Restaging of patients with lymphoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Pfluger ◽  
V. Schneider ◽  
M. Hacker ◽  
N. Bröckel ◽  
D. Morhard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

SummaryAim: Assessment of the clinical benefit of i.v. contrast enhanced diagnostic CT (CE-CT) compared to low dose CT with 20 mAs (LD-CT) without contrast medium in combined [18F]-FDG PET/CT examinations in restaging of patients with lymphoma. Patients, methods: 45 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 35) and Hodgkin's disease (n = 10) were included into this study. PET, LD-CT and CECT were analyzed separately as well as side-by-side. Lymphoma involvement was evaluated separately for seven regions. Indeterminate diagnoses were accepted whenever there was a discrepancy between PET and CT findings. Results for combined reading were calculated by rating indeterminate diagnoses according the suggestions of either CT or PET. Each patient had a clinical follow-up evaluation for >6 months. Results: Region-based evaluation suggested a sensitivity/specificity of 66/93% for LD-CT, 87%/91% for CE-CT, 95%/96% for PET, 94%/99% for PET/LD-CT and 96%/99% for PET/CE-CT. The data for PET/CT were obtained by rating indeterminate results according to the suggestions of PET, which turned out to be superior to CT. Lymphoma staging was changed in two patients using PET/ CE-CT as compared to PET/LD-CT. Conclusion: Overall, there was no significant difference between PET/LD-CT and PET/CE-CT. However, PET/CE-CT yielded a more precise lesion delineation than PET/LD-CT. This was due to the improved image quality of CE-CT and might lead to a more accurate investigation of lymphoma.

Evaluation of 18F-FDG uptake in lung parenchyma compensating for tissue fraction: Comparison between non-enhanced low dose CT and intravenous contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (01) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Sabine Garpered ◽  
David Minarik ◽  
Sophia Frantz ◽  
Sven Valind ◽  
Per Wollmer
Keyword(s):  
Attenuation Correction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Enhanced Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Tissue Fraction

Abstract Aim To determine how the presence of intravenous (IV) contrast-enhanced CT influences SUV measurements corrected for both attenuation and tissue fraction. Material and Methods Eighteen patients with different malignancies, free from lung disorders, lung cancer or metastasis, were prospectively recruited when referred for staging with combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT examination. A non-enhanced low-dose CT over the chest was immediately followed by a whole-body IV contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT and finally the PET acquisition. PET data were reconstructed with attenuation correction based on the two CT data sets. The lungs were segmented in the CT images and lung density was measured. Uptake of 18F-FDG in lung parenchyma was recorded using both non-enhanced and IV contrast-enhanced CT as well as with and without compensation for lung aeration. A comparison of SUV values of corrected and uncorrected PET images was performed. Results There was no significant difference between low dose PET/CT and IV contrast-enhanced PET/CT when removing the impact of air fraction (p = 0.093 for the right lung and p = 0.085 for the left lung). When tissue fraction was not corrected for, there was a significant difference between low dose PET/CT and IV contrast enhanced PET/CT used for attenuation correction (p = 0.006 for the right lung and p = 0.015 for the left lung). Conclusion There was only a marginal effect on the assessement of SUV in the lung tissue when using IV contrast enhanced CT for attenuation correction when the air fraction was accounted for.

18F-FDG-PET/CT response assessment in patients with advanced melanoma treated with combination of low-dose ipilimumab and anti-PD1: A real-world experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21533-e21533
Author(s):  
Caio Dabbous Liz ◽  
Marcos Rezende Teixeira ◽  
Luciana Beatriz Mendes Gomes Siqueira ◽  
Jose A. Rinck ◽  
Joao Paulo S. N. Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

e21533 Background: Combination therapy with anti-PD1 and low-dose ipilimumab has shown reduced rate of immune-related adverse effects compared with standard dose used in the Checkmates studies 067 and 204. However, the discussion whether low-dose ipilimumab may hamper the response rate in advanced melanoma is still open. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of response evaluation based on 18F-FDG PET/CT for patients with advanced melanoma treated with combination of nivolumab 3mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1mg/kg for 4 cycles (N3+I1) followed by anti-PD1 maintenance therapy and compared the results to RECIST 1.1 response criteria in the same population. Results: Between December 2017 and August 2020, 45 patients with advanced melanoma treated with N3+I1 in first-line setting were identified. Unresectable stage III/stage IV were 2/43 patients, respectively. Among stage IV patients, 60.5% were M1c, 23.3% had elevated LDH and 28% had brain metastasis (3 or more brain lesions: 58%). At a median follow-up of 16.7 months, 11 patients (24.4%) had G3/G4 toxicity. During induction phase, three patients (6.6%) discontinued all drugs and 2 other patients (4.4%) interrupted only ipilimumab. Review of response evaluation by RECIST was possible in 36 patients and showed an objective response of 50%. Complete response (CR): 11% and partial response (PR): 39%. Eight percent presented progressive disease (PD). In 37 patients, review of response evaluation using 18F-FDG PET/CT was possible. Twenty-four patients (65%) achieved metabolic CR, 5 (13.5%) PD and 8 (21.5%) were classified as non-CR non-PD. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) were not reached. 12-month PFS and OS were: 72.5 and 89%, respectively. During the study follow-up, only 1 patient with metabolic complete response relapsed and 3 out of 8 with non-CR non-PD progressed. Conclusions: Using low-dose ipilimumab combination does not hamper the response rates and, possibly due to fewer protocol interruptions, these patients may achieve more complete responses as showed by 18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation.

scholarly journals Follow-Up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus Contrast-Enhanced CT after Ablation of Liver Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma—A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2432
Author(s):  
Moritz L. Schnitzer ◽  
Matthias F. Froelich ◽  
Felix G. Gassert ◽  
Thomas Huber ◽  
Eva Gresser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Percutaneous Ablation ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Purpose: After a percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), follow-up investigations to evaluate potential tumor recurrence are necessary. The aim of this study was to analyze whether a combined 18F-Fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan is cost-effective compared to a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scan for detecting local tumor progression. Materials and Methods: A decision model based on Markov simulations that estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was developed. Model input parameters were obtained from the recent literature. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters based on a Monte-Carlo simulation with 30,000 iterations was performed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was set to $100,000/QALY. Results: In the base-case scenario, CE-CT resulted in total costs of $28,625.08 and an efficacy of 0.755 QALYs, whereas 18F-FDG PET/CT resulted in total costs of $29,239.97 with an efficacy of 0.767. Therefore, the corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 18F-FDG PET/CT was $50,338.96 per QALY indicating cost-effectiveness based on the WTP threshold set above. The results were stable in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Based on our model, 18F-FDG PET/CT can be considered as a cost-effective imaging alternative for follow-up investigations after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases.

scholarly journals How can we Use PET/ CT More Accurately for Characterization of Asbestos-related Pleural Thickening?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Selcuk Simsek ◽  
Muharrem cakmak ◽  
Duygu Kuslu ◽  
Tansel Balci ◽  
Erdal In ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Standardized Uptake Value ◽  
Pleural Thickening ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

IntroductionThere is no consensus about standardized uptake value maximum (SUVmax) cut-off value to characterize pleural thickening worldwide. Sometimes, this causes unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures. Our first aim is to determine a cut-off value for SUVmax. Secondly, we try to answer this question “If we use this cut-off value together with morphological parameters, can we differentiate benign thickening from Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) more accurately”.Material and methodsThirty-seven patients with performed 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) before pleural biopsy included the study. All of patients had histopathologically proven primary pleural disease. Their [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging reports were re-assessed. If patient’s SUVmax or size of the thickening was not mentioned in report, we calculated them with their [18F]FDG-PET/CT.ResultsAge, pleural effusion, size, and SUVmax were found a relationship with MPM. We found the size>14 mm, and SUVmax>4.0 as cut-off values for MPM. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for size>14 mm were found as 86.4%, 85.2%, 82.6%, 88.5%, respectively. For SUVmax>4.0; sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV were 90.9%, 87.0%, 85.1%, 92.2%, respectively.ConclusionsIf a patient has SUVmax>4.0 and/or size>14 mm, the risk of MPM is high. These patients should be undergone biopsy. If patient’s SUVmax<4.0, size<14 mm and does not have pleural effusion, he/she has low risk for MPM. These patients can be undergone to the follow-up. If a patient's SUVmax<4, Size<14, and has pleural effusion MPM risk is approximately 4%. These patients can be undergone biopsy/cytology/follow-up. Novel studies are needed for these patients.

scholarly journals Advantages of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging over Modified Duke Criteria and Clinical Presumption in Patients with Challenging Suspicion of Infective Endocarditis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 720
Author(s):  
Valentin Pretet ◽  
Cyrille Blondet ◽  
Yvon Ruch ◽  
Matias Martinez ◽  
Soraya El Ghannudi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Duke Criteria ◽  
High Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

According to European Society of Cardiology guidelines (ESC2015) for infective endocarditis (IE) management, modified Duke criteria (mDC) are implemented with a degree of clinical suspicion degree, leading to grades such as “possible” or “rejected” IE despite a persisting high level of clinical suspicion. Herein, we evaluate the 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnostic and therapeutic impact in IE suspicion, with emphasis on possible/rejected IE with a high clinical suspicion. Excluding cases of definite IE diagnosis, 53 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for IE suspicion were selected and afterwards classified according to both mDC (possible IE/Duke 1, rejected IE/Duke 0) and clinical suspicion degree (high and low IE suspicion). The final status regarding IE diagnosis (gold standard) was based on the multidisciplinary decision of the Endocarditis Team, including the ‘imaging specialist’. PET/CT images of the cardiac area were qualitatively interpreted and the intensity of each focus of extra-physiologic 18F-FDG uptake was evaluated by a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measurement. Extra-cardiac 18F-FDG PET/CT pathological findings were considered to be a possible embolic event, a possible source of IE, or even a concomitant infection. Based on the Endocarditis Team consensus, final diagnosis of IE was retained in 19 (36%) patients and excluded in 34 (64%). With a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and global accuracy of 79%, 100%, 100%, 89%, and 92%, respectively, PET/CT performed significantly better than mDC (p = 0.003), clinical suspicion degree (p = 0.001), and a combination of both (p = 0.001) for IE diagnosis. In 41 patients with possible/rejected IE but high clinical suspicion, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and global accuracies were 78%, 100%, 100%, 85%, and 90%, respectively. Moreover, PET/CT contributed to patient management in 24 out of 53 (45%) cases. 18F-FDG PET/CT represents a valuable diagnostic tool that could be proposed for challenging IE cases with significant differences between mDC and clinical suspicion degree. 18F-FDG PET/CT allows a binary diagnosis (definite or rejected IE) by removing uncertain diagnostic situations, thus improving patient therapeutic management.

scholarly journals Tumor Heterogenity in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasia

Endocrines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
Ludovica Magi ◽  
Maria Rinzivillo ◽  
Francesco Panzuto
Keyword(s):  
Functional Imaging ◽  
Clinical Heterogeneity ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Prognostic Role ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasia ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Owing to the rarity and the biological and clinical heterogeneity of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEP NEN), the management of these patients may be challenging for physicians. This review highlights the specific features of GEP NEN with particular attention on the role of Ki67 heterogeneity, the potential prognostic role of novel radiological techniques, and the clinical usefulness of functional imaging, including 68Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Understanding these specific features may help to plan proper and tailored follow-up programs and therapeutic approaches.

scholarly journals Role of 18F-PET-CT to predict pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Caruso ◽  
Emilio Vicente ◽  
Yolanda Quijano ◽  
Hipolito Duran ◽  
Isabel Fabra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Standardized Uptake Value ◽  
Tumour Regression Grade ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Abstract Objectives Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) is universally considered to be a valid treatment to achieve downstaging, to improve local disease control and to obtain better resectability in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The aim of this study is to correlate the change in the tumour 18F-FDG PET-CT standardized uptake value (SUV) before and after nCRT, in order to obtain an early prediction of the pathologic response (pR) achieved in patients with LARC. Data description We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with LARC diagnosis who underwent curative resection. All patients underwent a baseline 18F-FDG PET-CT scan within the week prior to the initiation of the treatment (PET-CT SUV1) and a second scan (PET-CT SUV2) within 6 weeks of the completion of nCRT. We evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LARC.A total of 133 patients with LARC were included in the study. Patients were divided in two groups according to the TRG (tumour regression grade): 107 (80%) as the responders group (TRG0-TRG1) and 26 (25%) as the no-responders group (TRG2-TRG3). We obtained a significant difference in Δ%SUV between the two different groups; responders versus no-responders (p < 0.012). The results of this analysis show that 18F-FDG PET-CT may be an indicator to evaluate the pR to nCRT in patients with LARC. The decrease in 18F-FDG PET-CT uptake in the primary tumour may offer important information in order for an early identification of those patients more likely to obtain a pCR to nCRT and to predict those who are unlikely to significantly regress.

scholarly journals 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters for Predicting Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110246
Author(s):  
Seokmo Lee ◽  
Yunseon Choi ◽  
Geumju Park ◽  
Sunmi Jo ◽  
Sun Seong Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Background and Aims: This study evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) performed before and after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in esophageal cancer. Methods: We analyzed the prognosis of 50 non-metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer (T1-4N0-2) patients who underwent CCRT with curative intent at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital and Haeundae Paik Hospital from 2009 to 2019. Median total radiation dose was 54 Gy (range 34-66 Gy). Our aim was to investigate the relationship between PET/CT values and prognosis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The median follow-up period was 9.9 months (range 1.7-85.7). Median baseline maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was 14.2 (range 3.2-27.7). After treatment, 29 patients (58%) showed disease progression. The 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 24.2% and 54.5%, respectively. PFS was significantly lower ( P = 0.015) when SUVmax of initial PET/CT exceeded 10 (n = 22). However, OS did not reach a significant difference based on maximum SUV ( P = 0.282). Small metabolic tumor volume (≤14.1) was related with good PFS ( P = 0.002) and OS ( P = 0.001). Small total lesion of glycolysis (≤107.3) also had a significant good prognostic effect on PFS ( P = 0.009) and OS ( P = 0.025). In a subgroup analysis of 18 patients with follow-up PET/CT, the patients with SUV max ≤3.5 in follow-up PET/CT showed longer PFS ( P = 0.028) than those with a maximum SUV >3.5. Conclusion: Maximum SUV of PET/CT is useful in predicting prognosis of esophageal cancer patients treated with CCRT. Efforts to find more effective treatments for patients at high risk of progression are still warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document