Faculty Opinions recommendation of Clostridium difficile infection is associated with increased risk of death and prolonged hospitalization in children.

Author(s):  
Jason Newland
2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Shaklee Sammons ◽  
Russell Localio ◽  
Rui Xiao ◽  
Susan E. Coffin ◽  
Theoklis Zaoutis

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 170-170
Author(s):  
Stuthi Perimbeti ◽  
Rishi Shrivastav ◽  
Prateeth Pati ◽  
Kristine Marie Ward ◽  
Michael Styler ◽  
...  

170 Background: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were half a million documented cases with 83,000 re-infections and 29,000 deaths due to Clostridium Difficile Infection(CDI) in the year 2011. The influence of CDI on outcomes in gastrointestinal(GI) malignancies is not well described, although the incidence is known to be higher in this subgroup of patients. Methods: National Inpatient Sample 1999-2014 was analyzed to identify adult admissions (>18 years of age) using ICD-9-CM codes with a primary diagnosis of esophageal(EC), Gastric(GC), Colorectal(CRC), Small intestinal(SIC), Hepatobiliary(HCC) and Pancreatic(PC) cancers. ICD-9 code 00845 was used to stratify these for the presence of CDI. We performed Chi-Square test to determine the in-hospital mortality percentage, and Cox Proportional Hazard model to control for confounders and determine the Hazard Ratio(HR) of death within 30 days of admission during hospitalization in patients with and without CDI. Results: See table. Conclusions: Despite controlling for potential confounders, patients with GI cancers and CDI are at an increased risk of death compared to those without CDI. Taking the more detrimental effects of CDI in this subgroup of patients into consideration, healthcare professionals should strive to avoid the inordinate use of antibiotics and strictly maintain current guidelines designed to prevent spread. It may be prudent to treat these patients as severe CDI, even if current criteria are not met. More scientific research is warranted in analyzing the specific outcomes of CDI in GI cancer patients and if more aggressive therapy for CDI is warranted, considering the limitations of this study. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Stuthi Perimbeti ◽  
Rishi Shrivastav ◽  
Karan Jatwani ◽  
Kristine Marie Ward ◽  
Michael Styler ◽  
...  

e15586 Background: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were half a million documented cases with 83,000 re-infections and 29,000 deaths due to Clostridium Difficile Infection(CDI) in the year 2011. The influence of CDI on outcomes in gastrointestinal(GI) malignancies is not well described, although the incidence is known to be higher in this subgroup of patients. Methods: National Inpatient Sample 1999-2014 was analyzed to identify adult admissions (>18 years of age) using ICD-9-CM codes with a primary diagnosis of esophageal(EC), Gastric(GC), Colorectal(CRC), Small intestinal(SIC), Hepatobiliary(HCC) and Pancreatic(PC) cancers. ICD-9 code 00845 was used to stratify these for the presence of CDI. We performed Chi-Square test to determine the in-hospital mortality percentage, and Cox Proportional Hazard model to control for confounders and determine the Hazard Ratio(HR) of death within 30 days of admission during hospitalization in patients with and without CDI. Results: See Table. Conclusions: Despite controlling for potential confounders, patients with GI cancers and CDI are at an increased risk of death compared to those without CDI. Taking the more detrimental effects of CDI in this subgroup of patients into consideration, healthcare professionals should strive to avoid the inordinate use of antibiotics and strictly maintain current guidelines designed to prevent spread. It may be prudent to treat these patients as severe CDI, even if current criteria are not met. More scientific research is warranted in analyzing the specific outcomes of CDI in GI cancer patients and if more aggressive therapy for CDI is warranted, considering the limitations of this study. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Adeyinka Charles Adejumo ◽  
Terence Ndonyi Bukong

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI), a prevalent cause of diarrhea, is the most notorious hospital-acquired infection, resulting in an alarming mortality and health care utilization rates. Herein, we investigate the impact of cannabis use, which is gaining significant legalization for recreational use, on the risk of CDI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We selected adult records (age ≥ 18 years) from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2014, and identified cannabis users and other clinical conditions using ICD-9-CM codes. With multivariate logistic modeling, we generated propensity scores for cannabis users and matched them to non-users in a 1:1 ratio (104,936:104,936). We then estimated the adjusted relative risk (aRR) for having CDI using conditional Possion regression models with generalized estimating equations [SAS 9.4]. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Among the matched hospitalizations (n=209,872), cannabis usage was associated with a reduced incidence of CDI (505.8[464.7-550.6] vs. 694.9[645.8-747.70] per 100,000 hospitalizations), resulting in a 27% reduced risk of CDI (aRR:0.73[0.65-0.81]; p-value:<0.0001). Non-dependent and dependent cannabis users respectively had 22% and 78% reduced likelihood of CDI when compared to non-cannabis users (0.78[0.69-0.90] & 0.22[0.12-0.40]). Furthermore, dependent users had less risk of CDI compared to non-dependent users (0.28[0.16-0.51]). Comparatively, abusive use of other substances like alcohol and tobacco was associated with increased risk for CDI (1.30[1.13-1.49] & 1.24[1.10-1.40]) DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Unlike alcohol and tobacco abuse which are associated with elevated risk for CDI, cannabis use, is related to a decreased risk of CDI amongst hospitalized patients. Further prospective and molecular mechanistic studies are required to elucidate how cannabis impacts CDI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S306-S307
Author(s):  
Heidi Hau ◽  
Sarah Mische ◽  
Sarah Klein ◽  
Ken Blount

Abstract Background Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infection is frequently associated with immunocompromised and critically ill patients. VRE carriers are at increased risk for infection due to VRE colonization and they pose a risk as a transmission source. VRE infection and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) share common risk factors, including disruption of the intestinal microbiome. Thus, therapeutic approaches that decolonize VRE would be valuable. Herein, we report on stool VRE clearance in a cohort analysis from a Phase 2 open-label study of RBX2660, standardized microbiota-based drug, for recurrent CDI. Methods This prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study enrolled subjects with recurrent CDI. Participants received up to 2 doses of RBX2660 delivered via enema with doses 7 days apart. Patients were requested to voluntarily submit stool samples at baseline and at 7, 30 and 60 days, 6, 12, and 24 months after the last administration of RBX2660. Stool samples were tested for VRE using bile esculin azide agar with 6 µg/mL vancomycin and gram staining. Vancomycin resistance was confirmed via blood agar and etest. Results Stool samples were available for 143 patients. Twenty-one patients were VRE-positive at the first test (baseline or 7 day). Of the 19 VRE-positive patients that provided additional samples at later timepoints, 18 (94.7%) converted to negative as of the last available follow-up (30 or 60 days and 6, 12, or 24 months). The remaining patient remained positive at all follow-ups. Conclusion This cohort analysis of VRE-positive patients within an rCDI population provides additional support that microbiota-based formulations, such as RBX2660, may have additional benefit beyond reducing the recurrence of CDI. Additional study is needed to confirm the role of microbiome restoration on VRE clearance. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5095-5095
Author(s):  
Justin S. Sadhu ◽  
Erik R. Dubberke ◽  
Robert Gatti ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Victoria J. Fraser

Abstract Allogeneic transplant (allo) patients (pts) are at high risk for Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD), yet there are few studies evaluating CDAD in allo pts. We carried out a retrospective chart review of all allo pts who had CDAD on a transplant (tx) unit between 8/01 and 7/03. 37 pts were identified who had CDAD during tx hospitalization (hosp) or after tx during the study period. 17 (46%) were admitted for initial tx, 13 (35%) for infection, and 7 (19%) for other reasons. 15 (40%) had acute leukemia, 6 (16%) lymphoma, 4 (11%) myelodisplastic syndrome, and 12 (32%) other underlying diseases. On admission, 17 (46%) pts were in complete remission, 4 (11%) in partial remission, 7 (19%) in relapse, and 9 (24%) presented with refractory disease. 5 pts (14%) had CDAD before day 0 (median d-2, range d-9 to d-1) and 32 pts (86%) had CDAD after tx (median d+49, d0 to d+3185). In the 60 days prior to CDAD, pts had median 1 (0–4) prior hosp and 15 days (1–50) hospitalized; 36 pts (97%) received antibiotics, 35 (95%) immunosuppressants, 33 (89%) antimotility/narcotic agents, 31 (84%) gastric acid suppression, 23 (62%) chemo, and 14 (38%) TBI. Within 48 hours of CDAD, 31 (86%) pts had diarrhea, 12 (33%) fever, 10 (28%) abdominal tenderness, 7 (19%) abdominal distention, and 7 (19%) hypothermia. 22 pts (59%) had either moderate or severe CDAD. 25 (68%) pts were treated for their primary episode of CDAD with metronizadole (met), 2 (5%) with vancomycin (vanc), 8 (22%) with met and vanc, and 2 (5%) were not treated for CDAD. 32 (86%) pts responded to therapy (median 2 days, range 0–25 days). Of the 32 pts who had CDAD post allo, 3 (9%) had gut graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) before CDAD and 8/29 (28%) developed gut GVHD after CDAD. Those 8 pts developed CDAD median d+114 (range +1 to +278) and gut GVHD d+131 (+1 to +454), with gut GVHD coming median 11 days (0 to 176) after CDAD. 7 pts (19%) died before discharge. The median survival time for all pts was 79 days after CDAD and 205 days after tx. Of the 30 (81%) pts discharged alive, 10 (33%) had recurrent CDAD episodes (median 1, range 1–3). When compared to mild CDAD, patients with severe CDAD had an increased risk of death at one year after CDAD (OR 3.3; CI 1.4–7.6). CDAD in allo pts may be associated with an increased risk of gut GVHD, death, and other adverse outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document