scholarly journals Psychological and neural mechanisms of trust formation: A perspective from computational modeling based on the decision of investor in the trust game

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Qinglin GAO ◽  
Yuan ZHOU
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 558-558
Author(s):  
Kendra Seaman ◽  
Alexander Christensen ◽  
Katherine Senn ◽  
Jessica Cooper ◽  
Brittany Cassidy

Abstract Trust is a key component of social interaction. Older adults, however, often exhibit excessive trust relative to younger adults. One explanation is that older adults may learn to trust differently than younger adults. Here, we report a study examining how younger (N=36) and older adults (N=37) learn to trust over time. Participants completed a classic iterative trust game with three partners (15 trials each). Younger and older adults shared similar amounts but there were differences in how they shared that money. Compared to younger adults, older adults invested more with untrustworthy partners and less with trustworthy partners. As a group, older adults displayed less learning than younger adults and computational modeling suggests that older adults used different learning strategies. These findings suggest that older adults attend to and learn from social cues differently from younger adults. Neuroimaging results focused on reward processing will also be discussed.


PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milen L. Radell ◽  
Rosanna Sanchez ◽  
Noah Weinflash ◽  
Catherine E. Myers

Decisions based on trust are critical for human social interaction. We judge the trustworthiness of partners in social interactions based on a number of partner characteristics as well as experiences with those partners. These decisions are also influenced by personality. The current study examined how the personality trait of behavioral inhibition, which involves the tendency to avoid or withdraw from novelty in both social and non-social situations, is related to explicit ratings of trustworthiness as well as decisions made in the trust game. In the game, healthy young adults interacted with three fictional partners who were portrayed as trustworthy, untrustworthy or neutral through biographical information. Participants could choose to keep $1 or send $3 of virtual money to a partner. The partner could then choose to send $1.5 back to the participant or to keep the entire amount. On any trial in which the participant chose to send, the partner always reciprocated with 50% probability, irrespective of how that partner was portrayed in the biography. Behavioral inhibition was assessed through a self-report questionnaire. Finally, a reinforcement learning computational model was fit to the behavior of each participant. Self-reported ratings of trust confirmed that all participants, irrespective of behavioral inhibition, perceived differences in the moral character of the three partners (trustworthiness of good > neutral > bad partner). Decisions made in the game showed that inhibited participants tended to trust the neutral partner less than uninhibited participants. In contrast, this was not reflected in the ratings of the neutral partner (either pre- or post-game), indicating a dissociation between ratings of trustworthiness and decisions made by inhibited participants. Computational modeling showed that this was due to lower initial trust of the neutral partner rather than a higher learning rate associated with loss, suggesting an implicit bias against the neutral partner. Overall, the results suggest inhibited individuals may be predisposed to interpret neutral or ambiguous information more negatively which could, at least in part, account for the tendency to avoid unfamiliar people characteristic of behaviorally inhibited temperament, as well as its relationship to anxiety disorders.


2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. S235-S236
Author(s):  
Anthony Privratsky ◽  
Josh Cisler ◽  
Michael Chung ◽  
Keith Bush ◽  
Clint Kilts

2021 ◽  
pp. 001139212110010
Author(s):  
Tien-Tun Yang ◽  
Ray-May Hsung ◽  
Shu-Heng Chen ◽  
Ye-Rong Du ◽  
Yi-Jr Lin ◽  
...  

Trust and cooperation within and between political identity groups are important issues for building a healthy civil society and democratic development. However, this research problem has seldom been analyzed under different political identity conditions by means of experimental design in Taiwan. Presidential elections have reproduced the polarization between two groups of voters supporting different presidential candidates. Therefore, in this article the authors are interested in whether political identity matters in trust exchanges among strangers. This study applies a three-stage trust game experiment to examine how trust is developed within pairs of subjects with either the same or different political identity. In the first stage subjects were randomly matched in pairs as trustor and trustee, and their political identities were not disclosed. In the second stage the pairs were still randomly matched, but each subject was informed of their partner’s political identity. In the final stage each subject could choose the preferred political identity of his/her partner. There were two mechanisms of trust-behavior formation under different identity conditions. The first mechanism was political identity. Supporters of presidential candidate Ma Ying-Jeou were more trustful than supporters of candidate Tsai Ing-Wen. Under the condition of subjects knowing their partner’s political identity, the identity effect became strongly significant in stages 2 and 3 of the experiment, especially for that of the Ma–Ma group. The second mechanism was mutuality. The mutuality effect was very significant in all three stages of the trust experiment, and that effect was stronger for those who voted for Tsai.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hester Sijtsma ◽  
Mariet van Buuren ◽  
Miriam Hollarek ◽  
Reubs J Walsh ◽  
Nikki Lee ◽  
...  

Assessing the trustworthiness of others to learn who you can and cannot trust is important for social relationships. During early adolescence, the social environment becomes increasingly complex. The number and nature of one’s friendships may help to shape, and may be facilitated by, adequate trust behavior. In the current fMRI study, we investigated in 49 young adolescents (Mage=12.8, SDage=0.4, 18 boys) the ability to adapt trust behavior when interacting with an untrustworthy partner as well as the neural mechanisms of trust using a trust game. Furthermore, we examined how trust behavior, the neural mechanisms of trust, and the position in a social network are related. Results indicate that adolescents decreased their trust behavior throughout the game. fMRI analysis showed no increased activity in regions of interest when making trust decisions. When receiving feedback, increased activity in the cognitive control and reward network was shown. Furthermore, less central social network positions (eigencentrality) were associated with lower overall trust behavior, which was the better strategy in the current interaction. In contrast, eigencentrality was not related to the adaptation of trust behavior or to brain activity. The current study provides insights in trust behavior and the neural mechanisms of trust in young adolescents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document