scholarly journals Student-Writing Tutors: Making Sense of "Academic Literacies"

Author(s):  
Joelle Adams
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Street

I provide an overview of approaches to writing referred to as 'academic literacies' building on broader traditions, such as New Literacy Studies, and I draw out the relevance of such traditions for the ways in which lecturers provide support to their students with regard to the writing requirements of the University. I offer three case studies of the application of academic literacies approaches to programmes concerned with supporting student writing, in the UK and the USA. I briefly conclude by asking how far these accounts and this work can be seen to bring together many of the themes raised at SIGET conferences - including academic literacies and its relation to genre theories - and express the hope that it opens up trajectories for future research and collaboration of the kind they were founded to develop.


Author(s):  
John Hilsdon ◽  
Cathy Malone ◽  
Alicja Syska

In 1998, the paper ‘Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach’ by Mary Lea and Brian Street reinvigorated debate concerning ‘what it means to be academically literate’ (1998, p.158). It proposed a new way of examining how students learn at university and introduced the term ‘academic literacies’. Subsequently, a body of literature has emerged reflecting the significant theoretical and practical impact Lea and Street’s paper has had on a range of academic and professional fields. This literature review covers articles selected by colleagues in our professional communities of the Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE), the association for lecturers in English for Academic Purposes (BALEAP), and the European Association of Teachers of Academic Writing (EATAW). As a community-sourced literature review, this text brings together reviews of wide range of texts and a diverse range of voices reflecting a multiplicity of perspectives and understandings of academic literacies. We have organised the material according to the themes: Modality, Identity, Focus on text, Implications for research, and Implications for practice. We conclude with observations relevant to these themes, which we hope will stimulate further debate, research and professional collaborations between our members and subscribers.


Author(s):  
Mai Trang Vu ◽  
Magnus Olsson

Our presentation discusses the practices and findings from a PhD workshop series at the Academic Resource Centre, Umeå University Library, Sweden. The partnership between librarians, writing tutors/researchers in supporting PhD research has recently become a new reality with Information Literacy courses offered as tools for resources and searching (Hassani, 2015; Paasio & Hintikka, 2015; Garson,2016). The insights from our course contribute to this literature by re-conceptualizing “academic literacy”, including Information Literacy, in doctoral education. Adopting Academic Literacies (Lea & Street, 1998, 2006) as our workshops’ underlying framework, we propose literacy beyond individual, transferable cognitive skills of writing and reading. Rather, it is an interrelated, dynamic, and situated set of knowledge, skills, and personal attributes that help PhD students acculturate into disciplinary discourses, the academic community, and wider social contexts. Our course approaches literacy holistically as comprising Research competence, Information literacy, and Academic English, with consideration to social processes (power, identity, and authority). The workshops cover critical reading, the literature review, writing abstract, communicating research and writing papers, but the PhD students are also encouraged to make sense of their writing by having critical, inquiry-based reflections about themselves, academia, and social discourses. The results from the first three workshop seasons emphasize knowledge co-creation – between academic librarians and researchers, and between workshop instructors and PhD students, as one key principle in developing academic literacies. The findings indicate that Information Literacy can be seen beyond tools and resources but rather a springboard that stimulates PhD students’ critical thinking in their becoming researchers. The positive feedback from the participants also gives the rationale for the expanding roles of the library (Delaney and Bates, 2018). These workshops have strengthened our belief that collaboration is one important strategy for librarians and writing tutors/researchers to acquire the skills of the future. Authors Mai Trang Vu, PhD, works at the Academic Resource Centre, Umeå University Library, and Department of Language Studies, Umeå University, Sweden, [email protected]. Magnus Olsson, Academic Librarian, Academic Resource Centre, Umeå University Library, Sweden, [email protected].   References Delaney, Geraldine, & Bates, Jessica. (2018). How Can the University Library Better Meet the Information Needs of Research Students? Experiences from Ulster University. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(1), 63-89. Garson, D. S. (2016). Doctoral students becoming researchers: An innovative curriculum. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 8(1). Hassani, A. E. (2015). The role of Information Literacy in higher education: An initiative at Al Akhawayn University in Morocco. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 7(1). Lea, M. & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–72. Lea, M. & Street, B. (2006). The ‘Academic literacies’ model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–77. Paasio, A-L, Hintikka, K. (2015). An Information Literacy course for doctoral students: Information resources and tools for research. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 7(1).


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Eckert Pereira ◽  
Francieli Matzenbacher Pinton

Assumindo a perspectiva dos estudos sobre letramento, o presente trabalho investiga de que forma professores de língua portuguesa ressignificam suas práticas de letramento no contexto acadêmico. Para tanto, partimos do conceito de eventos de letramentos, compreendido como episódios observáveis que surgem das práticas; e do conceito de práticas de letramento, entendido como os modos gerais de usar a escrita em eventos. O universo de análise compreende um grupo de professores de língua portuguesa em formação inicial, matriculados na disciplina de Produção textual, ofertada no segundo semestre de um curso de licenciatura de uma universidade federal do interior do estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Os dados foram gerados a partir de um questionário semiestruturado, respondido por 31 participantes, cujas questões evidenciaram o processo de ensino e aprendizagem de produção textual na escola e na universidade. Para análise dos dados, foram empregados os procedimentos: i) identificação dos recursos ricos em significação e elaboração de categorias semânticas de análise, ii) comparação entre as práticas letradas experienciadas na universidade e escola e iii) verificação da proximidade/distanciamentos entre as práticas descritas. Os resultados demonstram que os professores em formação compreendem o processo de letramento como individual, focalizando em aspectos estruturais e normativos. BARTON, D.; HAMILTON, M. Local Literacies. Reading and Writing in one Community. London/New York: Routledge, 1998. BARTON, D.; HAMILTON, M. Literacy practies. In: BARTON, D.; HAMILTON, M.; IVANIC, R. Situated literacies Reading and writing in context. Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2004, p. 7-15. BARTON, E. Linguistic Discourse Analysis: How the Language in Text Works. In: BAZERMAN, C.; PRIOR, P. (Ed.). What Writing Does and How It Does It: An introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004. p. 57-82. BAZERMAN, C. Judith C. Hoffnagel; Ângela P. Dionísio (orgs). Gêneros, agência e escrita. São Paulo: Cortez, 2006. FIAD, R, S. A escrita na universidade. Revista da ABRALIN, v. eletrônico, n. especial, t. 2, p. 357-369, 2011. Disponível em: <https://revistas.ufpr.br/%20abralin/article/view file/32436/20585> Acesso em: 31 jan. 2020. KLEIMAN, Ângela. Modelos de letramento e as práticas de alfabetização na escola. In: ______. (org.). Os significados do letramento: uma nova perspectiva sobre a prática social da escrita. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 1995. p. 15-61. LEA, Mary R. I thought I could write till I came here: Student writing in Higher Education. In: GIBBS, G (ed.) Improving student learning: theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, 1994. p. 216-226. ______; STREET, Brian V. Student writing in high education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, v. 23, n. 2, p. 157-172, 1998. Disponível em: <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079812331380364> Acesso em: 20 jan. 2020. LILLIS, Tereza. Student writing: access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge, 2001. STREET, Brian. Eventos de letramento e práticas de letramento: teoria e prática nos novos estudos do letramento. In: MAGALHÃES, I. (org.). Discursos e práticas de letramento. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2012. p. 69-92. ______. Literacy in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984. ______. What’s new in New Literacy Studies: critical approaches to literacy in theory and practices. Current Issues in Comparative Education. Columbia University, v. 5, n.2, p. 77-91, 2003. TERRA, M. R. Letramento & letramentos: uma perspectiva sócio-cultural dos usos da escrita. DELTA [online], vol.29, n.1, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-44502013000100002> Acesso em: 07 fev. 2020.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document