scholarly journals The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor determines the efficacy of post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy using oral fluoropyrimidines in stage II or III colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Ogata ◽  
Keiko Matono ◽  
Tomoaki Mizobe ◽  
Nobuya Ishibashi ◽  
Shinjiro Mori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Oral Fluoropyrimidines ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Preoperative Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels as a Prognostic Marker for Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. CGM.S7113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgur Kemik ◽  
Ahu Sarbay Kemik ◽  
Aziz Sümer ◽  
Sevim Purisa ◽  
A. Cumhur Dulger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Background The aim of the present study was to determine whether serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can provide prognostic information independent of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients undergoing curative surgery. Methods Serum samples were collected from 158 patients with colorectal cancer and from 100 controls. Serum and tissue levels of VEGF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum VEGF levels in colorectal cancer patients were compared with those in healthy controls, and we retrospectively assessed the association between serum VEGF levels and clinicopathologic findings and survival. Results VEGF expression was significantly higher in colorectal cancer tissue compared with nontumor tissue. Mean serum VEGF levels in patients were significantly higher than those in controls, and significantly higher in patients with large tumors, lymph node involvement, and distant metastases. Conclusion Elevated serum VEGF was significantly associated with poor survival, but was only an independent risk factor for poor survival in Stage II and/or III disease. Elevated serum VEGF is significantly associated with development of colorectal cancer, and lymph or distant invasive phenotypes and survival, especially in Stage II and III patients.

Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Tai-woong Jo ◽  
Sung-Chul Lim ◽  
Sungsoo Kim ◽  
Young-Don Min ◽  
Kyung-Jong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

A novel approach for the discrimination of culture medium from Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) overexpressing colorectal cancer cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinem Tunçer ◽  
Rafig Gurbanov
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Ftir Spectroscopy ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Lower Amount ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Cells ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

AbstractObjectivesThe expression level of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is assumed as a prognostic marker for several tumor types, including colorectal cancer. Therefore, the determination of pre- and post-therapy levels of VEGF appears to have great value in the assessment of tumor prognosis. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) is commonly used for the determination of serum or plasma VEGF levels, but the method is costly and time-consuming. In this study, we aimed to describe a rapid and cost-effective analysis method to discriminate VEGF overexpressing colorectal cancer-derived conditioned medium (CM).MethodsAttenuated Total Reflection (ATR)-Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), was used to differentiate VEGF overexpressing colorectal cancer cell line CM from CM obtained from the corresponding control cells which express and secrete relatively lower amount of VEGF.ResultsSamples belong to VEGF overexpressing colorectal cancer cells were clearly distinguished from the control group with very high PC scores as PC1 + PC2 = 96%. Besides, a 100% accurate distinction between these two groups was achieved by the LDA analysis.ConclusionsATR-FTIR spectroscopy combined with pattern recognition techniques was able to discriminate CM of VEGF overexpressing colorectal cancer cells with high efficiency and accuracy.

scholarly journals MicroRNAs miR-1 and miR-206 Regulate Monocarboxylate Transporter-4 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Anas Khaleel ◽  
Rowan AlEjielat ◽  
Cristina I. Batarseh ◽  
Abdallah Ahmed Elbakkoush ◽  
Amneh Tarkhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Monocarboxylate Transporter ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Web Tool ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Monocarboxylate Transporter 4

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently the third most common cancer type in males and the second most occurring in females. The role of microRNA (miRNA) in the development of colorectal cancer is not fully elucidated. Therefore, understanding the mechanistic interaction between miRNA and their target oncogenes may hold great importance as a possible target for interventional anticancer therapy. Aims: To identify miRNAs that are part of the regulating pathway of Monocarboxylate Transporter-4 (MCT4) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) oncogenes. Study Design: We used publicly available prediction tools (e.g. TargetScan, MicroCosm, PicTar, and DIANA-microT-CDS) to identify the possible miRNA that target the two oncogenes. Methodology: We used the GeneMania database to visualize the network and verify gene names and remove ambiguity and duplications.  Furthermore, we used miRTarBase database to identify experimentally validated targets which we used to further confirm miRNA-oncogene relationships.  Finally, we utilized miR-Mfold web-tool to further visualize the circular structures and the simulated miR-1 and miR-206 targeting arrangements. Results: We found two putative miRNA (miR-1 and miR-206) that may downregulate MCT4 coded by SLC16A3 gene and VEGF which is coded by VEGF gene. We found relationships between the validated target genes of miR-1 and miR-206 through GeneMania which we extracted from the literature. And we elucidated the proposed structure of these two miRNAs through miR-Mfold web-tool. Conclusion: Our results elucidated a novel regulation pathway in CRC cells and may suggest a potential therapeutic approach for CRC therapy. MiR-1 and miR-206 may help cells go to apoptosis and inhibit the angiogenesis of colorectal cancer cells by down-regulation of MCT4 and VEGF proteins in tumor tissues.

scholarly journals Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Plus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Dual Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Synergy or Antagonism?

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

There has been an intensive effort to develop novel therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies panitumumab and cetuximab and the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab have demonstrated clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity in the treatment of mCRC as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. Recent clinical trials have explored the efficacy and safety of treatment regimens incorporating chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab and either panitumumab or cetuximab in patients with mCRC. Results from the BOND-2 trial, which investigated cetuximab, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy in mCRC, provided support for this therapeutic approach. Two large randomized phase 3 trials were initiated to evaluate firstline treatment of mCRC. The Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation (PACCE) study investigated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab with or without panitumumab; CAIRO2 assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/oxaliplatin and bevacizumab with or without cetuximab. In both trials, the combination of bevacizumab, an EGFR-specific antibody, and chemotherapy in first-line treatment of mCRC was associated with increased toxicity and no improvement in patient outcome. These results suggest that these specific combinations should not be used in first-line mCRC outside investigational studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document