scholarly journals Use of peripheral blood transcriptomic biomarkers to distinguish high‑grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions from low‑grade lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 2280-2290
Author(s):  
Cunhua Zou ◽  
Yali Lyu ◽  
Jing Jiang ◽  
Yuan Cao ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

scholarly journals Colposcopic characteristics and Lugol׳s staining differentiate anal high-grade and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions during high resolution anoscopy

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Jay ◽  
J. Michael Berry ◽  
Christine Miaskowski ◽  
Misha Cohen ◽  
Elizabeth Holly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

Evaluation of cytologic screening results of the cervix

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-294
Author(s):  
S. Yalti ◽  
B. GÜRBÜZ ◽  
R. Bilgiç ◽  
Y. ÇAKAR ◽  
S. Eren
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Carcinoma ◽  
Precancerous Lesions ◽  
Histologic Examination ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Cytologic Diagnosis ◽  
Histologic Diagnosis ◽  
Papanicolaou Smear ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively cytologic screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix and to research whether biopsy is overused among women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). We examined 28 469 smears obtained over 5 years. The patients were referred when the result of the smear was abnormal for a colposcopic biopsy, endocervical curettage, or a repeat Papanicolaou smear. The results of the screening of 28 469 smears are as follows: 699 (2.45%) ASCUS, 67 (0.23%) low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL), 43 (0.15%) high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL), 1 epidermoid carcinoma, 31 (0.10%) atypical glandular cells, and 1 adenocarcinoma. Histologic examination of the cervix was done in 119 patients (17.0%) of ASCUS, 13 patients (10.9%) of LGSIL, and 15 patients (12.6%) of HGSIL and cervical carcinoma. In the 119 women with histological examination, histologic examination was generally performed in patients with ASCUS neoplastic Papanicolaou smear, and histologic diagnosis of low-grade, high-grade, or invasive lesion of the cervix was made in 23.5% of women with ASCUS; in these patients, 46.4% were cytologic LGSIL and 53.5 % were cytologic HGSIL and cervical carcinoma. In the aspect of these findings, we concluded that for patients with a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS, more aggressive interventions should be performed

Association of Bacterial Vaginosis and Human Papilloma Virus Infection With Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wissam Dahoud ◽  
Claire W Michael ◽  
Hamza Gokozan ◽  
Amelia K Nakanishi ◽  
Aparna Harbhajanka
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Vaginosis ◽  
Human Papilloma Virus Infection ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Papilloma Virus ◽  
Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

ABSTRACT Objectives Human papillomavirus (HPV) is known to be associated with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). However, there is limited and conflicting literature on the relationship between bacterial vaginosis (BV) and SIL. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of BV and evaluate the association between BV and SIL. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 10,546 cases between 2012 and 2017. HPV results were available in 7,081 cases. Results BV was present in 17.6% of cases. There was significant association between BV, positive HPV infection, and high-grade SIL. BV patients with negative HPV infection showed more squamous abnormalities than BV-negative HPV-negative patients. Conclusions We found there is a significant association between BV and SIL. BV is more common among patients with HPV infection and is independently associated with squamous abnormalities in cervical smears and surgical follow-up.

scholarly journals Critical Analyses of the Introduction of Liquid-Based Cytology in a Public Health Service of the State of São Paulo, Brazil

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adhemar Longatto-Filho ◽  
José Eduardo Levi ◽  
Toni Ricardo Martins ◽  
Diane Cohen ◽  
Lise Cury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
The State ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Squamous Cells ◽  
Liquid Based Cytology ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the current conventional Pap smear with liquid-based cytology (LBC) preparations. Study Design: Women routinely undergoing their cytopathological and histopathological examinations at Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo (FOSP) were recruited for LBC. Conventional smears were analyzed from women from other areas of the State of São Paulo with similar sociodemographic characteristics. Results: A total of 218,594 cases were analyzed, consisting of 206,999 conventional smears and 11,595 LBC. Among the conventional smears, 3.0% were of unsatisfactory preparation; conversely, unsatisfactory LBC preparations accounted for 0.3%. The ASC-H (atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) frequency did not demonstrate any differences between the two methods. In contrast, the incidence of ASC-US (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) was almost twice as frequent between LBC and conventional smears, at 2.9 versus 1.6%, respectively. An equal percentage of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were observed for the two methods, but not for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, which were more significantly observed in LBC preparations than in conventional smears (2.2 vs. 0.7%). The index of positivity was importantly enhanced from 3.0% (conventional smears) to 5.7% (LBC). Conclusions: LBC performed better than conventional smears, and we are truly confident that LBC can improve public health strategies aimed at reducing cervical lesions through prevention programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document