scholarly journals Relationship between vitamin D levels and mortality rates of critically ill patients in intensive care unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-175
Author(s):  
Müslüm SAĞIR ◽  
Mustafa KAPLAN ◽  
Alpaslan TANOĞLU ◽  
Fevzi DEMİREL
Author(s):  
Laurence Orchard ◽  
Matthew Baldry ◽  
Myra Nasim-Mohi ◽  
Chantelle Monck ◽  
Kordo Saeed ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The pattern of global COVID-19 has caused many to propose a possible link between susceptibility, severity and vitamin-D levels. Vitamin-D has known immune modulatory effects and deficiency has been linked to increased severity of viral infections. Methods We evaluated patients admitted with confirmed SARS-COV-2 to our hospital between March-June 2020. Demographics and outcomes were assessed for those admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with normal (>50 nmol/L) and low (<50 nmol/L) vitamin-D. Results There were 646 SARS-COV-2 PCR positive hospitalisations and 165 (25.5%) had plasma vitamin-D levels. Fifty patients were admitted to ICU. There was no difference in vitamin-D levels of those hospitalised (34, IQR 18.5–66 nmol/L) and those admitted to the ICU (31.5, IQR 21–42 nmol/L). Higher proportion of vitamin-D deficiency (<50 nmol/L) noted in the ICU group (82.0 vs. 65.2%). Among the ICU patients, low vitamin D level (<50 nmol/L) was associated with younger age (57 vs. 67 years, p=0.04) and lower Cycle Threshold (CT) real time polymerase chain reaction values (RT-PCR) (26.96 vs. 33.6, p=0.02) analogous to higher viral loads. However, there were no significant differences in ICU clinical outcomes (invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury and mechanical ventilation and hospital days) between patients with low and normal vitamin-D levels. Conclusions Despite the association of low vitamin-D levels with low CT values, there is no difference in clinical outcomes in this small cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients. The complex relationship between vitamin-D levels and COVID-19 infection needs further exploration with large scale randomized controlled trials.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S303-S303
Author(s):  
Rita Alexandra Rojas-Fermin ◽  
Ann Sanchez ◽  
Anel E Guzman ◽  
Edwin Germosen ◽  
Cesar Matos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, has caused a global public health crisis. Reported mortality rates across the world vary by region, local population characteristics and healthcare systems. There is a paucity of data on COVID-19 in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Our objective is to describe the clinical characteristics of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in the Dominican Republic (DR) Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe COVID-19 from March to December 31, 2020, at a 295-bed tertiary teaching hospital in the DR. Clinical characteristics, demographics, comorbidities, management and outcomes were tabulated. Survival was categorized by age and comorbidities. Results A total of 382 patients were admitted to the ICU. The median age was 64 (range 14-97) and 64.3% (246) were male. Hypertension, diabetes, and obesity were the most common risk factors (Table 1). Corticosteroids were used in 91.6% (350), tocilizumab in 63% (82), and remdesivir in 31.6% (31). Antibacterials were used in 99.2% (379) of patients in the ICU. All-cause mortality in the ICU was 35.3% (135). Mortality was higher in older age groups (Figure 1) and in patients with multiple coexisting comorbidities (Figure 2). Table 1. Comorbidities of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU Conclusion Hypertension, obesity and diabetes were common in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in the DR. Corticosteroids and tocilizumab were commonly used. Antibacterials were used in &gt;99% of patients admitted to the ICU and may signal a target for future antimicrobial stewardship. Higher mortality rates were present in older age groups and those with multiple comorbidities. Risk of death increased drastically after age 40 and was comparative to those in advanced age groups. In patients with 4 comorbidities and above, mortality was more than three times higher. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


TH Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. e134-e138
Author(s):  
Anke Pape ◽  
Jan T. Kielstein ◽  
Tillman Krüger ◽  
Thomas Fühner ◽  
Reinhard Brunkhorst

AbstractThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has a serious impact on health and economics worldwide. Even though the majority of patients present with moderate and mild symptoms, yet a considerable portion of patients need to be treated in the intensive care unit. Aside from dexamethasone, there is no established pharmacological therapy. Moreover, some of the currently tested drugs are contraindicated for special patient populations like remdesivir for patients with severely impaired renal function. On this background, several extracorporeal treatments are currently explored concerning their potential to improve the clinical course and outcome of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Here, we report the use of the Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity filter, which is licensed in the European Union for the removal of pathogens. Authorization for emergency use in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit with confirmed or imminent respiratory failure was granted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on April 17, 2020.A 53-year-old Caucasian male with a severe COVID-19 infection was treated with a Seraph Microbind Affinity filter hemoperfusion after clinical deterioration and commencement of mechanical ventilation. The 70-minute treatment at a blood flow of 200 mL/minute was well tolerated, and the patient was hemodynamically stable. The hemoperfusion reduced D-dimers dramatically.This case report suggests that the use of Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity filter hemoperfusion might have positive effects on the clinical course of critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, future prospective collection of data ideally in randomized trials will have to confirm whether the use of Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity filter hemoperfusion is an option of the treatment for COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephana J. Moss ◽  
Krista Wollny ◽  
Therese G. Poulin ◽  
Deborah J. Cook ◽  
Henry T. Stelfox ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Informal caregivers of critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICUs) experience negative psychological sequelae that worsen after death. We synthesized outcomes reported from ICU bereavement interventions intended to improve informal caregivers’ ability to cope with grief. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2020. Study selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bereavement interventions to support informal caregivers of adult patients who died in ICU. Data extraction Two reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. Narrative synthesis was conducted. Data synthesis Bereavement interventions were categorized according to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence three-tiered model of bereavement support according to the level of need: (1) Universal information provided to all those bereaved; (2) Selected or targeted non-specialist support provided to those who are at-risk of developing complex needs; and/or (3) Professional specialist interventions provided to those with a high level of complex needs. Outcome measures were synthesized according to core outcomes established for evaluating bereavement support for adults who have lost other adults to illness. Results Three studies of ICU bereavement interventions from 31 ICUs across 26 hospitals were included. One trial examining the effect of family presence at brain death assessment integrated all three categories of support but did not report significant improvement in emotional or psychological distress. Two other trials assessed a condolence letter intervention, which did not decrease grief symptoms and may have increased symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, and a storytelling intervention that found no significant improvements in anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, or complicated grief. Four of nine core bereavement outcomes were not assessed anytime in follow-up. Conclusions Currently available trial evidence is sparse and does not support the use of bereavement interventions for informal caregivers of critically ill patients who die in the ICU.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document