scholarly journals A Comparison of Archiving Strategies for Characterization of Nearly Optimal Solutions under Multi-Objective Optimization

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 999
Author(s):  
Alberto Pajares ◽  
Xavier Blasco ◽  
Juan Manuel Herrero ◽  
Miguel A. Martínez

In a multi-objective optimization problem, in addition to optimal solutions, multimodal and/or nearly optimal alternatives can also provide additional useful information for the decision maker. However, obtaining all nearly optimal solutions entails an excessive number of alternatives. Therefore, to consider the nearly optimal solutions, it is convenient to obtain a reduced set, putting the focus on the potentially useful alternatives. These solutions are the alternatives that are close to the optimal solutions in objective space, but which differ significantly in the decision space. To characterize this set, it is essential to simultaneously analyze the decision and objective spaces. One of the crucial points in an evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm is the archiving strategy. This is in charge of keeping the solution set, called the archive, updated during the optimization process. The motivation of this work is to analyze the three existing archiving strategies proposed in the literature (ArchiveUpdatePQ,ϵDxy, Archive_nevMOGA, and targetSelect) that aim to characterize the potentially useful solutions. The archivers are evaluated on two benchmarks and in a real engineering example. The contribution clearly shows the main differences between the three archivers. This analysis is useful for the design of evolutionary algorithms that consider nearly optimal solutions.

Author(s):  
Lan Zhang

To improve the convergence and distribution of a multi-objective optimization algorithm, a hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm, based on the quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO) algorithm and adaptive ranks clone and neighbor list-based immune algorithm (NNIA2), is proposed. The contribution of this work is threefold. First, the vicinity distance was used instead of the crowding distance to update the archived optimal solutions in the QPSO algorithm. The archived optimal solutions are updated and maintained by using the dynamic vicinity distance based m-nearest neighbor list in the QPSO algorithm. Secondly, an adaptive dynamic threshold of unfitness function for constraint handling is introduced in the process. It is related to the evolution algebra and the feasible solution. Thirdly, a new metric called the distribution metric is proposed to depict the diversity and distribution of the Pareto optimal. In order to verify the validity and feasibility of the QPSO-NNIA2 algorithm, we compare it with the QPSO, NNIA2, NSGA-II, MOEA/D, and SPEA2 algorithms in solving unconstrained and constrained multi-objective problems. The simulation results show that the QPSO-NNIA2 algorithm achieves superior convergence and superior performance by three metrics compared to other algorithms.


2013 ◽  
Vol 442 ◽  
pp. 419-423
Author(s):  
Ming Song Li

Problem of multi-objective optimization based on Artificial Immune System (AIS) is an important research area of current evolutionary computing. Starting from the intelligent information processing mechanism of immune theory and the immune system itself, a kind of evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm based on AIS is proposed. Clonal selection, scattered crossover and hypermutation based on the learning mechanism are characteristics of the algorithm. Algorithm implements clonal selection according to the distribution of individuals in the objective space, which benefit obtaining Pareto optimal boundary distributed more widely and speed up the convergence. Compared with the existing algorithms, the algorithm has been greatly improved in convergence, diversity, and distribution of solutions.


Author(s):  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Kamran Shafi ◽  
Hussein Abbass

A number of benchmark problems exist for evaluating multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) in the objective space. However, the decision space performance analysis is a recent and relatively less explored topic in evolutionary multi-objective optimization research. Among other implications, such analysis can lead to designing more realistic test problems, gaining better understanding about optimal and robust design areas, and design and evaluation of knowledge-based optimization algorithms. This paper complements the existing research in this area and proposes a new method to generate multi-objective optimization test problems with clustered Pareto sets in hyper-rectangular defined areas of decision space. The test problem is parametrized to control number of decision variables, number and position of optimal areas in the decision space and modality of fitness landscape. Three leading MOEAs, including NSGA-II, NSGA-III, and MOEA/D, are evaluated on a number of problem instances with varying characteristics. A new metric is proposed that measures the performance of algorithms in terms of their coverage of the optimal areas in the decision space. The empirical analysis presented in this research shows that the decision space performance may not necessarily be reflective of the objective space performance and that all algorithms are sensitive to population size parameter for the new test problems.


2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kudikala ◽  
Deb Kalyanmoy ◽  
Bishakh Bhattacharya

Shape control of adaptive structures using piezoelectric actuators has found a wide range of applications in recent years. In this paper, the problem of finding optimal distribution of piezoelectric actuators and corresponding actuation voltages for static shape control of a plate is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem. The two conflicting objectives considered are minimization of input control energy and minimization of mean square deviation between the desired and actuated shapes with constraints on the maximum number of actuators and maximum induced stresses. A shear lag model of the smart plate structure is created, and the optimization problem is solved using an evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm: nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Pareto-optimal solutions are obtained for different case studies. Further, the obtained solutions are verified by comparing them with the single-objective optimization solutions. Attainment surface based performance evaluation of the proposed optimization algorithm has been carried out.


Author(s):  
A. K. Nandi ◽  
K. Deb

The primary objective in designing appropriate particle reinforced polyurethane composite which will be used as a mould material in soft tooling process is to minimize the cycle time of soft tooling process by providing faster cooling rate during solidification of wax/plastic component. This chapter exemplifies an effective approach to design particle reinforced mould materials by solving the inherent multi-objective optimization problem associated with soft tooling process using evolutionary algorithms. In this chapter, first a brief introduction of multi-objective optimization problem with the key issues is presented. Then, after a short overview on the working procedure of genetic algorithm, a well- established multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, namely NSGA-II along with various performance metrics are described. The inherent multi-objective problem in soft tooling process is demonstrated and subsequently solved using an elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, NSGA-II. Multi-objective optimization results obtained using NSGA-II are analyzed statistically and validated with real industrial application. Finally the fundamental results of this approach are summarized and various perspectives to the industries along with scopes for future research work are pointed out.


2014 ◽  
Vol 904 ◽  
pp. 408-413
Author(s):  
Zhai Liu Hao ◽  
Zu Yuan Liu ◽  
Bai Wei Feng

Ship optimization design is a typical multi-objective problem. The multi-objective optimization algorithm based on physical programming is able to obtain evenly distributed Pareto front. But the number of Pareto solutions and the search positions of pseudo-preference structures still exit some disadvantages that are improved in this paper. Firstly uniform design for mixture experiments is used to arbitrarily set the number of Pareto solutions and evenly distribute the search positions of pseudo-preference structures. Then the objective space is searched by shrinking of search domain and rotation of pseudo-preference structure technology. The optimization quality is able to be improved. Finally, the improved multi-objective optimization algorithm is applied to ship conceptual design optimization and compared with the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to verify the effectiveness of the improved algorithm.


Author(s):  
Tipwimol Sooktip ◽  
Naruemon Wattanapongsakorn

In multi-objective optimization problem, a set of optimal solutions is obtained from an optimization algorithm. There are many trade-off optimal solutions. However, in practice, a decision maker or user only needs one or very few solutions for implementation. Moreover, these solutions are difficult to determine from a set of optimal solutions of complex system. Therefore, a trade-off method for multi-objective optimization is proposed for identifying the preferred solutions according to the decision maker’s preference. The preference is expressed by using the trade-off between any two objectives where the decision maker is willing to worsen in one objective value in order to gain improvement in the other objective value. The trade-off method is demonstrated by using well-known two-objective and three-objective benchmark problems. Furthermore, a system design problem with component allocation is also considered to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method. The results show that the trade-off method can be applied for solving practical problems to identify the final solution(s) and easy to use even when the decision maker lacks some knowledge or not an expert in the problem solving. The decision maker only gives his/her preference information.  Then, the corresponding optimal solutions will be obtained, accordingly.


Author(s):  
A. K. Nandi ◽  
K. Deb

The primary objective in designing appropriate particle reinforced polyurethane composite which will be used as a mould material in soft tooling process is to minimize the cycle time of soft tooling process by providing faster cooling rate during solidification of wax/plastic component. This chapter exemplifies an effective approach to design particle reinforced mould materials by solving the inherent multi-objective optimization problem associated with soft tooling process using evolutionary algorithms. In this chapter, first a brief introduction of multi-objective optimization problem with the key issues is presented. Then, after a short overview on the working procedure of genetic algorithm, a well- established multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, namely NSGA-II along with various performance metrics are described. The inherent multi-objective problem in soft tooling process is demonstrated and subsequently solved using an elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, NSGA-II. Multi-objective optimization results obtained using NSGA-II are analyzed statistically and validated with real industrial application. Finally the fundamental results of this approach are summarized and various perspectives to the industries along with scopes for future research work are pointed out.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document