding strategies on the microtensile bond strength to deep and superficial permanent dentin.Methods: Forty-eight teeth were randomly flattened according to the dentin depth: superficial dentin (SD) and deep dentin (DD). Subsequently, three adhesive systems were applied (n=8): an etchand- rinse (Adper Single Bond 2 - SB), a “mild” two-step self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond - SE) and a one-step self-etching adhesive system (Futurabond – FB). Each specimen was restored with a composite resin and sectioned into 1.0-mm2 thick slabs. After 24 hours, resin-dentin sticks were submitted to tensile stress in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test at a level of 0.05%.Results: Superficial dentin showed the highest microtensile bond strength values, which differed statistically from those obtained in the deep dentin, irrespective of the adhesive system used. FB yielded the highest bond strength values, which were statistically similar to the bond strength values of SE, but statistically different from those obtained when the SB adhesive was used.Conclusions: Bond strength obtained in superficial dentin was significantly higher than in deep dentin, for all adhesive systems tested. Adhesion was affected by the different bonding strategies: the one-step, low pH, acetone-based self-etching adhesive promoted the higher bond strength values, which were statistically similar to those obtained with the two-step, water-based self-etching adhesive. (Eur J Dent 2010;4:110-117)

Bond Strength of Two-Step Etch-and-Rinse Adhesive Systems to the Dentin of Primary and Permanent Teeth

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hérica Adad Ricci ◽  
Mariane Emi Sanabe ◽  
Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa ◽  
Josimeri Hebling
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Permanent Tooth ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
The Mean

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems to the dentin of primary and permanent teeth. Study Design: Non-carious human teeth (12 primary molars and 12 premolars) were assigned to 3 groups according to the adhesive system. The adhesive systems were applied to flat superficial coronal dentin surfaces etched with phosphoric acid and composite resin blocks were built up. The teeth were sectioned to produce beam-shaped specimens with 0.81 mm2 cross-sectional area subjected to µTBS testing. µTBS data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (a= 0.05). Results: The adhesive systems produced statistically similar mean µTBS to each other (p>0.05) and no significant differences (p>0.05) were found when the same material was applied to primary or permanent tooth dentin. The mean µTBS values (MPa) obtained were: Prime& Bond NT: 41.7±14.4 (permanent) and 40.8±13.4 (primary); Single Bond: 42.9±8.6 (permanent) and 41.4±11.9 (primary); Excite DSC: 46.3±11.3 (permanent teeth) and 43.4±12.0 (primary). Conclusion:There was no difference in the immediate µTBS of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems when applied to the dentin of primary and permanent teeth.

scholarly journals Adhesives Doped with Bioactive Niobophosphate Micro-Filler: Degree of Conversion and Microtensile Bond Strength

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 705-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Kato Carneiro ◽  
Marcia Margarete Meier ◽  
Clenilton Costa dos Santos ◽  
Adeilton Pereira Maciel ◽  
Ceci Nunes Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Degree Of Conversion ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Addition ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
One Step ◽  
Niobium Phosphate

Abstract To evaluate the effect of incorporating niobium phosphate bioactive glass (NbG) into commercial etch-and-rinse adhesive systems, with and without silane, on their degree of conversion (DC) (%) and microtensile bond strength (μTBS). The NbG micro-filler was added to two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems: One Step (OS) and Prime & Bond (PB) at 40% concentration. The following groups were formed: control without glass addition OS; addition of unsilanized NbG (OSNbG); addition of silanized NbG (OSNbGS); control without glass PB; addition of unsilanized NbG (PBNbG); addition of silanized NbG (PBNbGS). The DC was determined using total Fourier spectroscopy reflection (FTIR/ATR). For μTBS testing, 48 human third molars (n=8) were restored and sliced to obtain specimens (0.8 mm2) and they were tested at two different time intervals: immediately and after 6 months. The fracture mode was evaluated with a stereoscopic loupe (40×) and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey tests (a=0.05). NbG addition did not compromise the adhesive system DC values (p>0.05). Furthermore, the NbG added to the adhesive systems did not affect μTBS values (p>0.05). Fracture occurred predominantly at the dentin-adhesive interface. NbG bioactive glass did not affect the DC or microtensile bond strength results.

scholarly journals Microtensile bond strength of a universal adhesive to deep dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Cristina Gre ◽  
MAuro Amaral Caldeira de Andrada ◽  
Sylvio Monteiro Junior
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
One Way Anova

<p><strong>Objective</strong>: This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength of a universal adhesive system applied to deep dentin under different bonding strategies. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and Methods</strong>: Fifteen human third molars had the coronal portion removed exposing deep dentin and were assigned into 3 groups according to the adhesive system: G1(control): 2-steps totaletch (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE); G2: 1-step self-etch universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE); G3:2 steps total-etch universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE). Composite buildups were performed on the dentin surfaces and after water storage for 24 h, teeth were sectioned to obtain 40 bonded beams per group with sectional area of 0.9 mm2 . The specimens were submitted to the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test until failure. Statistical analyses were computed using one-way ANOVA (p = 0.05). <strong>Results</strong>: The mean µTBS (in MPa) were G1 = 22.27, G2 = 22.85 and G3 = 20.3. After statistical analysis, no significant differences were observed among the groups. <strong>Conclusions</strong>: Universal adhesive system performed similarly to the total-etch adhesive and was not affected by the adhesion strategy.</p><p> </p><p><strong>KEYWORDS </strong></p><p>Microtensile; Adhesive system; Dentin.</p>

scholarly journals Effect of Double Coating of One-step Self-etching Adhesive on Micromorphology and Microtensile Bond Strength to Sound vs Demineralized Dentin

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cerida Aurelia Rodrigues Oliveira ◽  
Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França ◽  
Roberta Tarkany Basting ◽  
Cecília Pedroso Turssi ◽  
Flavia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Layers ◽  
Application Method ◽  
One Step ◽  
The One ◽  
Demineralized Dentin ◽  
Double Coating

ABSTRACT Aim The purpose of the present study was to evaluate (1) the one-step adhesive system application method (doubling the adhesive coatings) in regard to microtensile bond strength (MTB) and (2) the interfacial morphology of one-step adhesives to sound vs demineralized dentin. Materials and methods Forty dentin fragments were randomly allocated to 2 groups: D. demineralized dentin and S. sound dentin. Specimens were also subdivided into 2 groups (n = 10), according to the one-step adhesive [AEO (Adper Easy One), 3M ESPE] application method: M, According to the manufacturer's instructions, and D, based on the application of two consecutive layers. After adhesive light polymerization, a resin composite block (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) was built on the dentin surface. Resin-tooth blocks were sectioned into 0.9 mm thick slabs, and one slab of each block was prepared for adhesive interface analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The remaining slabs were sectioned into 0.8 mm2 sticks that were subjected to tensile stress (0.5 mm/min). Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results The application of two consecutive layers of AEO adhesive system did not influence MTB values for sound dentin. When two consecutive layers of one-step adhesive system were applied, MTB was statistically greater in demineralized vs sound dentin. SEM analysis demonstrated that the application of two consecutive adhesive layers to sound and demineralized dentin produced longer resin tags. Conclusion It can be concluded that the application of two consecutive adhesive layers improved bond strength to demineralized dentin, but no such effect was observed for sound dentin. Clinical significance Application of double coats of one-step self-etching adhesive improved bond strength to demineralized dentin. How to cite this article Oliveira CAR, França FMG, Basting RT, Turssi CP, do Amaral FLB. Effect of Double Coating of One-step Self-etching Adhesive on Micromorphology and Microtensile Bond Strength to Sound vs Demineralized Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(4):385-391.

Effect of Different Protocols in Preconditioning With EDTA in Sclerotic Dentin and Enamel Before Universal Adhesives Applied in Self-etch Mode

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
EC Martini ◽  
SO Parreiras ◽  
MF Gutierrez ◽  
AD Loguercio ◽  
A Reis
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Etching Pattern ◽  
Bonding Performance ◽  
Universal Adhesives ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Main Factor

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different protocols of 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) conditioning on the etching pattern and immediate bond strength of universal adhesives to enamel and sclerotic dentin. Methods and Materials: Forty bovine teeth with sclerotic dentin and 20 human third molars were randomly divided into eight groups resulting from the combination of the main factors surface treatment (none, two-minute EDTA conditioning manual application, 30-second EDTA manual application, 30-second EDTA sonic application) and adhesives systems (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU] and Prime & Bond Elect [PBE]). Resin-dentin and enamel-dentin bond specimens were prepared and tested under the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and microshear bond strength (μSBS) tests, respectively. The etching pattern produced on the unground enamel and the sclerotic dentin surfaces under the different protocols and adhesive systems was evaluated under scanning electron microscopy. Results: For enamel, only the main factor adhesive was significant (p&lt;0.0001), with SBU showing the highest μSBS. In sclerotic dentin, the lowest mean was observed for the group without EDTA application and the highest mean in the group with EDTA application with the sonic device for 30 seconds. Regardless of the EDTA protocol, the highest means of μTBS were observed for SBU (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: EDTA conditioning improves the bonding performance of universal adhesives in the self-etch mode on sclerotic dentin, mainly when applied for 30 seconds with the aid of a sonic device. EDTA pretreatment also improves the retentive etching pattern of enamel, but it does not result in higher enamel bond strength.

scholarly journals Durability of Enamel Bonding Using One-step Self-etch Systems on Ground and Unground Enamel

10.2341/08-58 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Reis ◽  
S. K. Moura ◽  
A. Pellizzaro ◽  
K. Dal-Bianco ◽  
A. M. Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The improvement of resin-enamel bond strengths after using Si-C paper and diamond burs for enamel preparation is material dependent. No degradation of enamel bond strength could be observed for any one-step self-etch adhesive system after 12 months of water storage.

scholarly journals Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing and Surface Conditioning on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin-based Composite to Dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. E289-E298 ◽  
Author(s):  
CRG van den Breemer ◽  
M Özcan ◽  
MS Cune ◽  
AP Almeida Ayres ◽  
B Van Meerbeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Clinical Procedures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The One ◽  
Storage Times

SUMMARY This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin-based composite (RBC) to dentin after different immediate dentin sealing (IDS) strategies and surface-conditioning (SC) methods and on two water storage times. Human molars (n=48) were randomly divided into eight experimental groups involving four different IDS strategies—IDS-1L with one layer of adhesive, IDS-2L with two layers of adhesive, IDS-F with one layer of adhesive and one layer of flowable RBC, and DDS (delayed dentin sealing) with no layer of adhesive (control)—and two different SC methods—SC-P with pumice rubbing and SC-PC with pumice rubbing followed by tribochemical silica coating. The μTBS test was performed after one week and after six months of water storage, being recorded as the “immediate” and “aged” μTBS, respectively. Composite-adhesive-dentin microspecimens (0.9×0.9×8–9 mm) were stressed in tension until failure to determine the μTBS. Failure mode and location of failure were categorized. Two-way analysis of variance was applied to analyze the data for statistically significant differences between the experimental groups (p&lt;0.05). Two-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the one-week μTBS specimens for IDS strategy (p=0.087) and SC methods (p=0.806). However, the interaction of IDS strategy and SC methods appeared statistically significant (p=0.016). The six-month specimen evaluation showed no significant difference in μTBS for SC (p=0.297) and SC/IDS interaction (p=0.055), but the μTBS of the IDS strategies differed significantly among them (p=0.003). For tribochemical silica-coated IDS, no significant effect of aging on μTBS was recorded (p=0.465), but there was a highly significant difference in μTBS depending on the IDS strategy (p&lt;0.001). In addition, the interaction of IDS and aging was borderline statistically significant (p=0.045). The specimens failed mainly at the adhesive-dentin interface for all experimental groups. Dentin exposure during clinical procedures for indirect restorations benefits from the application of IDS, which was shown to result in higher bond strength. No significant differences were found between cleaning with solely pumice or pumice followed by tribochemical silica coating.

scholarly journals Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona A. Montasser ◽  
James L. Drummond ◽  
Carla A. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective: To compare rebonding of orthodontic brackets based on the hypothesis that no difference would be found between the adhesive systems with respect to shear bond strength, mode of failure, and clinical failure rates. Materials and Methods: The three adhesive systems included two self-etch primers (Transbond and M-Bond) and a conventional phosphoric acid etch (Rely-a-Bond). The sample size was 20 premolars for each adhesive system. The shear bond strength was tested 24 hours after bracket bonding with the bonding/debonding procedures repeated two times after the first debonding. Bond strength, adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure sites were evaluated for each debonding. Statistical analysis consisted of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Scheffè analysis. The clinical portion evaluated 15 patients over a 12-month period. Results: The mean shear bond strengths after the first, second, and third debondings for Rely-a-Bond were 8.4 ± 1.8, 10.3 ± 2.4, and 14.1 ± 3.3 MPa, respectively; for Transbond 11.1 ± 4.6, 13.6 ± 4.5, and 12.9 ± 4.4 MPa, respectively; and for M-Bond 8.7 ± 2.7, 10.4 ± 2.4, and 12.4 ± 3.4 MPa, respectively. After the three debondings the mean shear bond strength increased significantly from the first to the third debonding for Rely-a-Bond and M-bond (P ≤ .001), but did not change for Transbond (P = .199). Conclusions: The original hypothesis is not rejected. The two self-etching primers showing higher or comparable bond strength to the conventional phosphoric etch with less adhesive remnant on the enamel surface after the first debonding. With repeated bonding/debonding, the differences in the bond strength, ARI, and failure site were not significantly different. There was no difference in the clinical performance of the three adhesive systems (P = .667).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document