scholarly journals Machine Learning Classification Ensemble of Multitemporal Sentinel-2 Images: The Case of a Mixed Mediterranean Ecosystem

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Vasilakos ◽  
Dimitris Kavroudakis ◽  
Aikaterini Georganta
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Mediterranean Ecosystem ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Land Cover Type ◽  
Ensemble Classifiers ◽  
Machine Learning Classification ◽  
Cover Type ◽  
Voting Methods ◽  
Sentinel 2

Land cover type classification still remains an active research topic while new sensors and methods become available. Applications such as environmental monitoring, natural resource management, and change detection require more accurate, detailed, and constantly updated land-cover type mapping. These needs are fulfilled by newer sensors with high spatial and spectral resolution along with modern data processing algorithms. Sentinel-2 sensor provides data with high spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution for the in classification of highly fragmented landscape. This study applies six traditional data classifiers and nine ensemble methods on multitemporal Sentinel-2 image datasets for identifying land cover types in the heterogeneous Mediterranean landscape of Lesvos Island, Greece. Support vector machine, random forest, artificial neural network, decision tree, linear discriminant analysis, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers are applied and compared with nine ensemble classifiers on the basis of different voting methods. kappa statistic, F1-score, and Matthews correlation coefficient metrics were used in the assembly of the voting methods. Support vector machine outperformed the base classifiers with kappa of 0.91. Support vector machine also outperformed the ensemble classifiers in an unseen dataset. Five voting methods performed better than the rest of the classifiers. A diversity study based on four different metrics revealed that an ensemble can be avoided if a base classifier shows an identifiable superiority. Therefore, ensemble approaches should include a careful selection of base-classifiers based on a diversity analysis.

scholarly journals Semi-automated land cover mapping using an ensemble of support vector machines with moderate resolution imagery integrated into a custom decision support tool

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristofer Lasko ◽  
Elena Sava
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Landsat 8 ◽  
Terrain Analysis ◽  
Land Cover Type ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Cover Type ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Sentinel 2

Land cover type is a fundamental remote sensing-derived variable for terrain analysis and environmental mapping applications. The currently available products are produced only for a single season or a specific year. Some of these products have a coarse resolution and quickly become outdated, as land cover type can undergo significant change over a short time period. In order to enable on-demand generation of timely and accurate land cover type products, we developed a sensor-agnostic framework leveraging pre-trained machine learning models. We also generated land cover models for Sentinel-2 (20m) and Landsat 8 imagery (30m) using either a single date of imagery or two dates of imagery for mapping land cover type. The two-date model includes 11 land cover type classes, whereas the single-date model contains 6 classes. The models’ overall accuracies were 84% (Sentinel-2 single date), 82% (Sentinel-2 two date), and 86% (Landsat 8 two date) across the continental United States. The three different models were built into an ArcGIS Pro Python toolbox to enable a semi-automated workflow for end users to generate their own land cover type maps on demand. The toolboxes were built using parallel processing and image-splitting techniques to enable faster computation and for use on less-powerful machines.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Support Vector Machine and Maximum Likelihood Classification to Extract Land Cover of Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-274
Author(s):  
Fatima Mushtaq ◽  
Khalid Mahmood ◽  
Mohammad Chaudhry Hamid ◽  
Rahat Tufail
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Error Matrix ◽  
Classification Techniques ◽  
Machine Learning Classification ◽  
Hyper Plane ◽  
Better Than

The advent of technological era, the scientists and researchers develop machine learning classification techniques to classify land cover accurately. Researches prove that these classification techniques perform better than previous traditional techniques. In this research main objective is to identify suitable land cover classification method to extract land cover information of Lahore district. Two supervised classification techniques i.e., Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) (based on neighbourhood function) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (based on optimal hyper-plane function) are compared by using Sentinel-2 data. For this optimization, four land cover classes have been selected. Field based training samples have been collected and prepared through a survey of the study area at four spatial levels. Accuracy for each of the classifier has been assessed using error matrix and kappa statistics. Results show that SVM performs better than MLC. Overall accuracies of SVM and MLC are 95.20% and 88.80% whereas their kappa co-efficient are 0.93 and 0.84 respectively.  

scholarly journals Land Use and Land Cover Change Assessment in the Context of Flood Hazard in Lagos State, Nigeria

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1105
Author(s):  
Dorcas Idowu ◽  
Wendy Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Flood Hazard ◽  
The State ◽  
Land Cover Type ◽  
Lulc Change ◽  
Cover Type ◽  
Lulc Changes ◽  
Lagos State ◽  
Very High

Incessant flooding is a major hazard in Lagos State, Nigeria, occurring concurrently with increased urbanization and urban expansion rate. Consequently, there is a need for an assessment of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) changes over time in the context of flood hazard mapping to evaluate the possible causes of flood increment in the State. Four major land cover types (water, wetland, vegetation, and developed) were mapped and analyzed over 35 years in the study area. We introduced a map-matrix-based, post-classification LULC change detection method to estimate multi-year land cover changes between 1986 and 2000, 2000 and 2016, 2016 and 2020, and 1986 and 2020. Seven criteria were identified as potential causative factors responsible for the increasing flood hazards in the study area. Their weights were estimated using a combined (hybrid) Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Shannon Entropy weighting method. The resulting flood hazard categories were very high, high, moderate, low, and very low hazard levels. Analysis of the LULC change in the context of flood hazard suggests that most changes in LULC result in the conversion of wetland areas into developed areas and unplanned development in very high to moderate flood hazard zones. There was a 69% decrease in wetland and 94% increase in the developed area during the 35 years. While wetland was a primary land cover type in 1986, it became the least land cover type in 2020. These LULC changes could be responsible for the rise in flooding in the State.

Topsoil microbial community structure responds to land cover type and environmental zone in the Western Pacific region

2021 ◽  
Vol 764 ◽  
pp. 144349
Author(s):  
Yu-Pin Lin ◽  
Rainer Ferdinand Wunderlich ◽  
Chiao-Ming Lin ◽  
Norman Uphoff ◽  
Dirk S. Schmeller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Microbial Community ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Microbial Community Structure ◽  
Western Pacific ◽  
Land Cover Type ◽  
Pacific Region ◽  
Western Pacific Region ◽  
Cover Type ◽  
The Western Pacific

Land Cover Type and Fire in Portugal: Do Fires Burn Land Cover Selectively?

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria C.S. Nunes ◽  
Maria J. Vasconcelos ◽  
José M.C. Pereira ◽  
Nairanjana Dasgupta ◽  
Richard J. Alldredge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Land Cover Type ◽  
Cover Type

scholarly journals Preliminary verification for application of a support vector machine-based cloud detection method to GOSAT-2 CAI-2

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2863-2878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Oishi ◽  
Haruma Ishida ◽  
Takashi Y. Nakajima ◽  
Ryosuke Nakamura ◽  
Tsuneo Matsunaga
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Greenhouse Gases ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Tropical Rainforests ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Accuracy Evaluation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Land Cover Types

Abstract. The Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) was launched in 2009 to measure global atmospheric CO2 and CH4 concentrations. GOSAT is equipped with two sensors: the Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observations (TANSO)-Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS) and TANSO-Cloud and Aerosol Imager (CAI). The presence of clouds in the instantaneous field of view of the FTS leads to incorrect estimates of the concentrations. Thus, the FTS data suspected to have cloud contamination must be identified by a CAI cloud discrimination algorithm and rejected. Conversely, overestimating clouds reduces the amount of FTS data that can be used to estimate greenhouse gas concentrations. This is a serious problem in tropical rainforest regions, such as the Amazon, where the amount of useable FTS data is small because of cloud cover. Preparations are continuing for the launch of the GOSAT-2 in fiscal year 2018. To improve the accuracy of the estimates of greenhouse gases concentrations, we need to refine the existing CAI cloud discrimination algorithm: Cloud and Aerosol Unbiased Decision Intellectual Algorithm (CLAUDIA1). A new cloud discrimination algorithm using a support vector machine (CLAUDIA3) was developed and presented in another paper. Although the use of visual inspection of clouds as a standard for judging is not practical for screening a full satellite data set, it has the advantage of allowing for locally optimized thresholds, while CLAUDIA1 and -3 use common global thresholds. Thus, the accuracy of visual inspection is better than that of these algorithms in most regions, with the exception of snow- and ice-covered surfaces, where there is not enough spectral contrast to identify cloud. In other words, visual inspection results can be used as truth data for accuracy evaluation of CLAUDIA1 and -3. For this reason visual inspection can be used for the truth metric for the cloud discrimination verification exercise. In this study, we compared CLAUDIA1–CAI and CLAUDIA3–CAI for various land cover types, and evaluated the accuracy of CLAUDIA3–CAI by comparing both CLAUDIA1–CAI and CLAUDIA3–CAI with visual inspection (400  ×  400 pixels) of the same CAI images in tropical rainforests. Comparative results between CLAUDIA1–CAI and CLAUDIA3–CAI for various land cover types indicated that CLAUDIA3–CAI had a tendency to identify bright surface and optically thin clouds. However, CLAUDIA3–CAI had a tendency to misjudge the edges of clouds compared with CLAUDIA1–CAI. The accuracy of CLAUDIA3–CAI was approximately 89.5 % in tropical rainforests, which is greater than that of CLAUDIA1–CAI (85.9 %) for the test cases presented here.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document