scholarly journals ЕNDOPROSTHESIS AFTER FRACTURE OF PROXIMAL HUMERUS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS – 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 989-996
Author(s):  
Ivaylo Mitkovski

The proximal humerus is the third most common fracture location in elderly patients after the proximal femoral bone and the distal radial bone. In order to restore the anatomy and bring it as close to normal as possible, blood reposition with internal fixation is a method of choice for unstable fractures. However, surgical treatment is difficult and problematic because of disturbed approach to the fracture and the large fragmentation of pieces. A proximal shoulder bone fracture, which disturbs blood supply of the humeral head, may require placement of prosthesis. Hemiarthroplasty is a logical attitude in such cases, but analysis of functional results and complications has identified a certain number of risk factors limiting indications. Strict analysis of patient characteristics and of fracture type is an essential prerequisite to deciding against treatment by immobilization or osteosynthesis. Results in hemiarthroplasty are primarily dependent on respecting the rules of the art, which aim at stable anatomic osteosynthesis of the surrounding structures so as to restore normal shoulder function. The critical steps are the adjustment of implant height and retroversion, reduction and fixation of tuberosities and good management of the postoperative course. The recent development of fracture-dedicated shoulder implants should improve results. In elderly patients, when local conditions are unsuitable to hemiarthroplasty, a reverse prosthesis may be used, with an adapted surgical technique. Whatever the type of prosthesis, implantation for proximal humerus fracture is a demanding operation with definitive impact on the functional evolution of the shoulder. Following reports of results for shoulder prosthesis in proximal humerus fracture from 1970, several attempts were made to reproduce the encouraging initial findings. Most found good results in terms of pain, but much less satisfactory functional outcome. Analyzing the causes of failure identified risk factors and enabled solutions to be suggested. Among these, one of the first was to select indications, eliminating baseline situations of poor prognosis. Following good results reported in arthropathy involving rotator cuff tear and in revision of hemiarthroplasty for fracture, reverse prostheses were recommended as an alternative attitude in case of proximal humerus fracture in elderly subjects. This particular indication is currently under assessment.This article presents results of a 3-year experience in shoulder endoprothesis after fracture of proximal humerus in elderly patients at Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, St. Anna General Active Treatment Hospital – Varna, between 2016 and 2018. In this time period, 79 shoulder endoprothesis have been implanted, 68 of which have been actively and carefully observed in the first 12 months of the post-surgery recovery. For the treatment of functional results was utilized Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) that aided following patients’ condition, pain levels, as well as functioning and shoulder movements. Results suggest that in the time span of one year, 51% of the patients show excellent overall recovery state and 38% are in good overall recovery state. These fine results of post-surgery shoulder functioning are in large part due to precise surgery techniques and detailed pre-surgical diagnosis and planning.

2019 ◽  
pp. 135910531985088
Author(s):  
Sanjeeve Sabharwal ◽  
Stephanie Archer ◽  
Daniel Cadoux-Hudson ◽  
Dylan Griffiths ◽  
Chinmay M Gupte ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
Seung-Gil Baek ◽  
Chang-Wug Oh ◽  
Young-Soo Byun ◽  
Jong-Keon Oh ◽  
Joon-Woo Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mukka Naveen ◽  
D. Narsimlu

Introduction: Proximal humerus fracture is considered as one of the commonest fractures in clinical practice. Most of these fractures occur as a result of osteoporosis. Proximal humerus fractures are often nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures with two parts, which can be managed conservatively. Surgical interventions include closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). It also involves trans-osseous suture fixation, Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) with either conventional or Proximal Humerus Interlocking Osteosynthesis System (PHILOS) or hemiarthroplasty. Good clinical outcomes have been achieved by the PHILOS as they stabilize the proximal humeral fractures with steady fixation in osteoporotic bone and assisted aged patients in early functional exercises which resulted in early recovery.  Aim: To analyse the functional results and complications associated with management of proximal humerus fractures treated with PHILOS. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study conducted at Department of Orthopaedics, Prathima Institute Of Medical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar, from July 2017 to January 2019.  58 patients were taken into study with two-part, three-part, four-part fracture of the proximal humerus in adults >18 years of age. In all patients PHILOS plating was done and surgical events and surgical difficulties faced, post-surgery local or systemic complications, time needed for fracture union and time taken to return to pre-fracture activity were documented. They were followed up till there were signs of union on radiographs or for at least a period of 1 year. Results: The results were assessed with Constant Murley Score at 6 months post-surgery and Visual Analogue Scale at 6 weekly intervals. The mean Constant score for two-part fractures was 88.1, for Three-part 82.5, for Four-part 72.7. The patients with two-part and three-part fractures had a significantly better VAS than patients with four-part fractures till 18 months of surgery. After 18 months the VAS was similar for all 3 groups. 6.9% developed shoulder stiffness, 2 patients from four-part fracture group developed Varus angulation. Conclusion: we conclude that the PHILOS is safe, effective and provides stable fixation for  proximal humerus fractures and in patients with indigent bone quality.  Keywords:  PHILOS, Proximal Humerus Fracture


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 247154921984044
Author(s):  
Anshuman Singh ◽  
Mark Schultzel ◽  
Guy Cafri ◽  
Edward H Yian ◽  
Mark T Dillon ◽  
...  

Background Limited information exists regarding mortality and readmission following proximal humerus fracture. This study examines risk factors following hemiarthroplasty for these fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 788 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture from January 2005 to December 2011 was conducted. One-year mortality and 30- and 90-day hospital readmission were evaluated. Patient risk factors included age, race, gender, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and body mass index. Results One-year mortality rate was 5.2%. Patients with ASA ≥3 had 2.37 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–5.32) greater mortality risk versus patients with ASA1/2. The 30-day readmission rate was 8.4% and at 90 days was 12.6%. Females had 0.53 risk of readmission versus males (95% CI: 0.29–0.96). Patients with ASA ≥3 had 1.79 (95% CI: 1.04–3.09) risk of 90-day readmission versus patients with ASA1/2; females had 0.52 (95% CI: 0.31–0.85) risk of readmission versus males. Increased age increased all odds ratios. Conclusions Readmission rate after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture is significant both at 30 and 90 days and is higher in males. Age and ASA ≥3 correlate with this. Diabetes and obesity were not significant risk factors for readmission or mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document