scholarly journals Use of Lipid-lowering Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-based Cohort Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1082-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharath Manu Akkara Veetil ◽  
Elena Myasoedova ◽  
Eric L. Matteson ◽  
Sherine E. Gabriel ◽  
Cynthia S. Crowson
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
General Population ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Lipid Testing ◽  
Lipid Lowering Agents

Objective.Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Lipid-lowering therapy is reportedly underused in patients with RA. Longitudinal cohort studies comparing use of lipid-lowering medications in patients with RA versus the general population are lacking.Methods.Cardiovascular risk factors, lipid measures, and use of lipid-lowering agents were assessed in a population-based inception cohort of patients with RA and a cohort of non-RA subjects followed from January 1, 1988, to December 31, 2008. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII) guidelines were assessed at the time of each lipid measure throughout followup. Time from meeting guidelines to initiation of lipid-lowering agents was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods.Results.The study population included 412 RA and 438 non-RA patients with ≥ 1 lipid measure during followup and no prior use of lipid-lowering agents. Rates of lipid testing were lower among patients with RA compared to non-RA subjects. Among patients who met NCEP ATPIII criteria for lipid-lowering therapy (n = 106 RA; n = 120 non-RA), only 27% of RA and 26% of non-RA subjects initiated lipid-lowering agents within 2 years of meeting the guidelines for initiation.Conclusion.There was substantial undertreatment in both the RA and the non-RA cohorts who met NCEP ATPIII criteria for initiation of lipid-lowering agents. Patients with RA did not have as frequent lipid testing as individuals in the general population.

scholarly journals Rheumatoid Arthritis and Cardiovascular Risk: Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis Based on the RECORD Study of the Italian Society for Rheumatology

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Argnani ◽  
Anna Zanetti ◽  
Greta Carrara ◽  
Ettore Silvagni ◽  
Giulio Guerrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
General Population ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
World Population ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Therapy

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increase in cardiovascular (CV) risk. This issue maybe not only explained by a genetic component, as well as by the traditional CV risk factors, but also by an underestimation and undertreatment of concomitant CV comorbidities.Method: This was a retrospective matched-cohort analysis in the Italian RA real-world population based on the healthcare-administrative databases to assess the CV risk factors and incidence of CV events in comparison with the general population. Persistence and adherence to the CV therapy were also evaluated in both groups.Results: In a RA cohort (N = 21,201), there was a greater prevalence of hypertension and diabetes with respect to the non-RA subjects (N = 249,156) (36.9 vs. 33.4% and 10.2 vs. 9.6%, respectively), while dyslipidemia was more frequent in the non-RA group (15.4 vs. 16.5%). Compared with a non-RA cohort, the patients with RA had a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (incidence rate ratio, IRR 1.28), heart failure (IRR 1.53), stroke (IRR 1.19), and myocardial infarction (IRR 1.48). The patients with RA presented a significantly lower persistence rate to glucose-lowering and lipid-lowering therapies than the controls (odds ratio, OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.6–0.8] and OR 0.82 [0.8–0.9], respectively). The difference in the adherence to glucose-lowering therapy was significant (OR 0.7 [0.6–0.8]), conversely no statistically significant differences emerged regarding the adherence to lipid-lowering therapy (OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.8–1.0]) and anti-hypertensive therapy (OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.9–1.0]).Conclusion: The patients with RA have a higher risk of developing CV events compared with the general population, partially explained by the excess and undertreatment of CV risk factors.

Standard and intensive lipid-lowering therapy with statins for the primary prevention of vascular diseases: a population-based study

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Macías Saint-Gerons ◽  
C. de la Fuente Honrubia ◽  
D. Montero Corominas ◽  
M. J. Gil ◽  
F. de Andrés-Trelles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Vascular Diseases ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Lowering Therapy

scholarly journals Increased risk of COVID ‐19 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a general population‐based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilun Wang ◽  
Kristin M D’Silva ◽  
April M Jorge ◽  
Xiaoxiao Li ◽  
Houchen Lyv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
General Population ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Increased Risk

Effects of lipid-lowering therapy on major adverse limb events in patients with peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110439
Author(s):  
Walter Masson ◽  
Martín Lobo ◽  
Leandro Barbagelata ◽  
Graciela Molinero ◽  
Ignacio Bluro
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Objective Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). Furthermore, MALE have several clinical implications and a poor prognosis, so prevention is a fundamental issue. The main objective of the present meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials is to evaluate the effect of different lipid-lowering therapies on MALE incidence in patients with PAD. Methods A meta-analysis of randomized studies that evaluated the use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with PAD and reported MALE was performed, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScieLO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A fixed- or random-effects model was used. Results Five randomized clinical trials including 11,603 patients were identified and considered eligible for the analyses (5903 subjects were allocated to receive lipid-lowering therapy, while 5700 subjects were allocated to the respective placebo/control arms). The present meta-analysis revealed that lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MALE (OR: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–0.87; I2: 28%) compared to placebo/control groups. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results are robust. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the use of lipid-lowering therapy compared with the placebo/control arms was associated with a marked reduction in the risk of MALE. Physicians involved in the monitoring and treatment of patients with PAD must work hard to ensure adequate lipid-lowering medication in these patients.

scholarly journals Lipid Testing and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Hospitalized Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients

Stroke ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Mullard ◽  
Mathew J. Reeves ◽  
Bradley S. Jacobs ◽  
Rashmi U. Kothari ◽  
Gretchen L. Birbeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lipid Testing ◽  
Ischemic Attack

scholarly journals Hypolipidemic Therapy in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases: What Should a Gastroenterologist Know

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (28) ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
Yu.G. Sandler ◽  
◽  
E.V. Vinnitskaya
Keyword(s):  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Lipid Level ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Level Control ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk

Dyslipidemia is one of the main risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), which remain the leading cause of death worldwide. Lipid level control is the most effective strategy for the prevention of CVD and its complications (CVC). Statins are the first-line drugs of hypolipidemic therapy. Dyslipidemia is often found in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). From a clinical point of view, a number of CLD have an increased risk of CVD. Due to insufficient awareness of doctors about the possibilities of using statin and non-statin lipid-lowering therapy in patients with CLD, the possibility of treating CVD and reducing the risk of CVC in this category of patients is often missed. The purpose of the review is to study modern approaches to lipid-lowering therapy (statin and non-statin) in patients with CVD of various etiologies, including at the stage of liver cirrhosis (LC). Conclusion. CLD should not be considered as a contraindication to the use of statins and other lipid-lowering drugs. Pleiotropic effects of statins, in addition to hypolipidemic action, create new prospects for their use in patients with CLD. Hypolipidemic therapy is recommended for patients with CLD (including at the stage of compensated LC), if they have dyslipidemia and an increased risk of CVD. It is important to compare the benefits and risks of prescribing statins in patients with CLD

Combined lipid-lowering therapy from standpoint of modern guidelines for management of dyslipidaemias

2021 ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
O. D. Ostroumova ◽  
A. I. Kochetkov ◽  
A. I. Listratov
Keyword(s):  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Residual Risk ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Density Lipoproteins ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Wide Range

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death, and its prevalence is projected to increase in the near future. Dyslipidemia is one of the most important risk factors for CAD, and special attention is currently being paid to improving approaches to its correction. In the new revision of the Russian Guidelines for the Management of Patients with dyslipidemia (2020), priorities are given to high-intensity statin therapy: new more strict target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL–C) are introduced. Experts also emphasize the important role of the cholesterol fraction of non-high-density lipoproteins (non-HDL–C), primarily triglycerides, and introduce their target levels. The concept of residual risk, which remains despite effective statin therapy and achievement of the target level of LDL–C, is closely related to non-HDL–C. Here, hypertriglyceridemia is of crucial importance, contributing to an increased risk of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, combined lipid-lowering therapy in the form of a combination of high-intensity statin and fenofibrate is an effective approach to significantly improve the prognosis and reduce the residual risk. According to research data, rosuvastatin provides a reduction in LDL–C by ≥ 50 %, has a wide range of pleiotropic effects in combination with an optimal safety profile. Fenofibrate allows you to effectively reduce the level of triglycerides and implements additional protective effects on the cardiovascular system. The logical continuation of the principle of combined lipid-lowering therapy was the appearance of a fixed combination (FC) of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate, which already has its own evidence base of studies indicating a complex and complementary effect on the disturbed blood lipid spectrum, a good safety profile of therapy, and the form of ‘single-pill’ significantly increases patients adherence to treatment. It can be expected that the widespread use of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate in clinical practice will effectively reduce the residual cardiovascular risk and thus provide an improved prognosis for patients.

Abstract 148: Intensive Lipid Lowering Therapy Using Rosuvastatin Associates with Greater Atherosclerotic Aortic Plaques Regression - A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Makiko Yogo ◽  
Makoto Ayaori ◽  
Hiroki Sato ◽  
Teruyoshi Kihara ◽  
Sasaki Makoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Serum Lipids ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Plaque Regression ◽  
Aortic Plaques ◽  
Intensive Group

Whether intensive lipid-lowering therapy yields greater regression of atherosclerotic plaques remains inconclusive. We therefore performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing standard (achieving LDL-C levels recommended by the Japanese guideline) and intensive (achieving further 30% lower levels than the former) rosuvastatin therapy for 1 year with primary outcome of aortic plaques evaluated by MRI. Sixty dyslipidemic patients, who were eligible for statins therapy, were randomized to standard or intensive group, and dose of rosuvastatin were titrated to achieve the respective target LDL-C. Average doses of rosuvastatin throughout the study were 2.9±3.1 and 6.5±5.1 mg/day in standard and intensive group, respectively. Although both treatments significantly reduced serum LDL-C and hsCRP levels, reduction of LDL-C levels was greater in intensive group than in standard group (-46 vs. -34%). Intensive therapy improved endothelial function as evaluated by FMD in brachial artery compared to standard therapy (95 vs. 22%). MRI study revealed that both thoracic and abdominal plaques were significantly regressed in both groups with greater regression in thoracic plaques in intensive group compared to standard group (-9.1 vs. -3.2%) (Figure A). Correlation analysis revealed no significant association of plaque regression with the doses of rosuvastatin and the changes in serum lipids/FMD. In contrast, thoracic plaque regression correlated with hsCRP reduction (Figure B). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that this association still remain significant even after adjustment of the doses at flow-up, serum lipids and FMD. In conclusions, the present study demonstrated that intensive lipid-lowering using rosuvastatin led to additive plaques regression compared to standard therapy. Therefore, rosuvastatin may provide long term benefit in patients with increased risk through its LDL-C lowering and anti-inflammatory effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document