ANALYSIS OF THE MAIN PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL LAW NO 248-FZ DATED 31.07.2020 “ON STATE CONTROL (SUPERVISION) AND MUNICIPAL CONTROL IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION”

2020 ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Дмитрий Сергеевич Адамов ◽  
Евгений Вячеславович Козырев ◽  
Игорь Владимирович Костерин ◽  
Владимир Александрович Сорокин ◽  
Наталья Олеговна Щеголева
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

В статье рассмотрены основные положения Федерального закона от 31.07.2020 г. № 248-ФЗ «О государственном контроле (надзоре) и муниципальном контроле в Российской Федерации», который вступает в силу с 1 июля 2021 года. Проанализированы изложенные в Федеральном законе процессуальные основы осуществления государственного и муниципального контроля, акцент которых сделан на профилактические мероприятия. The article considers the main provisions of the Federal law No 248-FZ dated 31.07.2020 “On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation”, which comes into force on July 1, 2021. The article analyzes the procedural bases of state and municipal control expounded in the Law. The focus of these bases is on preventive measures.

Regulatory Guillotine in the Field of Industrial Safety

2020 ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
E.V. Klovach ◽  
◽  
A.S. Pecherkin ◽  
V.K. Shalaev ◽  
V.I. Sidorov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Industrial Safety ◽  
State Control ◽  
Regulatory Impact ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Executive Body

In Russia, the reform of the regulatory guillotine is being implemented in the field of control and supervisory activity. It should result in a new regulatory system formed according to the principles specified in the key federal laws: «On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation» (Law on Control) and «On mandatory requirements in the Russian Federation» (Law on Mandatory Requirements) adopted in August 2020. In the field of industrial safety, this process was launched by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation № 1192, which will come into force on January 1, 2021. The main provisions are discussed in the article, which are related to the Law on Control and the Law on Mandatory Requirements. The Law on Control establishes the priority of preventive measures aimed at reducing the risk of causing harm in relation to the control activities, the grounds for carrying out control (supervisory) activities, the types of these activities in the forms of interaction with the controlled person and without such, the procedure for presentation of the results of control (supervisory) activity. The Law on Mandatory Requirements establishes that the provisions of regulatory legal acts should enter into force either from March 1 or September 1, but not earlier than 90 days after their official publication, and their validity period should not exceed 6 years. The drafts of regulatory legal acts developed by the federal executive bodies are subject to regulatory impact assessment. With a view to ensuring systematization of mandatory require ments, their register is kept. The federal executive body prepares a report on the achievement of the goals of mandatory requirements introduction. By January 1, 2021, 10 resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation, 48 federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety and 9 other regulatory legal acts of Rostechnadzor should be adopted. The drafts of all the documents are already prepared, some of the acts are completing the process of discussion and approval.

Proactive Roleof Control and Supervisory Activity in the Field of Education

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
С. Феклин ◽  
S. Feklin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The City ◽  
Legal Entities

In accordance with the Federal Law No. 294-FZ of 26.12.2008 “On the Protection of the Rights of Legal Entities and Individual Entrepreneurs in the Conduct of State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control”, the warning, detection and suppression of violations by legal entities, their leaders and other offi cials, individual entrepreneurs, their authorized representatives of the requirements established by law. At the same time, the legislator did not formulate the notion and signs of “warning” in the sphere of control (supervision), did not specify the list of preventive measures, allowing the executive authorities to independently determine the odds, types, timeframes, methods and solve other problems of preventing violations of legislation by the controlled entities. The author of the articlehas analyzed the normative legal acts, studied the practice of conducting inspections in the sphere of education in the city of Moscow and other subjects of the Russian Federation, describes a possible system of preventive measures when conducting control and supervisory activities in the fi eld of education.

THE EXECUTIVE ACTION TAKEN BY THE JUDICIAL BAILIFF-EXECUTOR OUTSIDE OF ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-65
Author(s):  
I.V. SELIONOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Enforcement Action ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
Executive Action ◽  
Control Authority ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The article examines the enforcement action performed by the bailiff-executor in accordance with paragraph 16 of part 1 of Article 64 of the Law on Enforcement Proceedings – checking the correctness of the withholding and transfer of funds under the executive documents presented in the manner prescribed by part 1 of Article 8, part 1 of Article 8.1 and part 1 of Article 9 of the Law on Enforcement Proceedings. The purpose of the article is to identify the features of this action, to determine its place in the list of enforcement actions, and in general in enforcement proceedings. Based on the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that checking the correctness of withholding and transferring funds under executive documents is not an enforcement action. In this article, the author considers the specified action as an extra-executive action carried out by the bailiff-executor to control the execution by other bodies and organizations, expressed in conducting an audit in relation to the bodies directly executing the requirements of the executive document and in the event of their failure to bring them to justice. At the same time, in this article, the author considers checking the correctness of the withholding and transfer of funds under executive documents as the control authority of the bailiff, taking into account the provisions of the new Federal Law of 31 July 2020 No. 248-FZ “On State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control in the Russian Federation”. The author makes his proposals for improving the legislation of the Russian Federation on enforcement proceedings.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

Risk-oriented Model of the Organization and Implementation of the Federal State Energy Supervision

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
F.V. Matveenkov ◽  
◽  
D.A. Tolstova ◽  
O.V. Masharova ◽  
O.V. Sachkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
State Energy ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Economic Damage ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Emergency Situations ◽  
Vital Functions ◽  
The Russian Federation

Risk-oriented approach in the implementation of control (supervision) activities is an important state task that affects the country economy. As part of the implementation of the priority area of reforming control and supervision activities, the Federal Law «On the state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation» was adopted, which comes into force on July 1, 2021. In order to implement the Federal Law «On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation», it is advisable to revise the regulation on the federal state energy supervision. It is required to study the issue of taking into account the risks of causing harm (damage) to legally protected values when carrying out control (supervision) activities in relation to the subjects (objects) of the energy sector, as well as criteria for assigning it to the risk category and indicators of the risk of mandatory requirements violation. Currently, the only criterion for assigning the harm (damage) to the risk category is the dependence on the established and (or) transmitted capacity of the energy facilities used, which is nonobjective due to the changes in the normative-regulatory framework for the implementation of control and supervision activities. It is required to study the issue of categorization depending on the established (transmitted) capacity of the object, the amount of economic damage as a result of the implementation of emergency situations and (or) emergency incidents (in value terms), the number of people killed (irretrievable losses), the number of people whose vital functions were disrupted as a result of the implementation of emergency situations and (or) emergency incidents.

Control (supervisory) measures: innovations of Federal Law “On State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control in the Russian Federation”

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
O.V. Shinkareva ◽  
V.A. Dikikh
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Control Measure ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Field Inspection ◽  
Control Actions ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the analysis of the types of control measures that will be carried out in accordance with Federal Law No. 248-FZ of the “On State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control in the Russian Federation”, the main provisions of which will enter into force on July 1, 2021. This law also applies to the activities of organizations that are subject to licensing. Types of control (supervisory) measures are considered, in particular, control and monitoring procurement, inspection visit, raid inspection, documentary and field inspection, as well as monitoring compliance with mandatory requirements and field examination. The essence of each type of control measure, the basis for carrying out the measures, control actions that can be used in their implementation are analyzed.

scholarly journals Restriction of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms by the Law of the Constituent Entitity of the Russian Federation when Regulating the Sale of Non-Alcoholic Tonic Drinks

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
E. N. Doroshenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Energy Drinks ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Retail Trade ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Rights Of The Child ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Practice

A common practice of imposing various prohibitions and rules in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, owing to the need to solve acute social problems and achieve constitutionally significant goals, draws attention to the problem of restricting by the law of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation fundamental rights and freedoms of the man and citizen. Using the regulation of retail sale of non-alcoholic toning drinks as a case-study, the paper discusses the relevant legislative work, court practice, conditions and content of imposed restrictions. The laws of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation provide for prohibitions imposed on the sale of non-alcoholic tonic drinks to minors, retail trade in educational and medical organizations, as well as in places holding activities with the participation of young people and the consumption of such drinks by minors in public places. Attempts have been made to adopt a federal law with similar content, but taking into account the negative attitude of the Government of the Russian Federation and arguments concerning the absence of unambiguous scientific data with regard to the harm caused by ”energy” drinks, the State Duma rejected four draft laws. The regional laws’ analysis is carried out in the context of delineation of jurisdictions and powers between federal bodies of state power, sectoral legislative regulation and provisions consolidated in Part 3 Article 55 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Restrictions on the sale of “energy” drinks are considered within the framework of the content of the legislation regulating the protection of rights of the child, civil legislation and other legal acts, as well as legal stances of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The paper has revealed uncertainty in the interpretation of the constitutional provision restricting human rights and freedoms by the federal law, which leads to contradictions in court practice.

The Effectiveness of Control and Supervisio№ Activities i№ the Field of Education

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-28
Author(s):  
Феклин ◽  
S. Feklin ◽  
Ладнушкина ◽  
N. Ladnushkina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
Government Oversight ◽  
Municipal Employees ◽  
Effi Ciency ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Quantitative Indicators

In accordance with the Federal Law No. 294-FZ of 26.12.2008 “On the Defense of the Rights of Legal Entities and Individual Entrepreneurs in the Conduct of State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control”, annually the government oversight(supervision) authorities, the bodies of municipal control in accordance with the procedure established by the Government of the Russian Federation, prepare reports on the eff ectiveness of their activities. At the same time, the legislator did not formulate the defi nition of “eff ective control (supervision)”, and effi ciency reports are based primarily on quantitative indicators (information on state (municipal) employees, the number of inspections, the size of fi nes, a list of violations detected and prosecuted persons, information on Judicial decisions, otherwise). The authors of the article, analyzing the normative legal acts, studied the practice of conducting inspections in the sphere of education of Moscow and other subjects of the Russian Federation, set forth a scientifi c view on the effi ciency of control and supervision activity, propose a model, as well as indicators for assessing the eff ectiveness of inspections in education.

scholarly journals The right of Police officers and the Criminal-executive system to use firearms: some issues of theory and practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
A. А. Alimov ◽  
◽  
S. A. Yunusov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of the Federal Law «On the Police» and the law of the Russian Federation «On Institutions and Bodies Executing Criminal Sentences in the Form of Imprisonment», which empowers the police and the penal system with the right to use firearms. Possible problems of the implementation of the provisions of the legislation are identified, specific measures are proposed to improve the efficiency of legal regulation of the use of firearms by police officers and the penal system

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document