Personal Learning Environments

2016 ◽  
pp. 32-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuno Ricardo Oliveira ◽  
Lina Morgado
Keyword(s):  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Personal Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Evolution Of Technology ◽  
Use Of The Internet ◽  
The Web

Over the past 10 years there has been a great evolution of technology and the way the teaching and learning process is developed, as well as how research and publication are carried out. The Web 2.0, a term coined by O'Reilly in 2004, has introduced a new concept to the use of the Internet, in particular as it relates to the educational framework. The web 2.0 tools allow the creation of emerging ubiquitous environments that enable the development and management of a real Personal Learning Environment (PLE). This chapter is a proposal for the “Handbook of Applied Research on E-Learning in Engineering and Architecture Education” and represents a literature review on the topic of Personal Learning Environments (PLE). It explores the definition around the concept of PLE, its history, the advantages for its use in a lifelong learning process and its importance in the scope of the present research.

Mobile Web 2.0

2011 ◽  
pp. 180-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Pereira Coutinho
Keyword(s):  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Mobile Devices ◽  
Internet Access ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Web 2.0 Tools ◽  
Mobile Web ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Personal Learning Environments ◽  
The Web

In this chapter, the author reflects on the emergence of Mobile Web 2.0, a new paradigm for learning in the 21st century, made possible by the combination of a powerful generation of mobile devices with Internet access and the Web 2.0 technologies that allow collaboration, participation, knowledge sharing and construction. The author presents the theoretical framework which sustains learning with mobile devices, and reflects on the potential of Mobile Web 2.0 for the development of informal learning and the construction of personal learning environments. Finally, the chapter presents educational scenarios for the development of mobile learning using Web 2.0 tools, in particular, those made possible using Twitter and m-Flickr.

Personal Learning Environments

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian H. D. Fiedler ◽  
Terje Väljataga
Keyword(s):  
Adult Learners ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
The Other ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Web 2.0 Technologies ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Digital Instrumentation ◽  
Personal Learning Environments

This paper reviews and critiques how the notion of PLEs has been conceptualised and discussed in literature so far. It interprets the variability of its interpretations and conceptualisations as the expression of a fundamental contradiction between patterns of activity and digital instrumentation in formal education on one hand, and individual experimentation and experience within the digital realm on the other. It is suggested to place this contradiction in the larger socio-historic context of an ongoing media transformation. Thus, the paper argues against the prevalent tendency to base the conceptualisation of PLEs almost exclusively on Web 2.0 technologies that are currently available or emerging, while underlying patterns of control and responsibility often remain untouched. Instead, it proposes to scrutinise these patterns and to focus educational efforts on supporting adult learners to model their learning activities and potential (personal learning) environments while exploring the digital realm.

Promoting Cognitive Skill among Engineering Undergraduates with Technological Software

2015 ◽  
pp. 254-262
Author(s):  
Nur Maisarah Binti Shahril Khuzairi ◽  
Manjit Singh Sidhu
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Cognitive Skills ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Cognitive Skill ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Constant Change ◽  
Evolution Of Technology ◽  
Engineering Undergraduates

This chapter reviews the infusion of technology tools such as the integration of computers into programs like simulation to promote higher cognitive skills among engineering undergraduates. With the constant change of technology and education, it is necessary to refine the current teaching and learning process to not only promote understanding but also to create room for engineering undergraduates to process the information with higher-order cognitive skills. The authors examine the evolution of engineering education against the backdrop of the problems faced in the learning environments and the technological trends in engineering curriculum. To this end, the authors propose strategies to promote higher-order cognitive skills among engineering undergraduates based on the evolution of technology in engineering as well as the challenges faced in the implementation of such tools in teaching and learning.

e-Learning in the Cloud

2012 ◽  
pp. 10-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niall Sclater
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Virtual Learning Environment ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Learning Tools ◽  
It Services ◽  
Institutional Policies ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Personal Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Levels Of Service

Elearning has grown rapidly in importance for institutions and has been largely facilitated through the “walled garden” of the virtual learning environment. Meanwhile many students are creating their own personal learning environments by combining the various Web 2.0 services they find most useful. Cloud computing offers new opportunities for institutions to provide dynamic and up-to-date Internet-based, e-learning applications while ensuring high levels of service, and compliance with institutional policies and legislation. The cloud is rapidly evolving in its architecture, the services offered and the logistics of deployment. It brings with it risks but also possibilities for learners and for educational institutions to reduce costs and enhance services. It is likely to severely disrupt the business model developed by existing vendors of VLEs who provide an integrated suite of e-learning tools, installed and maintained by the institution’s IT services department.

eLearning in the Cloud

2010 ◽  
pp. 661-670
Author(s):  
Niall Sclater
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Virtual Learning Environment ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Learning Tools ◽  
It Services ◽  
Institutional Policies ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Personal Learning Environments ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Levels Of Service

Elearning has grown rapidly in importance for institutions and has been largely facilitated through the “walled garden” of the virtual learning environment. Meanwhile many students are creating their own personal learning environments by combining the various Web 2.0 servicesthey find most useful. Cloud computing offers new opportunities for institutions to provide dynamic and up-to-date Internet-based, e-learning applications while ensuring high levels of service, and compliance with institutional policies and legislation. The cloud is rapidly evolving in its architecture, the services offered and the logistics of deployment. It brings with it risks but also possibilities for learners and for educational institutions to reduce costs and enhance services. It is likely to severely disrupt thebusiness model developed by existing vendors of VLEs who provide an integrated suite of e-learning tools, installed and maintained by the institution’s IT services department.

scholarly journals COMPARISON STUDY OF ONLINE EDUCATION PLATFORM

2020 ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atul Patel ◽  
Yogesh Parekh
Keyword(s):  
Online Education ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Teaching Pedagogy ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Learning Platforms ◽  
Education Platform ◽  
The Web

With a boom in increased usage of internet, online learning has also witnessed a tremendous growth in this era. Although the teaching pedagogy will vary from platform to platform, the students and society at large have benefitted from vast content in various formats, and they have experienced best learning through e-learning. Various forms of electronic media support this e-teaching and learning process. In this process, educational content is delivered over the web in the form of text, video, audio format and fulfills the need of an instructor or trainer. This paper analyses the teaching pedagogy, content and various other aspects of e-learning platforms like SWAYAM, eDX and CourseEra.

E-Learning 2.0

2011 ◽  
pp. 213-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa M. Regueras ◽  
Elena Verdú ◽  
María A. Pérez ◽  
Juan Pablo de Castro ◽  
María J. Verdú
Keyword(s):  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Future Trends ◽  
Web 2.0 Technologies ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
The Future ◽  
E Learning ◽  
The Web

Nowadays, most of electronic applications, including e-learning, are based on the Internet and the Web. As the Web advances, applications should progress in accordance with it. People in the Internet world have started to talk about Web 2.0. This chapter discusses how the concepts of Web 2.0 can be transferred to e-learning. First, the new trends of the Web (Web 2.0) are introduced and the Web 2.0 technologies are reviewed. Then, it is analysed how Web 2.0 can be transferred and applied to the learning process, in terms of methodologies and tools, and taking into account different scenarios and roles. Next, some good practices and recommendations for E-Learning 2.0 are described. Finally, we present our opinion, conclusions, and proposals about the future trends driving the market.

Personal Learning Environments

2012 ◽  
pp. 166-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian H. D. Fiedler ◽  
Terje Väljataga
Keyword(s):  
Adult Learners ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
The Other ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Personal Learning ◽  
Digital Instrumentation ◽  
Personal Learning Environments ◽  
Media Transformation

This paper reviews and critiques how the notion of PLEs has been conceptualised and discussed in literature so far. It interprets the variability of its interpretations and conceptualisations as the expression of a fundamental contradiction between patterns of activity and digital instrumentation in formal education on one hand, and individual experimentation and experience within the digital realm on the other. It is suggested to place this contradiction in the larger socio-historic context of an ongoing media transformation. Thus, the paper argues against the prevalent tendency to base the conceptualisation of PLEs almost exclusively on Web 2.0 technologies that are currently available or emerging, while underlying patterns of control and responsibility often remain untouched. Instead, it proposes to scrutinise these patterns and to focus educational efforts on supporting adult learners to model their learning activities and potential (personal learning) environments while exploring the digital realm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document