scholarly journals Performance of AODV and OLSR Protocols with Different Mobility Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 4775-4778

The Mobile and ad hoc wireless network has a set of nodes and is a low power, wireless infrastructure less, self-organized and limited distance communicating network devices. The nodes are always changing their characteristics over time results into a different network topology. So, it is very difficult to predict the mobile ad hoc network performance. In this research paper we proposed comparative analysis and estimate the performance of network amongst the mobile nodes by reducing the control overhead. Main intention of the paper is to relate and estimate the performance of different network routing protocols under diverse mobility models. The routing protocols performance metrics are examined with varying node speed and node density of network amongst different mobile nodes. NS-3 is used as a network simulator with version 3.25 (NS-3.25) to carry out the research simulation results.

Author(s):  
S. Alani ◽  
Zahriladha Zakaria ◽  
Herwansyah Lago

A dynamic temporary network is created through wireless mobile nodes without the need for considerable infrastructure as well as a central manager. In a mobile ad hoc network, routing protocols allow a mobile for transmission and receiving packets. In the last decade, many variants have come up for the AODV. A minimum number of hop counts are chosen for enhancing routing protocols to include additional factors that can have an impact on path selections. As the distance between each node grows, the transmission power also rises accordingly. Hence, this impacts the network’s entire performance and the most important feature is the quality of service. Most of the traditional routing protocols include energy consumption levels of the nodes and various parameters, like residual battery power, consumption of energy per packet and energy needed per transmission. A new technique is proposed in this paper to enhance the routing efficiency by making use of lion optimization algorithm after identifying all possible paths in the network. This technique not only enhances the energy efficiency of each node but also the performance metrics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 06024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Taha AL-Dhief ◽  
Naseer Sabri ◽  
M.S. Salim ◽  
S. Fouad ◽  
S. A. Aljunid

Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a set of mobile nodes that communicate with each other to configure an immediate network without utilizing any of infrastructure, the centralized access point or centralized administration in multiple hop manner. There are a lot of routing protocols have been proposed in MANET which are different from each other in the performance and the mechanism. Therefore, the performance study of those protocols in different scenarios is needed. This paper presents the performance comparison between Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad hoc on demand distance Vector Routing (AODV) as reactive routing protocols and Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) as a proactive routing protocol to precisely determine which protocol is more effective. Network Simulator (NS) version 2.35 has used to simulate and evaluate the performance of these protocols in terms of the packet delivery ratio, average throughput, average end-to-end delay, and packet loss ratio with respect to the variable number of nodes.


Author(s):  
Gajanan Madhavrao Walunjkar ◽  
Koteswara Rao Anne

Popularity of Mobile ad hoc network in research is  due to their ad hoc nature and effectiveness at the time of disaster management when no infrastructure support is available. Due to the limited transmission range of wireless network interfaces, multiple network hops may be needed for nodes to exchange data across the network. In such a network, each mobile node operates as a router, forwarding packets for other mobile nodes in the network that may not be within the direct reach. Routing protocols developed for wired networks such as the distance vector or link state protocols are inadequate here as they not only assume mostly fixed topology but also have high overheads. This has lead to several routing algorithms specifically targeted for ad hoc networks. In this paper, we include the MANET supported routing protocols and their performance analysis over different performance parameters such as packet delivery ratio, delay, throughput, control overhead and energy etc.


2014 ◽  
Vol 672-674 ◽  
pp. 1977-1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Ming Cheng ◽  
Jing Niu ◽  
Tie Jun Sun

A Mobile Ad hoc network (MANET) is a network consisting of a set of wireless mobile nodes, in which nodes can communicate with each other without centralized control or established infrastructure. To obtain a better understanding of AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol) and OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing Protocol) routing protocols, different performances are simulated and analyzed using OPNET modeler 14.5 with the various performance metrics, such as PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio), end-to-end delay and routing overhead. Only effect of mobility is analyzed in the paper. As a conclusion, in mobility case, routing overhead is not greatly affected by mobility speed in AODV and OLSR, and the PDR of OLSR is decreased as the node speed increased, while AODV is not changed. As to delay, AODV is always higher than OLSR in both static and mobility cases.


Author(s):  
CHANDNI CHANDNI ◽  
ANJALI BHARTI ◽  
KANIKA SHARMA

A mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is composed of mobile nodes without any infrastructure. Mobile nodes selforganize to form a network over radio links. The goal of MANETs is to extend mobility into the realm of autonomous, mobile and wireless domains, where a set of nodes form the network routing infrastructure in an ad-hoc fashion. The majority of applications of MANETs are in areas where rapid deployment and dynamic reconfiguration are necessary and wired network is not available. Due to their time varying nature of the topology of these networks traditional routing methods cannot be directly used .In this paper a number of routing protocols which are used in MANETS are studied and compared on a range of parameters.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 6659-6665
Author(s):  
Jamal Muafaq Hameed Al-Bayati

This paper considers mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) in which mobile nodes can reach the Internet via stationary gateway node. The gateway works as bridge between MANET and the Internet. Several studies show that location of the gateway inside network topology has a significant effect on overall network performance. Two different scenarios, with varying number of nodes and two gateway locations, have been considered under the assumption that all mobile nodes are connected to Internet through the same gateway. Simulation has been done using NS-2 software, producing a computer model of AODV and DSR routing protocols. Comparison of these routing protocols is performed in terms of Average (end-to-end) delay, Throughput, Normalized routing load and Packet delivery ratio metrics. Simulation results suggest that AODV routing protocol has better performance in both scenarios. In addition, the results suggest that location of gateway at the center gives better results compared to gateway positioned at the edge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 4301-4310

One of the crucial and utilized simulator for mobile ad hoc network is the NS3 (Network Simulator). NS3 executes simulation scenarios and produces data regarding which flow monitor (flowMon) files are counted one of the important used format for estimating the research proposal. This article will introduce a novel framework to facilitate the simulation process in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Generally speaking, when network researchers need to evaluate the experiments, there is generally the necessity to estimate the different models advantages by computing a set of QoS metrics to understand the network performance impact in such scenario. Network simulators, and NS3 specifically, need important program writing from the researcher to consolidate simulation results. This article states a contribution for NS3 composed of a new Framework that tends to make it less complicated to obtain and plot various QoS network performance metrics. This framework generates and runs simulations using common simulation parameters, such as velocity, mobility models, and number of nodes automatically. It also contains permits to parse through the generated flow that contain several essential metrics a researcher may need in order to analyze the simulation, such as end-to-end delay, lost packet, and throughput.


Author(s):  
Prof.Ranjitha G ◽  
Sathwik J R ◽  
Shakthi Priya J ◽  
Sushmitha G

MANET stands for Mobile Ad-Hoc Network, they consist of mobile nodes that offer a routable networking environment in the link layer. The nodes are connected wirelessly in a self-healing, self-configured network that have no fixed infrastructure or centralized management. Routing in MANET’s is a very inconvenient process as wireless links in this network are highly prone to error and go down frequently because of the mobility of nodes. Therefore, it is a highly researched topic around the world, and to overcome such difficulty many routing protocols have been suggested around the world to improve its efficiency. Some protocols used in this paper are Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV), Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV), and Dynamic Source Routing. This paper hopes to summarize all the recent work done on MANET Routing protocols and the network simulator tool.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 11819-11823

A wirelessly appointed system is an accumulation of progressively framing some of moving hubs or mobile nodes or a transitory non-foundation organize without the utilization of any present system foundation. Because of the constrained range of correspondence between portable hubs in the impromptu organize, a few system expectations might be required to send a packet starting with one hub then onto the next in the wireless system. A scope of particular routing conventions have been depicted in most recent years that address multi-hub wirelessly appointed system and their proficiency issues are examined. In this paper, use the NS2.34 network simulator to compare Mobile Ad-Hoc network routing protocols DSDV, AODV and DSR. In this investigation of the effectiveness of routing conventions in systems when changing association parameters (traffic load, portability, arrange size). This archive experiences broad examination among routing performance for AODV, DSDV, DSR routing. For model, packet delivery ratio, delay, number of packet sent, number of packets received, throughput are analyze and also to look at these conventions to check the best routing conventions for Quality of Service in the network


Author(s):  
Mohammed Ahmed Jubair ◽  
Mustafa Hamid Hassan ◽  
Salama A. Mostafa ◽  
Hairulnizam Mahdin ◽  
Aida Mustapha ◽  
...  

<p>A Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) refers to a dynamic and wireless network, which can be designed without an existing infrastructure as every node serves as a router. A MANET is a self-configuring system of mobile nodes that are connected wirelessly. Every node serves as a sink, as well as a router to send packets. The movement of the nodes is not restricted as they can move in any direction, and they have the ability to get organized into a network. Due to their free and independent movement, they do not have a fixed position; they often change positions. In this study, the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Ad-hoc On Multipath Demand Distance Vector (AOMDV) protocols are compared using Network Simulator NS2.35. DSR is a reactive gateway discovery algorithm whereby the connection of a MANET mobile device is established only on demand. Basically, AOMDV was specially tailored for ad-hoc networks that are highly dynamic to respond to link failures and breakages in the network. It ensures that the paths for destinations are sustained, and it defines the new routing information using destination serial numbers to ensure loop freedom always while avoiding problems. More so, it is a protocol that is based on a timer that can discover ways through which the mobile nodes respond to link breakages and change in topology. A comparison of protocols has been carried out individually and jointly with the aim of evaluating their performance. The performance is measured in terms of End-to-End Delay, Packet Delivery Ratio, Packet Loss Ratio, and Routing Overhead Ratio. The performance of the routing protocols was done using two scenarios; when there is a change in the simulation time and when there is a change in the number of nodes.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document