Validity and Reliability of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: A Multicenter Study

Background: There is limited data about the psychometric properties of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in children. This study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of the RASS in assessing sedation and agitation in critically ill children.Methods: A multicenter prospective study in children admitted to pediatric intensive care, aged between 1 month and 18 years. Twenty-eight observers from 14 PICUs (pediatric intensive care units) participated. Every observation was assessed by 4 observers: 2 nurses and 2 pediatric intensivists. We analyzed RASS inter-rater reliability, construct validity by comparing RASS to the COMFORT behavior (COMFORT-B) scale and the numeric rating scale (NRS), and by its ability to distinguish between levels of sedation, and responsiveness to changes in sedative dose levels.Results: 139 episodes in 55 patients were analyzed, with a median age 3.6 years (interquartile range 0.7–7.8). Inter-rater reliability was excellent, weighted kappa (κw) 0.946 (95% CI, 0.93–0.96; p < 0.001). RASS correlation with COMFORT-B scale, rho = 0.935 (p < 0.001) and NRS, rho = 0.958 (p < 0.001) was excellent. The RASS scores were significantly different (p < 0.001) for the 3 sedation categories (over-sedation, optimum and under-sedation) of the COMFORT-B scale, with a good agreement between both scales, κw 0.827 (95% CI, 0.789–0.865; p < 0.001), κ 0.762 (95% CI, 0.713–0.811, p < 0.001). A significant change in RASS scores (p < 0.001) was recorded with the variance of sedative doses.Conclusions: The RASS showed good measurement properties in PICU, in terms of inter-rater reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. These properties, including its ability to categorize the patients into deep sedation, moderate-light sedation, and agitation, makes the RASS a useful instrument for monitoring sedation in PICU.

A Randomized Controlled Trial: The Effect of Acupressure and Foot Reflexology on Pain During Heel-Lancing in Neonates

This randomized controlled study aimed to determine the effects of acupressure and foot reflexology on procedural pain during heel-lancing in newborns. This study was conducted with 105 neonates (35 foot reflexology group, 35 acupressure group, and 35 control group) who met the inclusion criteria and who were delivered by cesarean section between October 2017 and March 2018 at a state hospital in Turkey. A “Newborn Information Form” and a “Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale” (N-PASS) were used to collect data. The study found a significant intergroup difference between pain scores of neonates during the procedures ( p < .05). Advanced analyses found that the pain scores in the acupressure and foot reflexology groups were similar, whereas the pain scores in the control group were higher than in the other two groups. Acupressure and foot reflexology administered during heel lancing in newborns are effective methods for reducing pain.

Experience of Dexmedetomidine using for intraoperative analgosedation during ophthalmic operations

Background. The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality and safety of the sedative effect of anesthesia in ambulant ophthalmic surgery by using continuous intravenous infu­sion of Dexmedetomidine. Materials and Methods. Patients were randomized into groups by age (people from 65 to 75 years old, old age 76 years, middle age, young people, children), by gender (men, women). The physical status of patients was assessed using the ASA scale and the dynamics of vegetatic activity by the Kerdo index. Sedation was assessed using the Richmond Sedation Scale RASS.Results. It was found that the difference in the frequency of adverse effects of the appointment of Dexmedetomidine clearly confirms the need to adjust the dose of Dexmede­tomidine, depending on the state of the autonomic nervous system. The use of Dexmedetomidine according to the rec­ommendations made it possible to achieve a safe level of sedation and eliminate side effects in ambulant ophthalmic surgery.Conclusions: Parenteral continuous infusion of Dexmedetomidine pro­vides an effective level of sedation for ambulant ophthalmic surgery and maintaining patient­surgeon contact. Safety is confirmed by a low level of critical incidents, no respiratory depression at the target sedation level. The patency of the upper airways was better compared to previous experience with propofol.

Comparison of the Effect of Ketamine, Ketamine-Midazolam and Ketamine-Propofol on Post-Tonsillectomy Agitation in Children

Background: Emergence agitation (EA) in children is one of the most common complications following anaesthesia. We aimed to compare the effect of ketamine, ketaminemidazolam and ketamine-propofol on EA after tonsillectomy. Methods: This study was a randomised, double-blind clinical trial conducted on 162 children undergoing adenotonsillectomy surgery. The participants were randomly divided into three groups of receiving ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) (N = 54), ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) + propofol (1 mg/kg) (N = 54) and ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) + midazolam (0.01 mg/kg) (N = 54) 10 min before the end of the operation. At the time of the patients’ entry into the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and at intervals of 5 min, 10 min and 20 min after that, consciousness, mobility, breathing, circulation and SpO2 were recorded. Modified Aldrete recovery score (MARS), the objective pain score (OPS) and Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) were also evaluated. Results: At the time of entrance to the PACU and 5 min later, the ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol groups had lower RASS scores than the ketamine group (P < 0.001); after 10 min and 20 min, the ketamine-propofol group showed the lowest RASS score (P < 0.001). Ketamine-propofol group had a significantly lower MARS score at all-time points (P < 0.001). Recovery time was the longest for the ketamine-propofol group (P = 0.008). Conclusion: The ketamine-midazolam group had lower RASS, greater haemodynamic stability and MARS values without delayed awakening.

Responsiveness Index versus the RASS-Based Method for Adjusting Sedation in Critically Ill Patients

Background. Sedation of intensive care patients is needed for patient safety, but deep sedation is associated with adverse outcomes. Frontal electromyogram-based Responsiveness Index (RI) aims to quantify the level of sedation and is scaled 0–100 (low index indicates deep sedation). We compared RI-based sedation to Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale- (RASS-) based sedation. Our hypothesis was that RI-controlled sedation would be associated with increased total time alive without mechanical ventilation at 30 days without an increased number of adverse events. Methods. 32 critically ill adult patients with mechanical ventilation and administration of sedation were randomized to either RI- or RASS-guided sedation. Patients received propofol and oxycodone, if possible. The following standardized sedation protocol was utilized in both groups to achieve the predetermined target sedation level: either RI 40–80 (RI group) or RASS −3 to 0 (RASS group). RI measurement was blinded in the RASS group, and the RI group was blinded to RASS assessments. State Entropy (SE) values were registered in both groups. Results. RI and RASS groups did not differ in total time alive in 30 days without mechanical ventilation ( p = 0.72 ). The incidence of at least one sedation-related adverse event did not differ between the groups. Hypertension was more common in the RI group ( p = 0.01 ). RI group patients were in the target RI level 22% of the time and RASS group patients had 57% of scores within the target RASS level. The RI group spent significantly more time in their target sedation level than the RASS group spent in the corresponding RI level ( p = 0.03 ). No difference was observed between the groups ( p = 0.13 ) in the corresponding analysis for RASS. Propofol and oxycodone were administered at higher RI and SE values and lower RASS values in the RI group than in the RASS group. Conclusion. Further studies with a larger sample size are warranted to scrutinize the optimal RI level during different phases of critical illness.

A Randomized Controlled Study of Caudal Dexmedetomidine for the Prevention of Postoperative Agitation in Children Undergoing Urethroplasty

Background: Postoperative agitation is a common complication in children undergoing general anesthesia. This study aimed to investigate the effect of caudal dexmedetomidine for the prevention of postoperative agitation in children undergoing urethroplasty.Materials and Methods: Eighty children were prospectively recruited to this study and randomized to two groups (40 cases in each group), specifically, a dexmedetomidine group (group D) who received 0.2% ropivacaine + 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine for caudal block, and a control group who received 0.2% ropivacaine alone. The time to wake up, the time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the duration of the caudal block, and the Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) were evaluated in the patients. Adverse events such as postoperative agitation, respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension, excessive sedation, nausea, and vomiting were also recorded during the first postoperative 24 h.Results: The incidence of postoperative agitation was lower in group D compared with patients in the control group (2.5 vs. 22.5%, p = 0.007). The time to wake up and the time to discharge from PACU were longer in group D than in the control group (15.2 ± 2.6 vs. 13.4 ± 1.3 min, 48.2 ± 7.7 vs. 41.5 ± 8.0 min, respectively, p &lt; 0.001). However, the extubation times were similar between the two groups. The duration of the caudal block was longer in group D compared with the control group (8.8 ± 1.6 vs. 4.6 ± 0.7 h, p &lt; 0.001).Conclusions: Caudal dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of caudal block and decreases the incidence of postoperative agitation in children undergoing urethroplasty.Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR1800016828.

Phase Lag Entropy as a Surrogate Measurement of Hypnotic Depth during Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Background and Objectives: Phase lag entropy, an electroencephalographic monitor, evaluates the variety in temporal patterns of phase relationship between frontal and prefrontal brain region. Phase lag entropy can reflect the depth of anesthesia induced by propofol, but the association between sevoflurane and phase lag entropy has not been elucidated. This study examined the effect of sevoflurane on phase lag entropy during induction of general anesthesia. We also explored the pharmacodynamic model between end-tidal anesthetic concentration and electroencephalographic monitor. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. General anesthesia was produced by escalating the sevoflurane (1 vol% up to 8 vol%). The relationship between phase lag entropy and end-tidal anesthetic concentration was analyzed. A non-linear mixed-effects model was used to get the relationship of pharmacodynamics between the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration and phase lag entropy. Mean blood pressure, heart rate, and the modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale were also recorded during sevoflurane anesthesia. Results: As level of sedation increased, phase lag entropy decreased. A significant correlation was showed between phase lag entropy and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (r = −0.759, p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale and phase lag entropy was 0.731 (p < 0.001). The pharmacodynamic factors assessed by the sigmoid Emax model were E0 = 84.9, Emax = 42, Ce50 = 1.81, γ = 4.78, and ke0 = 0.692. The prediction probability of phase-lag entropy for measuring the modified observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration were 0.764 and 0.789, respectively. With the increasing concentration of sevoflurane, mean blood pressure decreased, but heart rate did not change. Conclusions: The continuing escalation in end-tidal sevoflurane concentration caused a decline in phase lag entropy. Phase lag entropy can serve as an indicator of hypnotic depth in patients receiving sevoflurane anesthesia.

The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study

Background Continuous infusion of propofol has been used to achieve sedation in children. However, the relationship between the effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol and sedation scale has not been previously examined. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Ce of propofol and the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score in children with population pharmacodynamic modeling. Methods A total of 30 patients (aged 3 to 6 years) who underwent surgery under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil lasting more than 1 h were enrolled in this study. Sedation levels were evaluated using the UMSS score every 20 s by a 1 μg/mL stepwise increase in the Ce of propofol during the induction of anesthesia. The pharmacodynamic relationship between the Ce of propofol and UMSS score was analyzed by logistic regression with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Results The estimated Ce50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol to yield UMSS scores equal to or greater than n were 1.84 (1.54–2.14), 2.64 (2.20–3.08), 3.98 (3.66–4.30), and 4.78 (4.53–5.03) μg/mL for n = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The slope steepness for the relationship of the Ce versus sedative response to propofol (95% confidence interval) was 5.76 (4.00–7.52). Conclusions We quantified the pharmacodynamic relationship between the Ce of propofol and UMSS score, and this finding may be helpful to predict the sedation score at the target Ce of propofol in children. Trial registration http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (No.: NCT03195686, Date of registration: 22/06/2017).

Monitoring the depth of palliative sedation by video-pupillometry: A case report

Background: Palliative sedation is sometimes interrupted by undesired arousals. Pupillometry has been used in anesthesiology to monitor pain and sedation but has never been used during palliative sedation. Actual case: A 48 years-old patient, with multi-metastatic cancer, underwent palliative sedation to manage global suffering. On the second day, the patient experienced arousal which required medication adjustments to ensure pain relief and increased sedation. Possible course of action: Depth of sedation is monitored with clinical scales, such as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. But these scales do not measure brain stem activity and are poor at predicting arousal. Formulation of a plan: During palliative sedation, an infrared pupillometer was used to monitor pupil size and pupillary reactivity (Neurolight®, IDMed®, Marseille, France). Outcome: The pupillary light reflex was depressed during deep sedation. In our case, we observed a low-normal reflex along with dilated pupil before arousal. Lessons from the case: Our case suggests that reflex intensity and pupil size might predict arousals during palliative sedation. View on research problems, objectives, or questions generated by the case: Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings. Pupillometry’s acceptability should also be questioned from patient’s, families’, and caregivers’ perspectives.

THE USE OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN PUNCTURE TECHNIQUES FOR DEGENERATIVE DISEASES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the results of the use of dexmedetomidine (D) in the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine using puncture techniques. Methods The study included 77 patients who underwent surgical puncture for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine with the use of alpha-2-adrenomimetic D: percutaneous laser denervation of the facet joints (n = 46) and posterolateral transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (n = 31). We assessed: the level of sedation using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) and the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS); intraoperative dynamics of the cardiovascular and respiratory system parameters; the level of pain syndrome according to VAS. Results A high intraoperative level of sedation was determined, with RASS -2, -3 and Ramsay III, IV; when transferring a patient to a department (in 90 minutes) this parameter was RASS 0 and Ramsay II. There were no significant changes in central hemodynamics and respiratory depression. The minimum level of pain was determined immediately after surgery, at 30 and 60 minutes after surgery, and before transfer to the department (90 minutes): 6 (4;9); 10 (8;12); 12 (9;13); 16 (13;19) respectively. The absence of the need for additional analgesia on the first postoperative day was verified. Conclusion The use of D significantly reduces the level of pain, while maintaining the necessary verbal contact with the patient, and provides the necessary neurovegetative protection without respiratory depression or lowered hemodynamic parameters during the perioperative period. Level of evidence II; Prognostic Studies - Investigating the Effect of a Patient Characteristic on Disease Outcome. Case series, retrospective study.