scholarly journals Effects of Intra-vitreal Injection of Bevacizumab as an Adjunct during Phacoemulsification in Diabetic Maculopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Afzal Bodla ◽  
Syeda Minahil Kazmi ◽  
Noor Tariq ◽  
Ayema Moazzam ◽  
Muhammad Muneeb Aman

Purpose:  To study the effects of Intra-vitreal injection of Bevacizumab as an adjunct during phacoemulsification in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Study Design:  Quasi experimental study. Methods:  Hundred diabetic patients who were scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification were included in the study. They were equally divided into two groups; Bevacizumab and control group. Complete ocular examination and macular thickness and volume were determined using an OPTOVUE-OCT machine. The patients in the Bevacizumab group were given intra-vitreal injection of 1.25 mg/0.05ml of Bevacizumab at the time of Phacoemulsification. A written ethical approval was obtained and the study was conducted according to principles of declaration of Helsinki. Results:  The bevacizumab group manifested low value of CMT one month post-surgery as compared to the control group (262.2 ± 32.2 and 288.5 ± 54.1, respectively) with P = 0.01. The Total Macular volume, and Best-corrected visual acuity in the two groups showed no significant difference one month after surgery. Amongst the patients who developed postsurgical macular edema, four patients did not possess a positive history for diabetic retinopathy and 3 of them had Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. We found no significant relationship between the post-surgical macula edema with the presence of mild Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. (Fisher's test, P = 0.321). Conclusion:  The ocular anti-VEGF therapy substantially reduces macular edema secondary to post-surgical inflammation in diabetic patients. It effectively reduces the central macular thickness although the results are not found to be statistically significant when compared with the control group. Key Words:  Diabetes mellitus; diabetic macular edema; diabetic retinopathy: Bevacizumab.

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-37
Author(s):  
Amash Aqil ◽  
Muhammad Moin ◽  
Khadijah Abid ◽  
Ahsan Mehmood

Objective: To evaluate central macular thickness and choroidal thickness in patients with macular edema due to diabetic retinopathy versus controls. Study Design: Cross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from Jan to Jul 2018. Methodology: A retrospective data of 100 eyes from 50 patients having with diabetic macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy was extracted from hospital registry. Additionally, 100 eyes of 50 individuals without any preexisting ocular conditions, comprising a control group was included in the study. Choroidal thickness measurements were made from the posterior edge of the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid/sclera junction at subfoveal level using optical coherence tomography. Central macular thickness was also measured for all the enrolled patients. Results: One hundred patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study. The mean age was 56.27 ± 14.41 years. The mean Central macular thickness of all the patients were reported as 270.49 ± 72.38 μm, while the choroidal thickness was 284.89 ± 96.51 μm. There was statistically significant difference in central macular thickness between both healthy and diabetic retinopathy with diabetic macular edema groups (p=0.001), whereas insignificant difference existed between the two groups forchoroidal thickness (p=0.735). Conclusion: In patients with diabetic macular edema no significant change in choroidal thickness was observed compared with healthy controls, while the thickness of the retina was high in patients with macular edema due to diabetes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110012
Author(s):  
Ahmed Howaidy ◽  
Zeiad H Eldaly ◽  
Mohamed Anis ◽  
Tageldin M Othman

Purpose: To compare effect of topical Nepafenac versus intravitreal Ranibizumab on macular thickness after cataract surgery in diabetic patients with no preoperative macular edema. Patients and methods: A prospective randomized controlled study recruited diabetic patients with visually significant cataract and no diabetic macular edema (DME). Patient underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and were randomly assigned to receive post-operative topical Nepafenac, intra-operative intravitreal Ranibizumab, or no prophylactic treatment. Changes in subfoveal and perifoveal macular thickness were assessed by SD-OCT. Results: The mean central macular thickness showed a significant increase in all study groups 1 week and 1 month postoperative when compared to baseline. At 3 months postoperative, there was a significant difference between Nepafenac and Control group ( p = 0.017), Ranibizumab and Control groups ( p = 0.009) with no significant difference between Nepafenac and Ranibizumab group ( p = 0.545) regarding CMT. Comparable results could be detected as regarding peri-foveal macular thickness changes. Concerning BCVA, there was a significant difference between topical Nepafenac/control ( p = 0.001) and intravitreal Ranibizumab/control ( p = 0.004) at 1-week visit. No significant difference in BCVA was observed between Nepafenac and Ranibizumab group throughout the whole study period. In postoperative visits, cystoid macular edema occurred in three patients (7.9%) in Nepafenac group, one patient (2.7%) in Ranibizumab group, and seven patients (17.07%) in control group. Conclusion: Both postoperative topical Nepafenac and intra-operative intra-vitreal Ranibizumab are effective adjunctive to phacoemulsification in diabetic patients for prophylaxis of macular edema.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Chen ◽  
Jing Feng ◽  
Yanhong Shi ◽  
Fuxiao Luan ◽  
Fang Ma ◽  
...  

Purpose: To evaluate the expressions of erythropoietin (EPO) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the vitreous and fibrovascular membranes (FVMs) of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) after the intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) and further explore the relationship between EPO and VEGF.Method: The concentrations of EPO and VEGF levels in the vitreous fluid were measured in 35 patients (24 PDR and 11 non-diabetic patients) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The patients were divided into three groups: PDR with IVR (IVR group) before par plana vitrectomy (n = 10), PDR without IVR (Non-IVR group) (n = 14) and a control group [macular holes (MHs) or epiretinal membranes (ERM), n = 11]. Fluorescence immunostaining was performed to examine the expressions of VEGF, EPO and CD 105 in the excised epiretinal membranes.Result: The PDR eyes of Non-IVR group had the highest vitreous VEGF and EPO levels (836.30 ± 899.50 pg/ml, 99.29 ± 27.77 mIU/ml, respectively) compared to the control group (10.98 ± 0.98 pg/ml and 18.96 ± 13.30 mIU/ml/ml). Both the VEGF and EPO levels in the IVR group (13.22 ± 2.72 pg/ml and 68.57 ± 41.47 mIU/ml) were significantly lower than the Non-IVR group (P = 0.004 and P = 0.04, respectively). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed for VEGF levels between the control and IVR groups (10.9 ± 0.98 pg/ml and 13.22 ± 2.72 pg/ml, respectively, P = 0.9). Yet the EPO level in the IVR group was significantly higher than that in the Non-diabetic group (68.57 ± 41.47 pg/ml and 18.96 ± 13.30 pg/ml, respectively, P = 0.001). The expressions of EPO, VEGF, and CD105 were significantly reduced in fluorescence immunostaining of FVMs in the IVR group compared with the Non-IVR group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the EPO and VEGF levels were 0.951 and 0.938 in the PDR group.Conclusion: Both of the VEGF and EPO level were significantly increased in PDR patients, which have equal diagnostic value in the prediction of PDR. IVR could reduce the EPO level, but not enough to the normal level.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-78
Author(s):  
Krishna Rao ◽  
Ravi Chandra ◽  
Lavanya Rao ◽  
Shailaja S ◽  
Manali Hazarika

Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics. Design: Prospective cross–sectional study. Methods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes) and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey's test for multiple comparison between groups were used. Results: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = < 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = < 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609). Conclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van-An Duong ◽  
Jeeyun Ahn ◽  
Na-Young Han ◽  
Jong-Moon Park ◽  
Jeong-Hun Mok ◽  
...  

Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), one of the major microvascular complications commonly occurring in diabetic patients, can be classified into Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) and Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR). Currently available therapies are only targeted for later stages of the disease in which some pathologic changes may be irreversible. Thus, there is a need to develop new treatment options for earlier stages of DR through revealing pathological mechanisms of PDR and NPDR. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize proteomes of diabetic through quantitative analysis of PDR and NPDR. Methods: Vitreous body was collected from three groups: control (non-diabetes mellitus), NPDR, and PDR. Vitreous proteins were digested to peptide mixtures and analyzed using LC-MS/MS. MaxQuant was used to search against the database and statistical analyses were performed using Perseus. Gene ontology analysis, related-disease identification, and protein-protein interaction were performed using the differential expressed proteins. Results: Twenty proteins were identified as critical in PDR and NPDR. The NPDR group showed different expressions of kininogen-1, serotransferrin, ribonuclease pancreatic, osteopontin, keratin type II cytoskeletal 2 epidermal, and transthyretin. Also, prothrombin, signal transducer and activator of transcription 4, hemoglobin subunit alpha, beta, and delta were particularly up-regulated proteins for PDR group. The up-regulated proteins related to complement and coagulation cascades. Statherin was down-regulated in PDR and NPDR compared with the control group. Transthyretin was the unique protein that increased its abundance in NPDR compared with the PDR and control group. Conclusion: This study confirmed the different expressions of some proteins in PDR and NPDR. Additionally, we revealed uniquely expressed proteins of PDR and NPDR, which would be differential biomarkers: prothrombin, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, hemoglobin subunit alpha, beta, and transthyretin.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 630-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdinc Aydin ◽  
Helin Deniz Demir ◽  
Huseyin Yardim ◽  
Unal Erkorkmaz

Purpose To investigate the clinical effects and outcomes of intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) after or concomitant with macular laser photocoagulation (MP) for clinically significant macular edema (CSME). Methods Forty-nine eyes of 49 patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and CSME were randomized into three groups. The eyes in the laser group (n=17), group 1, were subjected to MP 3 weeks after IVTA; the eyes in the IVTA group (n=13), group 2, were subjected to MP, concomitant with IVTA; the eyes in the control group (n=19), group 3, underwent only IVTA application. Visual acuity (VA), fundus fluorescein angiography, and photography were performed in each group. Results In the first group, the mean VA improved from 0.17±0.09 at baseline to 0.28±0.15 (p=0.114) and in the second group, deteriorated from 0.19±0.08 at baseline to 0.14±0.08 at the sixth month (p=0.141), respectively. In Group 3, the mean VA improved from 0.16±0.08 at baseline to 0.28±0.18 (p=0.118) at the end of the follow-up. When VA was compared between the control and study groups, significant difference was detected at the sixth month (p=0.038). Conclusions MP after IVTA improved VA, rather than MP concomitant with IVTA, and only IVTA application for CSME. MP after IVTA may reduce the recurrence of CSME and needs further investigations in a longer period.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-357
Author(s):  
Shruthi Marati ◽  
Vallabha K

The clinical evaluation of macular edema has been difficult to characterize, but evaluation has become more precise with the help of optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study is undertaken to evaluate the quantitative changes in macular thickness using spectral domain OCT in diabetic patients undergoing cataract surgery pre and post operatively and its relation with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Study participants included 65 diabetic patients irrespective of presence or absence of retinopathy who underwent cataract surgery. Each eye underwent fundus examination with indirect ophthalmoscopy and OCT of macula i.e.,preoperatively and at postoperatively at day 1, 1 week, 4 weeks and at 12 weeks. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded at each visit. The central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) increased in all patients irrespective of presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy of about 17.4±25.3µm and 29µm±38.8 at 1 month and 3 month follow up. There was a statistically significant increase seen in CSMT after cataract surgery especially in patients with preoperatively diagnosed macular edema. Associated retinopathy also acts as a risk factor. But there was no statistically significant increase in mild and moderate NPDR preoperatively and also in postoperative period after uncomplicated small incision cataract surgery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochun Yang ◽  
Jianbiao Xu ◽  
Ruili Wang ◽  
Yan Mei ◽  
Huo Lei ◽  
...  

Purpose.To determine the efficacy and safety of preoperative intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection before vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).Methods.107 eyes of 88 patients that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for active PDR were enrolled. All patients were assigned randomly to either preoperative IVC group or control group. Follow-up examinations were performed for three months after surgery. The primary bioactivity measures were severity of intraoperative bleeding, incidence of early and late recurrent VH, vitreous clear-up time, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) levels. The secondary safety measures included intraocular pressure, endophthalmitis, rubeosis, tractional retinal detachment, and systemic adverse events.Results.The incidence and severity of intraoperative bleeding were significantly lower in IVC group than in the control group. The average vitreous clear-up time of early recurrent VH was significantly shorter in IVC group compared with that in control group. There was no significant difference in vitreous clear-up time of late recurrent VH between the two groups. Patients that received pretreatment of conbercept had much better BCVA at 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery than control group. Moreover, both patients with improved BCVA were greater in IVC group than in control group at each follow-up.Conclusions.Conbercept pretreatment could be an effective adjunct to vitrectomy in accelerating postoperative vitreous clear-up and acquiring stable visual acuity restoration for PDR.


2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 529-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Sencanic ◽  
Miroslav Stamenkovic ◽  
Vesna Jovanovic ◽  
Sinisa Babovic ◽  
Vesna Jaksic ◽  
...  

Introduction. Ultrastructural changes in corneas of patients with diabetes mellitus have been previously described. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CDR) values in diabetic patients without retinopathy at the stage of diabetic nonproliferative and proliferative retinopathy and CDR in a control group of healthy subjects. Methods. The study included 121 diabetic patients and 125 healthy subjects matched according to gender and age. Each patient underwent ophthalmological examination involving a dilated fundus examination and CDR measurement using the ultrasound pachymeter. The eyes of diabetic patients were classified according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study into three groups: without diabetic retinopathy (NDR), with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and a group with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Only one eye of each subject was chosen for the study. Results. The mean CDR value was significantly higher in the diabetic group (570.52?31.81 ?m) compared with the control group (541.42?27.82 ?m). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The highest mean CDR value was recorded in the PDR group (585.97?28.58 ?m), followed by the NPDR group (570.84?30.27 ?m), whereas the lowest mean CDR value was recorded in the NDR group (559.80?31.55 ?m). There was a statistically significant difference in CDR between the NDR and PDR groups, as well as between the NPDR and PDR groups (p<0.001, p<0.05 respectively). No significant difference was recorded between the NDR and NPDR groups (p>0.05). Conclusion. CDR of diabetic patients was higher compared to healthy subjects. The highest mean value of CDR was registered in the PDR group, followed by the NPDR and the NDR groups.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Fariba Ghassemi ◽  
Abdulrahim Amini ◽  
Masoud Yasemi ◽  
Amin Nabavi ◽  
Mohammadkarim Johari

Introduction. Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of visual loss and blindness in the age group of 20 to 64 years. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral Losartan adjuvant therapy in combination with intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Methods. In this randomized clinical trial, 61 eyes of 47 patients with normal blood pressure and diabetic macular edema and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy were studied. Patients were randomly divided into Losartan (n = 33) and control (n = 28) groups. All patients received 3–6 intravitreal injections of Bevacizumab over 6 months. General examination including blood pressure and glycosylated hemoglobin measurements were performed in all patients. Complete ophthalmologic examination and macular OCT were performed at the first, third, and sixth months of treatment in all patients. Results. The mean age of the patients studied was 57.1 ± 7.4 years and 37.7% of the patients were male. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of initial visual acuity, central macular thickness, and frequency of injections. There was no significant difference in visual acuity and central macular thickness between the two groups at the first, third, and sixth months of treatment. Age, frequency of injection, and initial macular thickness less than 450 microns were effective in patients’ final visual acuity. Conclusion. Short-term adjuvant treatment with Losartan in patients with diabetic macular edema and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy has no greater effect than the standard treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document