scholarly journals Hypolipidemic Therapy in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases: What Should a Gastroenterologist Know

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (28) ◽  
pp. 36-45
Author(s):  
Yu.G. Sandler ◽  
◽  
E.V. Vinnitskaya
Keyword(s):  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Lipid Level ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Level Control ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk

Dyslipidemia is one of the main risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), which remain the leading cause of death worldwide. Lipid level control is the most effective strategy for the prevention of CVD and its complications (CVC). Statins are the first-line drugs of hypolipidemic therapy. Dyslipidemia is often found in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). From a clinical point of view, a number of CLD have an increased risk of CVD. Due to insufficient awareness of doctors about the possibilities of using statin and non-statin lipid-lowering therapy in patients with CLD, the possibility of treating CVD and reducing the risk of CVC in this category of patients is often missed. The purpose of the review is to study modern approaches to lipid-lowering therapy (statin and non-statin) in patients with CVD of various etiologies, including at the stage of liver cirrhosis (LC). Conclusion. CLD should not be considered as a contraindication to the use of statins and other lipid-lowering drugs. Pleiotropic effects of statins, in addition to hypolipidemic action, create new prospects for their use in patients with CLD. Hypolipidemic therapy is recommended for patients with CLD (including at the stage of compensated LC), if they have dyslipidemia and an increased risk of CVD. It is important to compare the benefits and risks of prescribing statins in patients with CLD

scholarly journals The Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists for Correction of Thrombocytopenia prior to Elective Procedures in Chronic Liver Diseases: Review of Current Evidence

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran Qureshi ◽  
Shyam Patel ◽  
Andrew Meillier
Keyword(s):  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Invasive Procedures ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Thrombopoietin Receptor ◽  
Increased Risk

Patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD) undergo a range of invasive procedures during their clinical lifetime. Various hemostatic abnormalities are frequently identified during the periprocedural work-up; including thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia of cirrhosis is multifactorial in origin, and decreased activity of thrombopoietin has been identified to be a major cause. Liver is an important site of thrombopoietin production and its levels are decreased in patients with cirrhosis. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelet counts < 60–75,000/µL) is associated with increased risk of bleeding with invasive procedures. In recent years, compounds with thrombopoietin receptor agonist activity have been studied as therapeutic options to raise platelet counts in CLD. We reviewed the use of Eltrombopag, Romiplostim, and Avatrombopag prior to various invasive procedures in patients with CLD. These agents seem promising in raising platelet counts before elective procedures resulting in reduction in platelet transfusions, and they also enabled more patients to undergo the procedures. However, these studies were not primarily aimed at comparing bleeding episodes among groups. Use of these agents had some adverse consequences, importantly being the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis. This review highlights the need of further studies to identify reliable methods of safely reducing the provoked bleeding risk linked to thrombocytopenia in CLD.

scholarly journals TLRs, Alcohol, HCV, and Tumorigenesis

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keigo Machida
Keyword(s):  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Toll Like Receptor ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Epidemiological Evidence ◽  
Tlr Signaling ◽  
Chronic Liver Damage ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Alcoholic Liver Diseases ◽  
Tlr Signaling Pathway

Chronic liver damage caused by viral infection, alcohol, or obesity can result in increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ample epidemiological evidence suggests that there is a strong synergism between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and alcoholic liver diseases (ALD). The Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway is upregulated in chronic liver diseases. Alcoholism is associated with endotoxemia that stimulates expression of proinflammatory cytokine expression and inflammation in the liver and fat tissues. Recent studies of HCC have centered on cancer-initiating stem cell (CSC), including detection of CSC in cancer, identification of CSC markers, and isolation of CSC from human HCC cell lines. Synergism between alcohol and HCV may lead to liver tumorigenesis through TLR signaling.

Effects of lipid-lowering therapy on major adverse limb events in patients with peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110439
Author(s):  
Walter Masson ◽  
Martín Lobo ◽  
Leandro Barbagelata ◽  
Graciela Molinero ◽  
Ignacio Bluro
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Objective Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). Furthermore, MALE have several clinical implications and a poor prognosis, so prevention is a fundamental issue. The main objective of the present meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials is to evaluate the effect of different lipid-lowering therapies on MALE incidence in patients with PAD. Methods A meta-analysis of randomized studies that evaluated the use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with PAD and reported MALE was performed, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScieLO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A fixed- or random-effects model was used. Results Five randomized clinical trials including 11,603 patients were identified and considered eligible for the analyses (5903 subjects were allocated to receive lipid-lowering therapy, while 5700 subjects were allocated to the respective placebo/control arms). The present meta-analysis revealed that lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MALE (OR: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–0.87; I2: 28%) compared to placebo/control groups. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results are robust. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the use of lipid-lowering therapy compared with the placebo/control arms was associated with a marked reduction in the risk of MALE. Physicians involved in the monitoring and treatment of patients with PAD must work hard to ensure adequate lipid-lowering medication in these patients.

scholarly journals Use of Lipid-lowering Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-based Cohort Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1082-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharath Manu Akkara Veetil ◽  
Elena Myasoedova ◽  
Eric L. Matteson ◽  
Sherine E. Gabriel ◽  
Cynthia S. Crowson
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
General Population ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Lipid Testing ◽  
Lipid Lowering Agents

Objective.Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Lipid-lowering therapy is reportedly underused in patients with RA. Longitudinal cohort studies comparing use of lipid-lowering medications in patients with RA versus the general population are lacking.Methods.Cardiovascular risk factors, lipid measures, and use of lipid-lowering agents were assessed in a population-based inception cohort of patients with RA and a cohort of non-RA subjects followed from January 1, 1988, to December 31, 2008. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII) guidelines were assessed at the time of each lipid measure throughout followup. Time from meeting guidelines to initiation of lipid-lowering agents was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods.Results.The study population included 412 RA and 438 non-RA patients with ≥ 1 lipid measure during followup and no prior use of lipid-lowering agents. Rates of lipid testing were lower among patients with RA compared to non-RA subjects. Among patients who met NCEP ATPIII criteria for lipid-lowering therapy (n = 106 RA; n = 120 non-RA), only 27% of RA and 26% of non-RA subjects initiated lipid-lowering agents within 2 years of meeting the guidelines for initiation.Conclusion.There was substantial undertreatment in both the RA and the non-RA cohorts who met NCEP ATPIII criteria for initiation of lipid-lowering agents. Patients with RA did not have as frequent lipid testing as individuals in the general population.

Combined lipid-lowering therapy from standpoint of modern guidelines for management of dyslipidaemias

2021 ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
O. D. Ostroumova ◽  
A. I. Kochetkov ◽  
A. I. Listratov
Keyword(s):  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Residual Risk ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Density Lipoproteins ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Wide Range

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death, and its prevalence is projected to increase in the near future. Dyslipidemia is one of the most important risk factors for CAD, and special attention is currently being paid to improving approaches to its correction. In the new revision of the Russian Guidelines for the Management of Patients with dyslipidemia (2020), priorities are given to high-intensity statin therapy: new more strict target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL–C) are introduced. Experts also emphasize the important role of the cholesterol fraction of non-high-density lipoproteins (non-HDL–C), primarily triglycerides, and introduce their target levels. The concept of residual risk, which remains despite effective statin therapy and achievement of the target level of LDL–C, is closely related to non-HDL–C. Here, hypertriglyceridemia is of crucial importance, contributing to an increased risk of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality. Therefore, combined lipid-lowering therapy in the form of a combination of high-intensity statin and fenofibrate is an effective approach to significantly improve the prognosis and reduce the residual risk. According to research data, rosuvastatin provides a reduction in LDL–C by ≥ 50 %, has a wide range of pleiotropic effects in combination with an optimal safety profile. Fenofibrate allows you to effectively reduce the level of triglycerides and implements additional protective effects on the cardiovascular system. The logical continuation of the principle of combined lipid-lowering therapy was the appearance of a fixed combination (FC) of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate, which already has its own evidence base of studies indicating a complex and complementary effect on the disturbed blood lipid spectrum, a good safety profile of therapy, and the form of ‘single-pill’ significantly increases patients adherence to treatment. It can be expected that the widespread use of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate in clinical practice will effectively reduce the residual cardiovascular risk and thus provide an improved prognosis for patients.

Abstract 148: Intensive Lipid Lowering Therapy Using Rosuvastatin Associates with Greater Atherosclerotic Aortic Plaques Regression - A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Makiko Yogo ◽  
Makoto Ayaori ◽  
Hiroki Sato ◽  
Teruyoshi Kihara ◽  
Sasaki Makoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Serum Lipids ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Plaque Regression ◽  
Aortic Plaques ◽  
Intensive Group

Whether intensive lipid-lowering therapy yields greater regression of atherosclerotic plaques remains inconclusive. We therefore performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing standard (achieving LDL-C levels recommended by the Japanese guideline) and intensive (achieving further 30% lower levels than the former) rosuvastatin therapy for 1 year with primary outcome of aortic plaques evaluated by MRI. Sixty dyslipidemic patients, who were eligible for statins therapy, were randomized to standard or intensive group, and dose of rosuvastatin were titrated to achieve the respective target LDL-C. Average doses of rosuvastatin throughout the study were 2.9±3.1 and 6.5±5.1 mg/day in standard and intensive group, respectively. Although both treatments significantly reduced serum LDL-C and hsCRP levels, reduction of LDL-C levels was greater in intensive group than in standard group (-46 vs. -34%). Intensive therapy improved endothelial function as evaluated by FMD in brachial artery compared to standard therapy (95 vs. 22%). MRI study revealed that both thoracic and abdominal plaques were significantly regressed in both groups with greater regression in thoracic plaques in intensive group compared to standard group (-9.1 vs. -3.2%) (Figure A). Correlation analysis revealed no significant association of plaque regression with the doses of rosuvastatin and the changes in serum lipids/FMD. In contrast, thoracic plaque regression correlated with hsCRP reduction (Figure B). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that this association still remain significant even after adjustment of the doses at flow-up, serum lipids and FMD. In conclusions, the present study demonstrated that intensive lipid-lowering using rosuvastatin led to additive plaques regression compared to standard therapy. Therefore, rosuvastatin may provide long term benefit in patients with increased risk through its LDL-C lowering and anti-inflammatory effects.

Genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: Impact on diagnosis, treatment and cardiovascular risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1262-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seohyuk Lee ◽  
Leo E Akioyamen ◽  
Sumayah Aljenedil ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Rivière ◽  
Isabelle Ruel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Familial Hypercholesterolemia ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Aims Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common genetic disorder in medicine, with a prevalence of 1/250. Affected individuals have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and an increased lifetime risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The diagnosis of FH is based on algorithms that include LDL-C levels, physical manifestations, family history of high LDL-C and premature ASCVD, and, more recently, genetic testing. We sought to determine the impact of genetic testing on the: 1) diagnosis of ‘definite familial hypercholesterolemia’, 2) initiation and adherence of lipid-lowering therapy and 3) risk of ASCVD. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, pooling odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for ASCVD from studies comparing risk estimates in individuals harboring FH-causing variants and unaffected individuals. Results After screening 3304 unique publications, 56 studies were included in the analysis. 1) Genetic testing provided confirmation of FH in 28–80%, over clinical criteria alone, depending on the diagnostic algorithm and the method of analysis. In two large population-based studies comprising 76,751 individuals, an FH-causing variant was identified in only 1.7–2.5% of subjects with an LDL-C > 4.9 mmol/L (190 mg/dL). 2) A confirmed molecular diagnosis increased lipid-lowering therapy adherence (five studies, n = 4181 definite FH). 3) Loss-of-function variant of the LDLR were at a markedly increased risk of myocardial infarction (odds ratio 6.77, 95% confidence interval 4.75–9.66), and patients with a milder (hypomorphic) pathogenic LDLR change had a 4.4-fold increase in risk (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 2.34–8.26), compared with controls. Conclusion DNA sequencing confirms the diagnosis of FH but has a poor yield in unselected patients whose sole criterion is an elevated LDL-C. Initiation and adherence to treatment is improved. The risk of ASCVD is 4.4- to 6.8-fold increased in patients with an FH-causing variant compared with controls, depending on the severity of the DNA change.

scholarly journals Management of liver disease patients in different clinical situations during COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samy Zaky ◽  
Mohamed Alboraie ◽  
Mohamed El Badry ◽  
Mohamed A. Metwally ◽  
Ahmed Abdelaziz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Antitrypsin Deficiency ◽  
Alpha 1 Antitrypsin Deficiency ◽  
Alpha 1 Antitrypsin ◽  
Enzyme Elevation

AbstractChronic liver diseases are common worldwide, especially in developing countries. The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)/(COVID-19) leads to the infection of many patients with underlying chronic liver diseases. As a relatively new disease, management of COVID-19, in the context of chronic liver disease, is mainly based on the experience of the treating physician and the available data. In this review, we summarize the available evidence about the management of liver disease patients, in the context of COVID-19 infection, which can increase the severity of viral hepatitis B. Also, its clearance in HBV patients is delayed. A sixfold increased severity of COVID-19 was reported in obese patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFDL). In patients with autoimmune liver disease (AILD), it is not recommended to change their immunosuppressive therapy (as long as they are not infected with COVID-19), in order to avoid a flare of liver disease. However, immunosuppressant drugs should be modified, in the case of infection with COVID-19. To date, no data suggest an increased risk or severity in metabolic liver diseases, such as hemochromatosis, Wilson’s disease, or alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Patients with liver cirrhosis should be carefully managed with minimum exposure to healthcare facilities. Basic investigations for follow-up can be scheduled at wider intervals; if patients need admission, this should be in COVID-19-clean areas. Patients with hepatocellular carcinomas may have a poor prognosis according to preliminary reports from China. The course of COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients on immunosuppression seems to have a benign course, based on few reports in children and adults. The hepatotoxicity of COVID-19 drugs ranges from mild liver enzyme elevation to a flare of underlying liver diseases. Therefore, the decision should be customized. Telemedicine can minimize the exposure of healthcare workers and patients to infection with COVID-19 and decrease the consumption of personal protective equipment.

scholarly journals Diabetes mellitus and chronic liver diseases. Part 1: general mechanisms of etiology and pathogenesis

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Z A Kalmykova ◽  
I V Kononenko ◽  
A Yu Mayorov
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glucose Tolerance ◽  
Impaired Glucose Tolerance ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Abnormal Glucose Metabolism ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The One

In recent years there has been an active discussion about the relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic liver diseases (CLD). On the one hand, patients with diabetes have an increased risk of developing CLD. On the other hand, patients with CLD very often identify abnormal glucose metabolism which ultimately leads to impaired glucose tolerance and the development of diabetes. This review outlines potential causal relationships between some CLD and DM. Common mechanisms that provoke metabolic and autoimmune disorders in the development of various nosologies of the CKD group, leading to steatosis, insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance and the development of diabetes are described. Certain features of the assessment of carbohydrate metabolism compensation in patients with hepatic dysfunction, anemia and protein metabolism disorders are described.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document