Faculty Opinions recommendation of Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia.

Purpose In a phase III randomized trial, azacitidine significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with conventional care regimens (CCRs) in patients with intermediate-2– and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Approximately one third of these patients were classified as having acute myeloid leukemia (AML) under current WHO criteria. This analysis compared the effects of azacitidine versus CCR on OS in this subgroup. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2/d or CCR (best supportive care [BSC] only, low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), or intensive chemotherapy [IC]). Results Of the 113 elderly patients (median age, 70 years) randomly assigned to receive azacitidine (n = 55) or CCR (n = 58; 47% BSC, 34% LDAC, 19% IC), 86% were considered unfit for IC. At a median follow-up of 20.1 months, median OS for azacitidine-treated patients was 24.5 months compared with 16.0 months for CCR-treated patients (hazard ratio = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.79; P = .005), and 2-year OS rates were 50% and 16%, respectively (P = .001). Two-year OS rates were higher with azacitidine versus CCR in patients considered unfit for IC (P = .0003). Azacitidine was associated with fewer total days in hospital (P < .0001) than CCR. Conclusion In older adult patients with low marrow blast count (20% to 30%) WHO-defined AML, azacitidine significantly prolongs OS and significantly improves several patient morbidity measures compared with CCR.

Download Full-text

5-Azacitidine In Patients with Myelodysplasia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Single Centre Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4969.4969 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4969-4969 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Capodanno Isabella ◽

Paolo Avanzini ◽

Francesco Merli

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Median Number ◽

Study Population ◽

Blast Count ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4969 Introduction Hypomethylating agents have recently been shown to prolong overall survival and improve quality of life in patients with INT-2 and high IPSS risk myelodysplasia (MDS) and low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Since September 2008 we have been treating 26 patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia (13 patients), MDS (11 patients) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (2 patients) with 5-azacitidine. According to recent guidelines, most of myelodysplastic patients eligible for treatment belonged to the IPSS INT-2 or high risk groups. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia had a medullary blast count of 20–30%, except for four cases. Patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia had a medullary blast count > 10% and < 20%. The median age of patients when treatment was started was 69,5 years (range: 51–82). Azacitidine was administered subcutaneously (75 mg/m2/d) for 7 days of every 28-day cycle until loss of response or disease progression. Patients received a median number of 5,5 cycles of therapy (range 1–24). We evaluated overall improvement (CR + PR+ HI), the best response obtained and adverse events in the overall study population, according to International Working Group MDS and LMA criteria. In the subgroup of patients who received at least 6 cycles of therapy (10 patients) we also evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results The results of 5-azacitidine therapy in our cohort of patients are described in Table 1. In the AML cohort, after a median number of 4 cycles (range 1–10), we observed a hematological improvement (HI) in 15% of the patients, a stable disease (SD) in 31% of patients and a lack of response in 38% of patients. In the MDS cohort, after a median number of 7 cycles (range 2–24), we observed a complete response (CR) (including a cytogenetic response) in 36.5% of patients, a partial response (PR) in 9% of patients, a hematological improvement in 45.5% of patients and a stable disease in 18% of patients. The overall improvement (CR + PR + HI) was 15% in the AML cohort and 91% in the MDS cohort. In the LMMC cohort, after a median number of 2.5 cycles (range 1–4), we observed a hematological improvement in 50% of the patients. In the subgroup of patients who received at least six cycles of therapy, the overall survival was 11.5 months and the progression free survival was 9 months. In the overall study population, two patients (8%) discontinued treatment as a result of adverse events. In four non-responder patients (15%) death was due to a rapid progression of disease. Discussion In this analysis we have reported good response rates in MDS patients, with 36.5% of complete response (including a complete cytogenetic response). No CR or PR were observed in AML patients; however, in this subgroup of patients the median follow-up was short (median number of cycles of therapy: four). Furthermore, in these patients even a stable disease with no need of hospitalization and a good quality of life can be considered an important result. Due to the short period of follow-up, 57.5% of our patients received fewer than 6 cycles of 5-azacitidine and their therapy is still ongoing. Conclusions The limited number of cases and the short period of follow-up did not allow us to evaluate overall survival and progression free survival in the overall study population. We will update these data as time progresses. We reported these data in the subgroup of patients who received at least six cycles of therapy. According to current evidence, we observed that 5-azacitidine plays an important role in the treatment of patients with MDS (both with high- and low-IPSS risk) and low bone marrow blast counts AML. In these subgroups of patients, 5-azacitidine prolongs survival and is well tolerated. In our limited experience, this drug had no efficacy when a higher degree of bone marrow blasts (> 30%) was present. Further trials should assess the number of cycles required for treatment, the role of hypometilating agents in low-risk MDS and in patients with AML and a bone marrow blasts counts > 30%. Disclosures: No relevant conflict of interest to declare. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Effect of Complete Remission Achievement on Survival In Acute Myeloid Leukemia of the Elderly.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1048.1048 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1048-1048

Author(s):

Felicetto Ferrara ◽

Cira Riccardi ◽

Salvatore Palmieri ◽

Tiziana Izzo ◽

Antonella Carbone

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Normal Karyotype ◽

Loading Dose ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Bone Marrow Blast ◽

Blast Count ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 1048 The achievement of complete remission (CR) is considered an essential prerequisite for cure in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Notwithstanding, in older AML patients recent data suggest that, at least for patients receiving new compounds such as hypomethilating agents Azacytidine and Decitabine, the benefit on survival can be independent from CR achievement, namely in patients with low bone marrow blast count (< 30%) at diagnosis. In this study we evaluated the impact of CR achievement on overall survival from a series of 140 patients aged over 60 years; all patients received a therapeutic program including continuous infusion of fludarabine (F) and cytarabine (ARA-C) as induction and consolidation, followed whenever possible by autologous stem cell transplantation (Ferrara et al, Haematologica, 2005). Briefly, F was administered at a loading dose of 10 mg/m2 over 15 min at day 0 followed 6 hours and half later by continuous infusion (c.i.) of 20 mg/m2/24 hours for 72 hours (days 0–2); ARA-C was given at a loading dose of 390 mg/m2 three hours and half after F and then as c.i. over 96 hours at 1440 mg/m2/24 hours (days 0–3). G-CSF was added at day +15 at a dose of 5 μg/kg. A second identical course was planned for patients obtaining partial response, defined as less than 5% blasts in peripheral blood and less than 30% of blasts in the bone marrow. Patients achieving CR, established as less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow, normal blood count and differential and absence of extramedullary leukemia, were programmed to receive an additional identical course as consolidation, reduced of one day (i.e. two days c.i. of F and three days c.i, of ARA-C). The effect of CR was separately analyzed according to karyotype, bone marrow blast count and, in patients with normal karyotype, NPM1 and FLT3 positivity. Of note, patients dead in induction were excluded from survival benefit evaluation. The median age was 69 years (range 61–82). Cytogenetic analysis was successfully in 134/140 patients (96%). Among these 89 (66%) were found as having normal karyotype (NK) and 45 (34%) with different chromosomal abnormalities, mostly complex or involving chromosomes 5 and/or 7, classified as unfavorable (UK). Overall 94 patients (67%) achieved CR; the CR rate was 77 % in NK and 47% in unfavorable karyotype (p:<0.001). Of note, rates of either death in induction (22% vs 14%) or primary refractory disease (33 % vs 8%) were significantly higher in patients with adverse cytogenetics. The median survival for the whole patient population was 10 months; survival was significantly influenced by cytogenetics at diagnosis (12 months for NK vs 7 months for UK), p:<0.001). The median duration of CR was 11 months (16 months for patients with NK as opposed to 7 months for those with UK). The overall impact of CR achievement on survival was remarkable and remained statistically significant after exclusion of patients dead in induction (18 months vs. 6 months, p:< 0.001). The advantage of achieving CR was found in patients with NK, independently from molecular assessment at diagnosis, i.e. NPM1+/FLT3-, NPM1-FLT3-, NPM-FLT3+, NPM+/FLT3+). Of interest, no difference was found as bone marrow blast count at diagnosis, i.e. more or less than 30 %, was concerned in the rate of CR achievement, CR duration and impact of CR on survival either in univariate or multivariate analysis. By separately analyzing patients with UK, the advantage of CR achievement was found only when patients dead in induction were excluded and was limited to 4 months (11 months for remitters vs. 7 months for refractory patients, p:0.04). We conclude that older AML patients with unfavorable karyotype have lower CR rates following conventional chemotherapy, because of higher mortality in induction and more frequent refractory disease; in addition, CR is shorter when compared to patients with normal karyotype and has limited impact on survival. Accordingly, even when clinically eligible for aggressive chemotherapy, such patients should be included into therapeutic programs based on experimental programs including agents with alternative mechanisms of action. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Enasidenib: First Mutant IDH2 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry ◽

10.2174/1871520618666181025091128 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 18 (14) ◽

pp. 1936-1951 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Raghav Dogra ◽

Rohit Bhatia ◽

Ravi Shankar ◽

Parveen Bansal ◽

Ravindra K. Rawal

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Adverse Effects ◽

Blood Cells ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

White Blood Cells ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Acute Myeloid

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia is the collective name for different types of leukemias of myeloid origin affecting blood and bone marrow. The overproduction of immature myeloblasts (white blood cells) is the characteristic feature of AML, thus flooding the bone marrow and reducing its capacity to produce normal blood cells. USFDA on August 1, 2017, approved a drug named Enasidenib formerly known as AG-221 which is being marketed under the name Idhifa to treat R/R AML with IDH2 mutation. The present review depicts the broad profile of enasidenib including various aspects of chemistry, preclinical, clinical studies, pharmacokinetics, mode of action and toxicity studies. Methods: Various reports and research articles have been referred to summarize different aspects related to chemistry and pharmacokinetics of enasidenib. Clinical data was collected from various recently published clinical reports including clinical trial outcomes. Result: The various findings of enasidenib revealed that it has been designed to allosterically inhibit mutated IDH2 to treat R/R AML patients. It has also presented good safety and efficacy profile along with 9.3 months overall survival rates of patients in which disease has relapsed. The drug is still under study either in combination or solely to treat hematological malignancies. Molecular modeling studies revealed that enasidenib binds to its target through hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bonding inside the binding pocket. Enasidenib is found to be associated with certain adverse effects like elevated bilirubin level, diarrhea, differentiation syndrome, decreased potassium and calcium levels, etc. Conclusion: Enasidenib or AG-221was introduced by FDA as an anticancer agent which was developed as a first in class, a selective allosteric inhibitor of the tumor target i.e. IDH2 for Relapsed or Refractory AML. Phase 1/2 clinical trial of Enasidenib resulted in the overall survival rate of 40.3% with CR of 19.3%. Phase III trial on the Enasidenib is still under process along with another trial to test its potency against other cell lines. Edasidenib is associated with certain adverse effects, which can be reduced by investigators by designing its newer derivatives on the basis of SAR studies. Hence, it may come in the light as a potent lead entity for anticancer treatment in the coming years.

Download Full-text

Comorbidity as a risk factor for overall survival and decision criteria for intensity of chemotherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Medical Oncology ◽

10.1007/s12032-011-9853-8 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 1077-1081 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Irena Djunic ◽

Marijana Virijevic ◽

Aleksandra Novkovic ◽

Vladislava Djurasinovic ◽

Natasa Colovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Risk Factor ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Decision Criteria ◽

Acute Myeloid

Download Full-text

Targeted Intravenous Busulfan and Fludarabine Allogeneic Transplantation Conditioning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2290.2290 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2290-2290

Author(s):

Joseph A. Pidala ◽

Jongphil Kim ◽

Claudio Anasetti ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Ernesto Ayala ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Large Series ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Secondary Aml ◽

Relapsed Disease ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2290 Poster Board II-267 Reduced and intermediate intensity conditioning with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers promise to effectively control hematologic malignancies, while limiting treatment related toxicity and mortality (TRM). We aimed to examine the efficacy of IV targeted Busulfan and Fludarabine (IV-Bu/Flu) in a large series of adults with exclusively acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). One hundred adults (median age 48) with AML (CR1 49, CR2 25, REL1 8, REL2 1, PIF 16, untreated 1) were treated with Busulfan 130-145 mg/m2/day for four days with pharmacokinetic targeting on the final two days to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 5300 (+/-10%) μmol*min/L/day and Fludarabine 40mg/m2/day for 4 days, followed by transplantation of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (N=98) or unstimulated bone marrow (BM) (N=2) from allogeneic donors (MRD 38, MUD 38, MMUD 24). Acute GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/methotrexate (N = 77), tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (N = 22), or tacrolimus/sirolimus (N = 1). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 16 and 12 days, respectively. Non-relapse mortality was 3% at 100 days, and 15% by 1 year. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 41%. Overall survival (OS) was 59% (95% CI: 48.1 – 67.5) at 1 year, and 42% (95% CI: 30.8-53.3) at 4 years. OS at 4 years for primary AML in CR1, secondary AML in CR1, CR2, and PIF were 52.9%, 40.1%, 41.2%, and 57.5% respectively; none with relapsed disease survived to 4 years (log-rank p = 0.0014). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 53% (95% CI: 42.8 – 62.2) at 1 year, and 32.3% (95% CI: 21.8 – 43.2) at 4 years. PFS at 4 years for primary AML in CR1, secondary AML in CR1, CR2, and PIF were 44.1%, 33.4%, 33.9%, and 33.1%, respectively, while none with relapsed disease at transplant reached this endpoint (p = 0.0264). On multivariable modeling, remission status at HCT (relapsed disease HR 14.85 (95% CI: 2.12 - 104.2), p = 0.007), moderate/severe cGVHD (HR 0.281, 95% CI: 0.10 - 0.76; p = 0.013), and day 90 bone marrow (BM) chimerism ≥ 90% (HR 0.245, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.79; p = 0.018) predicted overall survival, and day 90 BM chimerism ≥ 90% (HR of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08 - 0.45), p = 0.0002) predicted PFS. The following were not significantly related with OS or PFS: age, cytogenetics, donor relation, number of induction cycles, aGVHD prophylaxis regimen, maximum aGVHD grade, WBC at diagnosis, time in first CR, or % BM blasts prior to transplant. Day 90 BM chimerism and cGVHD were significantly related with relapse. Maximum grade of aGVHD predicted non-relapse mortality. These data support the low TRM and efficacy of IV-Bu/Flu in a large series of exclusively AML patients, and demonstrate the impact of day 90 bone marrow chimerism as an important prognostic factor. Further efforts to mitigate relapse risk after HCT are warranted, particularly in those with advanced disease at time of transplant. Disclosures: Off Label Use: IV busulfan and fludarabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Alsina:Ortho Biotech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Field:PDL BioPharma: Research Funding. Fernandez:Otsuka: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Fludarabine, Cytarabine, and Attenuated-Dose Idarubicin (m-FLAI) Induction for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3626.3626 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3626-3626

Author(s):

Yoojoo Lim ◽

Youngil Koh ◽

Sung-Soo Yoon ◽

Seonyang Park ◽

Byoung Kook Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Performance Status ◽

Free Survival ◽

Induction Regimen ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 3626 Introduction: Although there have been remarkable improvements in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the prognosis of AML in elderly patients remains poor, and the best induction chemotherapy for these patients remains yet unknown. To devise an effective induction regimen for elderly patients with AML, we conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified fludarabine, cytarabine, and attenuated-dose idarubicin (m-FLAI) regimen in these patients. Patients and Methods: Elderly (60 years or older) AML patients who did not receive previous chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received two consecutive cycles of m-FLAI chemotherapy as an induction. The m-FLAI regimen was comprised of fludarabine (25mg/m2, days 1–4), cytarabine (1000mg/m2, days 1–4), and attenuated-dose idarubicin (5mg/m2, days 1–3). The primary end point was complete remission (CR) rate. Results: A total of 108 patients (median age 68.4 years, M:F=64:44) were enrolled. CR was achieved in 62.9% of patients, and treatment-related mortality rate (TRM) was 25.8%. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months, and median event-free survival (EFS) was 6.6 months. The mortality at 30 and 60 days was 18% and 24%, respectively. Performance status and comorbidity did not have prognostic value in these patients. Bone marrow expression of CD117 was related to long EFS and OS. Conclusion: In conclusion, m-FLAI is a safe and effective induction regimen for previously untreated AML in elderly patients. Bone marrow CD117 expression is an independent good prognostic factor in these patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01247493) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Patients with FLT3 Negative Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Normal Cytogenetic who Have the Combination Mutations (NPM1-/CEBPA-) Have Better Survival Than Patients Who Have the Combination Mutations (NPM1+/CEBPA+)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4874.4874 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4874-4874

Author(s):

Shamail Butt ◽

Pascal Akl ◽

Himanshu Bhardwaj ◽

Samer A Srour ◽

Terry Dunn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Mutation Analysis ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Risk Group ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Cebpa Mutations ◽

Normal Cytogenetics ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4874 Introduction: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults. About 50% of patients with AML have normal karyotype, and are categorized as intermediate risk group. However, the clinical behavior and response to treatment in this group is heterogeneous. As a result, there is strong interest in characterizing molecular genetic features in the intermediate-risk AML patients that might rectify their stratification risk. In this group, FLT3-ITD (Internal Tandem Duplication) and FLT3-TKD (Tyrosine Kinase Domain) mutations are known to confer unfavorable risk whereas NPM1 and CEBPA mutations are known to be favorable risk markers. The purpose of this study is to analyze the combination of NPM1 and CEBPA mutations in presence or absence of FLT3 mutations on prognosis of AML patients referred to the State's largest tertiary care center over a period of 10 years for the treatment of leukemia. Patients and Method: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with AML evaluated at University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center between January 2000 and December 2010. Patient's age, gender, race, laboratory and clinical data as well as bone marrow biopsy and aspirate findings were reported. PCR and Fragment Analysis were conducted on all available DNA preserved bone marrow materials to test the FLT3, NPM1 and CEBPA mutations. For statistical analysis, Kaplan-Meyer curve was used. Results: A total of 239 patients were evaluated. Male to female ratio was 2/1. Median age at diagnosis was 46y. 21 out of the 239 patients were less than 18 year old. DNA samples were present on 132 patients and mutation analysis for FLT3, CEBPA and NPM1 was performed. Correlation between mutations and AML prognosis was determined. 67/132 (50.8 %) patients were categorized into intermediate risk group (majority of patients had normal cytogenetics). 14/67 (20.9%) pts were FLT3+ (FLT3-ITD or FLT3-TKD mutation). 17/67 (23.9%) were NPM1+. 7/67 (10.4%) were CEBPA +. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to identify cumulative proportion surviving over time. FLT3 presence or absence itself was not identified to be statistically significant (p 0.416) in terms of overall survival. Interestingly, presence or absence of combined NPM1/CEBPA mutation in FLT3 negative patients, among intermediate risk group, was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) in determining overall survival. In this subgroup, presence of NPM1/CEBPA combination (NPM1+/CEBPA+) was associated with poor prognosis (figure 2, lower curve), while absence of NPM1/CEBPA combination (NPM1-/CEBPA-) carries a better prognosis (figure 2, upper curve). Conclusion: Results of our study highlight the importance of performing combinations of mutation analysis in evaluation of overall prognosis in AML patients. FLT3-/NPM1+ profile in patients with normal cytogenetics is thought to confer a favorable prognosis. We demonstrated in this study that using combination mutation analysis in patients with FLT3- can change the risk stratification in patients with intermediate risk group and might affect therapeutic interventions in this patient population. Larger prospective studies are needed in the future for further validation of our findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Bone Marrow Hematogones on Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4148.4148 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4148-4148

Author(s):

Theodore Honebrink ◽

Vanessa J. Dayton ◽

Karen Larsen ◽

Qing Cao ◽

Claudio Brunstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Donor Number ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cord Blood Transplant ◽

Differential Counts ◽

Related Mortality ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4148 Hematogones are B-lymphocyte precursors which reside in the marrow and undergo an orderly maturation sequence to give rise to mature B cells. (McKenna, Blood 2001) Recently, the percentage of hematogones detected in the bone marrow (BM) after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been associated with improved leukemia-free survival and overall survival. (Chantepie, Blood 2011) Early after umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT), patients show marked differences in BM hematogone percentages. Little is known about whether such differences are clinically relevant, which may explain why hematogones are not routinely reported in BM differential counts and are, instead, combined with other lymphocytes. We hypothesized that increased hematogones would be associated with superior transplant outcomes. Two independent reviewers assessed hematogone percentages in BM aspirates performed on day 21 and 100 post-UCBT (i.e. D21 & D100) from 88 patients with AML undergoing myeloablative UCBT at the University of Minnesota between 02/1999 and 07/2008. Patients with evidence of relapse at the time of the marrow analysis were excluded. Because of the morphological similarity between hematogones and leukemic lymphoblasts, only patients with AML were included in this analysis. The reviewers were blinded to clinical outcomes. Correlation coefficients for the morphologic assessment of hematogones at D21 and D100 were each >0.8, confirming good interobserver reproducibility (p<0.01). Prospective outcome data for patients in the lowest marrow hematogone quartile (0% at D21 after UCBT and ≤0.9% at D100 after UCBT) were compared with those of patients in the upper three quartiles using a multivariate analysis (MVA) model. This model incorporated donor number (single vs. double), recipient age (<21 vs. ≥ 21), recipient CMV status (negative vs. positive), total, post-thaw CD34 (<0.50 vs. ≥0.50), total, post-thaw CFU (<0.042 vs. ≥ 0.042), and total nucleated cell (TNC) (<0.38 vs. ≥0.38). Endpoints studied included time to neutrophil and platelet recovery, overall survival, disease free survival (DFS), transplant related mortality (TRM), risk of relapse, acute GVHD (aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). At D21 after UCBT, the percentage of marrow hematogones varied from 0 to 10.8% (N = 85). In MVA, a high percentage of hematogones at D21 was associated less aGVHD grade 3–4 (RR=0.3 [0.15–0.59], p=0.01). At D100 after UCBT the percentage of marrow hematogones varied from 0 to 29.8% (N = 69). In MVA, a high percentage of BM hematogones at D100 was associated with improved overall survival (p=0.02) and this was due to a lower treatment related mortality (p=<0.01). (See Table 1) Table 1: MVA examining the percentage hematogones detected in the BM at D100 after UCBT. Outcome Variable RR (95% CI) p value Overall Survival Hem @ Day 100 <0.9 1.00 >=0.9 0.20 (0.05–0.76) 0.02 Donor number 1 1.00 2 0.19 (0.04–0.84) 0.03 Transplant Age <20.5 1.00 >=20.5 4.89 (1.11–21.51) 0.04 Relapse Hem @ Day 100 <0.9 1.00 >=0.9 2.84 (0.32–24.91) 0.35 TRM Hem @ Day 100 <0.9 1.00 >=0.9 0.03 (0–0.34) <0.01 HLA (engrafting unit) 4/6 1.00 5/6 0.61 (0.05–7.13) 0.69 6/6 0 <0.01 CGVHD Hem @ Day 100 <0.9 1.00 >=0.9 0.44 (0.11–1.69) 0.23 Transplant Age <20.5 1.00 >=20.5 3.61 (1.18–11.06) 0.02 RR = relative risk. Hem = percentage hematogones. TRM = transplant-related mortality. HLA = human leukocyte antigen; values correspond to number of matched allelic loci for HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR between recipient and engrafting donor. CGVHD = chronic graft vs. host disease. This study shows that BM hematogone percentage may be a useful prognostic indicator in AML patients following UCBT. We propose that hematogones be routinely reported in BM differential counts. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Achieving Hematologic Remission with Combination Chemotherapy and Donor Leukocyte Infusions for Relapse of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Six Years After Human Leukocyte Antigen-Mismatched Transplantation: A Case Report

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4476.4476 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4476-4476

Author(s):

Jingyan Xu ◽

Jian Ouyang ◽

Rong-Fu Zhou

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Combination Chemotherapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Low Dose ◽

Mononuclear Cells ◽

Bone Marrow Examination ◽

Intensive Chemotherapy ◽

Bone Marrow Blast ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4476 Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) from partially HLA-matched (haploidentical) family donors represents a promising therapy for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, for patients with AML relapsed after HSCT from an HLA-mismatched familial donor, there is no standard therapy. They may receive conventional chemotherapy, cyclosporine withdrawal, second HSCT, and donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) with or without prior mobilization. Recently, combination chemotherapy and DLI showed achieving hematologic remission. We report a case of successful combination chemotherapy and donor leukocyte infusions from original donor in a patient with AML relapsing 6 years after HSCT from an HLA-Mismatched Familial Donor. A 37-year-old male presented with fever in June 2003.Bone marrow aspirate confirmed the diagnosis of AML(M5 subtype according to FAB classification). The patient initially received intensive chemotherapy. However, the patient with AML that was refractory to conventional therapy. He received HSCT in first CR from his mother 1-loci HLA-mismatched (HLA-A) using BuCY- Conditioning regimen on June 11, 2004. He showed a medullary relapse 6 years after HSCT. His bone marrow blast counts exceeded 80% with 8.25% of donor karyotypes (46 XX FISH). We decided to try to use his mother as the donor for DLI. Cytoreductive chemotherapy was commenced prior to DLI. He was treated twice with DLI on August 02, 2010 and September 23, 2011. He was treated chemotherapy before in first DLI, chemotherapy regimens; FLAG-ida [fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d from day-6 to-2 of cell infusion, cytosine arabinoside 2 g/m2/d from day-6 to-2 of cell infusion, idarubicine 20 mg/d day-1 and G-CSF 300μ g/day from day-7 to +30]. The donors received G-CSF 10μ g/kg subcutaneously daily starting day-3 of cell infusion for 5 days. Donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected by CS-3000 Plus cell separator (Baxter Corp.) on the fifth days of G-CSF administration and infused through a central venous catheter into the patients on the same day. 8.33×107/kg mononuclear cells, 6×107/kg CD3+ cells were reinfused without manipulation. Cyclosporine at the dose of 3 mg/kg were administered for the prevention of GVHD. On days 36 Bone marrow blast counts exceeded 45% with 44% of donor karyotypes (46 XX FISH) after first Chemo-DLI. He received cyclosporine withdrawal. He was treated chemotherapy by low-dose Ara-C and aclarubicin with concomitant use of G-CSF before in second DLI.,chemotherapy regimens;CAG[ Low-dose Ara-C was given subcutaneously at a dosage of 10 mg/m2 every 12 hours on days-14 to-1. Aclarubicin was administered intravenously at a dosage of 7 mg/m2 on days-14 to-7. Recombinant G-CSF was given subcutaneously at a dosage of 200μ g/m2 per day on days-14 to-1]. On day 0,1.4×108/kg mononuclear cells,1×108/kg CD3+ cells were reinfused. On days 25 bone marrow examination showed CR with 89% of donor karyotypes (46 XX FISH). He was treated consolidation chemotherapy by regimens; CAG.On days 62 bone marrow examination showed CR with 100% of donor karyotypes (46 XX FISH). He developed chronic GVHD with limited disease at day 123 of DLI. In the patient whose cGVHD resolved with the use of steroid, cyclosporine plus methotrexate. The patient died from pneumonia without evidence of recurrent leukemia on day +230. From the cases reported, combination chemotherapy and subsequent mobilized DLI produced a CR with AML in relapse six years after HLA-Mismatched transplantation. We demonstrate that of the patient who relapsed after 6 years, treatment with chemotherapy followed by intensive chemotherapy followed by DLI, can effectively salvage a patient with attainment of durable remissions. Although limited by the small number of one patient, AML in relapse six years after HLA-Mismatched transplantation requires particular attention in future studies, as well as in designing future treatment programs. Clearly a large number of patients is required to confirm the real efficacy of this treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text