scholarly journals Retinopathy of Prematurity: Clinical Diagnosis and Classification.

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is an important and preventable cause of childhood blindness. For this reason, in the VISION 2020 program initiated by the World Health Organization to eliminate avoidable blindness, the control of the disease was highlighted. As the survival rate of very low birth weight infants increases in developing countries, including our country, due to improvements in neonatal care, the frequency of the disease has increased. The basic strategy for the prevention of blindness from ROP is to identify the patients requiring treatment by examining them according to a certain protocol. In this process, also called the Screening program, it is important to identify as many babies needing treatment as possible while minimizing the number of examinations. In this respect, the risk group should be well- defined, and diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment process should be done in line with a standard protocol. This review aims to give information about the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of ROP.

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy VanStone

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a persistent and often devastating morbidity associated with premature and low birth weight infants. It continues to be a frequent diagnosis in the neonatal intensive care unit, despite technologic advances and increased knowledge. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has issued practice guideline recommendations for ROP screening and treatment that aid in creating a consistent and reliable ROP protocol. Challenges exist in screening for and treating ROP, including delayed or omitted exams, lack of qualified examiners, lack of parental compliance with follow-up care, and fear of litigation. This article provides a detailed example of a successful ROP program based on the AAP recommendations and utilizing a multidisciplinary approach to ensure optimal ROP care for the preterm infant. It also discusses the role of the ROP coordinator assigned to the NICU.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 2025-2035
Author(s):  
María Sol Ruiz ◽  
María Belén Sánchez ◽  
Yuly Masiel Vera Contreras ◽  
Evangelina Agrielo ◽  
Marta Alonso ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesThe quantitation of BCR-ABL1 mRNA is mandatory for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, and RT-qPCR is the most extensively used method in testing laboratories worldwide. Nevertheless, substantial variation in RT-qPCR results makes inter-laboratory comparability hard. To facilitate inter-laboratory comparative assessment, an international scale (IS) for BCR-ABL1 was proposed.MethodsThe laboratory-specific conversion factor (CF) to the IS can be derived from the World Health Organization (WHO) genetic reference panel; however, this material is limited to the manufacturers to produce and calibrate secondary reference reagents. Therefore, we developed secondary reference calibrators, as lyophilized cellular material, aligned to the IS. Our purpose was both to re-evaluate the CF in 18 previously harmonized laboratories and to propagate the IS to new laboratories.ResultsOur field trial including 30 laboratories across Latin America showed that, after correction of raw BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratios using CF, the relative mean bias was significantly reduced. We also performed a follow-up of participating laboratories by annually revalidating the process; our results support the need for continuous revalidation of CFs. All participating laboratories also received a calibrator to determine the limit of quantification (LOQ); 90% of them could reproducibly detect BCR-ABL1, indicating that these laboratories can report a consistent deep molecular response. In addition, aiming to investigate the variability of BCR-ABL1 measurements across different RNA inputs, we calculated PCR efficiency for each individual assay by using different amounts of RNA.ConclusionsIn conclusion, for the first time in Latin America, we have successfully organized a harmonization platform for BCR-ABL1 measurement that could be of immediate clinical benefit for monitoring the molecular response of patients in low-resource regions.


Author(s):  
Praveen Indraratna ◽  
Uzzal Biswas ◽  
Jennifer Yu ◽  
Guenter Schreier ◽  
Sze-Yuan Ooi ◽  
...  

Introduction: Mobile phone-based interventions in cardiovascular disease are growing in popularity. A randomised control trial (RCT) for a novel smartphone app-based model of care, named TeleClinical Care - Cardiac (TCC-Cardiac), commenced in February 2019, targeted at patients being discharged after care for an acute coronary syndrome or episode of decompensated heart failure. The app was paired to a digital sphygmomanometer, weighing scale and a wearable fitness band, all loaned to the patient, and allowed clinicians to respond to abnormal readings. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated several modifications to the trial in order to protect participants from potential exposure to infection. The use of TCC-Cardiac during the pandemic inspired the development of a similar model of care (TCC-COVID), targeted at patients being managed at home with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods: Recruitment for the TCC-Cardiac trial was terminated shortly after the World Health Organization announced COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Telephone follow-up was commenced, in order to protect patients from unnecessary exposure to hospital staff and patients. Equipment was returned or collected by a ‘no-contact’ method. The TCC-COVID app and model of care had similar functionality to the original TCC-Cardiac app. Participants were enrolled exclusively by remote methods. Oxygen saturation and pulse rate were measured by a pulse oximeter, and symptomatology measured by questionnaire. Measurement results were manually entered into the app and transmitted to an online server for medical staff to review. Results: A total of 164 patients were involved in the TCC-Cardiac trial, with 102 patients involved after the onset of the pandemic. There were no hospitalisations due to COVID-19 in this cohort. The study was successfully completed, with only three participants lost to follow-up. During the pandemic, 5 of 49 (10%) of patients in the intervention arm were readmitted compared to 12 of 53 (23%) in the control arm. Also, in this period, 28 of 29 (97%) of all clinically significant alerts received by the monitoring team were managed successfully in the outpatient setting, avoiding hospitalisation. Patients found the user experience largely positive, with the average rating for the app being 4.56 out of 5. 26 patients have currently been enrolled for TCC-COVID. Recruitment is ongoing. All patients have been safely and effectively monitored, with no major adverse clinical events or technical malfunctions. Patient satisfaction has been high. Conclusion: The TCC-Cardiac RCT was successfully completed despite the challenges posed by COVID-19. Use of the app had an added benefit during the pandemic as participants could be monitored safely from home. The model of care inspired the development of an app with similar functionality designed for use with patients diagnosed with COVID-19.


1997 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHANIE R. BRYSON ◽  
LEA THERIOT ◽  
NELL J. RYAN ◽  
JANET POPE ◽  
NANCY TOLMAN ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 951-952
Author(s):  
LAJOS LAKATOS

To the Editor.— The letter to the editor by Johnson et al1 and studies by others regarding vitamin E prophylaxis for retinopathy of prematurity suggest that further research into the prevention of retinopathy of prematurity should not be limited to vitamin E. On the basis of clinical observations we reported that d-penicillamine treatment in the neonatal period was associated with a marked decrease in the incidence of severe retrolental fibroplasia among the very low birth weight infants.2


2010 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Dong ◽  
Shuang Pan ◽  
Li-Sha Sun ◽  
Tie-Jun Li

Abstract Context.—Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is a relatively uncommon developmental cyst comprising about 10% of cases that had been previously coded as odontogenic keratocysts. Odontogenic keratocyst was designated as keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT) in the new World Health Organization classification and OOC should be distinguished from KCOT for differences in histologic features and biologic behavior. Objective.—To analyze the clinicopathologic features of 61 cases of OOC in a Chinese population. Design.—Clinicopathologic analysis was performed on 61 cases of OOC. Immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 and p63 was evaluated in 15 OOCs and 15 typical KCOTs. Results.—The 61 patients with OOC ranged from 13 to 75 years (average, 38.93 years). The lesions developed mainly in the third and fourth decades (57.38%) with a distinct predilection for males (72.13%). Six (9.84%) lesions were found in the maxilla and 55 (90.16%) in the mandible. The most common sites were in the mandibular molar and ramus region. Of the 54 cases with radiographic record, 47 (87.04%) were unilocular and 7 (12.96%) were multilocular radiolucencies. Twenty-seven of the 54 cysts were associated with an impacted tooth. Follow-up of 42 patients revealed no recurrence during an average period of 76.8 months after surgery. Compared with KCOTs, expression level of Ki-67 and p63 was significantly lower in OOCs, suggesting a lower proliferative activity. Conclusion.—Orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst is clinicopathologically distinct from KCOT and should constitute its own clinical entity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 074-079
Author(s):  
Hasan Kucukkendirci ◽  
Fatih Kara ◽  
Gulsum Gulperi Turgut

AbstractObjective According to the 2017 report of the World Health Organization (WHO), ∼1.5 million people die from vaccine preventable diseases. The WHO is working to generate and popularize effective vaccination programs. However, the concept of “vaccine rejection,” which first started in Europe and United States, has started to make an impact in Turkey during the past 10 years. It is therefore seen as a growing danger in future. This study was conducted to determine, detect, and prevent the reasons of vaccine rejection that have increased in recent years.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and December at 2015. In all districts of Konya (n = 31), it was aimed to reach all 242 families who rejected vaccination to their 0 to 2 years old babies. Families having more than one child refused to vaccinate all of their children. A questionnaire consisting of 47 questions was prepared by the researchers, using the standard trainings of the Ministry of Health and the literature. A total of 172 families agreed to participate in this study. The questionnaire was applied to the parents using the telephone interview technique. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation and percentage.Results About 41.3% (n = 71) of the mothers were high school graduates, 50.6% (n = 87) of their fathers were university graduates. About 82.6% (n = 142) of the participants received examination, treatment and follow-up services from family physicians and family health personnel. About 20.9% (n = 36) of the children were the only children of the family. About 55.8% (n = 96) of the families also refused the vaccination for other children. About 83.7% (n = 144) of the unvaccinated children had infants/children follow-up care. While all participants stated that vaccines had side effects, 31.4% (n = 54) of these believed that vaccines cause autism or paralysis in infants. About 62.2% (n = 107) of their mothers did not receive tetanus vaccine during pregnancy. The highest rate of nonvaccination was with the second dose of hepatitis A vaccine, which 96.5% (n = 166) refused. The most accepted vaccine was the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine, which was refused by 18.0% (n = 31). About 79.7% (n = 137) of the participants did not know the reason for the vaccination and 95.9% (n = 165) thought that the vaccines were not required. All participants received information from the health personnel about the vaccines. While 9.9% (n = 17) of the families thought that vaccines cause infertility, 44.8% (n = 77) did not receive vaccination because the vaccines were produced abroad.Conclusion A growing number of families refuse to have their babies vaccinated. The production of vaccines abroad is a major cause of insecurity. There are also beliefs that vaccines cause infertility. Vaccine production in Turkey should be accelerated and public education about vaccines should be reviewed. Training provided to families about vaccines should also be reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document