scholarly journals Engaged, Indifferent, Skeptical or Critical? Disentangling Attitudes towards Local Deliberative Mini-Publics in Four Western European Democracies

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 10518
Author(s):  
Sebastien Rojon ◽  
Jean-Benoit Pilet
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Vignette Study ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Western European ◽  
Intentions To Participate ◽  
Inform Decision Making

Democratic innovations, such as deliberative mini-publics, are designed to encourage public engagement in policymaking. They are increasingly being used to inform decision-making on the environment, climate change, and other sustainability issues. Research on support for democratic innovations has focused on identifying citizens in favor and understanding whether they are “enraged” or “engaged” with politics. However, this approach ignores potential differences between citizens expressing more (or less) positive attitudes towards democratic innovations. In an online vignette study, respondents from four Western European countries rated varying descriptions of a local mini-public, indicating both their support for the decision-making process and their willingness to get involved. Four distinct groups were identified based on a latent profile analysis: (1) those who are truly engaged, in that their support for mini-publics is reinforced by intentions to participate, correspond to one-third of citizens. Engaged deliberative democrats stand out as being more concerned about the environment than any other issue on the agenda; (2) the majority of citizens are indifferent, expressing neither positive nor negative inclinations towards mini-publics; (3) a group of “elitists” is skeptical of integrating citizens into policymaking despite intending to participate themselves; and finally (4), a small share of citizens was identified as critics, scoring low on both support and willingness to participate in a mini-public. The diversity of profiles points to the challenges of using deliberative mini-publics to address sustainability issues.

The Effect of Perfectionism on Career Adaptability and Career Decision-Making Difficulties

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danni Wang ◽  
Zhi-Jin Hou ◽  
Jing Ni ◽  
Lu Tian ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Career Counseling ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
High Standard ◽  
Career Decision ◽  
Career Adaptability ◽  
Career Decision Making ◽  
Competing Models ◽  
Practical Recommendations

This study investigated categorization of perfectionism subtypes for Chinese undergraduates and the effects of perfectionism subtypes on career outcomes based on two prominent, competing models of perfectionism, the tripartite model and 2 × 2 model. Indices of career outcome were defined with career adaptability (positive) and career decision-making difficulties (negative). The results of both cluster analysis and latent profile analysis coincided with the four-subtype structure of the 2 × 2 model. The result of Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars modeling indicated that the pure high standard subtypes were the most functional while pure discrepancy subtypes were most dysfunctional. Mixed perfectionism subtypes were identified as having high career adaptability but also high risk for career decision-making while nonperfectionism subtypes possess low career decision-making difficulties but also low career adaptability. Based on these findings for perfectionism subtypes, we extrapolate practical recommendations for how this information could be pertinent to career counseling.

scholarly journals Patients' Decision Making Preferences and Perceived Participation in Care: A Case Study in Selected Educational Hospitals of Yazd

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Amin Bahrami ◽  
Hasan Jafari ◽  
Sara Jambarsang ◽  
Samane Entezarian Ardakani
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Background: Patient's preferences in decision-making procedure are defined as the patient's willingness to participate in self-care management and decision-making. The aim of present study was to assess patients' preferences in decision-making procedure and perceived participation in care and their relationship with demographic in selected educational hospitals of Yazd in 2019. Methods: The study was conducted on 195 inpatients of the gynecology, internal medicine and surgery wards of teaching hospitals in Yazd of Iran. The inpatients were selected through stratified sampling method. The data was collected by 2 questionnaires: Degner and Sloan's control preferences scale and patients' perceived involvement in care scale of Lerman et al. parametric and non-parametric tests used to analyze the data. Results: In general, 49.20 % of patients preferred a relatively passive role in the decision-making process, and 36.40 % of them had high level of willingness to participate in their medical care decisions. The difference between the types of patients 'decision-making preferences was significant for education level, type of hospital and type of inpatient ward, type of basic insurance (p ≤ 0.05). The mean score of Patients' perceived participation was 62.08 ± 14.92. The difference observed in the mean score of patients' perceived participation in care for gender, type of disease, type of hospital, history of hospitalization, type of basic insurance was significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A large percentage of patients in the present study preferred a relatively passive role in decision-making, so it is best for health care providers to provide patients with understandable information about available treatment options and the benefits / risks associated with those choices. Also, the necessary interventions to promote shared decision-making, especially to help female patients and patients with more acute illnesses, as well as to support health care providers to participate in the shared decision-making process with patients, are of particular importance.

Trends in decision-making process for pharmaceuticals in Western European countries

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J.C. Nuijten ◽  
P. Berto ◽  
G. Berdeaux ◽  
J. Hutton ◽  
F.-U. Fricke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Western European

scholarly journals Paranormal Experience Profiles and Their Association With Variations in Executive Functions: A Latent Profile Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Graham Drinkwater ◽  
Neil Dagnall ◽  
Andrew Denovan ◽  
Andrew Parker ◽  
Álex Escolà-Gascón
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emotion Regulation ◽  
Executive Function ◽  
Executive Functions ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Everyday Memory ◽  
Paranormal Experience ◽  
Latent Profile

This study investigated relationships between inter-class variations in paranormal experience and executive functions. A sample of 516 adults completed self-report measures assessing personal encounter-based paranormal occurrences (i.e., Experience, Practitioner Visiting, and Ability), executive functions (i.e., General Executive Function, Working and Everyday Memory, and Decision Making) together with Emotion Regulation and Belief in the Paranormal. Paranormal belief served as a measure of convergent validity for experience-based phenomena. Latent profile analysis (LPA) combined experience-based indices into four classes based on sample subpopulation scores. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) then examined interclass differences. Results revealed that breadth of paranormal experience was associated with higher levels of executive functioning difficulties for General Executive Function, Working Memory, Decision Making, and Belief in the Paranormal. On the Everyday Memory Questionnaire, scores differed on Attention Tracking (focus loss) and Factor 3 (visual reconstruction), but not Retrieval (distinct memory failure). In the case of the Emotion Regulation Scale, class scores varied on Expressive Suppression (control), however, no difference was evident on Cognitive Reappraisal (reframing). Overall, inter-class comparisons identified subtle differences in executive functions related to experience. Since the present study was exploratory, sampled only a limited subset of executive functions, and used subjective, self-report measures, further research is necessary to confirm these outcomes. This should employ objective tests and include a broader range of executive functions.

AAC Decision-Making and Mobile Technology: Points to Ponder

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Abbott ◽  
Debby McBride
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mobile Technology ◽  
Communication System ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Ipod Touch ◽  
Feature Match

The purpose of this article is to outline a decision-making process and highlight which portions of the augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) evaluation process deserve special attention when deciding which features are required for a communication system in order to provide optimal benefit for the user. The clinician then will be able to use a feature-match approach as part of the decision-making process to determine whether mobile technology or a dedicated device is the best choice for communication. The term mobile technology will be used to describe off-the-shelf, commercially available, tablet-style devices like an iPhone®, iPod Touch®, iPad®, and Android® or Windows® tablet.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document