scholarly journals Apical Extrusion of Debris during Root Canal Preparation with ProTaper Next, WaveOne Gold and Twisted Files

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (21) ◽  
pp. 6254
Author(s):  
Wojciech Eliasz ◽  
Beata Czarnecka ◽  
Anna Surdacka
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Movement Kinematics ◽  
Liquid Component ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Adaptive Motion ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

(1) Background: Apical extrusion of debris is an example of a complication that may arise during root canal treatment, and it has been proven to be an unavoidable occurrence during endodontic treatment by numerous authors. Even though it may not hinder the long-term outcome of treatment, it may lead directly to increased levels of postoperative pain and, therefore, lower levels of patient acceptance and satisfaction. The aim of the study was to assess the weight of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation with instruments that use different movement kinematics (rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive motion); (2) Methods: The study was performed using the Myers and Montgomery model. Sixty human premolar teeth were inserted into preweighed Eppendorf tubes and randomly classified into three groups. After manual glide-path preparation, teeth in each group were instrumented to working length set 1 mm short of the anatomical apex using the standard sequence provided by the manufacturers (for Group 1: ProTaper Next X1 & X2; for Group 2: WaveOne Gold Primary, for Group 3: Twisted Files SM1-SM3). Root canals were irrigated with 1 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution between each file insertion. The tubes with collected debris were stored in an incubator at 70 °C for 5 days in order to evaporate the liquid component. Measurement of the weight of extruded debris was performed by subtracting the preinstrumentation from the postinstrumentation weight of the tubes. The results were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA, with significance level set at 0.05; (3) Results: The weight of extruded debris was 0.337 mg (SD = 0.148) for Group 1, 0.305 mg (SD = 0.201) for Group 2, and 0.348 mg (SD = 0.135) for Group 3. (4) Conclusions: Engine-driven root canal preparation with the use of instruments ProTaper Next, WaveOne Gold and Twisted Files that use different movement kinematics (rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive motion) was associated with apical extrusion of debris to a similar extent.

scholarly journals Apical extrusion of debris by manual and mechanical instrumentation

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilia E. Leonardi ◽  
Diana M. Atlas ◽  
Guillermo Raiden
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

The aim of the present study was to assess the presence of apically extruded debris and evaluate the influence of canal curvature on the amount of debris produced by manual and mechanical techniques. Forty single-rooted mature teeth with 15 to 30 degree of root canal curvature were selected. The presence of only one foramen was confirmed using a magnifying lens. A size 15 K-file was placed up to the apical foramen to determine the patency. Working length was determined with the same instrument, 1 mm short of the foramen. According to the employed technique, the groups were labeled as follows: Group 1 - Manual instrumentation with Mor-flex files; Group 2 - Mechanical instrumentation with Cursor and Mor-flex files; Group 3 - Manual instrumentation with Flexi-cut files; Group 4 - Mechanical instrumentation with Cursor and Flexi-cut files. During instrumentation, the root canals were irrigated with 20 mL. Debris extruded through the apical foramen was collected using the Myers and Montgomery technique. The values (in mg) were: Group 1: 0.422 ± 0.683; Group 2: 0.688 ± 0.795; Group 3: 0.409 ± 0.323; Group 4: 0.810 ± 0.708. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA at 5% significance level. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between slight and moderate curvatures in terms of the amount of extruded debris (p>0.05).

scholarly journals Apical Extrusion of Debris and Irrigants Using Different Irrigation Needles

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Barcellos Silva ◽  
Angélica Mohnsam Krolow ◽  
Katerine Jahnecke Pilownic ◽  
Renata Picanço Casarin ◽  
Regina Karla Pontes Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Bonferroni Correction ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Needle Type ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Root Canal Instrumentation ◽  
Final Instrument ◽  
Group 1

Abstract This study evaluated the influence of irrigation tip, root canal curvature and final apical diameter on periapical debris and irrigant extrusion during root canal instrumentation. After being classified as mildly or moderately curved, the mesiobuccal root canals of 90 human molars were instrumented. The teeth were allocated into three groups according to the used needle type: a flat open-end needle (Group 1), a side-vented needle (Group 2) or a double side-vented needle (Group 3). The amount of extruded material after instrumentation was calculated for each group. The differences in irrigant and debris extrusion between the experimental groups were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Irrigation tips and final instrument diameter differences were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multiple groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test with a Bonferroni correction at α=0.05. The amount of extruded material from the double side-vented needle was significantly less than the open-ended flat needle (p=0.008), but there was no difference compared to the side-vented needle (p=0.929). The results showed no effect of root curvature and final apical diameter on the amount of irrigant and debris extrusion (p>0.05). The double side-vented needles generated the least material extrusion to the periapical tissues. Irrigation needle type had the greatest influence on periapical irrigant and debris extrusion and the double side-vented needles may be safely used during endodontic therapy.

scholarly journals Effects of different glide path techniques on the amount of extruded debris and preparation times during root canal preparation

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-190
Author(s):  
Damla Kırıcı ◽  
Simay Koç ◽  
Alper Kuştarcı
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Glide Path ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Post Hoc

Background.This study purposed to compare the effect of new single glide path files on extruded apical debris and total preparation times during root canal preparation with the WaveOne Gold system. Methods. Thirty-six extracted human lower molar teeth with mesiobuccal canal curvature angles of 25‒35° were randomly splited to three groups. In group 1, the glide path was created with WaveOne Gold Glider (WGG) file at working length (WL); in group 2, the glide path was created with ProGlider file (PG); in group 3, the glide path was not performed. In all the groups, the root canals were shaped with WaveOne Gold Primary (WOG) reciprocating files at WL. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was picked up into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the dry extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pre- and post-instrumentation weights of the tubes in each group. The total time elapsed during the canal preparation was calculated with a chronometer. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. Results. The WGG/WOG group extruded significantly fewer debris than the WOG and PG/WOG groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the WOG and PG/WOG groups (P>0.05). The WGG/WOG and PG/WOG groups were significantly faster than the WOG group. Conclusion. The amount of debris extruded apically significantly diminished when conventional WGG was implemented before using WOG. The total preparation time significantly diminished when the WOG file was used in combination with reciprocating and rotary glide path preparation techniques.

scholarly journals Evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using Hand K file, Revo S, Protaper Next and Wave One file system: An in vitro study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Mohd Salman Akhtar ◽  
Ankit Agarwal ◽  
Mohammed Ayaz Malick ◽  
Sheeba Khan ◽  
Sachin Yadav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
File System ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Final Weight ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2

Introduction: The key step during the root canal treatment is the biomechanical preparation of the infected root canals. This preparation may result in pushing the apical debris through the apical foramen into the periapical space leading to initiation of immunological response by the host leading to postoperative pain and discomfort. Therefore the aim of the study was to compare the apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using Hand k file, Revo S, Protaper Next and Wave One file system.    Materials and Method: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars with single canal were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n = 15) for instrumentation with four different files. Group 1: Hand k file, Group 2: Revo S file, Group 3: ProTaper Next, and Group 4: WaveOne single reciprocating file. Debris extruding during instrumentation were collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. These tubes were then stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days and were then weighed to obtain the final weight, with the extruded debris. Weight of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s test. Result: For intergroup comparison, significant differences were found for the debris extruded. Instrumentation with hand K files resulted in significantly more debris extrusion apically as compared to other three NiTi groups. Maximum debris extrusion was seen by Hand K file, followed by group 2(Revo S), then group 4(Wave One) and least by group 3(Protaper Next). However, there was no significant difference in debris extrusion amongst groups prepared with either NiTi rotary or reciprocating file systems. Conclusion: The Pro Taper Next resulted in least debris extrusion when compared to Hand k file, reciprocating Wave One and rotary Revo S. However there was not a significant difference between all the NiTi rotary and reciprocating file system. Keywords: Apical extrusion debris; Hand k file, instrumentation; ProTaper Next, RevoS and WaveOne.

scholarly journals ANÁLISE DA CAPACIDADE DE LIMPEZA DE TRÊS TÉCNICAS DE INSTRUMENTAÇÃO EM CANAIS RADICULARES ACHATADOS: DIAPHANIZATION STUDY

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wagner Altamirando Santana Barros de Souza ◽  
Paloma Souza Gonçalves ◽  
Luis Cardoso Rasquin ◽  
Fabiola Bastos de Carvalho
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Arithmetic Average ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
India Ink ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Lower Incisors ◽  
Group 1

The purpose of this study was to evaluate by diaphanization the cleaning ability of walls of flattened root canals prepared with three different instruments. Thirty lower incisors, which had their root canals filled with India ink after coronal access and determination of the work length, were selected. The samples were randomly divided into three groups of 10 teeth each, according to the instrument used in the preparation: Group 1– hand files instrumentation; Group 2– instrumentation with ProTaper Universal rotary files; Group 3 – instrumentation with iRace rotary files. After instrumentation, the teeth were diaphanized and evaluated by cleaning ability, analyzing the amount of dentin walls in which India ink was not removed. When performing the Kruskal-Wallis test (p>0.05) there were not statistical significant differences between the groups, as the arithmetic average of the scores at cervical, middle and apical thirds. None of the instruments used in root canal preparation of flattened root canals was able to perform a complete cleaning of the dentin walls.

scholarly journals Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
Nezif Çelik ◽  
Sadullah Kaya ◽  
Özkan Adıgüzel
Keyword(s):  
File System ◽  
Native Speakers ◽  
Single Root ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Native Speakers Of English ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Aim: To compare the amount of apically extruded debris using Reciproc (R25) file with different reciprocal angles. Methodology: In this research, 60 extracted mandibular premolars with a single root, a single canal, and a single apical foramen were used. Specimens, the working length of which was determined by a stainless steel 10-K file, were randomly distributed into three experimental groups (n = 20) as follows: Group 1 150° counterclockwise (CCW)-30° clockwise (CW); Group 2 180° CCW-60° CW; and Group 3 210° CCW-90° CW. For the irrigation, 10 mL of distilled water was administered via syringe pump. The extruded debris was collected into Eppendorf tubes tared in advance. The distribution of data was analyzed using a Shapiro-Wilk test. A Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for statistical analysis. The null hypothesis is no significant difference between the groups in terms of the amount of apical extrusion of debris. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to amount of apical extrusion of debris (p>0.05). Nevertheless, the highest average amount of extrusion of debris was detected in group 1, and the lowest in group 3. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, different reciprocal angles during chemomechanical preparation has no significant effect on the amount of apical extrusion of debris.   How to cite this article: Çelik N, Kaya S, Adıgüzel Ö. Comparing the effect of Reciproc R25 rotary file system on the amount of apical extrusion of debris via using it with different reciprocal angles. Int Dent Res 2021;11(Suppl.1):63-6. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.10   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of various endodontic irrigants on apical extrusion of debris

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
Sameer Makkar ◽  
Simranjeet Kaur
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction. All techniques and instruments used to clean and shape canals produce some amount of apically extruded debris. The type of irrigant can affect the amount of apically extruded debris. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively compare the amount of debris extruded apically from root canals when three different irrigants were used during canal preparation with hand instruments. Material and Methods. Twenty extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars with straight root canals were used. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups based on the irrigant used: Group 1: Biopure MTAD (Dentsply), Group 2: 3% NaOCl (Prima Dentalproducts), Group 3: 2% Chlorhexidine (Vishal Industries, Gujarat), Group 4: Control (no irrigation). Debris extruded through apical foramen during root canal preparation was collected into pre weighed empty guttapercha tubes. The weight of dry extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the preinstrumentation and postinstrumentation weight for each group. Obtained data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. Results. Group 2 (3% sodium hypochlorite) had the greatest amount of extruded debris which was significantly different from other groups (p<0.05). Conclusion. The type of used irrigant can affect the amount of apically extruded debris. Sodium hypochlorite in the concentration of 3% showed the greatest amount of extruded debris.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of a silicon-based root canal sealer for filling of simulated lateral canals

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Vicente Baroni Barbizam ◽  
Matheus Souza ◽  
Doglas Cecchin ◽  
Jakob Dabbel
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Silicon Based

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of a silicon-based root canal sealer, compared to zinc oxide and eugenol and an epoxy resin-based sealers, for filling of simulated lateral canals. Thirty extracted single-rooted human teeth were selected, conventional access was made and the working length was established 1 mm from the apical foramen. Three simulated lateral canals, one in each root third (coronal, middle and apical) were prepared in both the mesial and distal surfaces of each tooth using a size 15 reamer adapted to a low-speed handpiece. Each root canal was instrumented using ProTaper rotary files up to file F3 at the working length, and then irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl followed by EDTA. The teeth were assigned to 3 groups (n=10), according to the root canal sealer: Roeko Seal (Group 1), Sealer 26 (group 2) and Grossman's sealer (Group 3). Gutta-percha cold lateral condensation technique was performed in all groups. Postoperative radiographs were taken and the images were projected for evaluation of the quality of lateral canal filling. Data were submitted to statistical analysis by Kruskal Wallis test at 5% significance level. The results showed that Grossman's sealer filled a larger number of lateral canals than Roeko Seal (p<0.05) and Sealer 26 (p<0.01). It may be concluded that Roeko Seal silicone-based root canal sealer was not as effective as the Grossman's sealer for filling of simulated lateral canals. The lateral canals localized in the apical third of the root were more difficult to be filled.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Three Different Single File Systems: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Deebah Choudhary
Keyword(s):  
File Systems ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Single File ◽  
Working Length ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cleaning Efficacy ◽  
Scanning Electron ◽  
Group 1

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the canal cleaning efficacy of these three file systems using scanning electron microscopy. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in the Department of Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences Sehora, between October 2020 and December 2020. Materials and Methods: Access cavity preparation was performed on sixty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth and working length was determined. The samples were randomly divided into three groups (n=20) depending upon the file system used i.e. Group 1 (Reciproc Blue), Group 2 (Waveone Gold) and Group 3 (F360). Samples were split into two halves by creating longitudinal grooves on the buccal and lingual surfaces. The samples were sputter-coated with gold and examined under scanning electron microscope at 5000X. The dentinal wall of root canal at coronal, middle and apical thirds of each sample were evaluated for the presence of determining the canal cleanliness and then analyzed using a five-score index. Results: The results of this study revealed that Group 1 (Reciproc Blue) exhibited better cleaning efficacy than samples of Group 2 (WaveOne Gold) and Group 3 (F360) at different locations in the canal i.e. coronal, middle and apical. The mean debris present was highest in coronal area for both group 2 and group 3 i.e. 2.1 and least was seen in apical area of group 1 i.e. 0.3. (p<0.05) Conclusion: Reciproc Blue single-file showed highest cleaning efficacy followed by Waveone Gold and F360. Reciproc file also showed effective cleaning in the apical third of the canal.

scholarly journals The Effect of Root Canal Irrigation with Combination of Sodium Hypo-chlorite and Chlorhexidine Gluconate on the Sealing Ability of Obturation Materials

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Homayouni ◽  
Nima Moradi Majd ◽  
Heidar Zohrehei ◽  
Behrad Mosavari ◽  
Mamak Adel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Fluid Filtration ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the precipitate that was formed by combining Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) and Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) on the sealing ability of root canal obturation materials. Materials and Methods: The fluid filtration method was conducted on a total of 100 roots. Samples were randomly divided into two control (n=5) and three experimental groups (n=30). The samples in group 1 were irrigated with 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl, and then the smear layers of the teeth were removed by 17% EDTA, while the specimens of group 2 were irrigated by 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl and 1.5 mL of 2% CHX; after the smear layer removal, a final flush with 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was performed. The samples of group 3 were irrigated the same as group 1 but after the smear layer removal canals were irrigated again with 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl and then a final flush with 1.5 mL of 2% CHX was performed. Teeth were obturated with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer and after seven days, microleakage was evaluated by the fluid filtration technique. The results were analyzed by the ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: The samples in group 3 had significantly greater microleakage compared to teeth in group 1, 2 (p<0.05), and the specimens in group 1 showed significantly less amount of microleakage than samples in group 2, 3 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The presence of the precipitate that is formed due to interaction between NaOCl and CHX has negative effect on the sealing ability of gutta-percha and AH26 sealer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document