scholarly journals Day-Time Patterns of Carbohydrate Intake in Adults by Non-Parametric Multi-Level Latent Class Analysis—Results from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008/09–2015/16)

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2476
Author(s):  
Wang ◽  
Almoosawi ◽  
Palla

This study aims at combining time and quantity of carbohydrate (CH) intake in the definition of eating patterns in UK adults and investigating the association of the derived patterns with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) Rolling Program included 6155 adults in the UK. Time of the day was categorized into 7 pre-defined time slots: 6–9 am, 9–12 noon, 12–2 pm, 2–5 pm, 5–8 pm, 8–10 pm, and 10 pm–6 am. Responses for CH intake were categorized into: no energy intake, CH <50% or ≥50% of total energy. Non-parametric multilevel latent class analysis (MLCA) was applied to identify eating patterns of CH consumption across day-time, as a novel method accounting for the repeated measurements of intake over 3–4 days nested within individuals. Survey-designed multivariable regression was used to assess the associations of CH eating patterns with T2D. Three CH eating day patterns (low, high CH percentage and frequent CH intake day) emerged from 24,483 observation days; based on which three classes of CH eaters were identified and characterized as: low (28.1%), moderate (28.8%) and high (43.1%) CH eaters. On average, low-CH eaters consumed the highest amount of total energy intake (7985.8 kJ) and had higher percentages of energy contributed by fat and alcohol, especially after 8 pm. Moderate-CH eaters consumed the lowest amount of total energy (7341.8 kJ) while they tended to have their meals later in the day. High-CH eaters consumed most of their carbohydrates and energy earlier in the day and within the time slots of 6–9 am, 12–2 pm and 5–8 pm, which correspond to traditional mealtimes. The high-CH eaters profile had the highest daily intake of CH and fiber and the lowest intake of protein and fat. Low-CH eaters had greater odds than high-CH eaters of having T2D in self-reported but not in previously undiagnosed diabetics. Further research using prospective longitudinal studies is warranted to ascertain the direction of causality in the association of CH patterns with type 2 diabetes.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e046183
Author(s):  
Xiyun Ren ◽  
Jian Gao ◽  
Tianshu Han ◽  
Changhao Sun

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the association between the trajectories of energy consumption at dinner versus breakfast and the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D).DesignCohort study.SettingThe study was conducted in China.ParticipantsA total of 10 727 adults, including 5239 men and 5488 women, with a mean age of 42.7±11.2 years and a mean follow-up time of 9.1 years, met the study criteria and completed a questionnaire about energy intake and diabetes status from the China Health and Nutrition Survey in 1997–2011.Primary outcome measuresParticipants were divided into subgroups based on the trajectories of the ratio of energy consumption at dinner versus breakfast. Cox multivariate regression models were used to explore the associations between different trajectories and the risk of T2D after adjustment for confounders and their risk factors. Mediation analysis was performed to explore the intermediary effect of triacylglycerol (TG), total cholesterol (TC), uric acid (UA) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) between the trajectories and the risk of T2D.ResultsFor energy consumption at dinner versus breakfast, compared with a low-stable trajectory, the adjusted HR of T2D in low-increasing from early-stage trajectory was 1.29 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.60). TG, TC, UA and ApoB were significantly higher in low-increasing from early-stage trajectory than other trajectories and play partial regulation roles between trajectories and T2D.ConclusionsThis study emphasised the harmful effect of a gradual increase in the ratio of energy consumption at dinner versus breakfast from early stage on the development of T2D and partially mediated by TG, TC, UA and ApoB, highlighting that it is necessary to intake more energy at breakfast compared with dinner to prevent T2D in adults.


Author(s):  
Nicole Prinz ◽  
Anke Schwandt ◽  
Bernadette Borgert ◽  
Bettina Hartmann ◽  
Hans-Peter Kempe ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 65 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A246-A246
Author(s):  
G. Gariepy ◽  
A. Malla ◽  
J. Wang ◽  
L. Messier ◽  
I. Strychar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1379-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuying Wang ◽  
Jiageng Chen ◽  
Xiaoqian Liu ◽  
Fei Gao ◽  
Haozuo Zhao ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1048-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Jie Benjamin Seng ◽  
Yu Heng Kwan ◽  
Vivian Shu Yi Lee ◽  
Chuen Seng Tan ◽  
Sueziani Binte Zainudin ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e0221257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma S. Mkuu ◽  
Tamika D. Gilreath ◽  
Caroline Wekullo ◽  
Gabriela A. Reyes ◽  
Idethia S. Harvey

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fenella Greig ◽  
Sharon Hyman ◽  
Elizabeth Wallach ◽  
Tom Hildebrandt ◽  
Robert Rapaport

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document