scholarly journals Botulinum Toxin: An Update on Pharmacology and Newer Products in Development

Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Supriyo Choudhury ◽  
Mark R. Baker ◽  
Suparna Chatterjee ◽  
Hrishikesh Kumar

Since its introduction as a treatment for strabismus, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has had a phenomenal journey and is now recommended as first-line treatment for focal dystonia, despite short-term clinical benefits and the risks of adverse effects. To cater for the high demand across various medical specialties, at least six US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved formulations of BoNT are currently available for diverse labelled indications. The toxo-pharmacological properties of these formulations are not uniform and thus should not be used interchangeably. Synthetic BoNTs and BoNTs from non-clostridial sources are not far from clinical use. Moreover, the study of mutations in naturally occurring toxins has led to modulation in the toxo-pharmacokinetic properties of BoNTs, including the duration and potency. We present an overview of the toxo-pharmacology of conventional and novel BoNT preparations, including those awaiting imminent translation from the laboratory to the clinic.

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eljim P. Tesoro ◽  
Gretchen M. Brophy

Seizures are serious complications seen in critically ill patients and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if the cause is not identified and treated quickly. Uncontrolled seizures can lead to status epilepticus (SE), which is considered a medical emergency. The first-line treatment of seizures is an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine followed by anticonvulsant therapy. Refractory SE can evolve into a nonconvulsive state requiring IV anesthetics or induction of pharmacological coma. To prevent seizures and further complications in critically ill patients with acute neurological disease or injury, short-term seizure prophylaxis should be considered in certain patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-49
Author(s):  
Malita Amatya ◽  
Ben Limbu ◽  
Purnima Rajkarnikar ◽  
Hom Bahadur Gurung ◽  
Rohit Saiju

Introduction: Blepharospasm is a condition of involuntary spasm of the orbicularis oculi muscle which leads to intermittent or complete closure of the eyelids. Botulinum toxin is the currently recommended first line treatment for such blepharospasm. This study aims to find out the outcome of injection Botulinum toxin Type A in Blepharospasm. Materials and methods:  It was a hospital based, prospective, interventional study conducted on patients diagnosed as Benign essential blepharospasm (BEB), Meige syndrome (MS) and Hemifacial spasm (HFS) by oculoplastic surgeon at Oculoplasty department OPD, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, from December 2018 to November 2019. After taking all standard precautions for botulinum toxin injections, 6 to 8 sites for injecting 2.5 to 5 IU of the toxin were given. All the patients were evaluated before and after injections according to Jankovic spasm grading and improvement in functional impairment scale and followed on one week, one month, three month and when the symptoms reappeared.  Results: A total of 43 cases which included 32 cases of Benign essential Blepharospasm, 9 Hemifacial spasm and 2 Meige syndrome. The mean Jankovic severity score was 3.51 ± 0.51 (range 3-4). The mean improvement in functional score was 2.60 ± 0.54 (range 1-3), was statistically significant (p-value <0.001).The effective period of injection was 130 ± 20.82 (93 – 189) days.38 patients had repeated injections after reappearance of symptoms. 4 patients had side effects of redness and hematoma at one site.  Conclusion: This study concludes that Botulinum toxin type A is effective in the management of Benign essential blepharospasm, Hemifacial spasm and Meige syndrome. This along with a good safety profile justifies its role as a first line treatment therapy in blepharospasm. However, it is a temporary treatment option where the effect lasts for a short period of time and repeated injections are required.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruka Miyata ◽  
Ichiro Nakahara ◽  
Shoji Matsumoto ◽  
Tsuyoshi Ohta ◽  
Yutaka Fukushima ◽  
...  

Objective: Penetration ratio of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in carotid revascularization caught up that of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in 2005, exceeding more than 60% in recent years after CREST in Japan. We choose CAS for first-line treatment, while CEA is applied to CAS high-risk patients dependent on factors including accessibility, plaque diagnosis, and symptom. The aim of this study is to evaluate short-term and mid-term results of single center experience of 266 consecutive cases with CAS / CEA. Materials / Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 227 CAS and 39 CEA during January 2009 to March 2013. The primary outcome measures (short-term results) were any periprocedural (within 30 days after procedure) death, stroke, and acute coronary syndrome, and the rate of postoperative positive lesion in diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) on MRI. The mid-term results include death, stroke, and restenosis requiring retreatment during the follow-up periods. Results: There were no significant differences in age, underlying disease, and the severity of stenosis in both CEA and CAS group. However, the percentage of symptomatic lesion and the MRI T1WI plaque-sternocleidomastoid muscle ratio (index of the vulnerability of plaque) were higher in CEA than CAS group (69% vs. 48%, p=0.015; 1.79±0.46 vs. 1.31±0.37, p<0.0001). Short-term results revealed no mortality in both groups, any stroke 2.6% CEA vs. 4.9% CAS (p=1); major stroke 2.6% CEA vs. 0.9% CAS (p=0.38); acute coronary syndrome 0% CEA vs. 0.9% CAS (p=1); the rate of DWI-positive 24% vs. 39% (p=0.10). Mid-term results during the follow-up periods (CEA 18.3±13.5 month, CAS 20.3±14.1 month): death 5.1% CEA vs. 5.7% CAS (p=1), stroke 7.7% CEA vs. 11.0% CAS (p=0.78), restenosis requiring retreatment 0% vs. 6.6% (p=0.14). Conclusion: The short-term and the mid-term results were excellent and equivalent in CAS and CEA although we apply CEA to high-risk lesions such as fragile plaque or symptomatic lesion. Our protocol, in which most patients undergo less invasive CAS as the first-line while CEA is selected for CAS high-risk patients, enables to provide high quality treatment for carotid artery revascularization.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1706-1706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
Carola Boccomini ◽  
Marco Ladetto ◽  
Enrica Gamba ◽  
Isabel Alvarez ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1706 Poster Board I-732 Introduction in order to maintain efficacy and reduce toxicity of the treatment in elderly follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, we designed a study with a short chemo-immunotherapy R-FND with Rituximab consolidation followed by randomization between R maintenance or observation. Material and methods: From January 2004 to December 2007, 242 patients (age 60-75) with untreated advanced stage FL were enrolled by 33 IIL centres. Treatment plan was: 4 courses of R-FND (standard doses of Rituximab, Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone, Dexamethasone) every 28 days followed by 4 weekly Rituximab infusions as consolidation; responding (CR+CRu+PR) patients were randomized between Rituximab maintenance, one dose every 2 months for a total of 4 doses or observation. Qualitative and quantitative PCR monitoring for IgH/Bcl-2 rearrangement on bone marrow (BM) was performed at diagnosis, after R-FND and R consolidation and during maintenance/observation. Results 234 patients were eligible for the study: median age was 66 yrs; advanced stage II 14%, stage III 21% and stage IV 65%; BM involvement and B symptoms were documented in 55% and 18% respectively. FLIPI score was: Low 11%, Intermediate 34%, High 55%. One and 2 or more comorbidities were present in 36% and 23% of the patients respectively. Qualitative PCR analysis for IgH/Bcl-2 was performed in 223 patients at diagnosis and 51% were positive. Two hundred and two (86%) patients completed the induction treatment and were randomized between maintenance or observation; 32 were not because of: stable/progressive disease (16), adverse events (10) or other causes (6). Overall response at the end of treatment was 86% with 69% CR and 18% PR; PCR negativity at the end of treatment was 75%. Rituximab consolidation was able to induce CR in 37/90 (41%) partial responders and to increase PCR negativity from 61% to 75%. With a median follow-up of 22 months, two-years OS and PFS were 92% (95% CI 87%-95%) and 75% (95% CI 68%-81%), respectively (see Figure). Two-years PFS rates according to FLIPI score were 85% for low/intermediate risk and 65% for high risk (p < 0.001); 2-years PFS rates were 57% and 79% respectively in patients with and without B symptoms (p < 0.001). The patients in more advanced decade (> 70 years) or those with 2 or more comorbidities did as well as younger ones or those with one or no comorbidities: 2-yr PFS rates for patients more or less seventy were 73% vs 76% (p = 0.39); for patients with ≥2 comorbidities or one or none were 84% vs 67% vs 76%, respectively (p = 0.82). A total of 1119 courses were delivered; the most frequent CTC grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia in 25% of the courses, with only 13 serious infections. One patients developed acute myelogenous leukaemia during treatment and died. Two toxic deaths during treatment (0.8%) occurred: 1 HBV reactivation and 1 Steven Johnson syndrome. So far 212 patients are alive; besides the above mentioned deaths, 15 patients died of lymphoma, 2 died of cardiac failure, 1 died of stroke and 1 died of drowning. So far too few events occurred to proper analyse the efficacy of the Rituximab maintenance. In the maintenance/observation phase the following severe (WHO grade 3-4) toxicities were recorded: 15 patients experienced neutropenia, seven cardiac events, four infections; no other relevant toxicities were recorded. The cumulative incidences of toxic events accounting for competing events at 18 months for maintenance arm (Arm A) versus observation arm (Arm B) were as follows: neutropenia 17% vs 1% (p<0.001); infections 2% vs 2% (p = 0.586); cardiac events 4% vs 4% (p= 0.627). Conclusions a short term chemo-immunotherapy R-FND + Rituximab consolidation is safe and effective with a good 2-yr PFS rate also in patients with high risk FLIPI score or in patients in more advanced decade or with comorbidities. Rituximab maintenance is safe with a more frequent neutropenia that was not associated with an increased risk of infections. Final results of the study will provide insights on the role of Rituximab maintenance after R-chemotherapy. Disclosures Vitolo: Roche: Lecture fees; Mundipharma: Lecture fees. Off Label Use: Study was supported by Roche: Rituximab maintenance in first line treatment is off-label. Boccomini:Roche: Lecture fees. Ladetto:Roche Italy: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding.


1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L Smith

Many important advances in transplantation have been made during the last decade. The introduction of Orthoclone OKT3 into clinical trials and its subsequent approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 1985 for use as an antirejection agent for renal transplantation were landmarks in the field of clinical transplantation of solid organs. In the decade since the approval of OKT3 for clinical use, much has been learned and written about OKT3. OKT3 now is considered a safe and effective agent for prophylaxis and first-line treatment of acute rejection of solid organ allografts. In this article, the development and use of OKT3 over the last 10 years, as well as the present status and future implications of immune therapy with OKT3, are reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document