scholarly journals A Simple Proposal for Including Designer Preferences in Multi-Objective Optimization Problems

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 991
Author(s):  
Xavier Blasco ◽  
Gilberto Reynoso-Meza ◽  
Enrique A. Sánchez-Pérez ◽  
Juan Vicente Sánchez-Pérez ◽  
Natalia Jonard-Pérez
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Underlying Structure ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Number Of Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Objective Space ◽  
Definition Of

Including designer preferences in every phase of the resolution of a multi-objective optimization problem is a fundamental issue to achieve a good quality in the final solution. To consider preferences, the proposal of this paper is based on the definition of what we call a preference basis that shows the preferred optimization directions in the objective space. Associated to this preference basis a new basis in the objective space—dominance basis—is computed. With this new basis the meaning of dominance is reinterpreted to include the designer’s preferences. In this paper, we show the effect of changing the geometric properties of the underlying structure of the Euclidean objective space by including preferences. This way of incorporating preferences is very simple and can be used in two ways: by redefining the optimization problem and/or in the decision-making phase. The approach can be used with any multi-objective optimization algorithm. An advantage of including preferences in the optimization process is that the solutions obtained are focused on the region of interest to the designer and the number of solutions is reduced, which facilitates the interpretation and analysis of the results. The article shows an example of the use of the preference basis and its associated dominance basis in the reformulation of the optimization problem, as well as in the decision-making phase.

Toward the Use of Pareto Performance Solutions and Pareto Robustness Solutions for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Problems

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijun Wang ◽  
Stéphane Caro ◽  
Fouad Bennis ◽  
Oscar Brito Augusto
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Robust Solutions ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Robust Optimization Problem ◽  
Design Solutions ◽  
Further Development

For Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Problem (MOROP), it is important to obtain design solutions that are both optimal and robust. To find these solutions, usually, the designer need to set a threshold of the variation of Performance Functions (PFs) before optimization, or add the effects of uncertainties on the original PFs to generate a new Pareto robust front. In this paper, we divide a MOROP into two Multi-Objective Optimization Problems (MOOPs). One is the original MOOP, another one is that we take the Robustness Functions (RFs), robust counterparts of the original PFs, as optimization objectives. After solving these two MOOPs separately, two sets of solutions come out, namely the Pareto Performance Solutions (PP) and the Pareto Robustness Solutions (PR). Make a further development on these two sets, we can get two types of solutions, namely the Pareto Robustness Solutions among the Pareto Performance Solutions (PR(PP)), and the Pareto Performance Solutions among the Pareto Robustness Solutions (PP(PR)). Further more, the intersection of PR(PP) and PP(PR) can represent the intersection of PR and PP well. Then the designer can choose good solutions by comparing the results of PR(PP) and PP(PR). Thanks to this method, we can find out the optimal and robust solutions without setting the threshold of the variation of PFs nor losing the initial Pareto front. Finally, an illustrative example highlights the contributions of the paper.

An Interactive Neural Network for Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization with Application to the Design of Digital Filters

2012 ◽  
Vol 433-440 ◽  
pp. 2808-2816
Author(s):  
Jian Jin Zheng ◽  
You Shen Xia
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Computational Complexity ◽  
Digital Filters ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Single Objective

This paper presents a new interactive neural network for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems. The constrained multi-objective optimization problem is reformulated into two constrained single objective optimization problems and two neural networks are designed to obtain the optimal weight and the optimal solution of the two optimization problems respectively. The proposed algorithm has a low computational complexity and is easy to be implemented. Moreover, the proposed algorithm is well applied to the design of digital filters. Computed results illustrate the good performance of the proposed algorithm.

A Method for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problems Containing an Infinite Number of Parameterized Objectives

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliot Rudnick-Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Infinite Number ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Pareto Frontier ◽  
Brute Force ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Brute Force Approach ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Multi-objective decision making problems can sometimes involve an infinite number of objectives. In this paper, an approach is presented for solving multi-objective optimization problems containing an infinite number of parameterized objectives, termed “infinite objective optimization”. A formulation is given for infinite objective optimization problems and an approach for checking whether a Pareto frontier is a solution to this formulation is detailed. Using this approach, a new sampling based approach is developed for solving infinite objective optimization problems. The new approach is tested on several different example problems and is shown to be faster and perform better than a brute force approach.

Optimization of Vehicle-Borne Radar Antenna Pedestal Based on Modified NSGA-II

2014 ◽  
Vol 945-949 ◽  
pp. 2241-2247
Author(s):  
De Gao Zhao ◽  
Qiang Li
Keyword(s):  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Population Diversity ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Sorting Process ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Radar Antenna ◽  
Modified Algorithm

This paper deals with application of Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm with elitism (NSGA-II) to solve multi-objective optimization problems of designing a vehicle-borne radar antenna pedestal. Five technical improvements are proposed due to the disadvantages of NSGA-II. They are as follow: (1) presenting a new method to calculate the fitness of individuals in population; (2) renewing the definition of crowding distance; (3) introducing a threshold for choosing elitist; (4) reducing some redundant sorting process; (5) developing a self-adaptive arithmetic cross and mutation probability. The modified algorithm can lead to better population diversity than the original NSGA-II. Simulation results prove rationality and validity of the modified NSGA-II. A uniformly distributed Pareto front can be obtained by using the modified NSGA-II. Finally, a multi-objective problem of designing a vehicle-borne radar antenna pedestal is settled with the modified algorithm.

An Improved Constrained Optimization Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm and its Application in Engineering

2014 ◽  
Vol 962-965 ◽  
pp. 2903-2908
Author(s):  
Yun Lian Liu ◽  
Wen Li ◽  
Tie Bin Wu ◽  
Yun Cheng ◽  
Tao Yun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Constrained Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Crossover Operator ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Constrained Optimization Problem ◽  
Great Ability ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Multi Objective Genetic Algorithm

An improved multi-objective genetic algorithm is proposed to solve constrained optimization problems. The constrained optimization problem is converted into a multi-objective optimization problem. In the evolution process, our algorithm is based on multi-objective technique, where the population is divided into dominated and non-dominated subpopulation. Arithmetic crossover operator is utilized for the randomly selected individuals from dominated and non-dominated subpopulation, respectively. The crossover operator can lead gradually the individuals to the extreme point and improve the local searching ability. Diversity mutation operator is introduced for non-dominated subpopulation. Through testing the performance of the proposed algorithm on 3 benchmark functions and 1 engineering optimization problems, and comparing with other meta-heuristics, the result of simulation shows that the proposed algorithm has great ability of global search. Keywords: multi-objective optimization;genetic algorithm;constrained optimization problem;engineering application

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Selection Hyper-Heuristics for Real-World Multi-Objective Optimization Problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 9153
Author(s):  
Vinicius Renan de Carvalho ◽  
Ender Özcan ◽  
Jaime Simão Sichman
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Exact Algorithms ◽  
Mathematical Function ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Algorithm Selection ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Cross Domain ◽  
Domain Performance

As exact algorithms are unfeasible to solve real optimization problems, due to their computational complexity, meta-heuristics are usually used to solve them. However, choosing a meta-heuristic to solve a particular optimization problem is a non-trivial task, and often requires a time-consuming trial and error process. Hyper-heuristics, which are heuristics to choose heuristics, have been proposed as a means to both simplify and improve algorithm selection or configuration for optimization problems. This paper novel presents a novel cross-domain evaluation for multi-objective optimization: we investigate how four state-of-the-art online hyper-heuristics with different characteristics perform in order to find solutions for eighteen real-world multi-objective optimization problems. These hyper-heuristics were designed in previous studies and tackle the algorithm selection problem from different perspectives: Election-Based, based on Reinforcement Learning and based on a mathematical function. All studied hyper-heuristics control a set of five Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) as Low-Level (meta-)Heuristics (LLHs) while finding solutions for the optimization problem. To our knowledge, this work is the first to deal conjointly with the following issues: (i) selection of meta-heuristics instead of simple operators (ii) focus on multi-objective optimization problems, (iii) experiments on real world problems and not just function benchmarks. In our experiments, we computed, for each algorithm execution, Hypervolume and IGD+ and compared the results considering the Kruskal–Wallis statistical test. Furthermore, we ranked all the tested algorithms considering three different Friedman Rankings to summarize the cross-domain analysis. Our results showed that hyper-heuristics have a better cross-domain performance than single meta-heuristics, which makes them excellent candidates for solving new multi-objective optimization problems.

scholarly journals APPLICATION OF POPULATION EVOLVABILITY IN A HYPER-HEURISTIC FOR DYNAMIC MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 951-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodoro Macias-Escobar ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
Bernabé Dorronsoro ◽  
Héctor Fraire-Huacuja ◽  
Nelson Rangel-Valdez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Selection Method ◽  
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Selection Methods ◽  
Dynamic Optimization Problems ◽  
Multi Objective

It is important to know the properties of an optimization problem and the difficulty an algorithm faces to solve it. Population evolvability obtains information related to both elements by analysing the probability of an algorithm to improve current solutions and the degree of those improvements. DPEM_HH is a dynamic multi-objective hyper-heuristic that uses low-level heuristic (LLH) selection methods that apply population evolvability. DPEM_HH uses dynamic multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (DMOEAs) as LLHs to solve dynamic multi-objective optimization problems (DMOPs). Population evolvability is incorporated in DPEM_HH by calculating it on each candidate DMOEA for a set of sampled generations after a change is detected, using those values to select which LLH will be applied. DPEM_HH is tested on multiple DMOPs with dynamic properties that provide several challenges. Experimental results show that DPEM_HH with a greedy LLH selection method that uses average population evolvability values can produce solutions closer to the Pareto optimal front with equal to or better diversity than previously proposed heuristics. This shows the effectiveness and feasibility of the application of population evolvability on hyperheuristics to solve dynamic optimization problems.

scholarly journals Multi-objective optimization of retaining wall using genetic algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 58-65
Author(s):  
Filip Dodigović ◽  
Krešo Ivandić ◽  
Jasmin Jug ◽  
Krešimir Agnezović
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Silty Sand ◽  
Embedment Depth ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Cost

The paper investigates the possibility of applying the genetic algorithm NSGA-II to optimize a reinforced concrete retaining wall embedded in saturated silty sand. Multi-objective constrained optimization was performed to minimize the cost, while maximizing the overdesign factors (ODF) against sliding, overturning, and soil bearing resistance. For a given change in ground elevation of 5.0 m, the width of the foundation and the embedment depth were optimized. Comparing the algorithm's performance in the cases of two-objective and three objective optimizations showed that the number of objectives significantly affects its convergence rate. It was also found that the verification of the wall against the sliding yields a lower ODF value than verifications against overturning and soil bearing capacity. Because of that, it is possible to exclude them from the definition of optimization problem. The application of the NSGA-II algorithm has been demonstrated to be an effective tool for determining the set of optimal retaining wall designs.

scholarly journals An approximation algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems using a box-coverage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Eichfelder ◽  
Leo Warnow
Keyword(s):  
Approximation Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Nondominated Set ◽  
Common Technique ◽  
Nondominated Points ◽  
Nondominated Point ◽  
Do So

AbstractFor a continuous multi-objective optimization problem, it is usually not a practical approach to compute all its nondominated points because there are infinitely many of them. For this reason, a typical approach is to compute an approximation of the nondominated set. A common technique for this approach is to generate a polyhedron which contains the nondominated set. However, often these approximations are used for further evaluations. For those applications a polyhedron is a structure that is not easy to handle. In this paper, we introduce an approximation with a simpler structure respecting the natural ordering. In particular, we compute a box-coverage of the nondominated set. To do so, we use an approach that, in general, allows us to update not only one but several boxes whenever a new nondominated point is found. The algorithm is guaranteed to stop with a finite number of boxes, each being sufficiently thin.

scholarly journals A new method for decision making in multi-objective optimization problems

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Brito Augusto ◽  
Fouad Bennis ◽  
Stephane Caro
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
New Method ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document