scholarly journals Respiratory Distress after a Liver Surgery, Think at Pneumopericardium

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Smiti Y ◽  
Oussama C ◽  
Othman A ◽  
Kallouch L ◽  
Omor Y ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Cardiac Tamponade ◽  
Liver Carcinoma ◽  
Iatrogenic Complications ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Common Etiology ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Tension Pneumopericardium ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

Introduction: Pneumopericardium is defined as a collection of air or gas in the pericardium, and considered a rare and innocuous condition. It may progress to tension and cardiac tamponade and may become life-threatening in many instances. In this publication, we will share the case of a pneumopericardium which occurred for middle-aged women treated for liver carcinoma after a laparotomic surgery. Discussion: Pneumopericardium was once defined as a collection of air or gas in the pericardium, and considered a rare and innocuous condition. The most common etiology of pneumopericardium is blunt trauma. Also, air may dissect into the mediastinum from the retroperitoneal space following the perforation of a hollow viscous or infection with gas-producing organisms. Other causes of pneumopericardium include iatrogenic complications during chest or abdominal surgeries. Diagnosis of spontaneous pneumopericardium can often be made with a formal two-view Chest X-Ray or CT scan. The treatment of air in the pericardial space depends on the type of pneumopericardium present and whether or not there is associated cardiac tamponade. However, tension pneumopericardium can be effectively relieved by pericardiocentesis or tube decompression and the underlying cause subsequently determined. Conclusion: In conclusion, surgeons should be aware of the possibility of pneumopericardium for patients with chest pain after a laparoscopic procedure and look for electrocardiographic abnormalities. It is important to outline the important role of the chest CT scan to search for pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum.

scholarly journals Comparative study between bedside chest ultrasound and chest CT scan in the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walid Abu Arab ◽  
Muhammad Abdulhaleem ◽  
Salah Eltahan ◽  
Moustafa Elhamami
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Chest Trauma ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Traumatic Pneumothorax ◽  
Surgical Emphysema ◽  
Chest Ct Scan ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

Abstract Background Traumatic pneumothorax (PTx) is common in chest trauma. Its incidence ranges between 10 and 28%. Chest X-ray (CXR) is the traditional imaging for the potential traumatic PTx, while CT chest is considered the gold standard diagnostic tool. However, it requires that the patient to be transferred from the Emergency Department (ED) with its resuscitative facilities. Chest US (E-FAST) has emerged as a sensitive tool that can be used on bedside basis with much higher sensitivity than CXR. The objective of this study was to compare between accuracy and usefulness of the bedside US chest and CT chest in the diagnosis of traumatic PTx, as well as its ability to quantify its size. This was a prospective clinical study that included two hundred patients who have been admitted to the ED. The inclusion criteria included any patient with chest trauma. Exclusion criteria included patients with clinical surgical emphysema, patients with life threatening PTx, and patients who did not undergo CT chest. Results Forty-seven hemithoraces were proved positive for PTx by CT chest, while forty-five hemithoraces out of those 47 were confirmed by bedside chest US. The sensitivity for chest US is 95.74% in detection of traumatic PTx. No false-positive cases were diagnosed. All of the forty-five hemithoraces diagnosed by chest US have been confirmed by CT scan making a specificity of 100%. Conclusions Chest US is a useful rapid diagnostic tool in the diagnosis and quantification of the traumatic PTx at ED. It avoids the delay in transportation of the critically ill patients to perform CT chest.

scholarly journals (F)utility of computed tomography of the chest in the presence of pleural effusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilak Pathak ◽  
Malvinder S. Parmar
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Plain Chest ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

AbstractBackgroundPleural effusion is common and can cause significant morbidity. The chest X-ray is often the initial radiological test, but additional tests may be required to reduce uncertainty and to provide additional diagnostic information. However, additional exposure and unnecessary costs should be prevented. The objective of the study was to assess the clinical benefit of an additional chest computed tomography (CT) scan over plain chest X-ray alone in the management of patients with pleural effusion.MethodsRetrospective analysis in 94 consecutive patients with pleural effusion who underwent chest X-ray and CT scan over an 18-month period in a single institution. All chest X-ray and CT scan reports were compared and correlated with clinical parameters in order to assess their utility in the clinical management. No blinding was applied.ResultsIn 75 chest CT scan reports (80 %), information provided by the radiologist did not change clinical management when compared to plain chest X-ray alone and did not provide any additional information over chest X-ray. Only 2/49 (4 %) of the native chest CT scan reports provided clinically relevant information as compared to 17/45 (38 %) contrast-enhanced chest CT scan reports (p<0.001).ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort of patients with pleural effusion, an additional chest CT scan was not useful in the majority of patients. However, if a chest CT scan is required, then a contrast-enhanced study after pleural aspiration should be performed. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Ultrasound Detection of Pneumothorax Compared with Chest X-Ray and Computed Tomography Scan

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 480-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khanjan Nagarsheth ◽  
Stanley Kurek
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Thoracic Ultrasound ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

Pneumothorax after trauma can be a life threatening injury and its care requires expeditious and accurate diagnosis and possible intervention. We performed a prospective, single blinded study with convenience sampling at a Level I trauma center comparing thoracic ultrasound with chest X-ray and CT scan in the detection of traumatic pneumothorax. Trauma patients that received a thoracic ultrasound, chest X-ray, and chest CT scan were included in the study. The chest X-rays were read by a radiologist who was blinded to the thoracic ultrasound results. Then both were compared with CT scan results. One hundred and twenty-five patients had a thoracic ultrasound performed in the 24-month period. Forty-six patients were excluded from the study due to lack of either a chest X-ray or chest CT scan. Of the remaining 79 patients there were 22 positive pneumothorax found by CT and of those 18 (82%) were found on ultrasound and 7 (32%) were found on chest X-ray. The sensitivity of thoracic ultrasound was found to be 81.8 per cent and the specificity was found to be 100 per cent. The sensitivity of chest X-ray was found to be 31.8 per cent and again the specificity was found to be 100 per cent. The negative predictive value of thoracic ultrasound for pneumothorax was 0.934 and the negative predictive value for chest X-ray for pneumothorax was found to be 0.792. We advocate the use of chest ultrasound for detection of pneumothorax in trauma patients.

scholarly journals Polyserositis: An Extremely Rare Life-Threatening Manifestation of Pheochromocytoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Maryam Heidarpour ◽  
Mohammad Ali Haghighatpanah ◽  
Hassan Rezvanian ◽  
Motahare Yadegarfar ◽  
Amir Mohammad Mozafari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Cardiac Tamponade ◽  
Adrenal Mass ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Abdominal Computed Tomography ◽  
Life Threatening

The pericardium is an uncommon site for manifestation of pheochromocytoma. Herein, the case of a 57-year-old man with cardiac tamponade is presented. Pericardiocentesis was performed, and the vital signs were stabilized afterwards. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan illustrated a nonhomogeneous right adrenal mass suspicious of pheochromocytoma, planned for right adrenalectomy. He recovered well after surgery, and his subsequent follow-ups did not reveal any complications.

Postoperative follow-up of lung cancer: Randomized trial comparing two follow-up programs in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (IFCT-0302).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7111-TPS7111
Author(s):  
Virginie Westeel ◽  
Fabrice Barlesi ◽  
Jean Domas ◽  
Philippe Girard ◽  
Pascal Foucher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Physical Examination ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

TPS7111 Background: There are no robust data published on the follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Current international guidelines are informed by expert opinion. Most of them recommend regular follow-up with clinic visit and thoracic imaging, either chest X-ray of Chest CT-scan. The IFCT-0302 trial addresses the question whether a surveillance program with chest CT-scan and fiberoptic bronchoscopy can improve survival compared to a follow-up only based on physical examination and chest x-ray. There is no such trial ongoing over the world. Methods: The IFCT-0302 trial is a multicenter open-label controlled randomized phase III trial. The objective of the trial is to compare two follow-up programs after surgery for stage I-IIIa NSCLC. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Patients are randomly assigned to arm 1, minimal follow-up, including physical examination and chest x-ray; or arm 2, a follow-up consisting of physical examination and chest x-ray plus chest CT scan and fiberoptic bronchoscopy (optional for adenocarcinomas). In both arms, follow-up procedures are performed every 6 months during the first two postoperative years, and every year between the third and the fifth years. The main eligibility criteria include: completely resected stage I-IIIA (6th UICC TNM classification) or T4 (in case of nodules in the same lobe as the tumor) N0 M0 NSCLC, surgery within the previous 8 weeks. Patients who have received and/or who will receive pre/post-operative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are eligible. Statistical considerations: 1,744 patients is required. Accrual status: 1,568 patients from 119 French centers had been included. The end of accrual can be expected for September 2012. Ancillary study: Blood samples are collected in 1000 patients for genomic high density SNP micro-array analysis. This collection will contribute to the French genome wide association study (gwas) of lung cancer gene susceptibility, and the genetic factors predictive of survival and lung cancer recurrence will be analyzed.

scholarly journals Intrapericardial Giant Lipoma Displacing the Heart

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Steger
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Female Patient ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Tumour Mass ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Echocardiographic Examination ◽  
Lipomatous Tumour ◽  
Giant Lipoma ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Chest X Ray

Despite their benign character, intrapericardial lipomas can cause life-threatening complications by rapid growth. This paper presents a case of an intrapericardial lipoma in an almost asymptomatic 41-year-old female patient only suffering from mild dyspnoea on exertion. The tumour was found incidentally by chest X-ray. Echocardiographic examination and a CT scan of the thorax revealed a 16 × 14 × 12 cm lipomatous tumour mass highly suspective of a lipoma. Histological examination of excised tumour specimens confirmed the diagnosis of a lipoma. The patient is currently asymptomatic and has not presented with evidence of recurrence at the 6-month followup.

scholarly journals The Role of Imaging In The Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Alfian Nur Rosyid ◽  
M. Yamin ◽  
Arina Dery Puspitasari
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Common Condition ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Proper Diagnosis ◽  
D Dimer

Pulmonary embolism is a common condition and sometimes can be life-threatening. A proper diagnosis can reduce mortality. Some examinations are needed to diagnose pulmonary embolism, including assessing the risk factors, clinical examination, D-dimer tests, and imaging. Imaging is necessary when the previous assessment requires further investigation. There are more imaging that can be used to diagnose and assess the severity of pulmonary embolism. However, it is still controversial regarding imaging modalities for optimizing pulmonary embolism diagnose. Chest X-Ray cannot exclude pulmonary embolism, but it is needed to guide the next examinations and to find alternative diagnoses. Pulmonary Multi-Detector CT Angiography is the gold standard to diagnose pulmonary embolism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document