Faculty Opinions recommendation of Combination therapy of bortezomib with novel targeted agents: an emerging treatment strategy.

Author(s):  
Hermann Einsele
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Winograd ◽  
Isabelle Germano ◽  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Jeffrey J. Olson ◽  
David Ryan Ormond

Abstract The following questions and recommendations are pertinent to the following:Target PopulationThese recommendations apply to adults with progressive GBM who have undergone standard primary treatment with surgery and/or chemoradiation.Question 1In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationLevel III: Treatment with bevacizumab is suggested in the treatment of progressive GBM, as it provides improved disease control compared to historical controls as measured by best imaging response and progression free survival at 6 months, while not providing evidence for improvement in overall survival. Question 2In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as combination therapy with cytotoxic agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationLevel III: There is insufficient evidence to show benefit or harm of bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic therapies in progressive glioblastoma due to a lack of evidence supporting a clearly defined benefit without significant toxicity.Question 3In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as a combination therapy with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 4In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 5In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents in combination with cytotoxic therapies superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 6In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 7In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?Recommendation There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.Question 8In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with bevacizumab superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival?RecommendationThere is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyera Kim ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
In Kyoung Lee ◽  
Suejean C. Min ◽  
Hyun Hwan Sung ◽  
...  

Despite comprehensive genomic analyses, no targeted therapies are approved for bladder cancer. Here, we investigate whether a single and combination therapy with targeted agents exert antitumor effects on bladder cancer cells through genomic alterations using a three-dimensional (3D) high-throughput screening (HTS) platform. Seven human bladder cancer cell lines were used to screen 24 targeted agents. The effects of 24 targeted agents were dramatically different according to the genomic alterations of bladder cancer cells. BEZ235 (dual phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor) showed antitumor effects against most cell lines, while AZD2014 (mTOR inhibitor) had an IC50 value lower than 2 μM in 5637, J82, and RT4 cell lines. AZD5363 (protein kinase B (AKT) inhibitor) exerted antitumor effects on 5637, J82, and 253J-BV cells. J82 cells (PI3KCA and mTOR mutations) were sensitive to AZD5363, AZD2014, and BEZ235 alone or in AZD5363/AZD2014 and AZD5363/BEZ235 combinations. Although all single drugs suppressed cell proliferation, the combination of drugs exhibited synergistic effects on cell viability and colony formation. The synergistic effects of the combination therapy on the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, apoptosis, and EMT were evident in Western blotting. Thus, the 3D culture-based HTS platform could serve as a useful preclinical tool to evaluate various drug combinations.


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Wood ◽  
Kimme Hyrich ◽  
Suzanne Verstappen ◽  
Douglas Steinke

Abstract Background Until 2018, NICE guidance recommended the use of a combination of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate (MTX), in the initial management of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In 2018 the guideline was updated to recommend monotherapy with MTX due to uncertainties in the evidence for combination therapy. However, it remains a requirement for progression onto any biologic that the patient should have persistent high disease activity and/or have intolerance to, a minimum of two DMARDs. The aim of this study was to understand the association between initial treatment strategy and EULAR response at 6 months. Methods This analysis included patients recruited to the longitudinal observational Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS) in the UK who were DMARD naïve and had symptoms for less than 1 year. Patients were defined as either starting MTX monotherapy or MTX in combination with another DMARD (6 weeks either side of MTX start date) and categorised into EULAR non responders or moderate/ good responders after 6 months. A logistic regression model was applied to test the association between initial treatment strategy and EULAR response at 6 months, adjusting for confounders. Results A total of 948 participants were included in the analysis. MTX monotherapy was prescribed in 72% (n = 678) of patients and combination therapy was prescribed in 28% (n = 270) of patients, the majority of whom received MTX plus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (n = 236, 87%). There was no significant difference between the MTX monotherapy and combination therapy groups in EULAR response at 6-months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.14). Conclusion In this large UK observational study investigating the effect of treatment strategy within the first 6 weeks of presentation and treatment response at 6 months, there was no significant difference between combination DMARD therapy and MTX monotherapy on EULAR response. Most patients received MTX in combination with HCQ, for which little evidence exists. Disclosures S. Wood None. K. Hyrich Consultancies; ABBVIE. Grants/research support; BMS, PFIZER, UCB. S. Verstappen None. D. Steinke None.


Author(s):  
Janneke M. Brussee ◽  
Anna Neodo ◽  
Jessica D. Schulz ◽  
Jean T Coulibaly ◽  
Marc Pfister ◽  
...  

To treat hookworm infections, pharmacotherapy has been only moderately successful and drug resistance is a threat. Therefore, novel treatment options including combination therapies should be considered, in which tribendimidine could play a role. Our aims were to (i) characterize the pharmacokinetics of tribendimidine's metabolites in adolescents receiving tribendimidine monotherapy, or a combination with ivermectin or oxantel pamoate, (ii) evaluate possible drug-drug interactions (DDI), (iii) link exposure to response, aiming to (iv) identify a treatment strategy associated with high efficacy, i.e. >90% cure rates (CRs), utilizing model-based simulations. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for tribendimidine's primary and secondary metabolites dADT and adADT in 54 hookworm-positive adolescents, with combination therapy evaluated as possible covariate. Subsequently, an exposure-response analysis was performed utilizing CRs as response markers. Simulations were performed to identify a treatment strategy to achieve >90% CRs. A two-compartmental model best described metabolite disposition. No pharmacokinetic DDI was identified with ivermectin or oxantel pamoate. All participants receiving tribendimidine plus ivermectin were cured. For the monotherapy and combination with oxantel pamoate arm, Emax models adequately described the correlation between dADT exposure and probability to be cured, with a required exposure to achieve 50% of maximum effect of 39.6 and 15.6 nmol/mL*h, respectively. Based on our simulations an unrealistically high monotherapy tribendimidine dose would be necessary to achieve CRs >90%, while combination therapy with ivermectin would meet this desired target product profile. Further clinical studies should be launched to develop this combination for the treatment of hookworm and other helminth infections.


Hematology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 242-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Jain

Abstract The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has changed dramatically in the last few years. The role of chemoimmunotherapy has declined significantly for patients with CLL. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab chemotherapy remains the standard frontline therapy for young fit patients with CLL, especially if IGHV mutated. For older adults, ibrutinib has been shown to be superior to chlorambucil. Hence, the role of chlorambucil monotherapy in the current era in the management of CLL is limited. The combination of chlorambucil and obinutuzumab is an alternative option for patients with comorbidities. For patients with del(17p), ibrutinib has become the standard treatment in the frontline setting. Several phase 3 trials with novel targeted agents, either as monotherapy or in combination, are either ongoing or have completed accrual. The results of many of these trials are expected in the next 1 to 2 years, and they will further help refine the frontline treatment strategy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document