scholarly journals Putusan Tentang Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penadahan

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-78
Author(s):  
Listiana Listiana ◽  
Elly Sudarti

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis putusan dalam tindak pidana penadahan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif.  Keputusan Pengadilan Negeri Sarolangun menunjukkan dalam penjatuhan pidana, hakim belum menerapkan ketentuan sanksi pidana yang terdapat dalam Undang-Undang secara maksimal. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari pemidanaan yang dijatuhkan terhadap pelaku penadahan kurang dari 1 (satu) tahun penjara, sementara ancaman maksimal dari tindak pidana penadahan adalah 4 (empat) tahun penjara. Hal ini mengakibatkan pemidanaan tidak akan memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku. ABSTRACT This article aims to find out and analyze the verdict of criminal offence. The research methods is normative research. The Sarolangun District Court's decision shows that in a criminal sentence, the judge did not apply the provisions of criminal sanctions contained in the law to the maximum. This can be seen from the punishment imposed on perpetrators of detention of less than 1 (one) year in prison, while the maximum threat of criminal offense is  4 (four) years in prison. This resulted in the punishment will not give a deterrent effect for the offender.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
Oktasari Putri Pramisela ◽  
Yulia Hesti

A crime or criminal act, usually perpetrators of criminals because of an encouragement based on the importance of fulfilling the necessities of life that is relatively difficult to fulfill. In principle the crime problem does not stand alone, but it relates to other issues such as social, economic, political and cultural which is as a phenomenon that affects each other. To tackle crimes and criminal acts such a thorough enforcement and anticipation policy is required. One of the most common criminal acts in the community is the violence of violent blackmail. Perpetrators can be assessed by the community, therefore it is necessary to be handled by the law enforcement officers intensively with the severity of the criminal that was dropped. The problem in this study is how the judge's consideration in dropping a criminal against perpetrators of criminal offenses with violence against motorcycles belonging to others, what are some factors causing perpetrators of criminal extortion with violence. The method of study used is the normative juridical approach and empirical approach obtained directly at the District Court of Kls II Kalianda, state Attorney of South Lampung. Based on the results of the study can be concluded that the judge's judgment in the criminal offence against the perpetrator of violent criminal offence is in accordance with the element contained in article 368 paragraph (1) of the criminal CODE and was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment. Factors affecting the cause of perpetrators of criminal extortion in violence are environmental factors, economic factors on society, the law enforcement. The advice given is to be expected to the Tribunal, the attorney general and the police in providing or establishing the article can be in accordance with its elements and actions, to the rationing punishment against the defendant is considered fair and give a deterrent effect so that the defendant can not repeat it again. There is cooperation between law enforcement and the community in minimizing the crimes that occurred.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Sanjaya Abidin ◽  
Fiony Gustin ◽  
Andre Hakim Pasaribu ◽  
Sonya Airini Batubara

<p>Pregnancy is a very happy situation for every partner who has been legitimate. In connection with this we still often encounter couples who do not value pregnancy so take the decision to do inhumane actions, one of which is abortion. Abortion is a form of criminality that is still very difficult to be handled by the public or the government, this is because there are still gaps for the perpetrators to carry out these actions and the deterrent effect is still lacking for abortion. This study aims to determine the legal arrangements and accountability for abortionists. This study uses normative juridical research methods, to address abortion problems that occur without looking at it from one perspective, but comprehensively. The results showed that the legal arrangements for the crime of abortion have been regulated in the law adjustment for abortion has been regulated ib article 194 law number 36 year 2009, about a midwife who help those who committed abortion is included in criminal code article 349</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-235
Author(s):  
Hadzil Hadzil ◽  
Mahdi Syahbandir ◽  
Syarifuddin Hasyim

Terdapat cukup banyak masyarakat yang dengan sengaja melakukan kecurangan-kecurangan dan melalaikan kewajibannya dalam melaksanakan pembayaran pajak yang telah ditetapkan sehingga menyebabkan timbulnya tunggakan pajak. Menyikapi hal tersebut, Pemerintah mengesahkan Undang-undang Tax Amnesty Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengampunan Pajak. Salah satu jenis pengampunan yang ditawarkan adalah memberikan penghapusan tindak pidana bagi Wajib Pajak (WP) yang melanggar undang-undang. Oleh sebab itu, hal ini menjadi menarik untuk diteliti karena dapat dianggap sebagai bentuk pengkhianatan terhadap rakyat miskin atau WP yang taat pajak. Masalah pokok dalam penelitian ini adalah apakah penghapusan sanksi pidana terkait pengampunan pajak (tax amnesty) sudah sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip pemidanaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan penghapusan sanksi pidana telah sesuai atau tidak dengan prinsip-prinsip pemidanaan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tujuan mengkaji asas-asas dan kaidah-kaidah yang terdapat dalam ilmu hukum. Data yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam hal penghapusan sanksi pidana dalam tax amnesty tidaklah sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip penghapusan pidana dalam konsep KUHP, yaitu alasan pembenar dan alasan pemaaf karena apabila harta tersebut berasal dari hasil korupsi, hal tersebut bukanlah merupakan perbuatan yang patut dan benar untuk dimaafkan. Disarankan kebijakan dalam pengampunan pajak (tax amnesty) sebaiknya tidak diberlakukan penghapusan pada unsur tindak pidana, apalagi dalam tindak pidana tersebut terdapat unsur yang merugikan negara.There are enough people who deliberately commit fraud and neglect their obligations in carrying out the payment of taxes that have been set so as to cause the arrears of taxes. In response, the Government passed the Tax Amnesty Act Number 11 Year 2016 About Tax Amnesty. One type of amnesty offered is to provide the abolition of a criminal offense for a Taxpayer (WP) that violates the law. Therefore, it is interesting to investigate because it can be considered as a form of betrayal of the poor or WP who are tax-conscious. The main problem in this research is whether the abolition of criminal sanctions related to tax amnesty is in line with the principles of punishment. This study aims to determine and explain the elimination of criminal sanctions are appropriate or not with the principles of punishment. This study is a normative juridical research with the aim of studying the principles and rules contained in the science of law. The data used consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results indicate that of the abolition of criminal sanctions in the tax amnesty is not in accordance with the principles of criminal abolition in the concept of the Criminal Code, namely the justification and reasons for forgiveness because if the property is derived from the corruption, it is not a proper and proper act to be forgiven. It is recommended that the tax amnesty should not be abolished on the element of criminal acts, morever in the criminal act there are elements that harm the state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (18) ◽  
pp. 68-81
Author(s):  
Akhmad Munawar ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih

Children who are in conflict with the law are seen to need to be given physical and spiritual protection. Bearing in mind, the Court's decision is more likely to impose imprisonment sanctions. The United Nations in several Congresses has criticized imprisonment sanctions, besides having the potential to cause stigmatization in children, it is also ineffective and does not create a deterrent effect. This study aims to examine and to analyze the implementation of Child Criminal sanctions in the perspective of Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, to analyze the factors that influence child criminal sanctions that are not yet fair. The research question is how the reconstruction of child-based criminal sanctions based on justice is. This research is included in non-doctrinal research (empirical). It used three theories, namely the theory of criminal purpose to analyze the first problem, the dignified justice theory to analyze the second problem and progressive legal theory to analyze the third problem. The results found that the implementation of sanctions Crime against a child in conflict with a law imposed by a prison sentence, the Judge in his consideration emphasizes juridical considerations so that the criminal sanctions imposed on the child are not in accordance with teleological theory as the purpose of punishment. Criminal sanctions against children have not brought justice, among others, because several articles in Law Number 11-year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System still have weaknesses. Reconstruction of Articles that hinder the realization of fair criminal sanctions, namely Article 7 paragraph (2) Article 32 paragraph (2), Article 71 paragraph (1) letter e, Article 79 paragraph (1) and Article 81 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 11 the year 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System.


Author(s):  
Prima Sophia Gusman ◽  
Oce Madril

This research aims to analyze the criteria of political parties’ criminal liability on corruption criminal offense and the obstacles of law enforcement. It also aims to analyze the regulations and its application in the future. This is normative research that uses literature review. It analyzes secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show: (1) criminal liability of political parties in corruption cases may only be demanded if the crime is carried out in the name of the political parties or if it is based on a mandate of that party; (2) the juridical factors which inhibits criminalization of political parties include the corruption regulations’ incapability to penalize them, there are contradictive legal norms between that of corporations and political parties, and that not all corporate criminal sanctions may be imposed to political parties; and (3) it is hoped that the legal regulations on corruption may categorize political parties as corporations, to give a deterrent effect to political parties involved in corruption.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (43) ◽  
pp. 32-40
Author(s):  
Yaroslav Kushnir ◽  
Mykola Hutsuliak

The purpose of our study is to form a typical criminological profile of a person who has committed a criminal offense in the field of protection of the State Border of Ukraine. Based on the detailed study of the sentences issued by the national courts of Ukraine during 2015-2020 concerning such persons, a typical criminological profile of the person was formulated. Thus, the typical criminological profile is a male (95.7%), a citizen of Ukraine (89%), Ukrainian by nationality (82.6%), married or living in common-law marriage (69.6%), with low income (67.4%). Not previously convicted (87%), committed the crime to obtain additional funds (86.9%), admits guilt in full, repents, contributes to the disclosure of the crime (84.8%). Specialized research methods are applied. The comparative method is used to compare the characteristics of the offender, who violated the order of entry into and exit from the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine and other crimes that encroached on border security. The logical-legal method is used to form logical, systematic, and consistent conclusions. The study is based on research of 38 sentences imposed on 46 people. The data obtained allowed us to interpret them as a characteristic of the offender.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-90
Author(s):  
Ikbal Sahardian ◽  
Hambali Thalib ◽  
Baharuddin Badaru

Penelitin ini di latar belakangan oleh fenomena bahwa efektif tidaknya penjatuhan sanksi tindak pidana korupsi dikabupaten jayapura papua kebanyakan korupsi terjadi pada lingkup pemerintah maupun swasta tetapi kebanyakan juga korupsi yang terjadi di bidang pertanian terutama dampak negative pada sector perekonomian serta kehidupan pada petani sehingga menghambat kemajuan dan pertumbuhan disektor pertanian. Penelitian ini dilaksakan di kabupaten jayapura papua pada kantor polres jayapura, Kejaksaan Negeri Jayapura dan Pengadilan Negeri jayapura dengan alas an bahwa instansi yang terjadi di kabupaten jayapura selama tiga tahun terakhir. Hasil penelitian ini menukkan bahwa dalam waktu tiga tahun terakhir ini. Tingkat efektifitas penjatuhan sanksi tindak pidana korupsi mengalami peningkatan. Hal ini di sebabkan karena kekurangna kepekaan apparat penegak hokum dalam hal mencegah serta mengurangi terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi disamping itu pula kesadaran hukum dan oknum pemerintah sendiri yang melakukan tindak pidana korupsi yang seharusnya ia mengetahui hukum sebagai unsur pemerintah tetapi malah ia sendiri yang melakukan perbuatan korupsi. Padahal yang melakukan korupsi diancam dengan sanksi penjatuhan yang berat. This study was in the background by the phenomenon that the effective absence of the rationing of corruption criminal sanctions in the district Jayapura Papua most corruption occurs in the scope of the government and private but most of the corruption in the field of agriculture, especially negative impact on the economic sector and life on the farmers, thereby inhibiting progress and growth of agricultural disetor. This research was established in Jayapura Papua District at the Jayapura Police Office, Jayapura state Attorney and the District Court of Jayapura with the base that the agency occurred in Jayapura district for the last three years. The results of this study have been inserted in the last three years. The level of effectiveness of criminal offence sanctions has increased. This has been caused by the Kekurangna sensitivity apparat the law enforcement in preventing and reducing the corruption of criminal acts besides the legal awareness and the Government itself who committed criminal acts of corruption that he should know the law as an element of the government but instead he himself doing corruption. In fact, corruption is threatened with heavy allotment sanctions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Martinus Halawa ◽  
Zaini Munawir ◽  
Sri Hidayani

A fact that in the association of human life, individuals and groups, there are often deviations from the norms of his life, especially known legal norms. Where in mutual human association, this deviation of legal norms is referred to as a criminal offense. In recent years there has been more and more crime against human souls in society. The research method used in this study is the Library Research and Field Research. Judge's consideration or Ratio Decidendi is an argument or reason used by the judge as a legal consideration that becomes the basis before deciding a case. In practice before this juridical consideration is proven, the judge will first withdraw the facts in the trial that arises and constitute the cumulative conclusions of the witnesses' statements, the defendant's statements, and the evidence. The application of the law in this case to the murder case is legitimate while in reasonable terms because the application of the law must be in accordance with what was done by the perpetrators because the deterrent effect that is expected in the application of this law is very important.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Priono ◽  
Widodo T. Novianto ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani

<p>Abstract<br />This articles aimed at to analyze the application of the Theory of Legal Interpretation by judges as an attempt of legal protection against the notary, are study of the judge’s Verdict against the crime of falsification of the authentic deed. The kind of research in this article is doctrinal, while seen from its shape including research evaluative sense and perspective. The analysis used logic deduction. Legal basis in the provision of criminal sanctions against notary can be taken but in addition to must meet formulation offense which is in law office notary and the book the act of criminal law. Judge in applying criminal sanctions against of criminal falsification an authentic deed rules must payment the following : (1) the what may be punishable and meet elements formulated in an act; (2) work of violates the laws or against the law; (3) a mistake, in the form of both were (dolus) and neglect (culpa). Recommendations are : 1) examination the allegation act punishable in forgery an authentic deed by a judge to do a holistic integral by look aspect outwardly, formal, material notarial deed associated with a task, authority the notary. 2) need to be made criteria and guidelines can be used the juridical for judges referred to forgery certificate in duty and position of a notary. 3) although there are freedom the judge in run/carry out of his rulings so the judges are not have to legalistik but prosecute at law in the country broadly including actual knowledge already established so that his ruling to reflect a sense of justice in society.</p><p>Keywords: The Application of; Interpreting; a Criminal Offense; an Authentic Deed.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan Teori Penafsiran Hukum oleh hakim sebagai upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris, yaitu studi atas Putusan Hakim terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan akta otentik. Jenis penelitian dalam artikel ini adalah doktrinal, sedangkan dilihat dari bentuknya termasuk penelitian evaluatif dan perspektif. Analisis yang digunakan logikadeduksi.Dasar hukum dalam penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap Notaris dapat saja dilakukan namun di samping harus memenuhi rumusan pelanggaran yang tersebut dalam UUJN dan KUHP. Hakim dalam menerapkan sanksi pidana terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan akta otentik harus dipenuhinya syarat-syarat antara lain sebagai berikut : (1) adanya perbuatan yang dapat dihukum dan memenuhi unsur-unsur yang dirumuskan dalam undang-undang; (2) perbuatan tersebut bertentangan dengan hukum/melawan hukum; (3) adanya kesalahan, baik berupa kesengajaan (dolus) dan kelalaian (culpa). Rekomendasinya adalah : 1) Pemeriksaan adanya dugaan perbuatan pidana dalam pemalsuan akta otentik oleh Hakim  harus dilakukan pemeriksaan yang holistik integral dengan melihat aspek lahiriah, formal, material Akta Notaris dikaitkan dengan tugas, wewenang, jabatan Notaris. 2) Perlu dibuat kriteria dan pedoman yang dapat dipakai landasan yuridis bagi hakim yang dimaksud pemalsuan akta dalam tugas dan jabatan notaris. 3) Meskipun ada kebebasan hakim dalam menjalankan/melaksanakan putusannya maka hakim tidak harus legalistik tetapi mengadili menurut hukum dalam arti yang luas termasuk aktualisasi pengertian-pengertian yang sudah mapan, sehingga putusannya dapat mencerminkan rasa keadilan (dalam) masyarakat.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Penerapan; Penafsiran; Tindak Pidana; Akta Otentik.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-176
Author(s):  
Suhaimi Suhaimi

The purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibility of taxpayers who manipulate transaction values in order to reduce Fees for Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB). This research is inspired by the results of previous research that many BPHTB taxpayers manipulate transaction values to reduce BPHTB, but they are missed from legal responsibility, so that their actions seem normal in society and are not perceived as despicable and violating of the law. This research is a normative legal research using a statutory approach, so that it can be seen how the responsibility of taxpayers who are not honest in paying BPHTB. The results showed that in statutory regulations cannot be found administrative sanctions imposed on taxpayers who manipulated transaction values to reduce BPHTB. In fact taxpayer's actions are really detrimental regional finance, because their taxes are paid to the Regional Treasury as the original financial resources. Sanctions contained in statutory regulations are only criminal sanctions, as regulated in Article 174 of Law Number 28 of 2009 with the threat of imprisonment for a maximum of one year if due to negligence and a maximum of two years if done intentionally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document