Comparison of the multigene panel test and OncoScan™ for the determination of HER2 amplification in breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaori Akazawa ◽  
Naofumi Kagara ◽  
Yoshiaki Sota ◽  
Daisuke Motooka ◽  
Shota Nakamura ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Bi ◽  
Brent Rexer ◽  
Carlos L. Arteaga ◽  
Mingsheng Guo ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
pp. 108-114
Author(s):  
Adriana Plata ◽  
María Mercedes Torres ◽  
Rocío López ◽  
Rafael E. Andrade

Objectives: To determine the status of the HER2 amplification in Breast cancer performed in peripheral laboratories in Colombia by immunohistochemistry and its comparison with central laboratories and the FISH status. Methods: Four thousand one hundred and five cases referred for the determination of the HER2 status by FISH and/or IHQ to the Department of Pathology of the Fundacion Santa Fe were studied. The analysis included correlation between the IHQ HER2 score submitted by the peripheral laboratory (PL), the HER2 score emitted in the LC and the FISH studies performed in the central laboratory (CL). Results: two thousand five hundred and eight HER2 IHQ studies were performed in the (CL), using the Dako Herceptest. With the following results: 68.2 % negative (0-1+); 16.4% indeterminate (2+); 15.3% 3+ and 2.3 % not adequate. 1360/ 1719 cases studied by FISH came from the (PL), and 329 (19.1%) from the (Lc). Comparing the IHQ score emitted by the PL and the positive FISH status showed: 6/28 0+ were positive (21.4%); 7/31 1+ (22.5%); 397/1.240 2+ (32.8%) and 74/91 3+ (81.3%). In the CL the results were 1/9 0+ (11.1%); 3/18 1+ (16.7%); 154/292 2+ (53.0%); and 9/9 3+ (100%). Only 1/4 negative cases (0/1+) was in house. Conclusion: The false negative rate (22.0%), and false positive results (18.7%), of the HER2 status performed by IHQ in peripheral laboratories in Colombia is unacceptable high as well as the inadequacy of tissue indicating that pre-analytical factors have to be improved in Colombia in order to get optimal results


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 238146831882110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Asphaug ◽  
Hans Olav Melberg

Background. Expansion of routine genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer from conventional BRCA testing to a multigene test could improve diagnostic yield and increase the opportunity for cancer prevention in both identified carriers and their relatives. We use an economic decision model to assess whether the current knowledge on non- BRCA mutation prevalence, cancer risk, and patient preferences justifies switching to a multigene panel for testing of early-onset breast cancer patients. Methods. We evaluated routine testing by BRCA testing, a 7-gene panel, and a 14-gene panel using individual-level simulations of annual health state transitions over a lifetime perspective. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence is reduced and posttreatment survival is improved when high-risk mutations are detected and risk-reducing treatment offered. Most model inputs were synthesized from published literature. Intermediate health outcomes included breast and ovarian cancer incidence rates, along with organ-specific cancer mortality. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were health sector costs and quality-adjusted life years. Results. Intermediate health outcomes improved by testing with multigene panels. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of $77,000, a 7-gene panel test with five non- BRCA genes was the optimal strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $53,310 per quality-adjusted life year compared to BRCA-only testing. Limitations. Unable to stratify carriers to specific mutations within genes, we can only make predictions on the gene level, with combined risk estimates for known variants. As mutation prevalence is the absolute upper bound of returns to more expansive testing, the rarity of modelled mutations makes analysis outcomes sensitive to model implementation. Conclusions. A 7-gene panel to diagnose hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in early-onset breast cancer patients can be a cost-effective alternative to current BRCA-only testing in Norway.


Heliyon ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e07558
Author(s):  
Yahdiana Harahap ◽  
Athalia Theda Tanujaya ◽  
Farhan Nurahman ◽  
Aurelia Maria Vianney ◽  
Denni Joko Purwanto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document