scholarly journals Exploratory study on relative dose intensity and reasons for dose reduction of adjuvant CAPOX therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Author(s):  
Ayumi Tsuchiya ◽  
Chiaki Ogawa ◽  
Naoki Kondo ◽  
Yasushi Kojima ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 171 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mamo ◽  
J. Easaw ◽  
F. Ibnshamsah ◽  
A. Baig ◽  
Y.S. Rho ◽  
...  

Background Despite lack of a true comparative study, the FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil–leucovorin–oxaliplatin) and CAPOX (capecitabine–oxaliplatin) regimens are believed to be similar in their efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of stage III colorectal cancer. However, that belief has been disputed, because real-life data suggest that the CAPOX regimen is more toxic, leading to more frequent reductions in the delivered dose intensity—thus raising questions about the effect of dose intensity on clinical outcomes.Methods A retrospective data review for two Canadian institutions, the Segal Cancer Centre and the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, considered patients diagnosed with stage III colorectal cancer during 2006–2013. Primary endpoints were dose intensity and toxicity, with a secondary endpoint of disease-free survival.Results The study enrolled 180 eligible patients (80 at the Segal Cancer Centre, 100 at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre). Of those 180 patients, 75 received CAPOX, and 105 received mFOLFOX6. In the CAPOX group, a significant dose reduction was identified for capecitabine compared with 5-fluorouracil in mFOLFOX6 group (p = 0.0014). Similarly, a significant dose reduction was observed for oxaliplatin in mFOLFOX6 compared with oxaliplatin in CAPOX (p = 0.0001). Compared with the patients receiving CAPOX, those receiving mFOLFOX6 were twice as likely to experience a treatment delay of more than 1 cycle-length (p = 0.03855). Toxicity was more frequent in patients receiving mFOLFOX6 (nausea: 30% vs. 18%; diarrhea: 47% vs. 24%; peripheral sensory neuropathy: 32% vs. 3%). At a median follow-up of 40 months, preliminary data showed no difference in disease-free survival (p = 0.598). Pooled data from both institutions were also separately analyzed, and no significant differences were found.Conclusions Our results support the use of CAPOX despite a lack of head-to-head randomized trial data.


2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 736-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Kanemasa ◽  
Tatsu Shimoyama ◽  
Yuki Sasaki ◽  
Miho Tamura ◽  
Takeshi Sawada ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19668-e19668
Author(s):  
F. Canoui-Poitrine ◽  
M. Laurent ◽  
E. Paillaud ◽  
P. Caillet ◽  
M. Verlinde-Carvalho ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18125-e18125
Author(s):  
Sorcha Ring ◽  
Derbrenn O'Connor ◽  
Niamh Cooney ◽  
Brian Richard Bird

e18125 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is commonly treated in both adjuvant and palliative settings with Oxaliplatin. Painful peripheral neuropathy resulting in dose adjustments is a well recognized side effect in up to 30% of cases. Relative dose intensity (RDI), an expression of the percentage of planned dose received at a scheduled time, is a tool used to measure how closely a prescription has been adhered to. Studies have suggested a decreased RDI (<85%) is associated with inferior outcomes. The aim of this study was to calculate the RDI for CRC patients undergoing treatment with Oxaliplatin, to investigate reasons for dose delays and reductions and to calculate a Charlson Co-Morbidity Index Score (CCIS) for each patient Methods: CRC patients treated with Oxaliplatin from 2010-2016 within the BSHC were identified using pharmacy lists and pathology reports. The following exclusion criteria were applied: non first line Oxaliplatin and excluding cycles after three months. Data was obtained through a systematic, retrospective chart review. An audit of the chemotherapy prescriptions allowed the RDI to be calculated and the CCIS was calculated using a colorectal specific Index previously described. Results: We identified 176 eligible patients, 83 charts were available for review and 69 charts contained all necessary information to be included. Xelox (61%), Folfox-6 (35%) and Flox (4%) were the chemotherapy agents involved in this study. The average RDI achieved was 87.47%, with a range of 25%-103.17%. The primary cause for dose adjustments was peripheral neuropathy (64%). The CCIS range was 0 -3, with results demonstrating a significant connection between a higher CCI and lower RDI, see table 1. Conclusions: A CCIS ≤ 1 correlates to achieving a higher RDI, with each of these subgroups achieving above the acceptable cut off for RDI (>85%), as such certain co-morbidities may be early predictors of reduced RDI. [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 313-313
Author(s):  
Simon Yuen Fai Fu ◽  
Paula Barlow ◽  
Carmel Maree Jacobs ◽  
Fritha J. Hanning ◽  
Peter C.C. Fong

313 Background: Docetaxel (D) chemotherapy is a standard of care in men with advanced prostate cancer (APC), both metastatic castration sensitive (CS) and castration resistant (CR) disease. The risk of significant toxicities may deter D use in elderly patients. We aim to evaluate the real world efficacy and tolerability of D in men with APC. Methods: Between 04/2014 and 05/2017, data from men aged ≥75 with APC treated at Auckland City Hospital with 3 weekly D were retrospectively collected from the genitourinary medical oncology database. Results: 33 (CS 12, CR 21) men were identified. 70% had PSA decline ≥50% (CS 92%, CR 57%). Median time to next line of therapy was 0.5 y in the CR arm. One third (n = 2/6) of CR patients on opioid had improved pain control with D. 75% had upfront dose reduction (DR). The median dose intensity was 21 mg/m2/wk (CS) and 18 mg/m2/wk (CR). 9 patients had dose escalation after upfront DR, all but 3 needed DR later, and none was escalated to 75 mg/m2. 58% (CS 75%, CR 48%) completed 6 cycles, and only 6% (n = 2) completed 6 cycles at 75 mg/m2. 24% had ≥G3 hematological toxicities. Febrile neutropenia rate was 12% (CS 8%, CR 14%). Pegfilgrastim was used in 1 CS and 1 CR men. Admission rate was 39% (CS 25%, CR 48%), 77% (CS 100%, CR 70%) was treatment related, and 23% (CR 30%) due to malignancy. 15% (CS 25%, CR 9%) required RBC transfusions. 33% CR men progressed while on treatment, and two deaths from pneumonitis and disease progression were noted. Conclusions: Docetaxel is active in elderly men with APC. Toxicities are manageable but can be life-threatening. Admission is frequent especially in CR patients. Proactive dose reduction should be considered to balance benefits vs. risks in this population. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (25) ◽  
pp. 4085-4091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Isabelle Tabah-Fisch ◽  
Harry Bleiberg ◽  
Aimery de Gramont ◽  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
...  

Purpose Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin are commonly used to treat advanced and resected colorectal cancer. This analysis compares the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered bimonthly (FOLFOX4) in patients age younger than and at least 70 years. Patients and Methods This retrospective analysis included 3,742 colorectal cancer patients (614 age ≥ 70) from four clinical trials testing FOLFOX4 in the adjuvant, first-, and second-line settings. End points included grade ≥ 3 adverse events, response rate (in advanced disease), progression or relapse-free survival, dose-intensity, and overall survival in the studies with mature survival data. Results Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity (neutropenia [43% v 49%; P = .04] and thrombocytopenia [2% v 5%; P = .04]) were significantly higher in older patients. Older age was not associated with increased rates of severe neurologic adverse events, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, infection, overall incidence of grade ≥ 3 toxicity (63% v 67%; P = .15), or 60-day mortality (1.1% v 2.3%; P = .20). The relative benefit of FOLFOX4 versus control did not differ by age for response rate, progression or recurrence free-survival (hazard ratio, 0.70 for FOLFOX4 v control for age < 70, 0.65 for age ≥ 70; P = .42), or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.77 age < 70, 0.82 age ≥ 70; P = .79). Dose-intensity did not differ by age at cycles 1, 3, 6, or 12. Conclusion FOLFOX4 maintains its efficacy and safety ratio in selected elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Its judicious use should be considered without regard to patient age, although scant data are available among patients older than 80 years.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1464-1470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Aparicio ◽  
Jean-Louis Jouve ◽  
Laurent Teillet ◽  
Dany Gargot ◽  
Fabien Subtil ◽  
...  

Purpose Elderly patients form a heterogeneous population. Evaluation of geriatric factors may help evaluate a patient's health status to better adapt treatment. Patients and Methods Elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil (FU) -based chemotherapy either alone or in combination with irinotecan (IRI) in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 2001-02 study. Sites participating in the geriatric substudy completed geriatric screening tools to perform prognostic factor analyses for treatment safety during the first 4 months after treatment initiation. Results The geriatric score was calculated in 123 patients (44%). Median age was 80 years (range, 75 to 91 years). The Charlson comorbidity index was ≤ 1 in 75%, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was ≤ 27/30 in 31%, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) showed impairment in 34% of the patients. Seventy-one patients (58%) had grade 3 to 4 toxicity, 41 (33%) had a dose-intensity reduction of more than 33%, and 54 (44%) had at least one unexpected hospitalization during the first 4 months after starting treatment. In multivariate analysis, significant predictive factors for grade 3-4 toxicity were IRI arm (odds ratio [OR], 5.03), MMSE ≤ 27/30 (OR, 3.84), and impaired IADL (OR, 4.67); for dose-intensity reduction of > 33%, the significant predictive factors were alkaline phosphates > 2 × upper limit of normal (OR, 4.16) and IRI arm (OR, 6.85); and for unexpected hospitalization, significant predictive factors were MMSE ≤ 27/30 (OR, 4.56) and Geriatric Depression Scale ≤ 2 (OR, 5.52). Conclusion Geriatric factors (MMSE and IADL) are predictive of severe toxicity or unexpected hospitalization (MMSE) in a randomized prospective phase III study in mCRC. These results suggest that cognitive function and autonomy impairment should be taken into account when choosing a regimen for chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document