Technology in Education, Win or Fail?

2022 ◽  
pp. 243-266
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Gound
Keyword(s):  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Technology In Education ◽  
Digital Literacies ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Educator Preparation ◽  
Integration Of Technology ◽  
Technology Instruction ◽  
Educator Preparation Program

Educator preparation programs and institutional polices should provide background knowledge and experience with digital literacies and emerging technologies in coursework and strategies. The emphasis on the integration of technology instruction is relevant in the literature today. This chapter will explore the intersections and disjunctures between digital literacy practices in an educator preparation program and personal digital literacy use from a recent study that examined the digital literacies of six teacher educators. The chapter will be organized into sections, examining technology tools, digital interactions, and online resources applied classrooms.

scholarly journals Making the Transition to Virtual Methods in the Literacy Classroom: Reframing Teacher Education Practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Stoetzel ◽  
Stephanie Shedrow
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Prospective Teachers ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Digital Learning ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Integration Of Technology ◽  
Literacy Methods ◽  
Digital Learning Environments

In response to the COVID 19 pandemic universities and colleges abruptly closed and teacher educators had little time to move instruction from face-to-face classrooms to digital learning environments. This sudden shift created a myriad of obstacles as instructors worked to retain pedagogically sound and effective instruction digitally—while also preparing novice teachers to teach online themselves. Adding another layer of complexity was prospective teachers’ lack of knowledge and hesitation regarding technology tools, as well as how to meaningfully integrate the tools into their teaching. Facing these challenges, we as literacy teacher educators drew upon effective methods of teacher education, literacy practices and digital literacy to rethink the way we design lessons and assignments for our literacy methods courses. The framework we created for restructuring the integration of technology into courses can be duplicated across disciplines and guide instructors to reconceptualize their use of tech tools to re-envision face-to-face and digital instruction to expand learning outcomes.

Online Clinical Teacher Preparation Programs in Special Education: Perspectives and Critical Components

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Ottley ◽  
Christan Grygas Coogle ◽  
Jon Ryan Pigman ◽  
Doug Sturgeon ◽  
Sara Helfrich
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Teacher Preparation Programs ◽  
Clinical Teacher ◽  
Special Educator ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Clinical Model ◽  
Educator Preparation ◽  
School Based ◽  
Critical Components

Online special educator preparation programs are growing in prevalence and popularity. Yet, implementing a clinical model of special educator preparation within online programs can be challenging. In this study, we explored the perspectives of the clinical model from a distance for school-based teacher educators and administrators. We conducted a survey followed by focus group interviews to identify perspectives regarding the clinical model from a distance approach and the components of a distance preparation program perceived to be critical for effective clinical practice. School-based teacher educators and administrators had favorable views of the clinical model (including clinical coaching) from a distance, indicating both feasibility and acceptability. Many perceived technology-related challenges were malleable aspects of online preparation programs that university- and school-based teacher educators can plan for in the implementation of their online program and clinical practice from a distance.

scholarly journals A Multidimensional Analysis of Teacher Preparation in Texas

2019 ◽  
pp. 106-113
Author(s):  
Daniella G. Varela ◽  
Lori Kupczynski ◽  
Marie-Anne Mundy
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Educators ◽  
School Administrators ◽  
Multidimensional Analysis ◽  
First Year ◽  
Preparation Program ◽  
Educator Preparation ◽  
Standards Compliance ◽  
Educator Preparation Program ◽  
Administrative Code ◽  
Survey Evaluation

Despite a healthy production of teachers, teacher attrition is a significant concern facing school administrators across the state of Texas. This study sought to determine the extent to which questions on the Exit and Principal Surveys reflect three sets of standards which guide educator preparation in Texas: Association of Teacher Educators (ATE) Standards for Teacher Educators, Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Educator Preparation Program Curriculum Standards, and Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities (PPR) Exam Standards. This analysis provides important information about the validity of survey questions as a measure of standards compliance for educator preparation in Texas and also sought to determine if there is a difference between teacher candidates’ Exit Survey evaluation of preparation and principals’ Principal Survey evaluation of first-year teachers’ preparation. Findings indicated a clear disconnect. Recommendations are provided as contributions for future discussion on much needed educator preparation program standards reform.

scholarly journals Multidimensional Approaches to Examining Digital Literacies in the Contemporary Global Society

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kewman M. Lee ◽  
Sohee Park ◽  
Bong Gee Jang ◽  
Byeong-Young Cho
Keyword(s):  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Complex Analysis ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Integrative Approach ◽  
Digital Literacies ◽  
Multiple Perspectives ◽  
Interpretive Inquiry ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Global World ◽  
Cognitive Perspectives

Literacy scholars have offered compelling theories about and methods for understanding the digital literacy practices of youth. However, little work has explored the possibility of an approach that would demonstrate how different perspectives on literacies might intersect and interconnect in order to better describe the multifaceted nature of youth digital literacies. In this conceptual article, we adopt the idea of theoretical triangulation in interpretive inquiry and explore how multiple perspectives can jointly contribute to constructing a nuanced description of young people’s literacies in today’s digitally mediated global world. For this purpose, we first suggest a triangulation framework that integrates sociocultural, affective, and cognitive perspectives on digital literacies, focusing on recent developments in these perspectives. We then use an example of discourse data from a globally connected online affinity space and demonstrate how our multidimensional framework can lead to a complex analysis and interpretation of the data. In particular, we describe the substance of one specific case of youth digital literacies from each of the three perspectives on literacy, which in turn converge to provide a complex account of such literacy practices. In conclusion, we discuss the promise and limitations of our integrative approach to studying the digital literacy practices of youth.

Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Partnerships

2018 ◽  
pp. 142-165
Author(s):  
Derek Decker ◽  
Jennifer Roth ◽  
Donna Cooner
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Candidates ◽  
Teacher Educators ◽  
Professional Development School ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Educator Preparation ◽  
School Based ◽  
Key Stakeholders

The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) set forth a set of new standards that demand excellence to produce educators who raise P-12 student achievement. This pilot multi-case study describes perspectives and across-case themes of the lived experiences of national key stakeholders in educator preparation programs and their professional development school (PDS) partnership system. CAEP's five guiding principles of Standard 2: Clinical Partnerships and Practice as a priori codes describe experiences and perspectives of three key stakeholders of the university's clinical partnership. The three key stakeholders include (1) university-based teacher educators, (2) school-based teacher educators, and (3) teacher candidates. The researchers discuss results and implications for practice and offer avenues for future research.

Establishing reliability and validity of an instrument to measure digital literacy practices and perceptions in higher education

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
B. Braktia ◽  
L. E. Haas ◽  
A. M. Montenegro Sanchez ◽  
A. V. Koptelov
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Faculty Perceptions ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Digital Literacies ◽  
University Professors ◽  
Relationship Patterns ◽  
Valid Instrument

The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable and valid instrument to explore the perceptions and practices of university professors and instructors with regards to digital literacy practices in the field of education. The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed four factors with eigenvalues greater than one. The 20-item instrument explained 65.08 % of the variance in relationship patterns among items: 36.49 % — F1: “Digital literacies help me teach”, 11.02 % — F2: “I have digital literacy competency and resources”, 8.99 % — F3: “Digital literacies support student learning”, and 8.58 % — F4: “Students are competent with digital literacy”. The instrument was deemed as reliable in determining faculty perceptions and practices.

scholarly journals Empowering English Language Learners through Digital Literacies: Research, Complexities, and Implications

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-136
Author(s):  
Chang Yuan ◽  
Lili Wang ◽  
Jessica Eagle
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learners ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
English Language ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Shared Vision ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Digital Literacies

In the context of an increasingly global society and rapidly changing technology, English Language Learners (ELLs) need support to develop digital literacies to prepare for a future in which learning new technology is an intuitive process. In the past few decades, technological advances have been shifting how information is produced, communicated, and interpreted. The Internet and digital environments have afforded a broader range of opportunities for literacy practices to take place. Technology has transformed the social practices and definitions of literacy, which leads to transformative implications for the teaching and learning environments facing ELLs. Despite immigrants’ attraction to the US, the tension between the public school system and emergent bilingual students has garnered broad attention. There is a need for a more appropriate teaching pedagogy that embraces the cultural identities of ELLs, and empowers ELLs as critical consumers and producers of information. Though complex, the authors advocate for examining this issue using an asset perspective rather than a deficit lens. Using the sociocultural perspective of learning and critical theory, this paper aims to define and conceptualize ELL learning, establish a shared vision of digital literacies, and review the literature on how practices of digital literacies empower ELLs to become active learners. In the final section, implications and future research directions are articulated in order to move the digital literacy field forward.

scholarly journals MONGOLIAN STUDENTS' DIGITAL LITERACY PRACTICES: THE INTERFACE BETWEEN ENGLISH AND THE INTERNET

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-318
Author(s):  
Daariimaa Marav
Keyword(s):  
New Media ◽  
University Students ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Family Background ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Digital Literacies

ABSTRACT Over the last few decades, Mongolia has experienced social, economic, technological and political changes. Those changes have contributed to the growing cultural status of English mediated in particular through the digital literacy practices of young Mongolians. However, much of the digital and new media research takes place in predominantly Anglo-American contexts (RINSLOO & ROWSELL, 2012) and not much is known about what shapes Mongolian university students' use of digital technologies. The research reported on here aims to fill this gap. Drawing on perspectives offered by the field of Literacy Studies, which analyses literacy practices within the social and cultural contexts in which they occur, and employing a mixed methods approach, the research examines how Mongolian university students majoring in English used digital technologies, especially the internet, in their everyday lives. Data were generated through a survey of 98 students and through observations of and interviews with six case study participants who came from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. The findings indicate that most students' digital literacy practices were directed towards improving their English. They used digital technologies strategically by negotiating the issues of cost and time, and exercised agency in personalising the technologies to support their English learning and eventually to improve their social positions. However, the findings also suggest that the participants' engagement with digital technologies was shaped by contextual and structural factors which included family background, personal resources such as English proficiency, digital literacies and aspirations. The research considers how the findings may inform improvements to educational practices around the teaching and learning of English and digital literacies in Mongolian universities.

Critical Reading, Critical Literacy, and Critical Classrooms

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Melissa Summer Wells ◽  
Jennifer D. Morrison ◽  
Julia M. López-Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Critical Literacy ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Critical Reading ◽  
Read Alouds ◽  
Preparation Programs ◽  
Educator Preparation ◽  
Multicultural Children's Literature ◽  
Unique Power

Critical reading and critical literacy are skills that preservice teachers need to cultivate not only in their future students, but also in their own literacy practices. Picturebooks have the unique power to facilitate critical reading and critical literacy with preservice teachers. This chapter analyzes critical reading, critical literacy, and the power of picturebooks and then presents three approaches for using picturebooks to develop critical reading and critical literacy skills with preservice teachers: (1) field-based coursework with multicultural children's literature, (2) analyzing voices and perspectives in read-alouds, and (3) analyzing wordless picturebooks. Through intentional use of picturebooks in educator preparation programs, preservice teachers can gain the expertise necessary to use picturebooks to craft their own critical classrooms.

Digital Literacies in Early Childhood

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Scott ◽  
Jackie Marsh
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Digital Literacies ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Communicative Practices ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Children's Literacy

The study of digital literacies in early childhood (0–8 years) is an emergent and fast-growing area of scholarship. Young children’s communicative practices are today more complex and diverse in scope than ever before, encompassing both “traditional” reading and writing and a growing range of “new” communicative competencies across multiple digital media contexts. Scholars are increasingly interested in children’s literacy practices outside traditional print-based texts, and the theory of multimodality helps them to understand children’s communicative practices in relation to a range of modes, including those present in digital technology. At the same time, the boundaries between what constitutes “digital” and “traditional” literacies are themselves blurred. Multiple academic disciplines have contributed to our understanding of children’s digital literacy practices. Numerous definitions for digital literacy or literacies exist, and scholars have proposed a range of theoretical approaches to the topic. Bill Green’s “3D model” of literacy provides a useful starting point for understanding the different dimensions of children’s digital literacy: operational, cultural, and critical. It is acknowledged that children’s digital literacy practices are specific to particular social and cultural contexts. In particular, scholars have identified important differences between accepted literacy practices in schools and early years’ settings (“school literacies”) and children’s literacy practices in a socioculturally diverse range of home settings (“home literacies”). A growing field of research is explicitly concerned with the unique skills developed at home, as children learn to produce and interpret a range of “new” digital and multimodal texts. At the same time, numerous scholars have suggested that there is still a general lack of progress with regard to early years’ practitioners’ use of technology in the curriculum. Gaps and absences in knowledge still exist, and it will be important for scholars over the coming years to continue research into young children’s digital literacy practices, both in homes and communities and across early years’ settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document