scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA MELALUI UPAYA DIVERSI BAGI PELAKU DEWASA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bendry Almy
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Research Goal ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legislation

ABSTRAKPrinsip keadilan restoratif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan hukum pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia hanya diatur dalam Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA) yang diaplikasikan dalam bentuk diversi, namun diversi tersebut hanya ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana anak bukan untuk pelaku dewasa, peraturan perundang-perundangan pidana Indonesia belum mengatur prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa. Dalam praktik penegakan hukum, penerapan prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa sebagian telah dilaksanakan melalui diskresi, namun secara teoritis dan pratik pelaksanaan diskresi masih bermasalah karena belum memenuhi tiga nilai dasar hukum yaitu keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan, dan diskresi juga bisa menimbulkan permasalahan ketidakadilan, karena adanya perbedaan perlakuan dalam proses penegakan hukum, sehingga asas “equality before the law” tidak dilaksanakan. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pelaksanaan prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia dan bagaimana penerapan diversi bagi pelaku dewasa dalam rangka mewujudkan keadilan restoratif. Jenis penelitian yaitu penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian hukum kepustakaan, untuk mencari dan menemukan data yang dibutuhkan untuk menjawab permasalahan. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa peraturan perundang-undangan hukum pidana Indonesia belum mengatur tentang prinsip keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dewasa, prinsip keadilan restoratif diterapkan baru sebatas untuk pelaku anak yang diaplikasikan dalam bentuk diversi. Secara teoritis, historis, normatif dan praktik prosedural, diversi juga dapat diterapkan untuk menyelesaikan perkara tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh orang dewasa, namun perlu adanya perubahan dan penyesuaian terutama dalam hal tujuan pelaksanaan, kwalifikasi jenis tindak pidana dan mekanisme atau prosedur pelaksanaannya.Kata kunci: kebijakan hukum pidana; anak; dewasa; diversi; keadilan restoratif.AbstractThe principle of restorative justice in criminal law regulations in force in Indonesia is only regulated in the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children (SPPA) which is applied in the form of diversion, however the diversion is only intended for child offenders not for adult offenders, Indonesian criminal laws and regulations do not regulate the principle of restorative justice for adult offenders. In law enforcement practices, the application of the principle of restorative justice for adult offenders has been partially implemented through discretion, but theoretically and practically the implementation of discretion is still problematic because it does not meet the three basic legal values, namely justice, certainty and benefit, and discretion can also cause problems of injustice, due to differences in treatment in the law enforcement process, so the principle of "equality before the law" is not implemented. The research goal is to find out how the implementation of the principles of restorative justice in criminal legislation in Indonesia, and how the application of diversion for adult offenders in order to realize restorative justice. This type of research is normative research or library research, to search and find the data needed to answer the problem. The results of the study note that Indonesian criminal law regulations do not regulate the principles of restorative justice for adult offenders, the principle of restorative justice is applied only to the child offenders which is applied in the form of diversion. Theoretically, historically, normatively and procedural practice, diversion can also be applied to resolve cases by adult offenders, but there needs to be changes and adjustments especially in terms of implementation objectives, qualification of the type of crime and the mechanism or procedure for its implementation.Keywords: criminal law policy; children; adults; diversion; restorative justice.

scholarly journals Legal Review Enforcement Repressive Legal Efforts Against Narcotics Users Of Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Alfredo Risano ◽  
Ayu Dian Ningtias
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Original State ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law

 In terms of enforcement the law. Second, legal instruments in the framework of criminal law enforcement abuse of narcotics against minors using a legal basis Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children. In the the provisions of the SPPA Law, in order to prosecute children who are involved with the law, then a diversion effort is carried out, namely a restorative effort or recovery state solve the problem together, in this research is focous about How are repressive legal measures against child narcotics users in under age?. As previously explained, in act Number 11 In 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, there is a restorative principle (Restorative justice), which is aimed at restoring the original state, meaning efforts to restore the attitudes and mentality of children who have committed acts the crime of narcotics abuse to be as before or as a cure for the criminal act he has committed. Of course, the provisions of the Narcotics Law are not sidelined even though his repressive legal remedies are based on the provisions of law SPPA.

scholarly journals Pendekatan dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pilkada Menunjang Kinerja Kepolisian dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Sebagai Pelindung, Pengayom dan Pelayan Masyarakat

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
husain kasim
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Mass Violence ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law

This study aims to: 1) knowing the basic law enforcement restorative justice approach in handling criminal acts riots, 2) to know how to implement a restorative justice approach and the factors that influenceThe experiment was conducted at the Police Resort Ternate, North Maluku province, with a population of security officers who work directly handling and protection against acts of mass violence with less sampling as many as 50 people through random sampling techniques. Data were collected by questionnaire and interview techniques. Data analysis was performed using qualitative descriptive analysis and interpretation.The results showed that: 1) The perpetrator of criminal acts of rioting should be avoided from the formal criminal justice system. The best solution that must be done is through the act of diversion (transfer) the completion of its case outside the criminal justice system, but there is no definite legal basis for implementing diversion measures in addition to referring to the Law 2 of 2002, which only specifies that police officers have the authority of police discretion. 2) Treatment of the criminal action in a dispute over the election unrest in North Maluku, which was held on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate is through mediation. This means that the principle of restorative justice has been implemented on Sat. Criminal Police Ternate, however, efforts to address criminal acts there are influences from the substance of the law, law enforcement officers, legal culture of society and their own community.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement against Children's Criminal Action Based On Law Number 11 of 2012 Concerning Children Criminal Justice Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (06) ◽  
pp. 226-235
Author(s):  
Feddy Hantyo Nugroho ◽  
Rodliyah ◽  
Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Objective Interpretation ◽  
The Law

This research was conducted to analyze and find out how criminal law policy is in the effort to apply criminal sanctions against children facing the law in terms of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children and whether the concept of Diversity can be applied in the process of law enforcement against children involved in Narcotics Crimes. This research is a normative study, to analyze the legal material related to the problem under study, the author uses the Interpretation, Subjective and Objective Interpretation instruments, after that the authors process these legal materials by deductive thinking. The results obtained from the study that the drafting of Law Number 11 of 2012 is a replacement to Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning juvenile justice conducted with the aim of establishing a judiciary that truly guarantees the best protection of the interests of children facing the law as nation's next generation. The concept of Restorative Justice is one of the important things in Law Number 11 of 2012 where restoring the situation as it used to be the main goal and also no less important is the form of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on Children where criminal sanctions that are harsh and miserable are used as ultimum Remedium is not as a premium remedium especially as a maximum remedium. The concept of diversion that should be applied in Indonesia in the future, should be a combination of the concept of diversion that is applied in Australia, namely Police Diversion which is combined with the process of handling cases with the diversion prevailing in Indonesia today.

scholarly journals Analisis Hukum Tentang Tindak Pidana Seksual Yang Terjadi Di Kota Medan (Study PutusanNomor : 1840/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mdn)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-200
Author(s):  
Mhd. Hendara Adha ◽  
Edi Warman ◽  
Triono Eddy
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process

This article discusses how the law arrangements in the juvenile justice in the process of resolving the case, How restorative justice restrictions in law enforcement in Indonesia and How the application of Restorative justice law in the process of settlement of criminal case in Criminal Law in Indonesia. This type of research is normative juridical that describes reviewing and explaining and analyzing normative provisions associated with restorative justice applicable in Indonesia. From the above discussion that restorative justice in the settlement of criminal acts committed by children is very concerned in rebuilding relations after the occurrence of criminal acts, rather than exacerbate the rift between the perpetrators, victims and the community which is the character of the current modern criminal justice system. The restorative criminal justice process holds the view that realizing justice is not only a matter of government and criminality, but more than that it must provide justice in totality that can not ignore the interests and rights of victims and society. Implementation of the principle of restorative justice and the process of diversion as an effort to solve crimes committed by children in formal juridical has been set clearly and firmly in Law Number 11 Year 2012 about kids of justice.

scholarly journals PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW AND DIVERSION ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR CHILDREN IN INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
BAMBANG JOYO SUPENO
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Ideal Norm ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Perpetrators And Victims ◽  
Formal Justice

<p>Restorative justice is the ultimate goal of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children, so that children in conflict with the law must obtain Diversion. Article 7 paragraph (2) and Article 9 paragraph (2) the SPPA Law is<br />discriminatory and unjust, both for perpetrators and victims of criminal acts, because there are restrictions, exceptions and disregard for Diversion provisions. In concretto, in 2014-2018 the use of Diversion (49.61%) was lower than formal justice (50.39%), the data showed that some children who were in conflict with the law did not get Diversion. Based on the analysis of concept the principle of equality before the law in ideal-norm thinking, it is necessary to reconstruct the provisions of Diversion in the SPPA Law, namely (a) The principle of equality before the law must be used as a determining indicator in the formulation and process of Diversion law enforcement. (b) Provisions on child-oriented Diversion as the subject of criminal acts will determine justice in the application of Diversion for every child in conflict with the law. (c) Diversion provisions which are oriented towards acts, sanctions and value of losses as a requirement for the application of Diversion, will cause discrimination in the application of Diversion.</p>

scholarly journals THE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHILDREN'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-198
Author(s):  
Ali Muhammad
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Since the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children in Indonesia needs to be sought immediately for Law Enforcement Officials (APH) who do not understand and know about the obligation to adopt a Restorative justice approach in the implementation of the Child Criminal Justice System. The norm that regulates the obligation to approach restorative justice in the handling of Children dealing with the Law (ABH) contained in article 5 paragraph 1 of the Child Criminal Justice System Law and this Law has also adopted the International instrument of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) ratified by the government of the Republic of Indonesia with a Presidential Decree Number 36 of 1990 concerning Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in addition to other international regulations such as the Beijing Rules, Riyadh Guidelines and Tokyo Rules which are certainly in line with the Constitution 1945 concerning the purpose of the country which was wrong was to realize social justice and promote public welfare. This restorative justice approach certainly has the same spirit as the ideological values ​​of Pancasila, politics, and the Indonesian national socio-culture which prioritizes solutions through deliberation to reach consensus so that this restorative justice approach is also one of legal reforms that elevates the values ​​of local wisdom from the Nation Indonesia. The conceptual approach and the approach to legislation (the statue approach) are the approaches used in this study and maximize the implementation of the implementation of restorative justice in every handling of children facing the law (ABH) at each stage of the investigation, prosecution and trial. research is to provide confirmation to every Law Enforcement Officer of the obligation to take a Restorative Justice approach in every Handling of ABH.  

scholarly journals Police Law Actions Based the Principle of Discretion against Suspects

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1984-1990
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
The Law

Among the law enforcement work in the criminal justice system, police are the most attractive, because in it there are many human involvement as decision makers. The police can in essence be seen as a living law, because it is in the hands of the police that the law is embodied, at least in the criminal law. If the law aims to create order in society, such as by fighting against evil, then in the end, it is the police who will determine what is concretely called ordering, who should be subdued, who should be protected and so on

scholarly journals Criminal Objectives Integrality in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System

Al-Risalah ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Ahmad Rofiq ◽  
Hari Sutra Disemadi ◽  
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Legal Decisions ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Rich

The integrality of the criminal justice system must be realized in every aspect of sub-systems, in substance, structure, and legal culture. In this respect, in the process of criminal justice, the three sub-systems’ integrality are required so that the criminal justice system is capable to produce fair legal decisions in the process of law enforcement in Indonesia. Until such a policy is undertaken, the law will always be harsh against the poor and weak against the rich. This paper discusses criminal objectives integrality in Indonesian criminal justice system and its influence in the integrated criminal justice system. Using a normative juridical method, this paper demonstrates that each sub-system of criminal justice (the Police, Prosecutors, Courts, and the prison) is in line with the main objectives of criminal law enforcement as found in various laws that govern the institutions.  

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN KOMISI PEMBERANTAS KORUPSI DALAM MELAKUKAN PENUNTUTAN MONEY LAUNDERING

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Roni Efendi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Initial Investigation ◽  
Asset Recovery ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The tackling of money laundering through the criminal Justice System has not been debatable as long as it is handled by sub-systems in the criminal justice system such as the police and prosecutors since they have been bestowed a clear mandate in law. That raised a question, what about Corruption Eradication Commission or KPK?  In Article 6 letter C Act no.30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission (Law of KPK) explicitly and clearly revealed that the KPK has a duty to conduct the initial investigation, investigation and prosecution of corruption. That article also did not provide the further explanation. For that reason, the authority of KPK in conducting initial investigation, investigation and prosecution is only regarding the criminal act of corruption.In several corruption cases settling, KPK also often tried to apprehend the perpetrators through the law of prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crime. Many People criticized KPK but some gave the appreciation on KPK’s efforts in asset recovery. That was also addressed to KPK on its’ authority in investigating and prosecuting TPPU. In the case of No. 39/Pid.Sus/ TPK/2013/PN.Jkt.Pst with the accused Ahmad Fathanah, Joko Subagion and I made Hendra as 2 (two) members of the judges’ panel stated dissenting opinion. It declared that KPK has the authority to investigate TPU but it is only concerning with the wealth which is suspected from a criminal act of corruption. Actually, the authority to persecute TPPU is on the general attorney. Meanwhile, persecutors of KPK does not have the right to file the indicment and demand of the TPPU. Therefore, the indictment related to money laundering should be declared unacceptable. It brings the writer’s unrest on the criminal law enforcement’s practice. It is especially in the eradication of money laundering since it is supposed that law enforcement does no provide justice for justicia belene, certainty and expediency in asset recovery.

scholarly journals Legality Letter of Statement of Khilaf in Indonesia Criminal Justice System

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Matters

In criminal law, a person charged with a criminal offense may be punished if it meets two matters, namely his act is unlawful, and the perpetrator of a crime may be liable for the indicated action (the offender's error) or the act may be dismissed to the perpetrator, and there is no excuse. The reasons may result in the death or the removal of the implied penalty. But it becomes a matter of how if the Letter of Statement Khilaf is the answer to solve the legal problems. The person who refuses or does not do what has been stated in the letters is often called "wanprestasi" because the statement is categorized as an agreement. The statement includes an agreement which is the domain of civil law or criminal law, so its application in the judicial system can be determined. This should be reviewed in the application of the law, are there any rules governing wrong statements in the criminal justice system. By using a declaration of khilaf as a way out of criminal matters, then the statement should be known in juridical rules. This study uses normative juridical methods, by conceptualizing the law as a norm rule which is a benchmark of human behavior, with emphasis on secondary data sources collected from the primary source of the legislation. The result of this research is that the statement of khilaf has legality, it is based on Jurisprudence No. 3901 K / Pdt / 1985 jo Article 189 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian criminal procedure law. However, this oversight letter needs to be verified in front of the court to be valid evidence, but this letter of error is not a deletion of a criminal offense, because the culpability of the defendant has justified the crime he committed. Such recognition, cannot make it free from the crime that has been committed.Keywords: Legality, Letter of Statement, Criminal Justice System

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document