NOM-035-STPS-2018

2022 ◽  
pp. 64-71
Author(s):  
Raul Martinez-Balderrama ◽  
Gabriela Jacobo Jacobo-Galicia ◽  
María Elizabeth Ramírez- Barreto ◽  
Judith M. Paz-Delgadillo ◽  
Samantha E. Cruz-Sotelo

Looking at the structure of NOM-035-STPS-2018, there is an assumption that there are areas of opportunity to improve the implementation of the standard. Thus, the purpose of this research is to identify through a review whether there are areas of opportunity that can improve the implementation of NOM-035. For the review, articles addressing the psychosocial risk factors evaluation were selected and analyzed. Four topics of discussion were identified: impact of psychosocial risk factors, policy and regulations, management systems, and evaluation of psychosocial risk factors. Subsequently, a synthesis was made, and it was found that there are three areas of opportunity to improve NOM-035-STPS-2018: it does not have a risk management system, its instruments do not present evidence of statistical validity, and the instruments do not take into account indicators of consequence.

Author(s):  
Anom Bowolaksono ◽  
Fatma Lestari ◽  
Saraswati Andani Satyawardhani ◽  
Abdul Kadir ◽  
Cynthia Febrina Maharani ◽  
...  

Developing countries face various challenges in implementing bio-risk management systems in the laboratory. In addition, educational settings are considered as workplaces with biohazard risks. Every activity in a laboratory facility carries many potential hazards that can impact human health and the environment and may cause laboratory incidents, including Laboratory Acquired Infections (LAIs). In an effort to minimize the impact and occurrence of these incidents, it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of a bio-risk management system in every activity that involves handling biological agents. This study was conducted in an Indonesian higher-education institution, herein coded as University Y. This is a descriptive, semi-quantitative study aimed at analysing and evaluating the implementation of the bio-risk management systems used in laboratories by analysing the achievements obtained by each laboratory. The study used primary data that were collected using a checklist which referred to ISO 35001: 2019 on Laboratory Bio-risk Management. The checklist consisted of 202 items forming seven main elements. In addition, secondary data obtained from literature and document review were also used. The results show that out of 11 laboratories examined, only 2 laboratories met 50% of the requirements, which were Laboratory A and B, achieving good performance. Regarding the clauses of standards, a gap analysis identified leadership, performance evaluation, and support as elements with the lowest achievement. Therefore, corrective action should be developed by enhancing the commitment from management as well as improving documentation, policy, education and training.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 10-21
Author(s):  
V. G. Zakrzewski ◽  
O. G. Charykova ◽  
Yu. Yu. Golubyatnikova

The article deals with risk management systems at enterprises of the agrarian sector, which represents an organization of economic activity, the purpose of which is to minimize losses and find sources of income. The research organization of the risk management system in the enterprises of agrarian sphere great attention should be paid to the integration of their specific activities. The process of risk management in enterprises consists of the following phases: definition of objectives and parameters for solving the problem of risk; identification of external and internal risk factors; identification of risk factors, risk identification; risk analysis; risk assessment; development and implementation of risk management measures; synthesis of the results of measures taken and preparing proposals. In addition, the risk management system is submitted to us through the introduction of a passport of risk, to enable the formulation and adjustment of economic activity at any stage of its implementation. Under the risk passport of the economic risk refers to a collection of information about risk, risk criteria, as well as guidance on the application of the necessary methods to manage or mitigate the risks. As well as the information in the article was considered in the context of a risk management system. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 07012
Author(s):  
Natalia Rykhtikova

Actuality and relevance of implementation of the risk management processes in the general system of management in organizations are justified in this article. Three major issues can be pointed out as referred to the implementation of the risk management system in modern organizations, such as 1) a high level of costs combined with relatively long payback period; 2) lack of the universal approach to the implementation of the risk management procedures; and 3) difficulties in identification of perspective directions of the systems under consideration. The basic directions of development of the risk management systems in the corporate structures are defined based on the results of comparative analysis of the experience of Russian and foreign companies. The activity in the field of risk management of such corporations as “Rusgidro”, “NMLK”, the Investment Company “RUSS-INVEST”, “Severstal”, “Gazpromneft”, “Metalloinvest”, “Philips”, “Nestlé”, and “Unilever” became the object of our research. Comparative analysis of practices of implementation of the risk management system has been performed based on the following criteria: organizational structure of management, register and prioritization of risks, structure and methods of risk management, and effectiveness of the risk management systems. The results of the study allowed identifying the following basic directions of development of the risk management systems in the corporations: amending register of prioritization of risks; increasing level of integration of the risk management procedures into the basic business processes of the corporations; expanding of use of the external assessments, credit rankings, etc. in the framework of implementation of the risk management procedures; increasing level of unification of methods of risk assessment and management that finally would be a prerequisite for improving effectiveness of the risk management systems in organizations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksana Netrebskaya

The article deals with the risk factors in the forestry of the country. The functions of risk management, implemented in forestry as a control system and a subsystem of management, are presented. The system of minimization of managerial risks and their consequences operating at the level of the federal forestry agency is considered. The results of an expert assessment of complex risk groups, and the most significant of them, are presented. The most significant and entailing serious risk consequences are strategic (programmatic), financial, commercial risk factors, as well as security risks, climatic and personnel risks. The need to modernize the existing forestry risk management system in a direction that provides greater transparency of information required for management has been determined.


Author(s):  
Jalal Elbaruni ◽  
Olena Bielova ◽  
Viktor Melenchuk

This article is devoted to the risk analysis of IT projects. The article defines the risks of IT projects, classifies the key risks of IT projects and identifies the main sources of risks of IT projects. The analysis of risks of IT projects at introduction of information management system in realization of projects of the company is also presented. The possibility of risks of IT projects during the implementation of the management information system in the implementation of the company's projects is analyzed. And also the ways of minimization of occurrence of risks of IT projects at introduction of information management system in realization of projects of the company are offered. Under ideal circumstances, in modern organizations, project implementation reduces risks to zero. At the same time, in modern realities, it remains necessary to take into account risks and manage them as part of the organization when implementing projects. Nevertheless, risk minimization is effective for the dynamic growth of an organization or institution when implementing projects. The current trends in information projects in today's competitive world are fundamental and necessary for any project-oriented organization to manage risks in information outsourcing projects in an ideally complex task. Thus, this article examines the main factors that lead to the emergence of risks, based on modern scientific sources from leading researchers in the field of project management, taking into account the peculiarities of developing an optimal risk management system in an organization when implementing projects, as well as the implementation of such a system under various scenarios of projects’ implementation in organizations. A structure aimed at improving the risk management system in organizations during project implementation is also proposed. The study found that prioritization in the consideration of project risks, as well as risk factors, helps to correlate the risk of the project and the risk of the company itself. Prioritizing the response to risk factors and their strength of influence, considering the time, volume and quality of risks are of paramount importance for the dynamic growth of the organization and allow to conduct a matrix analysis of risks, and then propose ways to minimize risk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 40-55
Author(s):  
A. V. Larionov ◽  
E. S. Salina

The study reveals features of the risk management in the payment system, taking into account the requirements of the Bank of Russia. Particular emphasis is placed on the implementation of practical aspects of organizing risk management systems in conformity with Bank of Russia Regulation No. 607-P dated 03.10.2017 “On requirements for the procedure for ensuring the smooth functioning of the payment system, indicators of the smooth functioning of the payment system and methods of risk analysis in the payment system including risk profiles”. The research uses international standards and approaches to the practical construction of risk management systems. The research suggests methodological recommendations for the construction of a comprehensive risk management system in the payment system. The results of the study can be used in the practical implementation of the Bank of Russia’s approaches to ensuring the smooth functioning of payment systems.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-423
Author(s):  
M. O. Kuznetsova

The article analyzes the practice of implementing risk management in Russian industrial companies. The study conducted a survey of 96 industrial companies in various industries in order to identify the features of implementing a risk management system in Russian industrial organizations. The main goals of implementing risk management systems in industrial companies, the features of organizational risk management structures, the amount of costs for maintaining risk management systems, risk assessment methods, the activities of industrial organizations that integrate risk management processes, and the level of automation of risk management systems were identified.The method of assessing the level of maturity of risk management is proposed: absent, managed, quantitatively managed, optimized and advanced levels.Using cluster analysis, groups of Russian industrial companies in various industries were identified by the level of process maturity of the risk management system. The most developed in the field of risk management systems are companies in the mining industry, mechanical engineering, as well as those engaged in the production of consumer goods. Companies with the least developed level of risk management include companies in the furniture, pulp and paper, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries, as well as those that produce building materials.On the basis of the survey identified the main barriers introducing a comprehensive system of risk management of industrial companies.The described research areas will help to increase the effectiveness of the risk management system, which will help to increase the strategic stability of the company.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-133
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Trifonov ◽  
S. M. Brykalov ◽  
V. Yu. Trifonov

The article describes the strategic management methodology based on the use of key performance indicators system, recommendations for its further development are given. The necessity of integration above-mentioned methodology with the methodology of risk management systems is justified for large companies. The main conceptual states and stages of key performance indicators system and risk management system integration are given. Integration processes are illustrated by the example of a particular large company.Conceptual states and integration stages of  key performance indicators system with risk management system are considered. Specific organizational and technical measures for implementation of above-mentioned systems  at the nuclear industry enterprises are described as well. Key performance indicators for risk management system are proposed to be laid for introducing enterprises’  performance management.The results of theoretical and empirical research, the described tools and approaches can be used in other industrial enterprises, regardless of their business.


MECOSAN ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 97-116
Author(s):  
Alessandro Capocchi ◽  
Paola Orlandini ◽  
Stefano Amelio

Covid-19 has imposed a rethinking of risk management systems in the healthcare sector. The aim of this paper is to investigate how the risk has been and is managed by the healthcare organizations, on the basis of regional directives. The analysis focuses on the health system of the Lombardy Region. In particular, the authors focused on the resolutions adopted by the Lombardy Region in the acute phase of the pandemic (2 March 2020-12 May 2020) with the aim of rebuilding the system put in place by the Region for risk prevention and management. Thanks to the resolutions, the Lombardy Region has established a risk management system, consisting of a surveillance system and an emergency management system that seems to have led to positive consequences.


2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Georg Köglmayr ◽  
Christoph Kolb ◽  
Uwe Dannwolf ◽  
Andrea Ströhle

Der Beitrag stellt die weltweit wichtigsten Gesetze, Regelungen und Vorschriften sowie Normen zum Thema Risikomanagement und Risikomanagementsysteme vor. Neben einer kurzen Charakteristik, der einzelnen Regelungen werden auch die Rahmenbedingungen und Praxistauglichkeit der vorgestellten Richtlinien beleuchtet. Die Kritik mündet in einem von den Autoren entwickelten Instrument – RIMBABS genannt – mit dessen Einsatz Unternehmer sehr einfach ein zukunftsorientiertes Risikomanagementsystem implementieren können. The paper introduces the world's most important laws, rules and regulations, and standards on risk management and risk management systems. Apart from a brief characteristic of the individual schemes will shed light on the conditions and feasibility of the proposed guidelines. Criticism leads to a model developed by the authors - RIMBABS called - with the use of the business very easy to use a forward-looking risk management system. Keywords: risikomanagementsysteme rechtlich verordnet


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document