FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENTERPRISES AND THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 91-106
Author(s):  
Evgeny V. Sokolov ◽  
◽  
Evgeny V. Kostyrin ◽  
Svetlana V. Lasunova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Pension Fund ◽  
Social Problems ◽  
The State ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Technological Equipment ◽  
Gross Domestic Product Growth ◽  
Development Fund ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Competitive Products

The proposed technology of financing enterprises and the Russian economy, harmoniously combining the interests of working citizens, owners and the state, makes it possible, at quite achievable rates of gross domestic product growth (enterprise revenue) by 3.5% per year, to ensure a 46.6% increase in wages of working citizens over 5 years, which will practically end poverty. To increase contributions to the development fund for 5 years by 25%, which the owners of enterprises and the entire workforce are interested in, since this ensures the growth of their incomes and the possibility of constant modernization and updating of technological equipment and the release of new competitive products. Increase in 5 years (despite a gradual decrease to 14.51% of contributions to the Pension Fund RF) the amount of funds received by budgets of all levels by 22%, which will allow the state to solve many social problems.

SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES OF ENTERPRISE FINANCING

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 13-26
Author(s):  
E. V. SOKOLOV ◽  
◽  
E. V. KOSTYRIN ◽  
A. B. BALANTSEV ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Medical Insurance ◽  
The State ◽  
Technological Equipment ◽  
Average Salary ◽  
Federal Fund ◽  
Development Fund ◽  
Social Technologies ◽  
Competitive Products

The proposed social technologies for financing enterprises, based on economic and mathematical models, algorithms and software, are a permanent mechanism for increasing the income of working citizens, developing enterprises, increasing tax revenues and social payments. The use of social technologies for financing enterprises allows with a 5% increase in revenue over 50 years to increase the wages of employees by 63%, which will amount to almost 104 trillion rubles in Russia; to increase deductions to the development fund by 72%, in which, first of all, the owners of enterprises are interested, since this ensures the growth of their income and the possibility of constant modernization and renewal of technological equipment, the release of new competitive products; to reduce to zero deductions to the Federal Fund of Compulsory Medical Insurance (FCHIF) from wages above 76 rubles, which is 955% higher than the average salary in Russia as of January 20. At the same time, despite the reduction in the rate of contributions to the FCHIF, the amount of deductions to the state in the form of income tax, income tax and in the FCHIF increases.

scholarly journals Economic Crisis in Europe: Panel Analysis of Inflation, Unemployment and Gross Domestic Product Growth Rates

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bibi Rouksar-Dussoyea ◽  
Ho Ming-Kang ◽  
Raja Rajeswari ◽  
Benjamin Chan Yin-Fah
Keyword(s):  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Panel Analysis ◽  
Causality Test ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Gross Domestic Product Growth ◽  
European Crisis ◽  
The Relationship

This panel analysis study is conducted to examine the relationship between inflation rates (CPI) and unemployment rates (HUR) with the Gross Domestic Product growth rates (GDP), before and after the 2008 European crisis. Quarterly data for 18 consecutive years and six sample countries from Europe (Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary and United Kingdom) have been considered in the panel. In order to get a more profound understanding of the impacts of the European crisis on the relationship between the variables, the panel data set has been classified into 3 separate panels, such that Panel 1 (1999Q1-2007Q4) represents before-crisis panel, Panel 2 (2008Q1-2016Q4) represents the during/after crisis panel and lastly, Panel 3 (1999Q1-2016Q4) represents the long-run panel. Panel 1 is subject to the Fixed Effects with LSDV model, whereby four out of the six countries are significant, and CPI and HUR are insignificant predictors of the GDP. Both Panel 2 and Panel 3 are subject to the Two-way Random Effects model, whereby both CPI and HUR have negative significant effect on GDP. Granger Causality test has also been carried out to determine whether causality is present among variables, based on each panel.

scholarly journals Estimating the Impact of Taxes on the Economic Growth in the United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branimir Kalaš ◽  
Vera Mirović ◽  
Jelena Andrašić
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Gross Domestic Product Growth ◽  
Social Security Contributions

AbstractIn a research paper, the authors provide an empirical approach to taxes and economic growth in the United States in the period 1996-2016. The basic goal is to explore how taxes affect economic growth. The subject of the research is measuring the effects of tax revenue growth and tax form as a personal income tax, corporate income tax and social security contributions on gross domestic product as a proxy for economic growth. Methodology framework includes several tests to clear the potential problem of heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation, multicollinearity and specification of the model. Based on diagnostic tests, a regression model is adequately created where fundamental econometric procedures are applied. Correlation matrix reflects a strong and positive relationship between tax revenue growth and corporate income tax on the one side and gross domestic product growth, on the another side. Also, personal income tax and social security contributions are weakly related to gross domestic product growth. The model shows a significant effect of tax revenue growth and social security contributions, while personal income tax and corporate income tax do not have a significant impact on gross domestic product growth. Interestingly, personal income tax as the main tax form in the tax structure of the United States has no significant impact on economic growth compared to social security contributions which percentage share is lesser.

scholarly journals A Macroeconomic News Index for Constructing Nowcasts of U.S. Real Gross Domestic Product Growth

Review ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Grover ◽  
Kevin L. Kliesen ◽  
Michael W. McCracken
Keyword(s):  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Macroeconomic News ◽  
Gross Domestic Product Growth ◽  
Real Gross Domestic Product
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document