scholarly journals Bacterial bloodstream infections in level-I trauma intensive care unit in Serbia: incidence, causative agents and outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1079-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivera Djuric ◽  
Ljiljana Markovic-Denic ◽  
Bojan Jovanovic ◽  
Snezana Jovanovic ◽  
Vuk Marusic ◽  
...  

Introduction: We aimed to describe incidence, outcomes and antimicrobial resistance markers of causative agents of bacterial BSI in the intensive care unit (ICU) in a trauma center in Serbia. Methodology: Prospective surveillance was conducted from November 2014 to April 2016 in two trauma-surgical ICUs of the Emergency Department of Clinical center of Serbia. Bloodstream infections were diagnosed using the definitions of Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Results: Out of 406 trauma patients, 57 had at least one episode of BSI (cumulative incidence 14.0%). Overall 62 BSI episodes were diagnosed (incidence rate 11.8/1000 patient/days), of which 43 (69.4%) were primary BSI (13 catheter-related BSI and 30 of unknown origin) and 19 (30.6%) were secondary BSI. The most common isolated pathogen was Acinetobacter spp. [n = 24 (34.8%)], followed by Klebsiella spp. [n = 17 (24.6%)] and P. aeruginosa [n = 8 (1.6%)]. All S. aureus [n = 6 (100%)] and CoNS [n = 3 (100%)] isolates were methicillin resistant, while 4 (66%) of Enterococci isolates were vacomycin resistant. All isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins [n = 22 (100%)] while 7 (87.5%) of P. aeruginosa and 23 (95.8%) of Acinetobacter spp. isolates were resistant to carbapenems. All-cause mortality and sepsis were significantly higher in trauma patients with BSI compared to those without BSI (P < 0.001 each). Conclusions: BSI is a common healthcare-associated infection in trauma ICU and it is associated with worse outcome. Better adherence to infection control measures and guidelines for prevention of primary BSI must be achieved.

This case focuses on reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) by asking the question: Can rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections be reduced by implementing a safety initiative involving five simple infection-control measures by ICU staff? Implementation of a safety initiative involving five simple infection-control measures by ICU staff was associated with a substantial reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections. While it is not certain that the safety initiative—rather than other factors—was responsible for the observed reduction, the study provides strong evidence that this safety initiative should be implemented widely.


Author(s):  
Michael E. Hochman

This chapter provides a summary of the landmark study known as the Keystone ICU Project. Can rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections be reduced by implementing a safety initiative involving five simple infection-control measures by intensive care unit (ICU) staff? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, year study began, year study was published, study location, who was studied, who was excluded, how many patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, gives a summary and discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case on reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU.


This case focuses on reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) by asking the question: Can rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections be reduced by implementing a safety initiative involving five simple infection-control measures by ICU staff? Implementation of a safety initiative involving five simple infection-control measures by ICU staff was associated with a substantial reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections. While it is not certain that the safety initiative—rather than other factors—was responsible for the observed reduction, the study provides strong evidence that this safety initiative should be implemented widely.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Xiaocui Zou ◽  
Boting Zhou ◽  
Tao Yin

Abstract Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is an increasing globally threat for human health, but the trends and clinical characteristics of CRKP infections in the intensive care unit(ICU) remain uninvestigated.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among ICU patients infected with KP isolates from January 2012 to December 2018. Carbapenem resistant to Klebsiella pneumoniae was defined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. The incidence and changing trend of CRKP were determined. CRKP patient sources, specimen types, infection sources and outcomes were investigated. Results: There were 256(40.13%) patients with CRKP and 382(59.87%) patients with CSKP. The incidence of CRKP increased from 2012(11.11%) to 2017(63.48%) and decreased in 2018(51.52%). The proportion of isolates not susceptible to three carbapenems increased from 0 to 98.04%. The rates of CRKP isolated from blood, wound, urine and pleural fluid were higher than that of CSKP. CRKP infections were mainly ICU acquired, rather than input acquired. Conclusion: The incidence of CRKP was high in ICU, but showed a downward trend. Implementation of different infection control measures to different sources of patients, specimen types, and KP infections are necessary. Surveillance data will be needed for ICU patients to decrease the incidence and mortality of CRKP.


2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hend Hanna ◽  
Jan Umphrey ◽  
Jeffrey Tarrand ◽  
Michelle Mendoza ◽  
Issam Raad

AbstractBetween November 1996 and February 1997, 17 episodes of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection or colonization (9 infections, 8 colonizations), all with the same or a similar genomic DNA pattern, were identified in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) of a tertiary-care cancer hospital. The cases were genotypically traced to a patient who was admitted to the hospital in September 1996 and who, by December 1996, had four different admissions to the MICU. Multifaceted infection control measures, including decontamination of the environment and of nondisposable equipment, halted the nosocomial transmission of VRE in the MICU.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 953-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Petignat ◽  
Patrick Francioli ◽  
Immaculée Nahimana ◽  
Aline Wenger ◽  
Jacques Bille ◽  
...  

Background.In 1998, a study in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our institution suggested possible transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from faucet to patient and from patient to patient. Infection-control measures were implemented to reduce the degree ofP. aeruginosacolonization in faucets, to reduce the use of faucet water in certain patient care procedures, and to reduce the rate of transmission from patient to patient.Objective.To evaluate the effect of the control measures instituted in 1999 to preventP. aeruginosainfection and colonization in ICU patients.Design.Prospective, molecular, epidemiological investigation.Setting.A 870-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary care teaching hospital.Methods.The investigation was performed in a manner identical to the 1998 investigation. ICU patients with a clinical specimen positive forP. aeruginosawere identified prospectively. Swab specimens from the inner part of the ICU faucets were obtained for the culture on 9 occasions between September 1997 and December 2000. All patients and environmental isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).Results.Compared with the 1998 study, in 2000 we found that the annual incidence of ICU patients colonized or infected withP. aeruginosahad decreased by half (26.6 patients per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 59.0 patients per 1,000 admissions in 1998), although the populations of patients were comparable. This decrease was the result of the decreased incidence of cases in which an isolate had a PFGE pattern identical to that of an isolate from a faucet (7.0 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000, vs 23.6 per 1,000 admissions in 1998) or from another patient (6.5 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 16.5 cases per 1,000 admissions in 1998), whereas the incidence of cases in which the isolate had a unique PFGE pattern remained nearly unchanged (13.1 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 15.6 cases per 1,000 admissions in 1998).Conclusions.These results suggest that infection control measures were effective in decreasing the rate ofP. aeruginosacolonization and infection in ICU patients, confirming thatP. aeruginosastrains were of exogenous origin in a substantial proportion of patients during the preintervention period.


2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 1166-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
TherÈSe M. Duane ◽  
Holly Brown ◽  
C. Todd Borchers ◽  
Luke G. Wolfe ◽  
Ajai K. Malhotra ◽  
...  

We evaluated the benefit of a central venous line (CVL) protocol on bloodstream infections (BSIs) and outcome in a trauma intensive care unit (ICU) population. We prospectively compared three groups: Group 1 (January 2003 to June 2004) preprotocol; Group 2 (July 2004 to June 2005) after the start of the protocol that included minimizing CVL use and strict universal precautions; and Group 3 (July 2005 to December 2006) after the addition of a line supply cart and nursing checklist. There were 1622 trauma patients admitted to the trauma ICU during the study period of whom 542 had a CVL. Group 3 had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) compared with both Groups 2 and 1 (28.3 ± 13.0 vs 23.5 ± 11.7 vs 22.8 ± 12.0, P = 0.0002) but had a lower BSI rate/1000 line days (Group 1:16.5; Group 2:15.0; Group 3: 7.7). Adjusting for ISS group, three had shorter ICU length of stay (LOS) compared with Group 1 (12.11 ± 1.46 vs 18.16 ± 1.51, P = 0.01). Logistic regression showed ISS ( P = 0.04; OR, 1.025; CI, 1.001-1.050) and a lack of CVL protocol ( P = 0.01; OR, 0.31; CI, 0.13-0.76) to be independent predictors of BSI. CVL protocols decrease both BSI and LOS in trauma patients. Strict enforcement by a nurse preserves the integrity of the protocol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document