Faculty Development for Clinical Educators

2018 ◽  
pp. 1554-1577
Author(s):  
Silvia Lizett Olivares Olivares ◽  
Mildred Vanessa López Cabrera ◽  
Martha Ruth Loyola Segura ◽  
Jorge Eugenio Valdez García
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Core Knowledge ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Faculty Experiences ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Flexner Report ◽  
Uncertain Future

Since the Flexner report in the 20th century, teaching and learning process has evolved through: science learning, problem based learning, competency based learning and perspective learning. This evolution provides a consensus that educators need to develop competencies in their students to prepare them for an uncertain future. Competency refers not only to core knowledge or instrumental skills, but to interpersonal and systemic abilities required for lifelong learning. This transformation requires changes in both the educational model and faculty development programs. Previous research and proposals have defined important qualities and attributes; for clinical educators. The Faculty Development program presented here has been assessed with a mixed multiphase approach for continuous improvement process: 1) assessment of proposal, 2) assessment of implementation, 3) assessment of faculty experiences and 4) institutionalization of program. Results from this experience are presented, as well as other further challenges on this initiative.

Faculty Development for Clinical Educators

2017 ◽  
pp. 277-300
Author(s):  
Silvia Lizett Olivares Olivares ◽  
Mildred Vanessa López Cabrera ◽  
Martha Ruth Loyola Segura ◽  
Jorge Eugenio Valdez García
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Core Knowledge ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Faculty Experiences ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Flexner Report ◽  
Uncertain Future

Since the Flexner report in the 20th century, teaching and learning process has evolved through: science learning, problem based learning, competency based learning and perspective learning. This evolution provides a consensus that educators need to develop competencies in their students to prepare them for an uncertain future. Competency refers not only to core knowledge or instrumental skills, but to interpersonal and systemic abilities required for lifelong learning. This transformation requires changes in both the educational model and faculty development programs. Previous research and proposals have defined important qualities and attributes; for clinical educators. The Faculty Development program presented here has been assessed with a mixed multiphase approach for continuous improvement process: 1) assessment of proposal, 2) assessment of implementation, 3) assessment of faculty experiences and 4) institutionalization of program. Results from this experience are presented, as well as other further challenges on this initiative.

scholarly journals Faculty development program: Way to excellence

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
Riffat Shafi ◽  
Ayesha Rauf ◽  
Khurram Irshad ◽  
Iffat Zaman ◽  
Ashraf Hussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teaching Effectiveness ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Educational Strategies ◽  
Individual Interviews

Introduction: The importance of faculty development programs (FDP) to improve teaching effectiveness has been emphasized in recent years. Our endeavors to improve teaching ways at Shifa College of Medicine, include development of student feedback mechanisms, professional development programs, and research into teaching. New trends taking place in academic medicine were accommodated by modification of faculty development model. Methods: With an aim to assess the perceptions of faculty about FDP at Shifa College of Medicine we gathered views of faculty, by administering questionnaire, conducting focus group and individual interviews. Results: More than half of faculty (51%-83%) agreed with various items related to teaching and learning concepts, 79% believed that they learned assessment methods. 73% agreed that it was a source of introduction to new educational strategies. Sixty-eight percent agreed that FDP helped to improve skills in teaching of ethics and professionalism.  Results of focus group discussion show that faculty found program helpful in their grooming and development and it made them more knowledgeable. Views from individual interviews stated that faculty development program has contributed towards learning. Conclusion: In conclusion FDP at Shifa College of Medicine is valued by faculty. It has contributed towards excellence in teaching. This program should be continued with an endeavor to improve it further.

Developing TPACK Understanding Through Experiential Faculty Development

2019 ◽  
pp. 224-256
Author(s):  
Michelle Fulks Read ◽  
Gwendolyn M. Morel ◽  
Tamarin Butcher ◽  
Ann Evans Jensen ◽  
Jesse M. Lang
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Faculty Knowledge ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Degree Of Confidence ◽  
Beliefs And Attitudes

The purpose of this chapter was to explore changes in faculty knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes regarding online teaching and learning, as well as faculty's degree of confidence in developing and implementing online courses after participating in a multiweek, experientially based faculty development program. The study draws on change theory, specifically teacher change in knowledge, beliefs and attitudes, self-efficacy, and the TPACK framework. The findings suggest that faculty development that incorporates elements of collaboration, modeling, peer review, coaching, extended time, and numerous opportunities for observation and reflection are key to participants' TPACK development and positive changes in teaching beliefs, e-learning attitudes, and self-efficacy.

Mounting Need Assessment of Medical Faculty: to Shift from Tradtional to Integrated Curriculum

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 3469-3472
Author(s):  
Najma Naz ◽  
Asif Mahmood ◽  
Nasrullah Khan ◽  
Shan E Zohra ◽  
Tariq Saeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Integrated Curriculum ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Medical Faculty ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Need Assessment

Introduction: FDP is an integral part of any organization to improve the expertise and skills of the faculty that is needed to indorse educational excellence. It is an important tool to enhance student learning and ultimate patient care. To get maximum benefit it must be well formed, properly executed and evaluated. Needs of faculty and institution play important role in organizing faculty development program. Aims & Objective. Current study was conducted to explore professional needs of medical faculty required for implementation of integrated curriculum in various medical colleges of Lahore. Material & Method: This is a descriptive cross sectional study conducted during the period of August to October 2019. Online google form was developed to identify the area of concern. It has two parts, demographic and faculty need assessment. Need assessment questionnaire having six domain (teaching and learning, assessment, curriculum, research, publication and community services) that comprises of 38 items. Each item has five point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to strongly agree). Link of this form was share with the medical faculty through whatsApp and email. Medical teaching faculty were asked to fill the survey form. Result: The response rate was 73%. All Participants exhibited more interest in areas especially teaching competance(70%), publication competence(78%), community services(69%). Whereas express comparatively less interest in research competence(63%), curriculum(63%) and assessment(60%). Conclusion: Need assessment is basic and fundamental part of any FDP. This survey enabled us to identify the concerns of our faculty and areas that needs enhancement in faculty development program. Keywords: Faculty development program, integrated curriculum , need assesssment

scholarly journals Becoming clinical supervisors: identity learnings from a registrar faculty development program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christy Noble ◽  
Jessica Young ◽  
Ellen Hourn ◽  
Dale Sheehan
Keyword(s):  
Identity Development ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Identity Formation ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Clinical Supervisors ◽  
Curriculum Review ◽  
Dual Identity ◽  
Comprehensive Curriculum

AbstractThis article shares our experiences and surprises as we developed, implemented and evaluated a 12-week faculty development program for registrars as clinical supervisors over three cohorts. The program has consistently been rated highly by participants. Yet, following a comprehensive curriculum review, we were surprised that our goal of encouraging identity development in clinical supervisors seemed to be unmet. Whilst our evaluation suggests that the program made important contributions to the registrars’ knowledge, application and readiness as clinical supervisors, challenges linked to developing a supervisor identity and managing the dual identity of supervisor and clinician remain. In this article we describe our program and argue for the importance of designing faculty development programs to support professional identity formation. We present the findings from our program evaluation and discuss the surprising outcomes and ongoing challenges of developing a cohesive clinical educator identity. Informed by recent evidence and workplace learning theory we critically appraise our program, explain the mechanisms for the unintended outcomes and offer suggestions for improving curricular and pedagogic practices of embedded faculty development programs. A key recommendation is to not only consider identity formation of clinical supervisors from an individualist perspective but also from a social perspective.

scholarly journals Faculty Development Program Models to Advance Teaching and Learning Within Health Science Programs

2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason W. Lancaster ◽  
Susan M. Stein ◽  
Linda Garrelts MacLean ◽  
Jenny Van Amburgh ◽  
Adam M. Persky
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Faculty Development Program

scholarly journals Participant perceptions of the faculty development Educational Research Series

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-245
Author(s):  
Nancy Dalgarno ◽  
Corinne Laverty ◽  
Rylan Egan ◽  
Kendall Garton ◽  
Eleftherios Soleas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Educational Research ◽  
Mixed Method ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Adult Learning Theory ◽  
Academic Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Scholarship Of Teaching ◽  
Individual Support

Interest in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is driven in part by the need to provide systematic academic development for faculty anchored in evidence-based practice such as the introduction of quality assurance frameworks. This article reports on a mixed-method evaluation of one institution’s grassroots multidisciplinary faculty development program, called the Educational Research Series, to determine if it met the needs of its faculty, graduate student, and staff participants. Conducted at one mid-sized university in southern Ontario and framed, as was the program design and implementation, by both adult learning theory and constructivism, the evaluation collected data from session exit surveys, attendee interviews, and facilitator focus groups. The data analysis revealed that reasons for participating included increasing levels of understanding, receiving individual support, and learning about colleagues’ research interests. The major strengths of the program included individual learning, resources, facilitator expertise, interactive sessions, and the multidisciplinary focus. The main challenges centered on depth versus breadth of the sessions, time, and educational language and theory. Participants recommended additional resources, communication among facilitators, institutional recognition, and increased depth of content. As a result of this evaluation, an Advanced Educational Research Series is being offered at the institution. This article will inform other institutions wishing to build SoTL as a field within their institutions.

scholarly journals Educational Leadership in Teaching Excellence (EnLITE): A Peer-Driven Faculty Development Program

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Buchholz ◽  
Janet Wolstenholme ◽  
Jeji Varghese ◽  
J. Andrew Robinson ◽  
Jennifer Spencer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Communities Of Practice ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Teaching Excellence ◽  
Approach To Teaching ◽  
One Year

Educational Leadership in Teaching Excellence (EnLITE) is an 11-month faculty development program at the University of Guelph, Ontario. Created and led by faculty members and educational developers, EnLITE is designed to engage participants in the principles, practice and theory of teaching and learning in higher education and to promote a learner-centred approach to teaching. Participants critically examine and discuss scholarly topics on teaching and learning and in their own disciplines; collaborate with one or more teaching mentors; engage in peer classroom observation; and participate in other teaching-related activities informed by their individual learning plans. Our objective was to determine the perceived impact of EnLITE on participants’ teaching-related practices and experiences. We collected pre-, post- and one-year post-program quantitative and qualitative survey responses from each of the 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 EnLITE cohorts (N = 17 participants representing a variety of disciplines; 71% female). There were significant improvements in participants’ perceived teaching practices related to critical self-reflection (13% increase from pre- to one-year post-program), student engagement (+28.2%), collaborative learning (+31%) and learner-centred pedagogy (+22.9%, all p < 0.05). There was little to no change in use of technology, student assessment, leadership, participation in communities of practice, or dissemination of teaching-related scholarship. These results provide empirical evidence of the effectiveness of a peer-driven faculty development program in promoting a learning-centred approach to teaching. Future research should determine whether these changes translate into improved student learning, and whether such programs demonstrate longer term improvements in engagement in teaching-related leadership, communities of practice and dissemination.

scholarly journals Faculty Development Effectiveness: Insights from a Program Evaluation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupma Wadhwa ◽  
Lopamudra Das ◽  
Savithiri Ratnapalan
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Faculty Development Program ◽  
Course Content ◽  
Time Commitment ◽  
Coaching Strategies ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
Course Format

Background. Faculty development programs are often time and resource intensive. In order to accommodate time constrained clinicians a limited time commitment faculty development program was developed and was shown to be effective in improving participant’s scholarly productivity. Objectives. The objective of this study was to assess participants’ perceptions of why the faculty development program was effective in promoting scholarship in education. Methods. In-depth semistructured interviews of course participants were conducted a year after completing a faculty development program. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The transcriptions were coded independently by the investigators for dominant themes. The investigators held coding meetings to further refine the themes and discrepancies were handled by referring to the transcripts and reaching consensus. Results. The participants’ satisfaction with the course as described in the interviews correlated with the early satisfaction surveys. Reasons offered for this impact fell into four broad categories: course content, course format, social networking during the course, and the course facilitation coaching strategies to achieve goals. Conclusions. Course focusing on the process, experiential learning, and situating the course facilitator in the role of a functional mentor or coach to complete projects can be effective in facilitating behaviour change after faculty development programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document