scholarly journals Decision Making System for Determining the Hepatitis Food Criteria using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S2) ◽  
pp. 993-998
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Saturated Fat ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
High Protein ◽  
High Sodium ◽  
High Sugar ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Hepatitis is a kind of inflammation which attacks the body's organ known as liver. Hepatitis itself is divided into commonly known types namely Hepatitis A, B, and C. however, there exist other types of hepatitis called D, E, G which are not familiar. The understanding of patients regarding hepatitis is an obstacle in healing. The thing that is needed is to regulate diet and avoid foods that are prohibited (high sodium, high saturated fat, high sugar, and high protein). Hepatitis sufferers must pay attention to food patterns, must control foods consumed daily, must consume food with low salt, low saturated fat, low in sugar, and low in protein to reduce the risk of not worsening the condition of people with hepatitis. The decision making system determines the hepatitis food criterion using 5 criteria’s, namely the presence of high sodium, high saturated fat, high protein, high sugar, and high iron. While the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is a decision making model which defines the multi-factor problems or complex multi criteria into a hierarchy. With hierarchy, a complex problem could be partitioned into smaller groups which are then ordered in a hierarchy to arrange the problem in a structural and systematic way.

scholarly journals Selection of the Best Lecturer in Management Forum Indonesia Chapter DKI Jakarta with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Webology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (Special Issue 04) ◽  
pp. 619-625
Author(s):  
Faroman Syarief ◽  
Rustam Effendi ◽  
Amrillah Azrin ◽  
Imam Suroso ◽  
Dhian Tyas Untari
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Management Forum ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

This study aims to be able to provide recommendations in the decision-making system related to the best lecturers at the Jakarta Chapter of the Indonesian Management Lecturer Forum. It is hoped that the research results can be used as input in the Best Lecturer decision making system with a more systematic system. This research was conducted through interviews, questionnaires and literature study related to the Lecturer profession. In the field, the assessment criteria are still rough, therefore this study must include all the criteria into the mechanism, rules, and codes. Analysis, each criterion is analyzed using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method in weighting. The cumulative results of the recapitulation of scores show that teaching is still a top priority in the implementation of the Tridaharma of Lecturers, after that the second priority is research, then community service and finally support in the form of participation in supporting activities and scientific development.

scholarly journals Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Pegawai pada Universitas Ekasakti Menggunakan Metode AHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
M Ilham A Siregar ◽  
Danyl Mallisza ◽  
Wahyuni Yahyan ◽  
Harry Setya Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Dynamic Logic ◽  
New Employees ◽  
System Method ◽  
New Employee ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

Private companies, government agencies and educational institutions are still experiencing difficulties in selecting employees / employees who are in accordance with their needs and experts in their respective fields. With the increasing number of workers who have different abilities, recruiting new employees requires selection of prospective employees at Ekasakti University, because if this is done manually, it will make it difficult for the staff to receive and also be prone to mistakes in decision making. The decision making system method (Decisions Support System) can be used to help the selection of new employee recipients with the AHP Method. Selection of new employee admissions by the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method can help solve the case of selecting employee recruitment. The model of applying dynamic logic applied in the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) has the advantage that the selection process provides very flexible results

USING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS IN SELECTING COMMERCIAL REAL-TIME OPERATING SYSTEMS

2009 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 151-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
NORITA AHMAD ◽  
PHILLIP A. LAPLANTE
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Operating Systems ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Performance Testing ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Theoretical Argument ◽  
Hierarchy Process

This work involves the novel application of a traditional technique for multivariate decision making to a complex problem in software selection. In particular, we formalize the problem statement "how does one select an appropriate commercial real-time operating system for a specific application" and we review two previous solutions to this decision making problem. Along the way, we will consider various aspects of the theoretical argument, broaden its application, and address the deficiencies of the two other solution strategies. Then, we present an improved solution to the problem using the well-developed Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is not traditionally used by software engineers. We then demonstrate the application of this method using the same criteria used in the previous methods. By explicitly representing preference, by providing tools that allow users to set and inspect their judgments, and by affording users with systematic evaluation procedure, the contribution is to help the decision maker to better identify an appropriate real-time operating systems solution without the need for intensive performance testing.

scholarly journals THE POLYVOCALITY IN ACTION: EMBODYING THE EPIPHANY ON PUBLIC HOUSING CONUNDRUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1396-1417
Author(s):  
Resi Ariyasa Qadri ◽  
Amrie Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Public Housing ◽  
Tacit Knowledge ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Housing Provision ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Purpose of the study: This paper aims to elaborate on how the institutional logic of public housing provision transforms from the old logic into the new logic. By encapsulating tacit-knowledge from the shift, this study focuses on how to explicate a model of multi-criteria decision-making for executing official residence projects in Indonesia. This research also aims to recuperate the future of the public residency field. Methodology: The methodology employed was a mixed method. The qualitative method was firstly applied by utilizing semi-structured interviews to build a decision-making model. Later, a quantitative method was implemented to improve the consistency of the model by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process protocols. Thirteen project representatives and ten decision-makers were being involved as the main informants. Google Sheets web-based software was applied for analyzing survey results by making use of a mathematical model for the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Main Findings: The result indicates that land not used as paddy field, fair house price, safe from flood location, serene ambiance, and developer experience has played a significant part in affecting buying decisions for residency projects. To carry out the new method, the total scores of the AHP calculation should be above 50. Otherwise, the government shall opt for the old mechanism. Applications of this study: The paper contributes to the public sector accounting field in the area of asset management and public housing procurement. The paper also gives a strong basis for the field to make use of the model of Indonesia's public housing provision. The government can adopt the research framework for choosing the new model or the old one. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study might be the only one of its kind. The research was using a multi-method to achieve the objectives. To generate a multi-criteria decision-making model, grounded data of excessive interviews were abstracted. Then the abstracted tacit-knowledge was tested with AHP to provide a consistent model.

scholarly journals Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Evaluating the Performance of Vietnamese Commercial Banks

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh Xuan Cuong ◽  
Hoang Thi Hien ◽  
Tran Long
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Research Show

The commercial banks (CBs) performance evaluating has been a necessary problem in currently integration trend and usually implemented by a committee of experts under criteria selected. Therefore, it is considered as a Multi - Criteria Decision - Making model (MCDM). Nowadays, there have been many researches proposing various standards and models to evaluate and rank CBs. But in Vietnam, the number of studies related to the Vietnamese banking evaluation model have still been limited. As a result, this study develops a multi-criteria decision model integrating Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Fuzzy the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). The proposed model has evaluated and ranked five Vietnamese commercial banks including CTG, VCB, BIDV, TCB and MB. The paper revealed their ranks. Besides, the results of the research show that the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model is suitable for applying it to the process evaluating bank performance.

scholarly journals PRIORITISING SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS FOR AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY BUILDINGS’ MANAGEMENT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpitha KALUTARA ◽  
Guomin ZHANG ◽  
Sujeeva SETUNGE ◽  
Ron WAKEFIELD
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Australian Community ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Building Components ◽  
Community Buildings ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pair Wise Comparison ◽  
Comparison Data

The essence of Australian community buildings’ sustainable management drives through a previously established decision-making structure with four sustainability aspects and accompanying 18 criteria. Informed decisions are supported with a decision-making model that generates sustainability impacts of building components based on this decision-making structure. Building components’ individual impacts can be assigned using a numbering scale incorporated with linguistic terms. However, similar importance given to each aspect or criterion is arguable when the combined effect is considered. Hence, they should be given different weightings and their combination with individual impacts will produce final sustainability impacts. For calculating weightings, the study uses Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), widely used technique in Multi Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). The study also conducted an industry-wide questionnaire across Australian local councils because pair-wise comparison data is essential for weighting calculation. This paper presents the survey data and analysis results that captured weightings of sustainability aspects and criteria.

scholarly journals Supplier Selection Very Small Aperture Terminal using AHP-TOPSIS Framework

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Sumanto Sumanto ◽  
Karlena Indriani ◽  
Lita Sari Marita ◽  
Ade Christian
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Assessment Criteria ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Small Aperture ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

There are several methods of decision making VSAT IT goods suppliers such as: Promethee, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Decision-making in the selection of the best suppliers, we have the basis of assessment criteria, and we will also be faced with more than one alternative. If alternatives are only two, maybe still easy for us to choose, but if the alternative is a lot of choice, it is quite difficult for us to decide. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a technique that was developed to help overcome this difficulty, because the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a form of decision-making model with many criteria. One of the reliability of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is able to perform simultaneous analysis and integrated between the parameters of qualitative or quantitative. In this study the authors use six criteria and alternatives 6, the results of these alternatives will be obtained perangkingan alternative used as a reference supplier selection VSAT IT goods company Total EP Indonesie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document