scholarly journals An Extensive Study on Logistics Providers in FSCM using AHP Technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (S1-Feb) ◽  
pp. 94-106
Author(s):  
Siddharth Jadhav ◽  
Papri Ray ◽  
R Duraipandian
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Extensive Study ◽  
Direct Impact ◽  
Primary Survey ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The growth of the Logistics business has caused many firms from different industries to enter the field. A logistics provider is an external provider who manages, controls, and delivers logistics activities maintains warehouse and other necessities on behalf of a supplier. They collect outbound shipments from manufacturers & consolidates shipments in their distribution centres and delivers to the customers through an effective routing of transport. Lead time is the most repetitive risk faced by the logistics providers and hence bench marking the major focused variables is must. This results in lowering the uncertainty in Leadtime. Researchers have spoken about challenges faced in evaluating the process. This research indents to identify the variables which are considered for the evaluation process of the operations of logistics providers. A primary survey will be conducted using the identified variables and then subjected to Analytical Hierarchy Process to funnel down the major focused variables. These variables will be benchmarked and be considered as standard variables which will cause a direct impact on the daily operations and result in variation in profitability. This paper will give a clear perspective regarding the evaluation of Logistics providers and their various policies incorporated

Analisis Evaluasi Kinerja Vendor Berdasarkan Penetapan Kriteria Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada PT. XYZ

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Nadya Uci Pramita ◽  
Adhitomo Wirawan
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Quality Cost ◽  
Questionnaire Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of performance evaluation of vendors especially in the vendor that provides a raw material for pressure vessel plate made of carbon steel. As for the evaluation process undertaken by PT. XYZ through performance indicators (KPI) where an evaluation that applied a focus on quality and delivery. In this study, researchers used the designation criteria vendor performance indicator (VPI) where the criteria used consist of quality, cost, delivery, flexibility and responsiveness (QCDFR). The methods used in the analysis process that is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Data collecting directionally by questionnaire method among 3 respondents on the procurement department that know the performance of the vendors over the years. The result showed that PT. RE has the best performance among the four vendors, as known PT.SS, PT. ST, PT. CH and PT. UN within value 0.540; The vendor with lowest performance owned by PT.CH within value 0.034.Keyword : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (vpi), plate pressure vessel, vendor performance evaluation Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses evaluasi kinerja vendor khususnya pada vendor yang mensupplai bahan baku plate pressure vessel berbahan carbon steel. Adapun proses evaluasi yang dilakukan oleh PT. XYZ melalui key performance indicator (KPI) dimana evaluasi yang diterapkan hanya berfokus pada quality dan delivery. Dalam studi ini, peneliti menggunakan penetapan kriteria Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) dimana kriteria yang digunakan yaitu quality, cost, delivery, flexibility dan responsiveness (QCDFR). Metode yang digunakan dalam proses analisis yaitu Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Pengambilan data menggunakan kuisioner terhadap 3 informan pada departemen procurement yang dianggap mengetahui kinerja vendor selama ini. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT. RE memiliki kinerja yang terbaik diantara keempat vendor yaitu PT. SS, PT. ST, PT. CH serta PT. UN dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.540 sedangkan vendor dengan kinerja terendah dimiliki oleh PT. CH dengan nilai bobot sebesar 0.034.Kata kunci : Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), vendor performance indicator (VPI), plate pressure vessel, evaluasi kinerja vendor.

scholarly journals Combination Analytical Hierarchy Process and Multy Factor Evaluation Process For Determining Promotion of Position

2018 ◽  
Vol 1114 ◽  
pp. 012079
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ardiansyah Sembiring ◽  
Andy Sapta ◽  
Guntur Maha Putra ◽  
Hambali ◽  
Afdhal Syafnur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Factor Evaluation ◽  
Hierarchy Process

scholarly journals Developing an Evaluation Framework for Selecting Optimal Medical Devices

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhyeok Park ◽  
Eungdo Kim ◽  
Kwangsoo Shin
Keyword(s):  
Medical Device ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
General Evaluation ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Specific Assessment ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The objective of this study is to summarize the current general evaluation process that stakeholders use to evaluate single or multiple medical devices to select the optimal medical device. This study constructed a novel evaluation framework to select the optimal medical device by overcoming the limitations of assessments that were previously confined to the medical device cycle and the purpose of the specific assessment. It also presents a general framework for incorporating usability evaluations into the frame to reflect the objectives and characteristics of key stakeholders in the medical device industry. In addition, the results of medical device evaluation are further analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP).

scholarly journals Perbandingan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi Kasus: Promosi Jabatan di Biro Kepegawaian Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung)

MIND Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-121
Author(s):  
UUNG UNGKAWA ◽  
RIDHO FARUQI ◽  
NUR FITRIANTI F
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Dalam sistem pendukung keputusan, banyak dijumpai metode untuk mengevaluasi pilihan dalam mengambil keputusan. Dua di antaranya adalah metode Multifactor Evaluation Process (MFEP) dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Dalam paper ini disajikan perbandingan keduanya baik secara prosedural maupun hasil akhir dalam pemberian peringkat karyawan di Biro Kepegawaian Institut Teknologi Nasional (Itenas) Bandung. Hasil menunjukkan, bahwa metode AHP lebih komplek dibanding MFEP sedangkan hasil pemeringkatan diperoleh perbedaan di peringkat empat dan lima dari lima karyawan yang dievaluasi. Kata kunci: Multifactor Evaluation Process, Analytical Hierarchy Process, sistem pendukung keputusan.

scholarly journals METODE AHP TOPSIS DAN FUZZY MOLP PADA APLIKASI PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN DAN PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 2169
Author(s):  
Siti Komsiyah
Keyword(s):  
Linear Programming ◽  
Remote Control ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Perkembangan pasar yang semakin pesat membuat perusahaan harus mampu bersaing secara global dengan tetap mempertahankan performance. Pemilihan supplier merupakan hal penting untuk menunjang performance perusahaan, karena pemilihan supplier yang tidak tepat dapat menyebabkan kerugian bagi perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang program aplikasi berbasis web untuk menentukan bobot subkriteria dengan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan memilih supplier terbaik dengan metode Technique Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) serta menghitung alokasi pesanan untuk masing-masing supplier dengan metode Fuzzy Multi Objective Linear Programming (FMOLP). Penelitian ini dilakukan pada toko Jaya Cibodas Toy’s dengan mengambil objek produk mobil remote control. Metode AHP menghasilkan bobot subkriteria kualitas produk 0.193, cacat produk 0.173, harga produk 0.131, biaya 0.100, payment term 0.096, ketepatan waktu 0.100, ketepatan jumlah 0.066, response 0.044, fleksibel 0.030, after sale service 0.025, lead time 0.019, reputasi supplier 0.014, demand 0.010, sedangkan untuk merangking supplier digunakan TOPSIS dan menghitung alokasi kuota digunakan FMOLP dengan hasil Winner Toys 45%, Sumatera Toys 25,6%, Bintang Toys 22,9%, Lestari Toys 6.5%, dan Green Toys 0%

Enhanced Selling on Digital Space via Matching Buyer and Seller Preferences Using Fuzzy MCDM Method

2016 ◽  
pp. 148-158
Author(s):  
Kedar Pandurang Joshi ◽  
Sivakumar Alur
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Digital Environment ◽  
Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Web Portal ◽  
Digital Space ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Mcdm Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Usage of websites like Olx.in, Quikr.com is rapidly growing in India. One of the major difficulties faced by the users of such websites is the long-time taken to realize the search. This work proposes an integrated approach to searching, through matching in digital environment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process considering multiple criteria. The objective of the study is to enable buyers to search the sellers effectively and efficiently. Efficient and effective search can help buyers narrow down to the desired matches and enhance seller's the chances of selling through online classified portal. Authors utilize a compatibility metric that enhances the probability of matchmaking with reduction in lead-time developed by Joshi and Kumar (2012). The study presents an illustration of matchmaking using a web portal, and demonstrates the MCDM methodology.

scholarly journals Evaluasi Supplier Bahan Baku Plat Besi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Taguchi Loss Function

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Wildatul Khoiro
Keyword(s):  
Loss Function ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Supplier Evaluation ◽  
Repair Service ◽  
Taguchi Loss Function ◽  
Iron Plate ◽  
Material Defects ◽  
Marine Industry ◽  
Hierarchy Process

PT. Lamongan Marine Industry is a manufacturing company that produce large ships. The company have contracts with four suppliers of iron plate. In cooperation with these suppliers, they unable to meet the quality standards for iron plate is a measure of the thickness of the thick 45 mm. Material defects from suppliers thickness is less the limit set by the company is 0,3 mm – 0,5 mm. Process evaluation of the suppliers performed to look for suppliers that meet the criteria of the company. In this study, supplier evaluation process is carried out using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Taguchi Loss Function (TLF). AHP for wighting each of criterian, while TLF  for calculating loss function each of supplier. Criterian of the supplier evaluation are price, quality, delivery, underweight, availability, payment system, guarantee policy and repair service, with wight for each criterion are 6%, 6%, 8%, 15%, 17%, 13%, 8% and 26%. The results showed that the best supplier that meets the company criteria is a supplier  PT. Biz Fitting with loss Rp. 1.140.973.

scholarly journals Penilaian Kinerja Pemasok Kayu dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Dian Eko Hari Purnomo ◽  
Alfani Risman Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Lead Time ◽  
Hierarchy Process

<p>Penilaian kinerja pemasok merupakan keputusan yang penting dalam suatu perusahaan, karena akan meningkatkan daya saing perusahaan dalam menghadapi persaingan bisnis yang sangat kompetitif. CV. Rimba Sentosa sedang melakukan pemilihan supplier yang akan memasok bahan baku kayu mahoni dengan lima pemasok, yaitu Manggala Jati, UD. Jati Mukti, Toko Kayu Jati”Mukti”, Gunung Hijau, dan Indah Sentosa. Dalam penelitian ini penilaian kinerja pemasok terbaik menggunakan metode <em>Analytical Hierarchy Process</em> (AHP). Metode ini didasarkan pada konsep perbandingan berpasangan untuk setiap hirarki yang ada pada struktur hirarki yang ada. Kriteria yang digunakan dalam pemilihan ini ada 3 kriteria dan 6 sub kriteria yang mendukung setiap kriteria. Kriteria-kriteria yang dapat digunakan untuk penilaian kinerja pemasok adalah waktu, kualitas, dan harga. Sub kriteria yang dapat digunakan dalam untuk penilaian kinerja pemasok adalah pengiriman tepat waktu, <em>lead time, </em>spesifikasi bahan baku, jumlah bahan baku, harga pembelian bahan baku, dan biaya transportasi. Berdasarkan perhitungan dengan menggunakan metode AHP, maka pemasok<em> </em>yang mempunyai nilai terbaik adalah pemasok “Indah Sentosa”, yang mana nilainya adalah 0,344 atau 34,420%.</p>

scholarly journals Evaluasi Supplier Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Taguchi Loss Function

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yanu Asdidi ◽  
Moeso Alpianto ◽  
Ahmad Ainul Yaqin
Keyword(s):  
Loss Function ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Purchasing Management ◽  
Policy Response ◽  
Supplier Evaluation ◽  
Taguchi Loss Function ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
A Company

Supplier evaluation process is a strategic activity on purchasing management that aims to find out the performance of the supplier. PT. Fronte Classic Indonesia is a company manufacturing car carpet, one of the raw materials needed in producing car carpet that is calcium. The supplier in partnership with the company has performance that is less suitable. The methods used in this research Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Taguchi Loss Function. AHP is used to determine the weights of the criteria and Taguchi Loss Function is used to calculate the loss function of the respective supplier. Supplier evaluation process carried out to search for suppliers and meet the criteria of the company. The criteria used in the evaluation of suppliers are price, delivery, quality, the accuracy of goods quantity, guarantee policy, response to claims. The results showed that the suppliers who meet the criteria of the company by providing minimum losses as the best supplier.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document