Assessment of Effect of Port Site and Intraperitoneal Instillation of Bupivacaine in Reduction of Post-Operative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nippun Roy
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Intraperitoneal Instillation

Aim: Effective postoperative pain control is an essential component for care of surgical patients. Inadequate pain control may result in increased morbidity or mortality. Analgesic effects of periportal infiltration of local anesthetics, infiltration of periportal parietal peritoneum, intraperitoneal spraying at subdiaphragmatic space and subhepatic space covering the area of hepatoduodenal ligament have been reported. The present controlled study aimed at assessing the effect of port site injection and intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine in reduction of post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: The present study was conducted among a group of 180 patients diagnosed to have symptomatic cholelithiasis and who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. In group 1, pre-incisional local infiltration of 20ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the port sites; and in group 2, local infiltration of 20ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the port sites with intraperitonial installation. In group 3, no local infiltration was done and treated as control group. Pain assessment is based on a Universal Pain Assessment Tool. Analysis of our study was performed one-way ANOVA & Post HOC test (Scheffe's HSD) & Chi square tests as and when indicated. Results: Mean pain scores at 30 minutes were significantly lower in groups 1 & 2 compared to control group; but however, the values were not significantly different when compared to each other. Similarly, the mean pain scores at 4th, 8th, 16th and 24th hours for the preincisional and preclosure groups, didn't signify any inter-group advantage. Therefore, bupivacaine provides a substantial reduction of pain intensity up to 24 hours postoperatively; and was found to be statistically significant. However, timing of anesthesia was found to be statistically insignificant in terms of preclosure vs pre incisional of the port sites. Conclusion: Instillation of bupivacaine at the port sites in laparoscopic cholecystectomy irrespective of the timing of instillation is an effective method of achieving pain control in the post-operative period as long as 24 hours after surgery. There was no statistically significant reduction of post-operative pain between the pre-incisional and pre-closure groups.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POST OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH PORT SITE AND INTRAPERITONEAL INSTILLATION OF 0.5% BUPIVACAINE WITH ADRENALINE AND PLACEBO

2021 ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Vivek Agrawal ◽  
Parikshit Bishnoi ◽  
Anand Nagar ◽  
Shireesh Gupta ◽  
Anshul Mathur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Anaesthetic Agent ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Intraperitoneal Instillation ◽  
Improve Cost

Introduction : Postoperative pain is variable in intensity,character,duration and is the main factor delaying discharge of patients undergoing day-care procedures including laparoscopy and hence adding to hospital cost and stay. Optimal management has a potential for shortening of hospital stay and for speeding up of recovery.AIM :Comparing the effect of port site and intraperitoneal instillation of 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline versus saline for post-operative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To assess the need of rescue analgesics in post- operative period in both groups.Material & Method :A comparative study to be performed on 50 cases receive 40 mls of 0.5% bupivacaine as intraperitoneal infiltration and local infiltration of 20 mls of 0.5% bupivacaine in the port sites (5 ml infiltration in each port) versus 50 cases receive 40 ml of normal saline intraperitoneally Discussion :Reduction in post-operative pain with better cosmesis and early return to work have been the goals to improve cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Conclusion : We conclude that instillation of local anaesthetic drug intraperitonialy & Port site local anaesthetic agent injection has added benefits in post operative pain

scholarly journals Periarticular Injection with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varah Yuenyongviwat ◽  
Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong ◽  
Thitima Chinachoti ◽  
Keerati Chareancholvanich
Keyword(s):  
Pain Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Local periarticular injection with bupivacaine alone in TKA has not been studied. Thus, we aimed to examine the effectiveness of local periarticular injection with bupivacaine for post-operative pain control in TKA.Method. Sixty patients undergoing TKA by a single surgeon were randomly assigned into two groups in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In the injection group, patients received periarticular injections with 0.25% bupivacaine before wound closure; in the control group, patients received a 0.9% normal saline injection. Both groups received the same anesthetic procedure, post-operative pain control, and rehabilitation protocol.Results. There was a significant reduction in post-operative morphine consumption in the first six hours after the operation (mean 0.9 mg and 2.43 mg,P=0.01), but there was no significant difference in post-operative morphine consumption between six hours and ninety-six hours after the operation, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, morphine side effects during the first 96 hours, length of hospital stay, or complications from morphine consumption.Conclusion. Local periarticular injection with bupivacaine alone before wound closer was shown to be an effective method to improve pain control after TKA with a few complications and ease of use.

scholarly journals Port Site Infiltration and Intraperitoneal Instillation of Bupivacaine for Post Operative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lipika Sanjowal ◽  
Swapan Kumar Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Intraperitoneal Instillation ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Experimental Group

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard treatment method for symptomatic gallstone diseases. However pain is the only complaint that delays the discharge. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of bupivacaine infiltration into port site and instillation into peritoneal cavity to reduce pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One hundred patients underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into experimental group (Group A) and control group (Group B) of 50 patients each. Following removal of gallbladder, patients of experimental group received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine in gallbladder bed and 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine was infiltrated into 4 port sites. Control group received no treatment. The evaluation of postoperative pain was done at 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively by using Visual Analogue Scale and the dose of NSAID was also recorded. Mean VAS score at 4, 8 and 12 hours postoperatively in experimental group was less than that of the control group (p<0.05). VAS score at 24 hours postoperatively did not differ between two study groups (p>0.05). The mean total NSAID doses used during first 24 hours postoperatively was less in the experimental group than control group (p<0.05). The localization of pain during first 24 hours postoperatively was 62% incisional, 29% intra abdominal and shoulder tip pain 9%. Port site infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduce pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this simple, inexpensive and effective method should be practiced to minimize early postoperative pain for all elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jul 2019;14(2): 58-61

scholarly journals Port Site and Intraperitoneal Infiltration of Local Anesthetics in Reduction of Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shaha Alam ◽  
Hasnat Waheedul Hoque ◽  
Mohammad Saifullah ◽  
Md Omar Ali
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Narcotic Analgesics ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the gold standard technique for the treatment of gallstones disease. Although pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less intense than after open cholecystectomy, some patients still experience considerable discomfort during the first 24 to 72 postoperative hours. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of intraperitoneal and port site instillation of local anaesthetics on pain relief in early postoperative period following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Fifty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were consecutively included in this study and sample was divided into two groups. Following removal of gallbladder, Group A received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine instilled in the right sub diaphragmatic space and 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in divided doses at the trocar sites. The evaluation of postoperative pain was done at fixed time interval according to the numerical verbal scale and the dosage of narcotic analgesics consumed was also recorded. Mean pain scores at 6 hours and at 12 hours after surgery were 6.02 and 4.72 respectively, in the bupivacaine group compared with 8.44 and 6.08 respectively in the control group (p= <0.001 and <0.001). However, pain scores at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively and incidence of shoulder tip pain did not differ significantly between the two groups. The mean total narcotic analgesics used in study group was 1.91 as compared to 2.50 in the control group respectively and was found to be statistically significant (p= <0.001). Infiltration of bupivacaine in to port site and intraperitoneal space is simple, inexpensive and effective technique to minimize early postoperative pain and can be practiced for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.   DOI: 10.3329/medtoday.v22i1.5601 Medicine Today Vol.22(1) 2010. 24-28

scholarly journals Effect of Administration of Ketorolac and Local Anaesthetic Infiltration for Pain Relief after Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
JH Kim ◽  
YS Lee ◽  
HW Shin ◽  
MS Chang ◽  
YC Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Local Infiltration ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Pain Site ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

The efficacy of local anaesthetic infiltration and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) was investigated in 83 patients, randomized into four groups in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study: group BK, local infiltration with bupivacaine and pre-incisional intramuscular (IM) ketorolac; group NN, saline local infiltration IM; group BN, local infiltration with bupivacaine and saline IM; group NK, local infiltration with saline and ketorolac IM. Post-operative pain scores were assessed at 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The major pain site, first analgesic request time and incidence of analgesic requests were also recorded. At 1 h, 3 h and 6 h after surgery, group BK patients had significantly lower VAS pain scores than group NN patients. The first analgesic request time was significantly longer in group BK than in groups NN, BN and NK. Pre-incisional treatment with ketorolac IM and local infiltration with bupivacaine reduced post-operative pain after LAVH.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Concerning the Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weihua Wang ◽  
Lishan Wang ◽  
Yan Gao
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Background and Purpose: Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block has been suggested to reduce post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, the literature is divided on whether ultrasound (USG)-guided TAP block is effective for pain control after LC. The present meta-analysis therefore evaluated the efficacy of USG-guided TAP block vs. controls and port site infiltration for pain control after LC.Methods: A comprehensive literature search of online academic databases was performed for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for studies published to January 31, 2021. The primary outcome analyzed was post-operative pain score at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h post-surgery, both during rest and while coughing. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence.Results: A total of 23 studies with data on 1,450 LC patients were included in our meta-analysis. A reduction in pain intensity at certain post-operative timepoints was observed for USG-guided TAP block patients compared to control group patients. No reduction in pain intensity was observed for patients receiving USG-guided TAP block patients vs. conventional Port site infiltration.Conclusion: This meta-analysis concludes that TAP block is more effective than a conventional pain control, but not significatively different from another local incisional pain control that is port site infiltration. Additional prospective randomized controlled trials are required to further validate our findings.

scholarly journals Comparison of intraincisional vs intraperitoneal bupivacaine for the control of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1509
Author(s):  
Umar Qadir Bacha ◽  
Majid Mushtaque ◽  
Sifna Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

 Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of infiltration of local anaesthetic bupivacaine at incision site (port site) and intraperitoneally on postoper­ative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: This was a randomized controlled study carried out on patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were divided into three groups of 60 patients each. Group 1 was the control group which did not receive either intraincisional or intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Group 2 received intraincisional bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml, while group 3 received 20 ml solution of bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml intraperitoneally. Postoperative pain was recorded for 24 hours post-operatively.Results: The incidence of abdominal pain was significantly lower in the group which received intraincisional bupivacaine upto 12 hours postoperatively. Right shoulder pain was low in group receiving intraperitoneal bupivacaine as compared to group 2, but it was not statistically significant.Conclusions: Intraincisional (port site) infiltration of bupivacaine is more effective than intraperitoneal infiltration for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It is easier to apply and there is less requirement of postoperative analgesics.

scholarly journals Glisson’s capsule cauterisation is associated with increased postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective case–control study

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 485-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Basak ◽  
M Hasbahceci ◽  
A Sisik ◽  
A Acar ◽  
Y Ozel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Control Study

INTRODUCTION Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy has three components: parietal, visceral and referred pain felt at the shoulder. Visceral peritoneal injury on the liver (Glisson’s capsule) during cauterisation sometimes occurs as an unavoidable complication of the operation. Its effect on postoperative pain has not been quantified. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between Glisson’s capsule injury and postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS The study was a prospective case–control of planned standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standardized anaesthesia protocol in patients with benign gallbladder disease. Visual analogue scale (VAS) abdominal pain scores were noted at 2 and 24 hours after the operation. One surgical team performed the operations. Operative videos were recorded and examined later by another team to detect presence of Glisson’s capsule cauterisation. Eighty-one patients were enrolled into the study. After examination of the operative videos, 46 patients with visceral peritoneal injury were included in the study group, and the remaining 35 formed the control group. RESULTS VAS pain score at postoperative 2 and 24 hours was significantly higher in the study group than control (P = 0.027 and 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Glisson’s capsule cauterisation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with increased postoperative pain. Additional efforts are recommended to prevent unintentional cauterisation.

A Randomized Controlled Trial: The Effect of Acupressure and Foot Reflexology on Pain During Heel-Lancing in Neonates

2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110618
Author(s):  
Ayşe Özge Deniz ◽  
Ayfer Açikgöz
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intergroup Difference ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Sedation Scale ◽  
Neonatal Pain ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores

This randomized controlled study aimed to determine the effects of acupressure and foot reflexology on procedural pain during heel-lancing in newborns. This study was conducted with 105 neonates (35 foot reflexology group, 35 acupressure group, and 35 control group) who met the inclusion criteria and who were delivered by cesarean section between October 2017 and March 2018 at a state hospital in Turkey. A “Newborn Information Form” and a “Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale” (N-PASS) were used to collect data. The study found a significant intergroup difference between pain scores of neonates during the procedures ( p < .05). Advanced analyses found that the pain scores in the acupressure and foot reflexology groups were similar, whereas the pain scores in the control group were higher than in the other two groups. Acupressure and foot reflexology administered during heel lancing in newborns are effective methods for reducing pain.

scholarly journals Effect of Ketorolac on the Prevention of Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Jun-Young Park ◽  
Jun Hyuk Hong ◽  
Jihion Yu ◽  
Doo-Hwan Kim ◽  
Gi-Ho Koh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Scores ◽  
Double Blinded

Urinary catheterization can cause catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD). Ketorolac is widely used for pain control. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of ketorolac on the prevention of CRBD in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). All patients were randomly allocated to the ketorolac group or the control group. The primary outcome was CRBD above a moderate grade at 0 h postoperatively. CRBD above a moderate grade at 1, 2, and 6 h was also assessed. Postoperative pain, opioid requirement, ketorolac-related complications, patient satisfaction, and hospitalization duration were also assessed. The incidence of CRBD above a moderate grade at 0 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ketorolac group (21.5% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.001) as were those at 1, 2, and 6 h. Pain scores at 0 and 1 h and opioid requirement over 24 h were significantly lower in the ketorolac group, while patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the ketorolac group. Ketorolac-related complications and hospitalization duration were not significantly different between the two groups. This study shows ketorolac can reduce postoperative CRBD above a moderate grade and increase patient satisfaction in patients undergoing RALP, suggesting it is a useful option to prevent postoperative CRBD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document