scholarly journals Simulation of Stone Column Ground Improvement (Comparison between Axisymmetric and Plane Strain)

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-137
Author(s):  
Maryam Gaber ◽  
Anuar Kasa ◽  
Norinah Abdul-Rahman ◽  
Jamal Alsharef
Keyword(s):  
Plane Strain ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Stone Column

scholarly journals Comparison between unit cell and plane strain models of stone column ground improvement

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Maryam Gaber ◽  
Anuar Kasa ◽  
Norinah Abdul Rahman ◽  
Jamal Alsharef
Keyword(s):  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Plane Strain ◽  
Clayey Soil ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Unit Cell ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
The Impact

This article presents a comparative study of the behaviour of clayey soil reinforcements using stone column ground improvement by means of numerical analyses. Two-dimensional finite element analyses with commercially available software, PLAXIS, were performed on end-bearing stone columns using 15-noded triangular elements to investigate the impact of the modelling type on the stress concentration ratio and failure mechanism of an improved foundation system. Consolidation analyses were conducted throughout the study using Mohr-Coulomb’s criterion. The computed values of the stress concentration ratios were compared for different key parameters, including the diameters of stone columns, c/c spacing of columns, friction angle of stone column material, and undrained cohesion of soft soil. The major conclusions of this study were that the stone column in the unit cell model shared between 2.5 to 3.14 times more loads than the surrounding soil, whilst in the plane strain model it shared between 1.7 to 2.9 times more loads. The use of plane strain approach to model the stone column gave a more comprehensive representation of the stress distribution and load transfer between the soil and columns, in addition to being a better method than the unit cell concept to evaluate the failure mode in this system.

scholarly journals Modelling of a vacuum consolidation project in Vietnam

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-101
Author(s):  
Nguyen Trong Nghia
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Solution ◽  
Numerical Modelling ◽  
Plane Strain ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Design Tool ◽  
In Situ Monitoring ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Prefabricated Vertical Drains ◽  
Prefabricated Vertical Drain

Ground improvement technique by prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) in combination with vacuum preloading is widely used to facilitate consolidation process and reduce residual settlement. However, this technique seem hardly be estimated by both analytical method and numerical method because it has complex boundary conditions (such as vacuum pressure changing with time). Moreover, lateral displacements caused by this technique are also significant problem. Numerical modelling may be an effective design tool to estimate behavior of soft soil treated by this method, however it needs to have a proper calibration of input parameters. This paper introduces a matching scheme for selection of soil/drain properties in analytical solution and numerical modelling (axisymmetric and plane strain conditions) of a ground improvement project by using Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVD) in combination with vacuum and surcharge preloading. In-situ monitoring data from a case history of a road construction project in Vietnam was adopted in the back-analysis. Analytical solution and axisymmetric analysis can approximate well the field data meanwhile the horizontal permeability need to be adjusted in plane strain scenario to achieve good agreement. In addition, the influence zone of the ground treatment was examined. The residual settlement was investigated to justify the long-term settlement in compliance with the design code. Moreover, the degree of consolidation of non-PVD sub-layers was also studied by means of two different approaches.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Existing Cement Fly Ash Gravel pile and Encased Stone Column Composite Foundation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1197 (1) ◽  
pp. 012002
Author(s):  
N. B. Umravia ◽  
C.H. Solanki
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Pile Group ◽  
Composite Foundation ◽  
Excess Pore Pressure ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Seismic Load ◽  
Total Settlement ◽  
Lateral Behavior

Abstract The Cement Fly Ash and Gravel (CFG) Pile and Encased Stone Column (ESC) are the ground improvement techniques. The main object of the study is to the numerical analysis of the Both techniques pile group were used to support the Embankment with and without the geotextile both techniques composite foundation by the Finite Element method under static and dynamic load analysis. Numerical simulation has been carried out in Plaxis 3D. A case study from china’s highspeed embankment supported by CFG and ESC have investigated the load caring capacity by soil and pile. While the failure behaviors, settlement, excess pore pressure, and lateral behavior with variable embankment loading and number of geosynthetic effect moreover, the diameter of CFG piles and ESC at various locations in an embankment has been varied to study its influence on the load distribution among the CFG piles/ESC and lateral load displacement of the pile group. The results show that increasing the diameter of both techniques reduced the total settlement and differential settlement of embankment. It observed that the seismic load has a significant effect on the vertical and lateral displacement.

scholarly journals LIGHTWEIGHT SLAG, PFA COLUMN A NEW SOFT GROUND IMPROVEMENT METHOD

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 04-07
Author(s):  
Hafez, M. A ◽  
Sidek, H.N ◽  
Moustafa Z. Ibrahim ◽  
Almkahal, Z
Keyword(s):  
Shear Failure ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Performance Testing ◽  
Pozzolanic Reaction ◽  
Total Weight ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Power Station ◽  
Unconfined Compression Test ◽  
Curing Method

This study investigates how to reduce the demand on in non-renewable granite source, by replacing granite aggregate with boiler slag in the stone column. It is a fact that boiler slag is a power station waste material which causes too many environmental problems. By introducing it as a ground improvement technique, we can reduce the bulging and shear failure problems encountered on stone columns application by adding more improvement to the stone column mixture. For more enhancements to the mixture, pulverized fly ash (PFA) of Class F is added. By increasing the amount of PFA, the resistance of the stone column in term of shear and bearing capacity are increased as the PFA pozzolanic reaction begins to produce more strength during the increasing time of the curing period. Both samples of the boiler slag and PFA are taken from Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Power Station, Klang, Selangor. The materials mixed are sand, cement and water to make boiler slag aggregates -PFA (slag) mixture. This study aims to define the slag concrete performance according to the optimum configuration of the materials used in the mixture. Unconfined Compression Test (UCT) is applied to define the ideal ratio of boiler slag between 60% to 30% ratios from the total weight which applied with 2% ratio of cement from the total weight. The results of the study show that the number of boiler slags, the period of curing, and the method of curing are the most important factors in defining the slag stone column performance. Testing the samples in ordinary circumstances to entire areas can be accomplished by determining the soil properties and meeting them. The best result gained was the 40% ratio of boiler slag in a curing method that preserved the mixture moisture and temperature, which led to the optimum strength of the slag stone column.

scholarly journals Settlement Behaviour of Soft Soil Reinforced with Geogrid Encased Stone Column under Sustained Loading

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1307-1311
Keyword(s):  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Replacement Ratio ◽  
Sustained Loading ◽  
Settlement Behavior ◽  
Column Material ◽  
Area Replacement Ratio ◽  
Different Diameters

The use of stone columns in improving the bearing capacity of soft soil is well researched, but the understanding of settlement requires further studies. This paper presents the results of a series of laboratory tests carried out to study the settlement behavior of soft soil bed reinforced with ordinary stone column (OSC) and Geogrid encased stone columns (GESC). Kaolin was used as the soft soil and stones of size from 2.5 to 10 mm were used as column material. The stone columns of four different diameters were installed, by the method of replacement, into the soil having undrained shear strength of 22.5 kPa. The OSC and GESC test beds were subjected to pressure of 250 and 300 kPa. Each pressure was sustained for 24 hours and the settlement of the composite soil with time was noted. It is found that Geogrid encased stone columns have small settlement than the corresponding ordinary stone columns. The SRR (settlement reduction ratio) being a measure of ground improvement, is found increasing with the area replacement ratio. Further, at a particular sustained pressure SRR is found more for GESC than the corresponding value for OSC.

scholarly journals Settlement Behaviour of Soft Clay Bed Reinforced with Stone Column under Sustained Loading

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1744-1749
Keyword(s):  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Soft Clay ◽  
Reinforced Soil ◽  
Sustained Load ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Sustained Loading ◽  
Settlement Behavior ◽  
High Area ◽  
Area Replacement Ratio

This research paper investigates the behaviour of soft clay reinforced with stone column under sustained loading. Experiments were conducted in the laboratory on stone column reinforced prepared soft soil bed of kaolin having strength of 7.5 kPa with aggregate of size 2.5 to 10 mm as column material. The stone column with four diameters of 38.1, 50.8, 63.5 and 76.2mm were constructed which correspond to low to high area replacements ratios (i.e. 6.93% - 26.49%). The plain and reinforced soft clay beds were subjected to a sustained load of 150, 200, 250 and 300 kPa where each applied load has been maintained for 24 hours and the settlement behavior of composite ground was taken into account. The test results represent the settlement of reinforced soil bed decreases with increase of column diameters. The settlement reduction ratio is a measure of ground improvement which increases with area replacement ratio. The experimental and theoretical results values were compared as per IS15284 (Part 1): 2003 with reference of stress concentration ratio ‘n’(The ratio of stress in the column to the stress of surrounding ground area). The % variation in theoretical and experimental results is in the range of 50% and therefore the theoretical procedure needs to be revised.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document