scholarly journals Herb–Drug Interactions: Worlds Intersect with the Patient at the Center

Medicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Babos ◽  
Michelle Heinan ◽  
Linda Redmond ◽  
Fareeha Moiz ◽  
Joao Victor Souza-Peres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Drug Information ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Full Information ◽  
Information Need ◽  
Herbal Products ◽  
Reduce Risk

This review examines three bodies of literature related to herb–drug interactions: case reports, clinical studies, evaluations found in six drug interaction checking resources. The aim of the study is to examine the congruity of resources and to assess the degree to which case reports signal for further study. A qualitative review of case reports seeks to determine needs and perspectives of case report authors. Methods: Systematic search of Medline identified clinical studies and case reports of interacting herb–drug combinations. Interacting herb–drug pairs were searched in six drug interaction resources. Case reports were analyzed qualitatively for completeness and to identify underlying themes. Results: Ninety-nine case-report documents detailed 107 cases. Sixty-five clinical studies evaluated 93 mechanisms of interaction relevant to herbs reported in case studies, involving 30 different herbal products; 52.7% of these investigations offered evidence supporting reported reactions. Cohen’s kappa found no agreement between any interaction checker and case report corpus. Case reports often lacked full information. Need for further information, attitudes about herbs and herb use, and strategies to reduce risk from interaction were three primary themes in the case report corpus. Conclusions: Reliable herb–drug information is needed, including open and respectful discussion with patients.

Potential Drug Interactions— Fact or Fallacy?

1975 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 586-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis D. Black ◽  
Nicholas G. Popovich
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Potential Drug ◽  
Careful Evaluation ◽  
Current Drug ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

At present, the pharmacist is faced with a perplexing number of potential drug interactions as they relate to patient care. The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate current drug-drug interaction literature, specifically gastrointestinal drug interactions. Literature search and review evaluated the authoritative basis on which conclusions were made. From this, a review was written to illustrate fallacies and misconceptions that could be derived from the literature with the intent it would serve as a guide in interpreting and evaluating drug-drug interactions. The overall study illustrates the vast need for careful evaluation of drug interaction literature before erroneous recommendations are made on conceivably inconclusive clinical studies.

scholarly journals DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (03) ◽  
pp. 357-365
Author(s):  
Hina Hasnain ◽  
Huma Ali ◽  
Farya Zafar ◽  
Ali Akbar Sial ◽  
Kamran Hameed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Drug Information ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Information Provision ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Order

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is a specific type of adverse event, which developsdue to multiple regimen therapy, and that may lead to significant hospitalization and death.Clinical and economic impact of drug interactions are increasingly accredited as a chiefconcern in critical care. Potentiating effects of DDIs in intensive care units are far more criticaldue to complex medications regimen, high risk severely ill population and associated metabolicand physiological disturbances which can impede drug effects. Pharmacist contribution isclassified as clarification of drug order, appropriate drug information provision, and advice forsubstitute treatment. A multidisciplinary approach is very necessary in developing a pharmacotherapeuticregimen designed to optimize patient outcome and minimize any potential dugdrug interactions. This review encompasses the prevalence, categorization, significance interm of patient safety and prescription efficacy, clinical and economic burdens, national andinternational data comparisons related to drug-drug interactions.

scholarly journals Meropenem-induced Valproic Acid Elimination: A Case Report of Clinically Relevant Drug Interaction

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 105-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Šíma ◽  
Jan Hartinger ◽  
Jan Rulíšek ◽  
Robert Šachl ◽  
Ondřej Slanař
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Serum Concentration ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Treated Patient ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Concomitant Administration ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Population Kinetic

We present two case reports of drug interaction between valproic acid and meropenem. In comparison with expected population-kinetic based serum levels, we observed 90.8 and 93.5% decrease in valproic acid serum levels during concomitant administration with meropenem. If carbapenems need to be administered to valproic acid treated patient, other anticonvulsant addition seems to be the appropriate as most probably the valproic acid dose escalation would not be sufficient to achieve therapeutic serum concentration.

scholarly journals Evaluation of resources for analyzing drug interactions

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Risha I. Patel, PharmD ◽  
Robert D. Beckett, PharmD, BCPS
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Pharmacology ◽  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Dietary Supplement ◽  
Drug Information ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

Objective: The research sought to evaluate seven drug information resources, specifically designed for analyzing drug interactions for scope, completeness, and ease of use, and determine the consistency of content among the seven resources.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted where 100 drug-drug and drug-dietary supplement interactions were analyzed using 7 drug information resources: Lexicomp Interactions module, Micromedex Drug Interactions, Clinical Pharmacology Drug Interaction Report, Facts & Comparisons eAnswers, Stockley’s Drug Interactions (10th edition), Drug Interactions Analysis and Management (2014), and Drug Interaction Facts (2015). The interaction sample was developed based on published resources and peer input. Two independent reviewers gathered data for each interaction from each of the 7 resources using a common form.Results: Eighty-two drug-drug and 18 drug-dietary supplement interactions were analyzed. Scope scores were higher for Lexicomp Interactions (97.0%), Clinical Pharmacology Drug Interaction Report (97.0%), and Micromedex Drug Interactions (93.0%) compared to all other resources (p<0.05 for each comparison). Overall completeness scores were higher for Micromedex Drug Interactions (median 5, interquartile range [IQR] 4 to 5) compared to all other resources (p<0.01 for each comparison) and were higher for Lexicomp Interactions (median 4, IQR 4 to 5), Facts & Comparisons eAnswers (median 4, IQR 4 to 5), and Drug Interaction Facts (4, IQR 4 to 5) compared to all other resources, except Micromedex (p<0.05 for each comparison). Ease of use, in terms of time to locate information and time to gather information, was similar among resources. Consistency score was higher for Micromedex (69.9%) compared to all other resources (p<0.05 for each comparison).Conclusions: Clinical Pharmacology Drug Interaction Report, Lexicomp Interactions, and Micromedex Drug Interactions scored highest in scope. Micromedex Drug Interactions and Lexicomp Interactions scored highest in completeness. Consistency scores were overall low, but Micromedex Drug Interactions was the highest.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Tertiary Drug Resources’ Consistency Regarding Drug-Drug Interactions of Adjunctive Analgesics

2020 ◽  
pp. 875512252095133
Author(s):  
Andrew Lang ◽  
Michael A. Veronin ◽  
Justin P. Reinert
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Drug Information ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Background: Health care providers routinely rely on tertiary drug information resources to affirm knowledge or proactively verify the safety and efficacy of medications. Though all patient care areas are affected, the reliability of these resources is perhaps nowhere as poignant as it is in high-acuity settings, including the emergency department and the intensive care unit. As providers seek to identify adjunctive analgesics for acute pain in these areas, they must be able to rely on the integrity to whichever resource their institution has granted access. Objective: To determine the congruency of drug-drug interaction information found on 3 tertiary drug resources. Methods: A drug-drug interaction analysis was conducted on Micromedex, Lexicomp, and Medscape. Adjunctive analgesics included dexmedetomidine and ketamine, which were compared with the intravenous opioid products morphine, fentanyl, and hydromorphone. Results: Significant discrepancies were appreciated with regard to the severity of drug-drug interactions. In addition, the heterogeneity in which reaction severity and likelihood are described by each respective resource makes direct comparisons difficult. Interaction warnings for dexmedetomidine and fentanyl included a “major interaction” from Micromedex, whereas Lexicomp did not identify a risk and Medscape only recommended increased monitoring on the grounds of respiratory and central nervous system depression. Conclusions: Health care providers must remain vigilant when reviewing tertiary drug information resources. Pharmacists possess the training and skills necessary to assist interdisciplinary medical teams in providing optimal patient care through evaluating and applying the information gleaned from these resources.

Advantages of everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology when drug–drug interaction is suspected: A case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1743-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Strobbe ◽  
Diane Pannier ◽  
Ilyes Sakji ◽  
Alexandre Villain ◽  
Frédéric Feutry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
High Doses

Introduction Drug interactions involving everolimus are fairly well known because of its common use, primarily as an immunosuppressant. Several recommendations regarding therapeutic drug monitoring are also available for the use of everolimus-based immunosuppression regimens. However, everolimus use in oncology differs substantially, particularly because of the high doses involved. Therapeutic drug monitoring, although sometimes necessary, is not recommended as a routine in oncology. Thus, it was deemed inapplicable due to the lack of clear recommendations. Case report Here, we present a case where a patient was prescribed everolimus for renal cell carcinoma. The patient benefitted from a pharmaceutical consultation prior to treatment initiation, and a drug interaction with verapamil was suspected. Management and outcome: Therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus was proposed. Based on the everolimus values reported in the literature, trough plasma concentration in the patient was greatly increased. The patient was then diagnosed with grade 4 oral mucositis, thereby requiring temporary suspension of everolimus treatment. Management of adverse effects was performed through multiple medicated mouthwashes. Discussion Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus is important for potential drug interactions or the occurrence of severe adverse events. In such cases, dose adjustments should be managed according to everolimus plasma concentrations. Clear oncological recommendations regarding plasma everolimus thresholds are required for a successful follow-up of the patient’s condition and to ensure adequate response to treatment.

Assessment of Herb-Drug Interactions Based on the Pharmacokinetic Changes of Probe Drug, Midazolam

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarvesh Sabarathinam ◽  
Thangavel Mahalingam Vijayakumar
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Online Database ◽  
Probe Drug

Background: In healthy volunteers, the probe drug method is widely practised to assess the pharmacokinetic mediated herb-drug interactions (HDI). We analyzed the clinical evidence of CYP3A4 probe drug, Midazolam. Methods: Literatures where Midazolam was used as a probe drug for prediction of herb-drug interaction was survey through an online database such as google scholar, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Midazolam was considered as a sensitive probe for CYP3A4 substrates due to its bioavailability. We observed that not all the herbs are causing drug interaction. However, significant changes of the Midazolam pharmacokinetics were found after high-dose and long-term intake of some herbs and food supplements, Suggesting the induction and/or inhibition of CYP activities. Conclusion: Probe drug technique is one of the easiest ways for predicting CYP enzyme-mediated herb-drug interactions. Midazolam shows a good response in clinical studies because of short half-life and low harmfulness compared with other probe drugs.

Influence of Etiologic Factors in Peri-Implantitis: Literature Review and Case Report

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes ◽  
Paulo Ferraz ◽  
Mauro Tosta
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Etiologic Agents

Peri-implantitis is a pathology that has been described in many clinical studies and case reports. However, it is still not clear how the roles of its etiologic agents work. This article is based on a review of the literature and a case report. It aims to offer data related to the factors that cause this pathology, and to analyze how these factors interact, leading to the contamination of the peri-implant tissue.

Phenelzine and Morphine Drug-Drug Interaction? A Literature Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002097075
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Beechinor ◽  
Rachel Tyson ◽  
Mary E. Roth
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Human Studies ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Review Articles ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

The objectives of this manuscript are to describe a case report of a patient whose phenelzine maintenance therapy was discontinued due to concern for a phenelzine-morphine drug interaction, to review the available literature regarding the potential for this drug-drug interaction, and provide recommendations for this clinical scenario. A PubMed/MEDLINE literature search was conducted and all publications determined to be relevant to this case report were included. Literature describing in vitro data, case reports/human studies, and review articles concerning the interaction between morphine and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) were included. A total of 14 publications pertinent to the potential phenelzine-morphine interaction were included in this review including 5 in vitro studies, 4 human studies, and 6 review articles detailing the drug interaction profile between opioids and antidepressants. Of these publications, only a single case report of a potential drug interaction between morphine and phenelzine was identified. The literature suggesting a drug interaction between morphine and phenelzine is limited. The combination of phenelzine and morphine, with close monitoring for signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome, is reasonable for patients with appropriate indications for both agents.

Predicting Inhibitory Drug—Drug Interactions and Evaluating Drug Interaction Reports Using Inhibition Constants

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1064-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth A Bachmann ◽  
Jeffrey D Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Cytochrome P450 ◽  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Web Sites ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Inhibitory Drug

OBJECTIVE: To review the use of inhibitory constants (Ki) determined from in vitro experiments in the prediction of the significance of inhibitory drug—drug interactions (DDIs). DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE (1966—August 2004) and manual review of journals, conference proceedings, reference textbooks, and Web sites were performed using the key search terms cytochrome P450, drug—drug interaction, inhibition constant, and Ki. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and information deemed relevant was included for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: The cytochrome P450 isoenzymes factor prominently in the explanation of numerous DDIs. Although the regulation of these enzymes by one drug can affect the pharmacokinetics of other drugs, the consequences may not necessarily be significant either in terms of pharmacokinetic or clinical outcomes. Yet, many DDI monographs originate as unconfirmed case reports that implicate the influence of one drug on the CYP-mediated metabolism of another, and these often uncorroborated mechanisms can eventually become regarded as dogma. One consequence of this process is the overprediction of potentially important DDIs. The pharmaceutical industry, Food and Drug Administration, and pharmaceutical scientists have developed a strategy for predicting the significance of inhibitory DDIs at the earliest possible stages of drug development based on a new chemical entity's Ki value, determined in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the use of Ki values of drugs purported to behave as CYP inhibitors be incorporated in the assessment of case reports that ascribe DDIs to inhibition of metabolism of one drug by another.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document