scholarly journals Protection of the labor rights, freedoms and social interests in the criminal law: experience of foreign countries

2020 ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Tetiana LYSKO

The analysis of certain points of the criminal legislation of the foreign countries, which provide protection of labour rights, freedoms and social interests, is made in the paper with the help of comparative legal analysis. Despite the quite wide legal regulation of labour relations in all countries in the world, the special criminal law protection of labour rights has remained a feature of "eastern" countries of the continental family of law mainly, the so-called post-socialist family of law. The analysis of criminal legislation of foreign countries regarding criminalization of the violation of labour rights of a person is conducted in the paper. Comparative-legal analysis allows defining general approaches to formation of labour rights of employees, including in the sphere of contractual relationship. The most similar and corresponding to the national criminal legislature are the Criminal codes of Spain an Polish Republic, which establish criminal liability for violation of not only labour legislation in force, but also conditions of individual labour acts (agreements, contracts etc.). It is stated in the text that the protection of labour rights in the modern legislation of foreign countries often has fragmentary, unsystematic nature. The violation of labour safety rules is most often regulated in the criminal legislation of foreign countries. Other types of violation of the labour legislation are regulated with arbitration under administrative or civil legislation. The drawbacks of the fatherland`s legislation are mentioned and the main positive improvements in this sphere after adoption of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in 2001 are emphasized. It was made the conclusion that the list of crimes against labour rights, which are provided by modern criminal legislations, is strong enough and has specific features. The list mentioned above could be the target for improving Ukrainian criminal legislation in certain cases. Therewith it is important to remember that formation of the legislation in the sphere of the protection of labour rights, freedoms and social interests directly depends on the development of the regulatory legislation. It is the clarity and certainty of blanket norms that will become the fundamental basis for the formation of effective criminal law protection of labour rights, freedoms and interests.

Author(s):  
Шухратжон Хайдаров ◽  
Shuhratzhon Haydarov

On the basis of the provisions of the criminal legislation of several foreign countries (Russia, Uzbekistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Venezuela, United Kingdom, Germany, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, United States, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, France, Estonia, South Korea) the comparative-legal analysis of criminal liability for the improper performance of professional duties is given. The specific features of social relations – object of criminal law protection in the studied countries are determined. Public danger of these crimes is analyzed in the context of the constitutional right to life, health and integrity. The legal essence of concepts such as “failure to fulfill professional duties” and “improper performance of professional duties” is defined. The important constituent elements of criminal liability for the improper performance of professional duties in the studied countries are specified. The priority directions of improving norms of the criminal legislation are offered. The conclusion is made that the positive legislative experience of the countries under investigation can be applied in the criminal legislation of Uzbekistan.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-88
Author(s):  
Yermak O.V. ◽  
◽  
Suprun H.H. ◽  

Minors’ criminal behavior has become a significant problem for the state for a long time. Today it attracts a lot of public attention. Scholars state the need for a detailed analysis and reform of coercive measures of educational nature against minors in order to modernize the arsenal of special means of combating and preventing child crime. At the same time, special forms of criminal law response to children and adolescents’ criminal illegal actions remain poorly studied. In order to study the state of criminal law enforcement of some coercive measures of educational nature in more details, the authors turned to the legislation on criminal liability, which regulates the application of similar measures in foreign countries. This article is devoted to the study of coercive measures of educational nature against minors in Ukraine and abroad. In this scientific paper the comparative criminal-legal analysis of the concept and types of coercive measures of educational character concerning minors provided by the Criminal Code of Ukraine (further – CC of Ukraine) with similar norms of the criminal legislation of foreign states regulating questions of special criminal-legal measures concerning persons who at the time of committing a criminal offense did not reach the age of eighteen is carried out. The comparative analysis of the criminal legislation on applying coercive measures of an educational nature in Ukraine is carried out in comparison with the criminal laws of Switzerland, Latvia, Georgia, Bulgaria and Italy. The general conclusion is made in the article that the norms of the current Ukrainian criminal legislation need to be amended, improved and further adjusted both by scholars and by the legislator. Key words: coercive measures, criminal-legal measures, other measures of criminal-legal character, minors.


Author(s):  
Viktoria N. Sizova ◽  

The article attempts to make a comparative legal analysis of foreign criminal legislation on the subject of legal regulation of the category of criminal offense. The presence of this category in most criminal law systems of foreign countries has been established. It is concluded that it is necessary to introduce a criminal offense in the Russian criminal law


Author(s):  
X. Shan

The article looks into the evolution of the concept of “the principles of criminal law” in the legislation of the People’s Republic of China during the second half of the twentieth century. The principles of law are recognized as the normative foundations of law, which determine the general scope, main peculiarities and the most significant features of legal regulation. The article studies a number of definitions offered by some Chinese scientists who dealt with the theoretical and legal problems. The People’s Republic of China was created on October 1, 1949 against the background of destroyed economy, demoralized society, prevailing chaos and the unstructured nature of public authorities. In that period, no codified criminal law was in place. Some criminal acts of that time showed that any fundamental principles were included in the system of criminal legislation either. The first Criminal Code of the People’s Republic of China of 1979 did not mention any principles of law, whereas the Criminal Code of 1997 provided for three fundamental principles, which became the subject of our analysis. These are the principle of legality, also known as the principle of no punishment for doing something that is not prohibited by law (nullum crimen, nullum točka sine lege), the principle of equality of citizens before the law, the principle of conformity of criminal-legal measures to the nature and circumstances of crime. It is these principles that have been reflected in the current criminal code. Despite the amendments of criminal law introduced over the last few decades, the principles of law have remained unchanged. The conclusion to the publication makes a suggestion to introduce the general principle of humanism into in the General Provisions of the Criminal Code of China. The scholar believes that this principle should be recognized as the key principle of the criminal law of China, and will aim to ensure the democratic nature of Chinese criminal law.


Author(s):  
M. G. Nikitenko ◽  
E. E. Nikitenko

The article presents an analysis of the historical development of extreme necessity as an institution of criminal law. The authors examines the peculiar views of Roman jurists on the possibility of exemption from criminal liability in connection with injury to the state of emergency, the specifics of medieval canon law, assessment of Russian lawyers of the institute of extreme necessity. Conclusions about the peculiarities of the evolution of the norms of extreme necessity in criminal legislation on the basis of a retrospective analysis of the sources of criminal law are made.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 03010
Author(s):  
Andrey Vladimirovich Makarov ◽  
Larisa Vladimirovna Makogon ◽  
Oleg Vyacheslavovich Firsov ◽  
Aleksandra Sergeevna Zhukova

The purpose of the study is a comprehensive analysis of the issues of the application of criminal liability as a means of countering violations of sanitary and epidemiological rules in a pandemic. The main idea of the study: the validity and expediency of amending the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation establishing punishment for violation of sanitary and epidemiological rules and criminalization of the spread of an infectious disease. A methodological toolkit is a set of methods, means and techniques with the help of which the criminalization of violations of sanitary and epidemiological rules in a pandemic is substantiated. The following methods were used in the work: hypothetical-deductive; dogmatic (formal legal analysis); description; comparative. The result of the work is the provision that in a pandemic, a necessary condition for ensuring national security seems appropriate to criminalize the spread of infectious diseases that pose a danger to others, which will make it possible to prosecute people who, deliberately or through negligence, have committed infecting a disease included in the category of dangerous to others. These recommendations are due to the noted problems in science and practice, including the results of comparative legal analysis. The novelty of the research lies in the substantiation of amending the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation by federal law. The amendments introduce stricter types of punishments, establish responsibility for the threat of a mass disease or people intoxication, and additions have been made in the form of a third part which provides for liability for violation of sanitary standards that inadvertently entailed the death of two or more people. The peculiarities of bringing to criminal responsibility for similar acts in certain foreign countries are also considered. There is a tendency to classify such crimes as terrorism-related.


2018 ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Yevgeny Petrovich Kim

The subject of the study is the criminal responsibility of minors as an independent institution of criminal law. The purpose of the analysis is to reveal the peculiarities of bringing a person to criminal liability. The methodology of the study is based on a combination of formal legal and comparative legal analysis, which made it possible to establish criteria for assessing the age of criminal responsibility. The main results of the study contain conclusions on the achievement of a certain age by a person as one of the necessary conditions for recognizing a crime as a subject. The specifics of the criminal liability of minors are due to the age and socio-psychological characteristics of this group of persons, the incompleteness of the formation of their personality, the best receptivity to punitive and educational measures. Taking into account the characteristics of a minor acquires special significance when choosing the necessary measure of a criminally-legal, educational nature. The chosen measure of impact with minimal costs of criminal repression should give a warning effect.


Author(s):  
Gulfia G. Kamalova ◽  

The subject of the work is the status and prospects of criminal law liability for various violations of the special legal regime of legally protected secrets. Considering the specifics of criminal liability for violation of confidentiality of information, experts traditionally focus on certain legally protected secrets and a detailed analysis of the relevant corpus delicti, which does not allow to cover the problem of protection of information of limited access by criminal law means as a whole. The author of this article performed a comprehensive legal analysis of criminal liability for violation of legal regime of secrets protected by law and other restricted information on the basis of a set of unlawful acts of non-compliance with the requirements of the regime. Methodologically, the study is based on a set of modern general scientific and private legal methods. It is based on the comparative legal method, which allows to compare the norms of criminal legislation of Russia, CIS countries, European and other states. The author draws attention to the existing differences and notes that some provisions of the modern Russian criminal law do not meet the requirements of the time, modern challenges and threats of the global information society in the conditions of building a digital economy. Based on a generalized analysis of the regulatory legal framework of the Russian Federation, foreign states and existing doctrinal views, the conclusion is made about the unsystematic composition of crimes aimed at violating the legal regime of secrets protected by law and other information of limited access. The author additionally notes the need to separate eco-nomic espionage and intentional disclosure of trade secrets into separate corpus delicti. Certain shortcomings of the Russian criminal law is the lack of corpus delicti aimed at the protection of legal regimes of professional and official secrets, personal data. Taking into account changes in the attitude to the institution of adoption and global trends in the protec-tion of children's rights, the possibility of decriminalisation of the disclosure of adoption secrets in modern conditions has been argued. The above and other problems identified in Russian criminal law with regard to the protection of legally established secrets and other restricted information are aimed at improving criminal legislation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Alexander М. Smirnov ◽  
◽  

The article describes the provisions of the sources of criminal law of some foreign countries regarding the regulation of extrajudicial forms of protection of an individual’s rights and freedoms, excluding the criminality of the act. The author refers to these forms as a necessary defense, causing harm to the person who committed the crime, and extreme necessity. The article discusses the possibility of implementing the provisions of these sources in Russian criminal law to improve the state response to the implementation of these forms. The author comes to the conclusion that the most positive and constructive features of legal regulation in foreign countries, extrajudicial forms of protection of an individual’s rights and freedoms while excluding the criminality of the act, deserve scientific attention and consideration of their implementation in domestic criminal law and legal practice. The main features consist of the following: the conditions for the onset of the right to necessary defense, extreme need and infliction of harm during the detention of a person who has committed a crime, and the grounds for exceeding it; taking into account the situation when determining the legitimacy of the given circumstances; allocation of privileged conditions under which a person is either exempted from criminal liability or not exempted from it, but can count on mitigation of punishment; criminal prosecution for actions if absolutely necessary only if they have resulted in more harm than the harm prevented; regulation of legal and factual error with the necessary defense and extreme necessity; legal regulation of the conditions for the use of weapons in the implementation of these forms; holding accountable those who provoked the necessary defense; the emergence of the right to necessary defense of the person whose rights are being encroached upon.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-158
Author(s):  
Sergii Starodubov ◽  
Viktoriia Vladyshevska ◽  
Maryna Pyzhova

Public legislation has long failed to meet such large-scale challenges as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In emergencies, to protect the lives and health of the population, it is necessary to promptly make decisions on the legal regulation of public relations that have developed due to the spread of Covid-19. For this purpose, the state has created legal mechanisms that are designed to ensure compliance with the rule of law and which need the scientific-legal assessment. The objective of the work is to analyze the novelties of administrative and criminal legislation, which regulate the liability for violation of quarantine. The object of research is the norms of administrative and criminal law. The subject of the study is public relations that have developed as a result of the introduction of quarantine and which are governed by administrative and criminal law. To achieve this goal, the situation in foreign countries was firstly analyzed; general patterns were identified; alternative solutions were proposed, with a minimum restriction of human rights and freedoms. Then, the novelties of the national legislation were studied in more detail; additional specific problems were identified; and a more balanced legislative policy was proposed. As a result of the study, the current state of legal regulation in the areas of administrative and criminal law related to quarantine violations was analyzed; the liability for such offenses was characterized; some conclusions regarding the existing related problems were made and options for their solution were proposed, as well as propositions for modernization of legislation were made.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document