Can the Time Lag between the Reconstruction of Focusing Events and the Type of Policy Learning Refine the Event-Related Policy Learning Model?: Focus on the Special Act on Humidifier Disinfectants

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-156
Author(s):  
Young Woong Lee ◽  
Dong Kyu Lee
2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
GEORGE J. BUSENBERG

This study builds a conceptual framework to guide empirical studies of learning in public policy. Learning in public policy is defined here as a process in which individuals apply new information and ideas to policy decisions. This topic is examined by adapting relevant concepts from studies of organizational learning to the context of public policy. Recent work in the organizational learning literature focuses on institutional structures, procedures, and customs (learning arrangements) that act to promote individual learning. Further work in the policy literature suggests that focusing events (incidents that focus public and political attention on a policy issue) can also shape learning in public policy. Combining insights from these two literatures, this study proposes that both learning arrangements and focusing events can play observable roles in shaping policy change over time. These concepts are developed and examined in the context of hazardous systems.


Author(s):  
Felipe Gonçalves Brasil

A pandemia causada pela Covid-19, que se prolonga desde os primeiros meses de 2020 ao redor de todo o mundo, marcada por irreparáveis impactos sociais, econômicos, sanitários e humanitários, tem despertado a atenção de acadêmicos que se dedicam a entender e analisar as ideias, escolhas e prioridades dos tomadores de decisão num momento caracterizado pela extrema necessidade de atuação governamental. Seja no seu papel de fonte oficial de informações que orientem e informem a população, seja na atuação direta na elaboração de estratégias de redução do contágio, no estabelecimento de regras de funcionamento de equipamentos públicos e privados, ou na elaboração de políticas que minimizem os efeitos catastróficos da pandemia e garantam a sobrevivência de seu povo, o “estado em ação” vem sendo observado por diferentes lentes teóricas inseridas no interdisciplinar campo das políticas públicas. Este estudo tem o objetivo de apresentar, ainda que brevemente, dois referenciais teóricos e analíticos com grande potencial para apoiar estudos que buscam entender melhor a forma como o processo de políticas públicas pode sofrer importantes alterações em momentos de crise como essa. O primeiro referencial analisado é o dos “efeitos focalizadores” (focusing events), presentes na literatura de policy process e agenda-setting. Outra lente analítica relevante está relacionada com o aprendizado em políticas públicas e a formulação de políticas baseadas em evidência (policy learning and evidence-based policy making). As escolhas por essas três linhas teóricas não têm a intenção de limitar os estudos em políticas públicas, mas de lançar luz a novas abordagens com grande potencial explicativo para novas agendas de pesquisas.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-152
Author(s):  
Fajar Sodiq Irawan

Studies on policy learning in the formulation of public policies have received less attention in the era of decentralization. This article aims to discuss policy learning in the formulation of local poverty reduction policies. By taking a case study in Gunungkidul Regency, this study shows that the learning carried out is conceptual learning which changes the perspective on local poverty reduction, from problem-based to asset-based. The form of policy learning that occurs is by selective imitation, which is taking certain elements to be included in the policy and not taking it in detail to avoids political risks. This policy learning model has implications for the implementation of policies that do not explicitly create new activities, but complement existing activity programs. The policy learning process at first glance appears as an administrative process, but in essence it is very political because it involves various actors with various interests. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-185
Author(s):  
Daniela Moza ◽  
Laurențiu Maricuțoiu ◽  
Alin Gavreliuc

Abstract. Previous research established that an independent construal of the self is associated with higher self-esteem, which, in turn, is associated with increased happiness. Regarding the directionality of these relationships, theoretical arguments have suggested that self-construal precedes self-esteem and that self-esteem precedes happiness. However, most research in this area is cross-sectional, thus limiting any conclusions about directionality. The present study tested these relationships in 101 Romanian undergraduates using a 3-wave cross-lagged design with a 6-month time lag between every two waves. Structural equation modeling analyses revealed that self-esteem is an antecedent of both happiness and dimensions of independent self-construal (i.e., consistency vs. variability and self-expression vs. harmony). In other words, one’s positive evaluation of self-worth precedes one’s self-perception as being a happy and independent person. The findings are discussed with respect to the theoretical and practical implications, along with limitations and suggestions for future research.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Chao Zhang ◽  
Oi Ling Siu ◽  
Jing Hu ◽  
Weiwei Zhang

This study investigated the direct, reversed, and reciprocal relationships between bidirectional work-family conflict/work-family facilitation and psychological well-being (PWB). We administered a three-wave questionnaire survey to 260 married Chinese employees using a time lag of one month. Cross-lagged structural equation modeling analysis was conducted and demonstrated that the direct model was better than the reversed causal or the reciprocal model. Specifically, work-to-family conflict at Time 1 negatively predicted PWB at Time 2, and work-to-family conflict at Time 2 negatively predicted PWB at Time 3; further, work-to-family facilitation at Time 1 positively predicted PWB at Time 2. In addition, family-to-work facilitation at Time 1 positively predicted PWB at Time 2, and family-to-work conflict at Time 2 negatively predicted PWB at Time 3.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document