scholarly journals JUDGE'S JUDGMENT ON CRIMINAL OFFENSE AGAINST PERPETRATORS OF CRIMINAL EXTORTION WITH THE VIOLENCE AGAINST OTHER PEOPLE'S MOTORCYCLES (Verdict Study Number: 237/Pid. B/2018/PN Kla)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
Oktasari Putri Pramisela ◽  
Yulia Hesti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Violent Criminal ◽  
The Law

A crime or criminal act, usually perpetrators of criminals because of an encouragement based on the importance of fulfilling the necessities of life that is relatively difficult to fulfill. In principle the crime problem does not stand alone, but it relates to other issues such as social, economic, political and cultural which is as a phenomenon that affects each other. To tackle crimes and criminal acts such a thorough enforcement and anticipation policy is required. One of the most common criminal acts in the community is the violence of violent blackmail. Perpetrators can be assessed by the community, therefore it is necessary to be handled by the law enforcement officers intensively with the severity of the criminal that was dropped. The problem in this study is how the judge's consideration in dropping a criminal against perpetrators of criminal offenses with violence against motorcycles belonging to others, what are some factors causing perpetrators of criminal extortion with violence. The method of study used is the normative juridical approach and empirical approach obtained directly at the District Court of Kls II Kalianda, state Attorney of South Lampung. Based on the results of the study can be concluded that the judge's judgment in the criminal offence against the perpetrator of violent criminal offence is in accordance with the element contained in article 368 paragraph (1) of the criminal CODE and was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment. Factors affecting the cause of perpetrators of criminal extortion in violence are environmental factors, economic factors on society, the law enforcement. The advice given is to be expected to the Tribunal, the attorney general and the police in providing or establishing the article can be in accordance with its elements and actions, to the rationing punishment against the defendant is considered fair and give a deterrent effect so that the defendant can not repeat it again. There is cooperation between law enforcement and the community in minimizing the crimes that occurred.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Sepeda Motor Dengan Pemberatan (Studi di Polrestabes Medan)

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 398-410
Author(s):  
Jaya Syah Putra ◽  
Rizkan Zulyadi ◽  
M.Citra Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Crime Scene ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
The Law ◽  
National Police

The purpose of this study was to analyze law enforcement efforts, obstacles and prevention of criminal acts of theft by POLRI against perpetrators of the crime of motorcycle theft with weights in the jurisdiction of Medan Police. This type of research is directed to normative juridical law research. The nature of the research is descriptive analysis of the law enforcement by the Indonesian National Police against the perpetrators of the crime of theft. The results showed that law enforcement efforts were carried out, after the personnel received a complaint report from the victim regarding the occurrence of theft with weighting proceed to the stage of investigation and investigation, against the perpetrators of theft with the weight of a motorcycle subject to Article 363 of the Criminal Code with a maximum penalty of 9 years imprisonment depending on the the method used by the perpetrator to commit theft by weight. Barrier factors include the identity of the perpetrator is not clear, the perpetrator does not have an ID card, the perpetrator does not admit his actions, there are no witnesses at the crime scene. The perpetrator lost evidence, the victim did not want to report it to the police, there were no supporting witnesses. Countermeasures include carrying out preventive measures by carrying out patrols in suspected places, conducting socialization and community approaches in order to create synergistic coordination and cooperation in creating security. Repressive efforts by increasing efforts to take action against perpetrators of theft by weighting motorbikes by providing strict sanctions and having a deterrent effect on perpetrators and providing guidance to the community to comply with the law.

scholarly journals Paradoks Kewajiban Bersaksi pada Ketentuan Hukum Acara Perdata

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Zakki Adlhiyati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
To Come ◽  
Judicial Method

Analyzing witness obligation in giving testimony according to Indonesian civil procedural law is the objective of this writing. With the normative judicial method, concluded There is inconsistency in Indonesian civil procedural law in regulating the witness obligation. Punishment is provided for a witness when they neglected the hearing summons as regulated in Article 140 HIR/157 RBG, but in contrast article 143 HIR/170 RBG stated that no one may be forced to come before a court to testify in civil matters if the district court beyond their resides. Giving the same regulation with the current civil procedural law, the civil procedural law bill shows contradiction within its law and also with another law. Abandonment of court summons as a witness is a criminal offense with a sentence of six months in prison (Article 224 paragraph of the Criminal Code). The inconsistency and contradiction to some extent may bring negative impact to law enforcement and the law should be an amendment.

scholarly journals Efektifitas Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-90
Author(s):  
Ikbal Sahardian ◽  
Hambali Thalib ◽  
Baharuddin Badaru
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
District Court ◽  
Economic Sector ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Penelitin ini di latar belakangan oleh fenomena bahwa efektif tidaknya penjatuhan sanksi tindak pidana korupsi dikabupaten jayapura papua kebanyakan korupsi terjadi pada lingkup pemerintah maupun swasta tetapi kebanyakan juga korupsi yang terjadi di bidang pertanian terutama dampak negative pada sector perekonomian serta kehidupan pada petani sehingga menghambat kemajuan dan pertumbuhan disektor pertanian. Penelitian ini dilaksakan di kabupaten jayapura papua pada kantor polres jayapura, Kejaksaan Negeri Jayapura dan Pengadilan Negeri jayapura dengan alas an bahwa instansi yang terjadi di kabupaten jayapura selama tiga tahun terakhir. Hasil penelitian ini menukkan bahwa dalam waktu tiga tahun terakhir ini. Tingkat efektifitas penjatuhan sanksi tindak pidana korupsi mengalami peningkatan. Hal ini di sebabkan karena kekurangna kepekaan apparat penegak hokum dalam hal mencegah serta mengurangi terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi disamping itu pula kesadaran hukum dan oknum pemerintah sendiri yang melakukan tindak pidana korupsi yang seharusnya ia mengetahui hukum sebagai unsur pemerintah tetapi malah ia sendiri yang melakukan perbuatan korupsi. Padahal yang melakukan korupsi diancam dengan sanksi penjatuhan yang berat. This study was in the background by the phenomenon that the effective absence of the rationing of corruption criminal sanctions in the district Jayapura Papua most corruption occurs in the scope of the government and private but most of the corruption in the field of agriculture, especially negative impact on the economic sector and life on the farmers, thereby inhibiting progress and growth of agricultural disetor. This research was established in Jayapura Papua District at the Jayapura Police Office, Jayapura state Attorney and the District Court of Jayapura with the base that the agency occurred in Jayapura district for the last three years. The results of this study have been inserted in the last three years. The level of effectiveness of criminal offence sanctions has increased. This has been caused by the Kekurangna sensitivity apparat the law enforcement in preventing and reducing the corruption of criminal acts besides the legal awareness and the Government itself who committed criminal acts of corruption that he should know the law as an element of the government but instead he himself doing corruption. In fact, corruption is threatened with heavy allotment sanctions.

scholarly journals Analisis Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika

PLENO JURE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-71
Author(s):  
Muhammad Asyharudddin ◽  
Baharuddin Badaru ◽  
Muhammad Kamal Hidjaz
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Convictions ◽  
Criminal Sanctions

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan bertujuan (1) untuk mengetahui dan memahami efektivitas pelaksanaan Sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkotika. (2) Untuk mengetahui dan memahami faktor-faktor apakah yang mempengaruhi efektivitas sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku  tindak pidana narkotika. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif empiris dan dilakukan di Pengadilan Negeri Makassar serta respondenya adalah Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Makassar , dan Penyidik BNN Makassaar. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukan : Evektivitas pelaksanaan Sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana narkotika kurang efektif diakibatkan oleh adanya penjatuhan pidana yang tidak memberikan dampak atau deterrent effect terhadap pelakunya. Faktor yang memperngaruhinya adalah lingkungan, agama, dan pekerjaan. Sebagai saran: para pembuat undang-undang hendaknya memberikan pedoman penindasan khusus yang memenuhi skala prioritas tentang narkotika sebagai pedoman pemidanaan mengenai pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi, karena KUHP belum cukup menjadi pedoman pemidanaan bagi hakim, dimana Hakim sebagai penegak hukum yang berwenang mengadili hanya mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor yang ada dilapangan pada saat persidangan. Abstract. This research was conducted with the aim of (1) to find out and understand the effectiveness of the implementation of criminal sanctions against narcotics offenders. (2) To find out and understand what factors affect the effectiveness of criminal sanctions against narcotics offenders. This type of research is empirical normative research and is carried out in the Makassar District Court and the respondents are Makassar District Court Judges and BNN Makassaar Investigators. The results of this study indicate: The effectiveness of the implementation of criminal sanctions against narcotics offenders is less effective due to criminal convictions that have no impact or deterrent effect on the perpetrators. Factors that influence it are the environment, religion, and work. As a suggestion: lawmakers should provide specific guidelines on the oppression that meet the priority scale on narcotics as a guideline for judicial consideration in imposing sanctions because the Criminal Code has not been sufficiently a guideline for convicting judges, where Judges as law enforcement authorities are authorized to only consider factors -factors that exist in the field at the hearing.

The current state of the legislative implementation of criminal law policy

2020 ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Ostrohliad
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Public Discussion ◽  
Current State ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Legal Technology ◽  
Logical Semantic

Purpose. The aim of the work is to consider the novelties of the legislative work, which provide for the concept and classification of criminal offenses in accordance with the current edition of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the draft of the new Code developed by the working group and put up for public discussion. Point out the gaps in the current legislation and the need to revise individual rules of the project in this aspect. The methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of appropriate conclusions and recommendations. During the research, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, logical-semantic, system-structural, logical-normative, comparative-historical. Results In the course of the study, it was determined that despite the fact that the amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine came into force in July of this year, their perfection, in terms of legal technology, raises many objections. On the basis of a comparative study, it was determined that the Draft Criminal Code of Ukraine needs further revision taking into account the opinions of experts in the process of public discussion. Originality. In the course of the study, it was established that the classification of criminal offenses proposed in the new edition of the Criminal Code of Ukraine does not stand up to criticism, since other elements of the classification appear in subsequent articles, which are not covered by the existing one. The draft Code, using a qualitatively new approach to this issue, retains the elements of the previous classification and has no practical significance in law enforcement. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in law-making activities to improve the norms of the current Criminal Code, to classify criminal offenses, as well as to further improve the draft Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Dukungan Legislatif Dalam RUU KUHP Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi: Pro dan Kontra Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam RUU KUHPDukungan Legislatif Dalam RUU KUHP Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi: Pro dan Kontra Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam RUU KUHP

Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 1721
Author(s):  
Muhammad Aziz Syamsuddin
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
Legislative Support ◽  
The Law ◽  
Shared Commitment ◽  
Crime Of Corruption

AbstractThe spirit of the eradication of corruption is running continually. Various efforts or strategies were arranged to sharpen the power of corruptions’ eradication. One of the strategies is legislation support or comprehend and effective legislation. It was proved by the enactment of Law No. 28 of 1999 on State Implementation of Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism and also Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication. The other related legislation such as Law No. 30 of 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission and the Law 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering.  Those Supporting legislations show that there is a shared commitment to eradicate corruption. Indonesia has also ratified the UNCAC (United Nations Convention against Corruption) by Law No. 7 of 2006 on the UN Convention (United Nations) Anti-Corruption. Support legislation is expected to provide a deterrent effect for offenders and protecting the rights of citizens has a whole. Keywords: Legislative Support, Criminal Code Draft, Eradication, Crime of Corruption, Pros and Cons    AbstrakSemangat pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi terus bergulir. Berbagai upaya atau strategi dibangun untuk mempertajam kekuatan pemberantasan korupsi. Salah satunya adalah dengan dukungan legislasi atau peraturan perundang-undangan yang komprehensif dan efektif. Dibuktikan dengan lahirnya Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih dan Bebas dari Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme dan Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Adapun undang-undang terkait lainnya seperti UU No. 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Dukungan legislasi tersebut menunjukkan adanya komitmen bersama untuk memberantas tindak pidana korupsi. Indonesia juga  telah meratifikasi UNCAC (United Nations Convention Against Corruption) dengan UU No. 7 Tahun 2006 tentang Konvensi PBB (Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa) Anti Korupsi. Dukungan legislasi ini diharapkan memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku sekaligus melindungi hak-hak warga negara secara keseluruhan. Kata Kunci: Dukungan Legislatif, RUU KUHP, Pemberantasan, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pro dan Kontra

scholarly journals SUATU KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM KEJAHATAN CYBER DALAM SISTEM PENEGAKAN HUKUM

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Ni Made Trisna Dewi,Reido Lardiza Fahrial
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
Witness Statements ◽  
And Function

Abuse in the electronic transaction because it is formed from an electronic process, so the object changes, the goods become electronic data and the evidence is electronic.  Referring to the provisions of positive law in Indonesia, there are several laws and regulations that have set about electronic evidence as legal evidence before the court but there is still debate between the usefulness and function of the electronic evidence itself, from that background in  The following problems can be formulated, How do law enforcement from investigations, prosecutions to criminal case decisions in cybercrimes and How is the use of electronic evidence in criminal case investigations in cybercrimes This research uses normative research methods that are moving from the existence of norm conflicts between the Criminal Procedure Code and  ITE Law Number 19 Year 2016 in the use of evidence.  The law enforcement process of the investigator, the prosecution until the court's decision cannot run in accordance with the provisions of ITE Law Number 19 of 2016, because in interpreting the use of electronic evidence still refers to Article 184 paragraph (1) KUHAP of the Criminal Procedure Code stated that the evidence used  Legitimate are: witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions and statements of the accused so that the application of the ITE Law cannot be applied effectively The conclusion of this research is that law enforcement using electronic evidence in cyber crime cannot stand alone because the application of the Act  - ITE Law Number 19 Year 2016 still refers to the Criminal Code so that the evidence that is clear before the trial still refers to article 184 paragraph (1) KUHAP of the Criminal Procedure Code and the strength of proof of electronic evidence depends on the law enforcement agencies interpreting it because all electronic evidence is classified into  in evidence in the form of objects as  so there is a need for confidence from the legal apparatus in order to determine the position and truth of the electronic evidence.   Penyalahgunaan didalam transaksi elektronik tersebut karena terbentuk dari suatu proses elektronik, sehingga objeknya pun berubah, barang menjadi data elektronik dan alat buktinya pun bersifat elektronik. Mengacu pada ketentuan hukum positif di Indonesia, ada beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah mengatur mengenai alat bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah di muka pengadilan tetapi tetap masih ada perdebatan antara kegunaan dan fungsi dari alat bukti elektronik itu sendiri, dari latar belakang tersebut di atas dapat dirumuskan masalah sebagai berikut, Bagaimana penegakkan hukum dari penyidikan, penuntutan sampai putusan perkara pidana dalam kejahatan cyber dan Bagaimanakah penggunaan bukti elektronik dalam pemeriksaan perkara pidana dalam kejahatan cyber Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yakni beranjak dari adanya konflik norma antara KUHAP dengan Undang-undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 dalam penggunaan alat bukti. Proses penegakkan hukum dari penyidik, penuntutan sampai pada putusan pengadilan tidak dapat berjalan sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016, karena dalam melakukan penafsiran terhadap penggunaan alat bukti Elektronik masih mengacu pada Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP disebutkan bahwa alat bukti yang sah adalah: keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli, surat, petunjuk dan keterangan terdakwa. sehingga penerapan Undang-undang ITE tidak dapat diterapkan secara efektiv. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah penegakan hukum dengan menggunakan alat bukti elektronik dalam kejahatan cyber tidak bisa berdiri sendiri karena penerapan Undang-Undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tetap merujuk kepada KUHP sehingga alat bukti yang sah di muka persidangan tetap mengacu pada pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti elektronik tersebut tergantung dari aparat hukum dalam menafsirkannya karena semua alat bukti elektronik tersebut digolongkan ke dalam alat bukti berupa benda sebagai petunjuk sehingga diperlukan juga keyakinan dari aparat hukum agar bisa menentukan posisi dan kebenaran dari alat bukti elektronik tersebut.

scholarly journals Putusan Tentang Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penadahan

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-78
Author(s):  
Listiana Listiana ◽  
Elly Sudarti
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law ◽  
One Year

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis putusan dalam tindak pidana penadahan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif.  Keputusan Pengadilan Negeri Sarolangun menunjukkan dalam penjatuhan pidana, hakim belum menerapkan ketentuan sanksi pidana yang terdapat dalam Undang-Undang secara maksimal. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari pemidanaan yang dijatuhkan terhadap pelaku penadahan kurang dari 1 (satu) tahun penjara, sementara ancaman maksimal dari tindak pidana penadahan adalah 4 (empat) tahun penjara. Hal ini mengakibatkan pemidanaan tidak akan memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku. ABSTRACT This article aims to find out and analyze the verdict of criminal offence. The research methods is normative research. The Sarolangun District Court's decision shows that in a criminal sentence, the judge did not apply the provisions of criminal sanctions contained in the law to the maximum. This can be seen from the punishment imposed on perpetrators of detention of less than 1 (one) year in prison, while the maximum threat of criminal offense is  4 (four) years in prison. This resulted in the punishment will not give a deterrent effect for the offender.

scholarly journals Can experiments on animals constitute a criminal offence of cruelty to animals?

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1339-1344
Author(s):  
Branislav Ristivojevic ◽  
Tatjana Bugarski
Keyword(s):  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Rule ◽  
The Other ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
Experimental Animals ◽  
The Law ◽  
Cruelty To Animals

The criminal offence ?killing and torturing animals? under Article 269 of the Criminal Code says that it can be committed only ?contrary to regulations?. The regulations governing the treatment of experimental animals are the Animal Welfare Law from 2009 and the Law on the Ratification of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes amended by the Protocol of amendment to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes from 2010. The first one imposes numerous obligations and introduces numerous prohibitions in the treatment of experimental animals, which at first sight make the possibilities of committing this criminal offence greater. The other law does not contain most of the prohibitions and restrictions that are included in the Animal Welfare Law. Thanks to a legal rule which says that a later law regulating the same subject replaces the former one (lex posterior derogate legi priori) and the aforementioned unconstitutionality of many provisions of the Animal Welfare Law, researchers and teachers in Serbia are not in particular danger of criminal prosecution.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Hukuman terhadap Bidan yang Melakukan Tindakan Pidana Aborsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Sanjaya Abidin ◽  
Fiony Gustin ◽  
Andre Hakim Pasaribu ◽  
Sonya Airini Batubara
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

<p>Pregnancy is a very happy situation for every partner who has been legitimate. In connection with this we still often encounter couples who do not value pregnancy so take the decision to do inhumane actions, one of which is abortion. Abortion is a form of criminality that is still very difficult to be handled by the public or the government, this is because there are still gaps for the perpetrators to carry out these actions and the deterrent effect is still lacking for abortion. This study aims to determine the legal arrangements and accountability for abortionists. This study uses normative juridical research methods, to address abortion problems that occur without looking at it from one perspective, but comprehensively. The results showed that the legal arrangements for the crime of abortion have been regulated in the law adjustment for abortion has been regulated ib article 194 law number 36 year 2009, about a midwife who help those who committed abortion is included in criminal code article 349</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document