The epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in the intensive care unit from 2012 to 2018

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Xiaocui Zou ◽  
Boting Zhou ◽  
Tao Yin
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Changing Trend ◽  
Different Sources

Abstract Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is an increasing globally threat for human health, but the trends and clinical characteristics of CRKP infections in the intensive care unit(ICU) remain uninvestigated.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among ICU patients infected with KP isolates from January 2012 to December 2018. Carbapenem resistant to Klebsiella pneumoniae was defined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria. The incidence and changing trend of CRKP were determined. CRKP patient sources, specimen types, infection sources and outcomes were investigated. Results: There were 256(40.13%) patients with CRKP and 382(59.87%) patients with CSKP. The incidence of CRKP increased from 2012(11.11%) to 2017(63.48%) and decreased in 2018(51.52%). The proportion of isolates not susceptible to three carbapenems increased from 0 to 98.04%. The rates of CRKP isolated from blood, wound, urine and pleural fluid were higher than that of CSKP. CRKP infections were mainly ICU acquired, rather than input acquired. Conclusion: The incidence of CRKP was high in ICU, but showed a downward trend. Implementation of different infection control measures to different sources of patients, specimen types, and KP infections are necessary. Surveillance data will be needed for ICU patients to decrease the incidence and mortality of CRKP.

scholarly journals Spread of Carbapenemase Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in Our Hospital: Investigation of Molecular Typing and Clonal Relationship

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reyhan Kiş ◽  
Ebru Demiray Gündüz ◽  
Ayşe Nur Sarı ◽  
Zeynep Gülay
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Clonal Relationship ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

Objective: Carbapenem resistance has been reported with increasing frequency among members of Enterobacterales, especially in the last 10 years. Screening and detection of carbapenemase-producing isolates is important in terms of both directing the treatment and preventing its spread. In our study, it was aimed to determine the carbapenemase types and molecular epidemiological relationships of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, which were isolated sequentially from the samples sent to microbiology laboratory of our hospital. Method: A total of 32 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates of the samples sent to microbiology laboratory between July and September 2014, were included in the study. In addition to classical methods, identification of isolates at species level was made with BD Phoenix ID/AST automated system. Carbapenemase types (blaOXA-48, blaNDM, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaVIM and blaGES) of the isolates were investigated by PCR. The clonal relationship between the isolates was assessed with PFGE. Results: It was noted that 18 isolates were obtained from intensive care units, 9 from inpatient and 5 from outpatient departments. The blaOXA48 gene was found in all isolates while the other carbapenemase genes were not found. It was determined that strains were isolated from 32 patients in our hospital had 12 different PFGE pulsotypes, named as A-L. Among these, the most common ones were B (n=18) and closely related B1 pattern (n=2). The remaining isolates were represented by 11 different types. It was observed that the first isolate with B pulsotype was responsible for the spread of the outbreak from General Intensive Care Unit. Conclusion: It has been thought that the spread of carbapenem- resistant K. pneumoniae isolates in the hospital was probably occurred through the transfer of isolates from patients with gastrointestinal colonization to other patients through hospital staff. Therefore, the spread of the isolates in hospitals can be limited by detecting colonization with active surveillance programs and by applying contact isolation and effective infection control measures.

Exogenous Sources ofPseudomonas aeruginosain Intensive Care Unit Patients Implementation of Infection Control Measures and Follow-Up With Molecular Typing

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 953-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Petignat ◽  
Patrick Francioli ◽  
Immaculée Nahimana ◽  
Aline Wenger ◽  
Jacques Bille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Clinical Specimen ◽  
Pfge Pattern ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Infection Control Measures ◽  
Exogenous Origin

Background.In 1998, a study in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our institution suggested possible transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from faucet to patient and from patient to patient. Infection-control measures were implemented to reduce the degree ofP. aeruginosacolonization in faucets, to reduce the use of faucet water in certain patient care procedures, and to reduce the rate of transmission from patient to patient.Objective.To evaluate the effect of the control measures instituted in 1999 to preventP. aeruginosainfection and colonization in ICU patients.Design.Prospective, molecular, epidemiological investigation.Setting.A 870-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary care teaching hospital.Methods.The investigation was performed in a manner identical to the 1998 investigation. ICU patients with a clinical specimen positive forP. aeruginosawere identified prospectively. Swab specimens from the inner part of the ICU faucets were obtained for the culture on 9 occasions between September 1997 and December 2000. All patients and environmental isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).Results.Compared with the 1998 study, in 2000 we found that the annual incidence of ICU patients colonized or infected withP. aeruginosahad decreased by half (26.6 patients per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 59.0 patients per 1,000 admissions in 1998), although the populations of patients were comparable. This decrease was the result of the decreased incidence of cases in which an isolate had a PFGE pattern identical to that of an isolate from a faucet (7.0 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000, vs 23.6 per 1,000 admissions in 1998) or from another patient (6.5 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 16.5 cases per 1,000 admissions in 1998), whereas the incidence of cases in which the isolate had a unique PFGE pattern remained nearly unchanged (13.1 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2000 vs 15.6 cases per 1,000 admissions in 1998).Conclusions.These results suggest that infection control measures were effective in decreasing the rate ofP. aeruginosacolonization and infection in ICU patients, confirming thatP. aeruginosastrains were of exogenous origin in a substantial proportion of patients during the preintervention period.

scholarly journals An Outbreak of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae of K57 Capsular Serotype in an Emergency Intensive Care Unit of a Teaching Hospital in China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhong Shao ◽  
Yan Jin ◽  
Shuang Liu ◽  
Meijie Jiang ◽  
Shuping Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Galleria Mellonella ◽  
Pulse Field ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Surrounding Environment ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance Genes ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

Abstract Background: Klebsiella pneumoniae is a common causative pathogen of nosocomial infections. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (CR-hvKP) strains has further increased the threat posed by this bacterium. Here, we described an outbreak of 32 CR-hvKP isolates from the emergency intensive care unit (EICU) of a teaching hospital in China. Methods: From January 29, 2019 to March 11, 2019, 32 CRKp isolates were collected from 6 patients and their surrounding environment in EICU. Patient information including age, gender, length of EICU stay, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. The isolates were identified using Vitek-MS system. The hypermucoviscosity phenotype was determined by the “string test”. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using VITEK 2 compact system, E-test or the broth microdilution method. All isolates were serotyped for K1, K2, K5, K20, K54, and K57 serotypes, antimicrobial resistance genes and twelve virulence-associated genes were screened using PCR and DNA sequencing. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were employed to characterize the genetic relationships among the CPKP isolates. The virulence capability of 11 CRKp isolates from 6 patients was evaluated through Galleria mellonella larva infection assay. Results: This outbreak involved 6 patients and lasted for 40 days. All 32 CR-hvKp isolates were obtained from 6 patients and their surrounding environment. PFGE showed that all 32 isolates belonged to one cluster, and MLST revealed that belonged to ST11. All isolates exhibited high resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, quinolones, and aminoglycosides. They were susceptible to ceftazidime/averbatan, tigecycline, and colistin. All 32 isolates harbored multiple resistance determinants, including blaKPC-2, blaSHV-11, blaTEM-1, rmtB, and qnrD. The serotype of all 32 isolates was K57 that was rarely reported. In the virulence gene analysis, all 32 isolates contained 6 virulence genes, namely, fimH, iucB, mrkD, rmpA, uge, and wabG. Infection assays demonstrated high mortality in the Galleria mellonella model. Following measures implemented by the hospital, the outbreak was controlled. The mortality rate was 83.3%.Conclusions: The epidemiology of CR-hvKP should be monitored closely to detect early indications of this emerging public health threat.

Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Outbreak in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Risk Factors for Mortality

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meltem Bor ◽  
Ozkan Ilhan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Congenital Anomalies ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Antifungal Use ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Aim The aim of our study was to determine the factors associated with mortality in neonates with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). Material and methods This retrospective, single-center study was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Harran University Faculty of Medicine between January 2017 and July 2018 who had CRKP growth in their blood, urine or cerebrospinal fluid cultures. The discharged group was designated as the control group (Group 1), whereas the group that faced mortality was classified as the case group (Group 2). The demographic data, clinical findings and laboratory and microbiological results of the two groups were compared to identify risk factors. Results A total of 58 patients (36 in Group 1 and 22 in Group 2) exhibited CRKP growth during the study period. Low birth weight (p = 0.039), previous antifungal (p = 0.002) or amikacin use (p = 0.040), congenital anomalies (p = 0.002), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) administration (p = 0.002), surgery (p = 0.035), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.007), low platelet mass index (p = 0.011), elevated C-reactive protein (p = 0.004), high carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (p = 0.029) and high amikacin MIC (p = 0.019) were associated with mortality. In a multivariate regression analysis, previous antifungal use (p = 0.028), congenital anomalies (p = 0.032) and TPN use (p = 0.013) were independent factors in predicting mortality. Conclusion Previous antifungal use, congenital anomalies and TPN use were found to be independent risk factors for mortality in neonates with CRKP infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document